Диссертация (1136364), страница 27
Текст из файла (страница 27)
С. 38–53.41. Турченко М. С. Электоральные реформы в сравнительной перспективе // Политическая наука. 2018. № 1. С. 283–300.42. Турченко М. С., Завадская М. А. Каузальный механизм vs нагромождение фактов? Критерии оценки причинно-следственныхсвязей в case studies // Полис. Политические исследования. 2017.№ 2. С. 134–146.43. Шейнис В. Л. Превращения избирательной системы в России //Общественные науки и современность.
2008. № 6. С. 39–52.44. Шириков А. Анатомия бездействия: политические институты иконфликты в бюджетном процессе регионов России. СПб.: Издво. Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2010.45. Ahmed A. Reading History Forward: The Origins of Electoral Systems in European Democracies // Comparative Political Studies.
2010.Vol. 43, № 8–9. P. 1059–1088.46. Amorim Neto O., Cox G. W. Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties // American Journal of Political Science. 1997. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 149–174.47. Andrews J. T., Jackman R. W. Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choiceunder Extreme Uncertainty // Electoral Studies. 2005. Vol. 24, № 1. P.65–84.13148.
Bader M., van Ham C. What Explains Regional Variation in ElectionFraud? Evidence from Russia: A Research Note // Post-Soviet Affairs.2015. Vol. 31, № 6. P. 514–528.49. Benoit K. Duverger’s Law and the Study of Electoral Systems //French Politics. 2006. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 69–83.50. Benoit K. Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining theOrigins and Change of Electoral Institutions // Annual Review of Political Science. 2007. Vol. 10. P.
363–390.51. Benoit K. Models of Electoral System Change // Electoral Studies.2004. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 363–389.52. Benoit K. Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A NewLook with New Evidence // Political Analysis. 2000. Vol. 8, № 4. P.381–388.53. Benoit K., Schiemann J. W. Institutional Choice in New Democracies:Bargaining over Hungary’s 1989 Electoral Law // Journal of Theoretical Politics.
2001. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 153–182.54. Birch S. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2011.55. Birch S. et al. Embodying Democracy: Electoral System Design inPost-Communist Europe. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.56. Birch S., van Ham C. Getting Away with Foul Play? The Importanceof Formal and Informal Oversight Institutions for Electoral Integrity //European Journal of Political Research.
2017. Vol. 56, № 3. P. 487–511.57. Blais A. The Debate over Electoral Systems // International PoliticalScience Review. 1991. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 239–260.58. Blais A., Massicotte L. Electoral Formulas: A Macroscopic Perspective // European Journal of Political Research. 1997. Vol. 32, № 1. P.107–129.13259. Blais A., Dobrzynska A., Indridason I. H. To Adopt or Not to AdoptProportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice //British Journal of Political Science. 2005.
Vol. 35, № 1. P. 182–190.60. Boix C. Electoral Markets, Party Strategies, and Proportional Representation // The American Political Science Review. 2010. Vol. 104,№ 2. P. 404–413.61. Boix C. Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies // The American Political Science Review.
1999. Vol. 93, № 3. P. 609–624.62. Bowler S. Electoral Systems // The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions / eds. R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, B. A. Rockman. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 577–594.63.
Bowler S., Donovan T., Karp J. A. Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology? // The Journal of Politics. 2006. Vol. 68, № 2. P. 434–446.64. Brambor T., Clark W. R., Golder M. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses // Political Analysis. 2006. Vol.14, № 1. P. 63–82.65. Brancati D. Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects // Annual Review of Political Science. 2014. Vol. 17. P. 313–326.66. Calingaert D.
Election Rigging and How to Fight It // Journal of Democracy. 2006. Vol. 17, № 3. P. 138–151.67. Carey J. M. Electoral System Design in New Democracies // The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems / eds. E. S. Herron, R. Pekkanen,M. S. Shugart. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. P.86–112.68. Case W. Manipulative Skills: How Do Rulers Control the ElectoralArena // Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Compe-133tition / ed. A. Schedler.
Boulder, London: Lynne Reinner Publishers,2006. P. 95–112.69. Clark W. R., Golder M. Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory: Testing theMechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws //Comparative Political Studies. 2006. Vol. 39, № 6. P. 679–708.70. Colomer J. M. It’s Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down) // Political Studies. 2005. Vol. 53, № 1. P.1–21.71. Colomer J. M. Party System Effects on Electoral Rules // The OxfordHandbook of Electoral Systems / eds.
E. S. Herron, R. Pekkanen, M.S. Shugart. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 70–85.72. Colomer J. M. The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choice //Handbook of Electoral System Choice / ed. J. M. Colomer. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. P. 3–78.73. Cox G. W. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in theWorld’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1998.74. Cusack T. R., Iversen T., Soskice D. Coevolution of Capitalism andPolitical Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems // TheAmerican Political Science Review. 2010.
Vol. 104, № 2. P. 393–403.75. Cusack T. R., Iversen T., Soskice D. Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems // The American Political Science Review.2007. Vol. 101, № 3. P. 373–391.76. Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B. Party Dominance and the Logic ofElectoral Design in Mexico’s Transition to Democracy // Journal ofTheoretical Politics.
2001. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 271–293.77. Diermeier D., Krehbiel K. Institutionalism as a Methodology // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 2003. Vol. 15, № 2. P. 123–144.13478. Donno D. Defending Democratic Norms: International Actors and thePolitics of Electoral Misconduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2013.79. Downs A. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy //Journal of Political Economy. 1957.
Vol. 65, № 2. P. 135–150.80. Duverger M. Which Is the Best Electoral System? // Choosing anElectoral System: Issues and Alternatives / eds. A. Lijphart, B.Grofman. New York: Praeger, 1984. P. 31–39.81. Elgie R. France: Stacking the Deck // The Politics of Electoral Systems / eds. M. Gallagher, P. Mitchell. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2005. P. 119–136.82. Enikolopov R. et al. Field Experiment Estimate of Electoral Fraud inRussian Parliamentary Elections // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
2013. Vol. 110, № 2. P. 448–452.83. Farrell D. M. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed.Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.84. Fortin-Rittberger J. The Role of Infrastructural and Coercive StateCapacity in Explaining Different Types of Electoral Fraud // Democratization. 2014. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 95–117.85. Frye T. M., Reuter O. J., Szakonyi D.
S. Political Machines at Work:Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace //World Politics. 2014. Vol. 66, № 2. P. 195–228.86. Gallagher M. Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities // British Journalof Political Science.
1992. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 469–496.87. Gallagher M., Mitchell P. Introduction to Electoral Systems // ThePolitics of Electoral Systems / eds. M. Gallagher, P. Mitchell. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 3–23.13588. Gandhi J. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.89. Gandhi J., Heller A. L. Electoral Systems in Authoritarian States //The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems / eds. E.
S. Herron, R.Pekkanen, M. S. Shugart. Oxford, New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 2018. P. 388–403.90. Gandhi J., Lust-Okar E. Elections under Authoritarianism // AnnualReview of Political Science. 2009. Vol. 12. P. 403–422.91. Geddes B. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press, 2003.92. Gehlbach S., Sonin K., Svolik M. W. Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics // Annual Review of Political Science. 2016.
Vol. 19. P.565–584.93. Gel’man V. Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet RegimeChange. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.94. Gel’man V. Out of the Frying Pan, Into the Fire? Post-Soviet RegimeChanges in Comparative Perspective // International Political ScienceReview. 2008a. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 157–180.95. Gel’man V. Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy //Europe-Asia Studies.
2008b. Vol. 60, № 6. P. 913–930.96. Gel’man V. The Unrule of Law in the Making: The Politics of Informal Institution Building in Russia // Europe-Asia Studies. 2004. Vol.56, № 7. P. 1021–1040.97. Gill G. Russia and the Vulnerability of Electoral Authoritarianism? //Slavic Review. 2016. Vol. 75, № 2. P. 354–373.98. Gill G. The Decline of a Dominant Party and the Destabilization ofElectoral Authoritarianism? // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2012.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
