Диссертация (1136792), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
– 76(2) – P.397–416.152. Marsh H. W., Martin A. J. Academic self-concept, academic achievement: Relations, causal ordering //British Journal of Educational Psychology. – 2011.– Т. 81. – №. 1. – P. 59-77.153. Martin A. Motivation, Academic Resilience: Developing a Model forStudent Enhancement // Australian Journal of Education. – 2002.
– 46(1). – P. 34–49.169154. McFarland D. A. Student resistance: How the formal, informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance1 //American Journalof Sociology. – 2001. – Т. 107. – №. 3. – P. 612-678.155. Molenberghs G. et al. (ed.). Handbook of missing data methodology.
–CRC Press 2014.156. Möller J., Köller O. Frame of Reference Effects Following the Announcement of Exam Results // Contemporary Educational Psychology. – 2001. –26(2). – P. 277–287.157. Molloy L.E., Gest S.D., Rulison K.L. Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” PeerRelationships // The Journal of Early Adolescence.
– 2010. – 31(1). – P. 13–40.158. Murphy M. The Ties that Bind: Distinction, Recognition, the Relational//International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences. – 2011. – Т. 5. – №. 10.159. Natkhov T., Kozina N. Inequality of Educational Opportunity in a CrossSection of Countries: Empirical Analysis of 2009 PISA Data //Higher School of Economics Research Paper No.
BRP. – 2012. – Т. 7.160. Need A., De Jong U. Educational Differentials in the Netherlands Testing Rational Action Theory //Rationality, Society. – 2001. – Т. 13. – №. 1. – P. 7198.161. Nelson R. M., DeBacker T. K. Achievement motivation in adolescents:The role of peer climate and best friends //The Journal of Experimental Education. –2008. – Т. 76.
– №. 2. – С. 170-189.162. Newman D. A. Missing data techniques and low response rates//Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fablein the organizational and social sciences. – 2009. – Т. 7.163. Nosek B. A., Smyth F. L., Sriram N., Lindner N. M., Devos T., AyalaA., Kesebir S. National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sexdifferences in science and math achievement //Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences. – 2009.
– Т. 106. – №. 26. – С. 10593-10597.170164. Olsson U. Maximum likelihood of the polychoric correlation coefficient// Psychometrika. – 1979. – 44. – Р. 443–460165. Parcel T. L., Dufur M. J. Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement //Social Forces. – 2001. – Т. 79.
– №. 3. – С. 881-911.166. Phelan P., Davidson A. L., Cao H. T. Students' multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures //Anthropology & EducationQuarterly. – 1991. – Т. 22. – №. 3. – С. 224-250.167. Plucker J. A., Robinson N.M., Greenspon T.S., Feldhusen J.F., Betsy D.,Subotnik R.F. It’s Not How the Pond Makes You Feel, but Rather How High YouCan Jump // American Psychologist.
– 2004. – 59(4). – P. 268–269.168. Portes A., Rumbau R.G. Introduction: The second generation, the children of immigrants longitudinal study // Ethnic, Racial Studies. – 2005. – 28(6). – P.983-999.169. Portes A., Zhou M. The new second generation: Segmented assimilation,its variants // The annals of the American academy of political, social science. –1993.
– 530(1). – P. 74-96.170. Preckel F., Goetz T., Pekrun R., Kleine M. Gender Differences in Gifted,Average-Ability Students Comparing Girls’, Boys’ Achievement, Self-Concept, Interest,, Motivation in Mathematics // Gifted Child Quarterly. – 2008. – 52(2). – P.146–159.171. Prevoo M. J. L., Malda M., Mesman J., Van IJzendoorn M.H. Withinand Cross-Language Relations Between Oral Language Proficiency, School Outcomes in Bilingual Children With an Immigrant Background A Meta-AnalyticalStudy // Review of Educational Research.
– 2016. – 86(1). – P. 237-276.172. Quatman T., Watson C. M. Gender differences in adolescent self-esteem:An exploration of domains //The Journal of genetic psychology. – 2001. – Т. 162. –№. 1. – С. 93-117.173. Reckase M. D. Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests:Results, implications //Journal of Educational, Behavioral Statistics. – 1979.
– Т. 4. –№. 3. – P. 207-230.171174. Rivera H.H., Waxman H.C. Resilient, Nonresilient Hispanic EnglishLanguage Learners’ Attitudes Toward Their Classroom Learning Environment inMathematics // Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR). – 2011. –16(3). – P. 185–200.175. Ryan A. M. The peer group as a context for the development of youngadolescent motivation and achievement //Child development. – 2001. – Т.
72. – №. 4.– С. 1135-1150.176. Sáinz M., Eccles J. Self-concept of computer, math ability: Gender implications across time, within ICT studies //Journal of Vocational Behavior. – 2012. –Т. 80. – №. 2. – P. 486-499.177. Scarborough H. S., Dobrich W., Hager M. Preschool literacy experience,later reading achievement //Journal of learning Disabilities.
– 1991. – Т. 24. – №. 8. –P. 508-511.178. Seaton M., Marsh H.W., Craven R. G. Earning its place as a pan-humantheory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally, economically diverse countries // Journal of Educational Psychology. – 2009. – 101(2). – P.403–419.179.
Sewell W. H., Haller A. O., Portes A. The educational and early occupational attainment process //American sociological review. – 1969. – С. 82-92.180. Sewell W. H., Haller A. O., Ohlendorf G. W. The educational and earlyoccupational status attainment process: Replication and revision //American Sociological Review. – 1970.
– С. 1014-1027.181. Sewell W. H., Hauser R. M. Education, Occupation, and Earnings.Achievement in the Early Career. 1975.182. Shavit Y., Blossfeld H. P. Persistent Inequality: Changing EducationalAttainment in Thirteen Countries. Social Inequality Series. – Westview Press, 5500Central Avenue, Boulder, CO 80301-2847 1993.183. Schwartz S. H., Boehnke K. Evaluating the structure of human valueswith confirmatory factor analysis //Journal of research in personality. – 2004.
– Т. 38.– №. 3. – С. 230-255.172184. Smith T. E. Push versus pull: Intra-family versus peer-group variables aspossible determinants of adolescent orientations toward parents //Youth and Society.– 1976. – Т. 8. – №. 1. – С. 5.185. Somers M. R. The narrative constitution of identity: A relational andnetwork approach //Theory and society.
– 1994. – Т. 23. – №. 5. – С. 605-649.186. Spearman C. Theory of General Factor/British Journal of Psychology.General Section. – 1946. – Т. 36. – №. 3. – С. 117-131.187. Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., Quinn D. M. Stereotype threat, women'smath performance //Journal of experimental social psychology. – 1999. – Т. 35.
– №.1. – С. 4-28.188. Spiezia V. Does computer use increase educational achievements? Student-level evidence from PISA //OECD Journal: Economic Studies. – 2011. – Т.2010. – №. 1. – С. 1-22.189. Stanton-Salazar R. D. Manufacturing hope, despair: the school, kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth / New York: Teachers College Press. – 2001.190. Stark, David. 2011. “What’s Valuable?” Pp. 319–38 in The Worth ofGoods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy, edited by J.
Beckert and P. Aspers.New York: Oxford University Press.191. Steiger J.H. Structural model evaluation and modification: An intervalestimation approach. Multivariate behavioral research, 1990, 25(2), 173-180.192. Swanson J., Valiente C., Lemery-Chalfant K., O’Brien T.C. PredictingEarly Adolescents’ Academic Achievement, Social Competence,, Physical HealthFrom Parenting, Ego Resilience,, Engagement Coping // The Journal of Early Adolescence. – 2010. – 31(4). – P. 548–576.193. Thomas A.
M. Parent and peer influences: their role in predicting adolescent moral values and delinquent behavior : дис. – Colorado State University. Libraries, 2007.194. Thorpe G. L., Favia A. Data Analysis Using Item Response TheoryMethodology: An Introduction to Selected Programs, Applications. – 2012.173195. Tilly C. Relational origins of inequality //Anthropological Theory. –2001. – Т. 1. – №. 3. – С.
355-372.196. Tilly C. Why?:[what happens when people give reasons... and why]. –Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2006.197. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Marsh H.W., Köller O., Baumert, J. Tracking,grading,, student motivation: Using group composition, status to predict self-concept,interest in ninth-grade mathematics // Journal of Educational Psychology. – 2006. –98(4). – P. 788–806.198. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Marsh H.W., Nagy G. Within-school socialcomparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic selfconcept // Journal of Educational Psychology. – 2009.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
