Диссертация (1136137), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
Партии и партийныесистемы: современные тенденции развития. М., 2015.13. Манен Б. Принципы представительного правления. СПб., 2008.18414. Мельвиль А.Ю. Задержавшиеся и/или несостоявшиеся демократизации:почему и как? // Полис. – 2010. - № 4. – С. 73-76.15. Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К. Условия демократии и пределыдемократизации: Факторы режимных изменений в посткоммунистическихстранах: опыт сравнительного и многомерного статистического анализа //Полис. – 2011. - № 3.
– С. 164-183.16. Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К., Миронюк М.Г. «Царь горы», или Почему впосткоммунистических автократиях плохие институты // Полис. – 2013. № 2. – С. 125-142.17. Платон. Диалоги. Книга Первая. М., 2008.18. Пшеворский А. Демократия и рынок: Политические и экономическиереформы в Восточной Европе и Латинской Америке. М., 2000.19. Салмин А.М. Современная демократия: Очерки становления и развития.М., Форум, 2009.20. Суриков И.Е.
Античная Греция. М., 2008.21. Танин-Львов А.А. Выборы во всем мире: Энциклопедическийсправочник. М., 2001.22. Хантингтон С. Третья волна: Демократизация в конце XX века. М., 2003.23. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy.Cambridge, 2006.24. Achen C., Bartels L.
Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not ProduceResponsive Government. Princeton, 2016.25. Almond G., Verba S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy inFive Nations. Newbury Park, 1989.26. Anand P., Pattanaik P., Puppe C. (eds.). The Handbook of Rational and SocialChoice. Oxford, 2009.18527.
Anderson C. The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and theLimits of Democratic Accountability // The Annual Review of PoliticalScience. – 2007. – Vol. 10. – P. 271-296.28. Bakke E., Sitter N. Patterns of Stability: Party Competition and Strategy inCentral Europe Since 1989 // Party Politics. – 2005. – Vol. 11, № 2. – P. 243263.29.
Barnes A. Extricating the State: The Move to Competitive Capture in PostCommunist Bulgaria // Europe-Asia Studeis. – 2007. – Vol. 59, № 1. – P. 7195.30. Barr R. Bolivia: Another Uncompleted Revolution // Latin American Politicsand Society. – 2005. – Vol. 47, № 3. – P. 69-90.31. Barro R. Determinants of Democracy // Journal of Political Economy. – 1999.
–Vol. 107. – P. 158-183.32. Barro R. The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model // Public Choice. –1973. – Vol. 14. – P. 19-42.33. Beetham D. Conditions for Democratic Consolidation // Review of AfricanPolitical Economy. – 1994. - Vol. 60. – P. 157-172.34. Bengtsson A. Economic voting: The Effect of Political Context, Volatility, andTurnout on Voters’ Assignment of Responsibility // European Journal ofPolitical Research. – 2004.
– Vol. 43. – P. 749-767.35. Berg-Schlosser D., De Meur G. Conditions of Democracy in Interwar Europe:A Boolean test of Major Hypotheses // Comparative Politics. – 1994. – Vol. 26,№ 3. – P. 253-279.36. Berlin I. Liberty. Oxford, 2002.37. Bielasiak J. The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems inPostcommunist States // Comparative Politics. – 2002. – Vol.
34, № 2. – P.189-210.18638. Bingham Powell G., Whitten G. A Cross-National Analysis of EconomicVoting: Taking Account of Political Context // American Journal of PoliticalScience. – 1993. – Vol. 37, № 2. – P. 391-414.39. Boix C. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, 2003.40. Brambor T., Clark W., Golder M. Understanding Interaction Models:Improving Empirical Analyses // Political Analysis. – 2006. – Vol. 14. – P. 6382.41. Bueno de Mesquita B., Smith A. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad BehaviorIs Almost Always Good Politics. New York, 2012.42. Bueno de Mesquita B., Smith A., Siverson R.
et al. The Logic of PoliticalSurvival. Cambridge, 2003.43. Cameron C., Trivedi P. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications.Cambridge, 2005.44. Cameron D. Post-Communist Democracy: The Impact of the European Union //Post-Soviet Affairs. – 2007. – Vol. 23, № 3. – P. 185-217.45. Caplan B. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose BadPolicies. Princeton, 2006.46. Carothers T. The End of the Transition Paradigm // Journal of Democracy. –2002.
– Vol. 13, № 1. – P. 5-21.47. Ceka B. The Perils of Political Competition: Explaining Participation and Trustin Political Parties in Eastern Europe // Comparative Political Studies. – 2012. –Vol. 46, № 12. – P. 1610-1635.48. Center for Systemic Peace. The Polity Project. URL:http://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html (дата обращения:10.08.2016).49. Cohen J.
The Earth Is Round (p < .05) // Amercian Psychologist. – 1994. – Vol.49, № 12. – P. 997-1003.18750. Converse P. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964) // CriticalReview. – 2006. – Vol. 18, № 1-3. – P. 1-74.51. Croissant A. From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping AsianDemocratization // Democratization. – 2004. – Vol.
11, № 5. – P. 156-178.52. Crosier M., Huntington S., Watanuki J. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on theGovernability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York, 1975.53. Cumming G. The New Statistics: Why and How // Psychological Science. –2014. – Vol. 25, № 1. – P. 7-29.54. Dalberg-Acton J. Historical Essays and Studies. London, 1907.55. Database of Political Institutions 2012 (updated Jan. 2013). URL:http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/0,,contentMDK:20649465~pagePK:64214825~piPK:64214943~theSitePK:469382,00.html (дата обращения: 10.08.2016).56.
De Tocqueville A. De la Démocratie en Amérique. Paris, 2012.57. Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. URL:https://sites.duke.edu/democracylinkage/data/ (дата обращения: 10.08.2016).58. Diamond L. The Democratic Rollback: The Resurgence of the Predatory State// Foreign Affairs. – 2008. – Vol.
87, № 2. – P. 36-48.59. Diamond L. Thinking About Hybrid Regimes // Journal of Democracy. – 2002.– Vol. 13, № 2. – P. 21-35.60. Duch R., Stevenson R. The Economic Vote: How Political and EconomicInstitutions Condition Electoral Results. Cambridge, 2008.61. Duverger M. A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government //European Journal of Political Research.
– 1980. – Vol. 8. – P. 165-187.62. Ekiert G., Kubik J., Vachudova M. Democracy in the Post-Communist World:An Unending Quest? // East European Politics and Socieities. – 2007. – Vol.21, № 1. – P. 7-30.18863. ElectionGuide: Democracy Assistance and Elections News. URL:http://www.electionguide.org/ (дата обращения: 10.08.2016).64. Epstein D., Bates R., Goldstone J. et al. Democratic Transitions // AmericanJournal of Political Science. – 2006. – Vol. 50, № 3. – P. 551-569.65. Fearon J. Self-Enforcing Democracy // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. –2011.
- Vol. 126. – P. 1661-1708.66. Ferejohn J. Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control // Public Choice. –1986. – Vol. 50. – P. 5-25.67. Fiorina M. Rational Choice, Empirical Contributions, and the ScientificEnterprise // Critical Review. – Vol. 9, № 1-2. – P. 85-94.68. Fish S. Stronger Legislatures, Stronger Democracies // Journal of Democracy. –2006. – Vol. 17, № 1. – P. 5-20.69. Freedom House. Freedom in the World. URL:https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2016 (датаобращения: 10.08.2016).70. Gallie W.
Essentially Contested Concepts // Proceedings of AristotelianSociety. – 1955-1956. – Vol. 56. – P. 167-198.71. Ganev V. Post-Communism as an Episode of State Building: A Reverse TillyanPerspective // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. – 2005. – Vol. 38. – P.425-445.72. Gasiorowski M., Power T. The Structural Determinants of DemocraticConsolidation: Evidence from the Third World // Comparative PoliticalStudies. – 1998. – Vol. 31, № 6. – P.
740-771.73. Geddes B. A Comparative Perspective on the Leninist Legacy in EasternEurope // Comparative Political Studies. – 1995. – Vol. 28, № 2. – P. 239-274.74. Geddes B. What Do We Know about Democratization After Twenty Years? //Annual Review of Political Science.
– 1999. – № 2. – P. 115-144.18975. Gel’man V. Out of the Frying Pan, Into the Fire? Post-Soviet Regime Changesin Comparative Perspective // International Political Science Review. – 2008. –Vol. 29, № 2. – P. 157-180.76. Gel’man V. Post-Soviet Transitions and Democratization: Towards TheoryBuilding // Democratization. – 2003. – Vol. 10, № 2.
– P. 87-104.77. Gelman A., Stern H. The Difference Between “Significant” and “NotSignificant” Is Not Itself Statistically Significant // The American Statistician. –2006. – Vol. 60, № 4. – P. 328-331.78. Gigerenzer G. Mindless Statistics // The Journal of Socio-Economics. – 2004. –Vol. 33. – P. 587-606.79. Gill J. The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing // PoliticalResearch Quarterly. – 1999. – Vol.
52, № 3. – P. 647-674.80. Global Corruption Barometer. URL:http://www.transparency.org/research/gcb/overview (дата обращения:26.10.2016).81. Global Elections Database. URL:http://www.globalelectionsdatabase.com/index.php/tables (дата обращения:10.08.2016).82. Graziano L. Clientelismo e sistema politico: il caso dell’Italia. Milano, 1980.83. Grzymala-Busse A. Beyond Clientelism: Incumbent State Capture and StateFormation // Comparative Political Studies. – 2008. – Vol. 41, № 4/5. – P.
638673.84. Grzymala-Busse A. Political Competition and the Politicization of the State inEast Central Europe // Comparative Political Studies. – 2003. – Vol. 36, № 10.– P. 1123-1147.85. Grzymala-Busse A. Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and StateExploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge, 2007.19086. Grzymala-Busse A., Jones Luong P. Reconceptualizing the State: LessonsFrom Post-Communism // Politics and Society. – 2002. – Vol.
30, № 4. – P.529-554.87. Habermas J. Die Postnationale Konstellation: Politische Essays. Frankfurt amMain, 1998.88. Haerpfer C., Bernhagen P., Inglehart R., Welzel C. Democratization. Oxford,2009.89. Harvey B. The Rule of Law in Historical Perspective // Michigan Law Review.– 1961. – Vol. 59, № 4. – P. 487-500.90. Hayes A., Cai L. Using Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Standard ErrorEstimators in OLS Regression: An Introduction and Software Implementation //Behavior Research Methods. – 2007. – Vol.
39, № 4. – P. 709-722.91. Held D. Models of Democracy. Comwall, 2008.92. Hicken A. Clientelism // The Annual Review of Political Science. – 2011. –Vol. 14. – P. 289-310.93. Hilgers T. (ed.) Clientelism in Everyday Latin American Politics. New York,2012.94. Huntington S. How Countries Democratize // Political Science Quarterly. –1991-1992. – Vol. 106, № 4. – P. 579-616.95. Inglehart R., Welzel C. Political Culture and Democracy: Analyzing CrossLevel Linkages // Comparative Politics. – 2003. – Vol. 36, № 1. – P.