Диссертация (1136638), страница 26
Текст из файла (страница 26)
55.– P. 57–65.48.Chapman, O. Classroom practices for context of mathematics wordproblems // Educational Studies in Mathematics. – 2006. – Vol. 62. – No.2. – P.211–230.49.Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. A practical guidethrough qualitative analysis. – London, Sage Publication, 2006. – 208 p.15350.Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. Anchored instructionand its relationship to situated cognition // Educational Researcher.
– 1990. – Vol.19. – No.6. – P. 2–10.51.Cooper, B., Harries, A.V. Realistic contexts, mathematics assessmentand social class: lessons for assessment policy from an English researchprogramme / Verschaffel, L., Grre, B., Van Dooren, W., Mukhopadhyay, S. et al.(Eds.). // Words and worlds: modelling verbal descriptions of situations. – SensePublications, 2009.
– P. 93–110.52.De Lange, J. Using and applying mathematics in education / Bishop,A., Clements, M.A.K., Keitel-Kreidt, C., Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). // Internationalhandbook of mathematics education.– Springer Netherlands, 1996. – P. 49–97.53.De Putter-Smits, L.G.A., Taconis, R., Jochems, W.M.G. Mappingcontext-based learning environments: The construction of an instrument //Learning Environments Research. – 2013. – Vol. 16. – No. 3. – P. 437–462.54.Debba, R.
An exploration of the strategies used by grade 12mathematical literacy learners when answering mathematical literacy examinationquestions based on a variety of real-life contexts. – Unpublished master’s thesis. –University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa, 2011.55.Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L. Teachers’ approachestowards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context //Teaching and Teacher Education.
– 2010. – Vol. 26. – No.2. – P. 152–160.56.Dickinson, P., Hough, S., Searle, J., Barmby, P. Evaluating the impactof a Realistic Mathematics Education project in secondary schools // Proceedingsof the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. – 2011. – Vol. 31.– P. 47–52.57.Dixon, R., Brown, R. Transfer of learning: Connecting conceptsduring problem solving // Journal of Technology Education. – 2012. – Vol.24.
–No.1. – P. 2–17.15458.Dossey, J. The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence / D. A.Grouws (Ed.) // Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. –New York: Macmillan, 1992. – P. 39–4859.Du Feu, C. Naming and shaming. // Mathematics in School. – 2001. –Vol.
30. – No.3. – P. 2–8.60.Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Minnich, C.A., Stanco, G.M., Arora, A.,Centurino, V.A.S., & Castle, C.E. (Eds.) TIMSS 2011 Encyclopedia: EducationPolicy and Curriculum in Mathematics and Science, Volumes 1 and 2. – ChestnutHill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College, 2012. –1088 p.61.Engle, R.A., Lam, D.P., Meyer, X.S., Nix, S.E. How Does ExpansiveFraming Promote Transfer? Several Proposed Explanations and a ResearchAgenda for Investigating Them // Educational Psychologist. – 2012. – Vol.
47. –No. 3. – P. 215–231.62.Erickson, D. K. Middle school mathematics teachers’ view ofmathematics and mathematics education, their planning and classroom instruction,and student beliefs and achievement // Proceedings of the Annual Conference ofthe American Educational Research Association. – Atlanta, GA, 1993. – (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 364412).63.Foss, D.H., Kleinsasser, R.C. Preservice elementary teachers’ views ofpedagogical and mathematical content knowledge // Teaching and TeacherEducation.
– 1996. – Vol. 12. – No.4. – P. 429–442.64.Frejd, P. Teachers’ conceptions of mathematical modelling at SwedishUpper Secondary school // Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application. –2012. – Vol. 1. – No.5. – P. 17–40.65.Freudenthal, H. The Number Concept—Objective Accesses //Mathematics as an Educational Task. – Springer Netherlands, 1973. – P. 170–241.66.Gainsburg, J. Real-world connections in secondary mathematicsteaching // Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. – 2008.
– Vol. 11. – P.199–219.15567.Gerofsky, S. A linguistic and Narrative View of Word Problems inMathematics Education // For the Learning of Mathematics. – 1996. – Vol. 16. –No. 2. – P. 36–45.68.Gerofsky, S. Genre Analysis as a Way of Understanding Pedagogy inMathematics Education // Counterpoints. – 2001. – Vol. 137. – P. 147–175.69.Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J. Analogical problem solving // CognitivePsychology.
– 1980. – Vol. 12. – P. 306–355.70.Gilligan, C. In a different Voice. – Harvard University Press,Cambridge, 1982. – 2016 p.71.Gould, H. Teachers’ conceptions of mathematical modeling. -Doctoral dissertation. – Columbia University, 2013.72.Gravemeijer, K. Educational development and developmental researchin mathematics education // Journal for research in Mathematics Education. –1994. – Vol. 25. – No.5. – P. 443–471.73.Gravemeijer, K., Lehrer, R., Van Oers, H.J., Verschaffel, L. (Eds.).Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education. – SpringerNetherlands, 2002.
– 308 p.74.Gravenmeijer, K. Commentary: solving word problems: a case ofmodeling? // Learning and Instruction. – 1997. – Vol. 7. – No. 4. – P. 389–397.75.Greeno, J. G., The Middle-School Mathematics through ApplicationsProject Group. Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think // AmericanJournal of Education. – 1997.
– Vol. 106. – No.6. – P.85–126.76.Greer, B. Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case ofword problem // Learning and Instruction. – 1997. – Vol. 7. – No.4. – P. 293–307.77.Greer, B., Verschaffel, L. The Answer Is Really 4.5: Beliefs AboutWord Problems / Leder, G.C., Pehkonen, E., Torner, G. (Eds.) // Beliefs: A HiddenVariable in Mathematics Education? – Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. – P.271–292.15678.Grover, S., Pea, R., Cooper, S. Expansive framing and preparation forfuture learning in middle-school computer science // International Conference ofthe Learning Sciences (ICLS).
– 2014. – P. 992–996.79.Halpern, D. F., Hansen, C., Riefer, D. Analogies as an aid tounderstanding and memory // Journal of Educational Psychology. – 1990. – Vol.82. – P. 298–305.80.Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., Redish, E. F. Resources,framing, and transfer / J. Mestre (Ed.) // Transfer of learning: Research andperspectives. – Greenwich, CT: Information Age, 2005. – P.
89–120.81.Handal, B., Herrington, A. Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs andCurriculum Reform // Mathematics Education Research Journal. – 2003. – Vol. 15.– P.59–69.82.Hanley, U., Darby, S. Working With Curriculum Innovation: TeacherIdentity and the Development of Viable Practice // Research in MathematicsEducation.
– 2006. – Vol. 8. – P. 53–65.83.Hartzler, D. S. A meta-analysis of studies conducted on integratedcurriculum programs and their effects on student achievement. - Doctoraldissertation. – Indiana University, 2000.84.Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., Monk, C.A. Comprehension of arithmeticword problems: a comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers //Journal of Educational Psychology. – 1995.
– Vol. 87. – No.1. P. – 18–32.85.Hutchison, D., Schagen, I. Comparisons between PISA and TIMSS -Are we the man with two watches? / Loveless, T. (Eds.) // Lessons Learned - Whatinternational assessments tell us about math achievement. – Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institute Press, 2007. – P. 227–261.86.Johnson, S. D., Dixon, R., Daugherty, J. Lawanto, O. General versusspecific intellectual competencies: The question of learning transfer / M. Barak &M. Hacker (Eds.) // Fostering human development through engineering andtechnology education. – Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2011.
– P. 55–74.15787.Jonassen, D. H. Instructional design models for well-structured andIII-structured problem-solving learning outcomes // Educational TechnologyResearch and Development. – 1997. – Vol. 45. – No.1. – P. 65–94.88.Kitchener, K.S. Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: athree-level model of cognitive processing // Human development. – 1983. – Vol. 4.– P. 222–232.89.Klette, K. Working-time blues. On Teachers’ Experience ofRestructing in Education in Norway / C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, J.