Диссертация (1173986), страница 47
Текст из файла (страница 47)
2009. Vol. 61.250. Barkow R. Separation of Powers and the Criminal Law // Stanford Law Review.2006. Vol. 58.251. Bloch S. The Early Role of the Attorney General in our Constitutional Scheme: Inthe Beginning There Was Pragmatism // Duke Law Journal. 1989.252. Carns T., Kruse J. Alaska’s Plea Bargaining Ban Re-Evaluated: ExecutiveSummary.[электронныйресурс]–Режимдоступа:URL:http://www.ajc.state.ak.us/reports/plea91Exec.pdf.253. Dangel S.
Note, Is Prosecution a Core Executive Function? Morrison v. Olsonand the Framers’ Intent // The Yale Law Journal. 1990. Vol. 99.254. Dershowitz А. Backround Paper in Fair and Certain Punishment: Report of theTwentieth Century Fund Task Force on Criminal Sentencing. – NY: McGraw-Hill,1976.255.
Dickerson Moore. Questioning the autonomy of prosecutorial charging decisions:recognizing the need to exercise discretion – knowing there will be consequences forcrossing the line // Louisiana Law Review. Vol. 60.256. Goldshtien A. The passive judiciary: prosecutorial discretion and the guilty plea.Louisiana, 1981.257. Gwladys G. Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe. A ComparativeAnalysis with Special Focus on Switzerland, France, and Germany. – Switzerland:Springer International Publishing, 2014.258.
Howe S. The Value of Plea Bargaining // Oklahoma Law Review. 2005. Vol. 58.259. Jones E. The Office of Attorney-General // The Cambridge Law Journal. 1969.Vol. 27.260. Krent H. Executive Control over Criminal Law Enforcement: Some Lessons fromHistory // American University Law Review. 1989. Vol. 38.261. Langer M. Rethinking Plea Bargaining: The Practice and Reform of ProsecutorialAdjudication in American Criminal Procedure // American Journal of Criminal Law.Vol.
33. 2006.262. LaFave W. The prosecutor’s discretion in the United States // American Journalof Comparative Law. 1970. Vol. 18.209263. Lessig L., Sunstein C. The President and the Administration // Columbia LawReview. 1994. Vol. 94.264. Lynch G. Our administrative system of criminal justice // Fordham Law Review.1998. Vol. 66.265.
Lynch G. Screening versus plea bargaining. Exactly what are we trading off? //Stanford Law Review. Vol. 55. 2003.266. Luna E., Wade M. The prosecutor in transnational perspective. – Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2012.267. Nakdai L. Are New York’s Rockefeller Drug Laws Killing the Messenger for theSake the Message? // Hofstra Law Review. 2001. Vol. 30.268. O’Hear М. Plea Bargaining and Procedural Justice // Georgia Law Review. 2008.Vol.
42.269. Schwartz V.L. Comparing U.S. and French models of criminal pre-trialinvestigation[электронныйресурс]–Режимдоступа:URL:http://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/biblio/108/138072/doc/slspublic/SchwartzVirginieLtft07.pdf.270. Spence M.J. The Complexity of Success: the U. S. Role in Russian Rule of LawReform // Carnegie Papers.
2005. № 60.271. Stuntz W.J. Bordenkircher v. Hayes: The Rise of Plea Bargaining and the Declineof the Rule of Law // Harvard Public Law Working Paper. 2005. Vol. 120.272. Wedgwood R. The Revolutionary Martyrdom of Jonathan Robbins // The YaleLaw Journal. 1990. Vol. 100.273. Weninger R. The Abolition of Plea Bargaining: a case study of El Pasco county,Texas // UCLA Law Review. 1987.
Vol. 35.274. William B. The Indeterminacy of the Separation of Powers and the Federal Courts// The George Washington Law Review. 1989. Vol. 57.275. Wright R. Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in Federal Criminal Justice //University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
2005. Vol. 154.210.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
