Диссертация (1098142), страница 83
Текст из файла (страница 83)
Arnold, 1907. xvi,252 p.61.Craik E. M. AIDÔS in Euripides’ Hippolytos 373-430: Review andInterpretation // JHS 113, 1993, 45-59.62.Croally N. T. Euripidean Polemic: The Trojan Women and the Functionof Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. xii, 315.63.Cropp, M. (ed.) Euripides. Electra.
Warminster, Aris & Phillips, 1988.lxii, 194 pp.64.Cropp M. J. (ed.) Euripides. Iphigenia in Tauris. Warminster, Aris &Phillips, 2000. 283 p.65.Csapo E. New Music's Gallery of Images: the ‘Dithyrambic’ FirstStasimon of Euripides'' Electra // J. R.
C. Cousland and J. R. Hume(eds.) The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of MartinCropp. Leiden, Brill, 2009, 95-109.66.Cunningham M. Medea ἀπὸ µηχανῆς // CP 49, 1954, 151-160.67.Dale A. M. (ed.) Euripides. Alcestis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954. xl,130 p.49568.Dale, A. M. (ed.) Euripides. Helen.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.xxxiv, 179 p.69.Dakaris S.I. Οι γεννεαλογικοί µύθοι των Μολοσσών. Αθήναι: Η ενΑθήναις Αρχαιολογική Εταιρεία, 1964. 53 p.70.Davies M. Symbolism and Imagery in the Poetry of Ibycus // Hermes,114, 1986, 399-405.71.Delebecque E. Euripide et la guerre du Péloponnèse. Paris: Klincksieck,1951. 489 p.72.Devereux G. The Character of the Euripidean Hippolytus: An EthnoPsychoanalytical Study. Chico: Scholars Press, 1985. x, 162 p.73.Diggle J.
(ed.) Euripides. Fabulae. Oxford, 1981-1994. 3 v.74.Diggle J. Review: Michelini 1987, Kovacs 1987 // AJP 110, 1989, 360362.75.Dillon J. Euripides and Antiphon on Nomos and Physis: Some Remarks// K. Boudouris (ed.) The Sophistic Movement (papers read at the FirstInternational Symposium on the Sophistic Movement, 27-29 Sept. 1982).Athens: Athenian Library of Philosophy, 1984, 127-136.76.Dittenberger W. Sylloge inscriptionum graecarum. 3 ed. Leipzig: Hirzel,1915-1924. 4 v.77.Dodds E. R. The αἰδώς of Phaedra and the Meaning of Hippolytus // CR39, 1925, 102-104.78.Dodds E.
R. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley, Los Angeles:University of California Press, 1951. 327 p.79.Dodds E. R. (ed.) Euripides Bacchae. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960. lv,231 p.80.Dougherty C. Democratic Contradictions and the Synoptic Illusion ofEuripides’ Ion // J. Ober, C. Hedrick (eds.) Demokratia. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 249-270.81.Dover K. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle.Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. xix, 330 p.49682.Dover K.
Who Was To Blame? // Stuttard, Shasha 2001, 1–9.83.Downing E. Apate, Agon, and Literary Self-Reflexivity in Euripides'Helen // M. Griffith and D. J. Mastronarde (eds.) Cabinet of the Muses:Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G.Rosenmeyer. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1990, 1-16.84.Grégoire H. Introduction, dans: H. Grégoire, L.
Méridier, F. Chapouthier(eds.), Euripide. Tragédies. Tome V. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1950, 9–46.85.Dunn, F.M.: Beginning at the End in Euripides' Trojan Women // RhM136, 1993, 22–35.86.Easterling P. E. (ed.) Sophocles. Trachiniae. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1982. xiii, 254 p.87.Easterling P. E. Euripides Outside Athens: a Speculative Note // ICS 19,1994, 73-80.88.Ebeling H. L.
The Admetus of Euripides Viewed in Relation to theAdmetus of Tradition // TAPA 29, 1898, 65-85.89.Edmunds L. Theatrical Space and Historical Place in Sophocles' Oedipusat Colonus. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1996. xii,191 p.90.van Erp Taalman Kip, A. M. Euripides and Melos // Mnemosyne 40,1987, 414–419.91.Festugière A.-J.
Personal Religion among the Greeks. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1954. viii, 186 p.92.Fauth, W. Hippolytus und Phaidra: Bemerkungen zu religiösenHintergrund eines tragischen Konflikts. Mainz: Akademie derWissenschaften und der Literatur, 1958-1959. 2 v.93.Fisher N. R. E. 'Hybris' and Dishonour: I // Greece and Rome 23, 1976,177-193.94.Fisher N. R. E. 'Hybris' and Dishonour: II // Greece and Rome 26, 1979,32-47.49795.Fisher N. R. E. Hybris: A Study in the Values of Honour and Shame inAncient Greece. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1992.
xvi, 526 p.96.Foley H. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press, 1985. 285 p.97.Fontenrose J. E. Python: A Study of Delphic Myth and Its Origins.Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1959. xviii, 616p.98.Fowler B. H. Lyric Structures in three Plays of Euripides // Dioniso 49(1978), 15-5199.von Fritz K. Euripides Alkestis und ihre modernen Nachahmer undKritiker // von Fritz K.
Antike und moderne Tragödie, neunAbhandlungen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1962, 27-70.100. Galinsky G. K. The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero inLiterature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell,1972. xvi, 317 p.101. Gantz T. N. The Fires in the Oresteia // JHS 97, 1977, 28–38.102. Garvie A. F. Sophocles. Ajax.
Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1998. vi,266 p.103. Garvie A. F. Euripides' Trojan Women: Relevance and Universality //Stuttard, Shasha 2001, 45–60.104. Garvie A. F. Aeschylus. Persae. Oxford, New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 2009. lix, 398 p.105. Gill C. The Articulation of the Self in Euripides' Hippolytus // A. Powell(ed.). Euripides, Women and Sexuality. London, New York: Routledge,1990, 76-107.106. Giovannini A. Untersuchungen über die Natur und die Anfänge derbundesstaatlichen Sympolitie in Griechenland.
Göttingen: Vandenhoeckund Ruprecht, 1971. 99 p.498107. Goff B. The Noose of Words: Readings of Desire, Violence andLanguage in Euripides’ Hippolytus. Cambridge, New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1990. xiv, 140 p.108. Goff B. History, Tragedy, Theory. Austin: University of Texas Press,1995. vii, 228 p.109. Goff B. Euripides: Trojan Women. Duckworth Companions to Greekand Roman Tragedy.
London: Duckworth, 2009. 173 p.110. Goldfarb B. E. The Conflict of Obligations in Euripides' Alcestis //GRBS 33, 1992, 109–28.111. Goldhill S. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1986. xi, 302 p.112. Goldhill S. The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology // Winkler, Zeitlin1990, 97-129.113. Goossens R. Euripide et Athènes. Bruxelles: Palais des Académies,1962.
xii, 772 p.114. Graham H. F. The Escape-Ode in Hippolytus // CJ 42, 1947, 275-276.115. Greenwood L. H. G. Aspects of Euripidean Tragedy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1953. vii, 143 p.116. Grégoire, H. Euripide, Ulysse et Alcibiade // Bulletin de la Classe desLettres et des Sciences morales et politiques de l’Académie royale deBelgique, 5e série, 21, 1933, 83–106.117. Gregory J. Euripides’ Alcestis // Hermes 107, 1979, 259-270.118.
Gregory J. Euripides and the Instruction of the Athenians. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press, 1991. 208 p.119. Grene D. The Interpretation of the Hippolytus of Euripides // CP 34,1939, 45-58.120. Griffin J. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980. xvi,218 p.121. Griffin, J. The Trojan Women // Stuttard, Shasha 2001, 61–72.499122. Griswold C.
L. Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge,New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. xxvi, 242 p.123. Grube G. M. A. The Drama of Euripides. 2nd ed., New York: Barnes &Noble, 1961. viii, 456 p.124. Guthrie W. K. C. A History of Greek Philosophy. Volume III (The FifthCentury Enlightenment). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.xvi, 544 p.125. Hall E. Inventing the Barbarian. Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. xvi, 277 p.126.
Halleran M. R. (ed.) Euripides. Hippolytus. Warminster: Aris & Phillips,1995. viii, 275 p.127. Hammond N. G. L. Epirus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. xxiii, 847 p.128. Hammond N. G. L. Illyris, Epirus and Macedonia // Boardman J.,Hammond N. G. L. (eds.) Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 3, part 3.London: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 261-285.129. Hathorn, Y. Rationalism and Irrationalism in Euripides' Hippolytus // CJ52, 1957, 211-18.130. Heinimann F. Nomos and Physis.
Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt, 1945. iv,221 S.131. Helmbold W. C. The Paradox of the Oedipus // AJP 72, 1951, 293-300.132. Herman G. Ritualised Friendship and the Greek City. Cambridge, NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 1987. xiii, 212 p.133. Hölscher T. Images and Political Identity: The Case of Athens // D.Boedeker, K. Raaflaub (eds.) Democracy, Empire and the Arts in FifthCentury Athens. Cambridge Mass., London: Harvard University Press,1998, 153-184.134. Holzhausen J. Eros und Aidos in Phaidras Monolog. Mainz: Akademieder Wissenshaften und der Literatur; Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1995. 45 p.135. Hose M. Studien zum Chor bei Euripides. Teil 1. Stuttgart: Teubner,1990. 347 p.500136.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
