Диссертация (1173972), страница 37
Текст из файла (страница 37)
McGill University, Montreal.2011. P. 597.194188) Ashley Cook. Kompetenz-Kompetenz: Varying Approaches and a Proposal fora Limited Form of Negative Kompetenz-Kompetenz // Pepperdine LawReview. Vol. 2014. Issue 1. 2014. P. 17-34.189) Austen L. Parrish. Comity and Foreign Parallel Proceedings: A Reply to Blackand Swan.
Lloyd’s Underwriters v. Cominco LTD. 2009 // Maurer School ofLaw: Indiana University. P. 209-224.190) Bernd U Graf. International Concurrent Jurisdiction: Dealing with thePossibility of Parallel Proceedings in the Courts of More than OneCountry.1988. LLM Theses and Essays. Paper 125.
P. 141.191) Cahit Agaoglu. Arbitration in merger and acquisitions transactions: problem ofconsent in parallel proceedings and in the transfer of arbitration agreements inmerger and acquisitions arbitration // Queen Mary University of London. 2012.P. 292.192) Chrispas Nyombi, Moses Oruaze Dickson. Replacing lis pendens with forumnon conveniens: a viable solution to tactical litigation in the EU? // E.C.L.R.2017, 38(11), P. 491-500.193) Chrispas Nyombi, Moses Oruaze Dickson. Tactical litigation in the post-recastBrussels Regulation era // European Competition Law Review.
2017. 38(10).P. 457-469.194) Christa Roodt. Conflicts of procedure between courts and arbitral tribunalswith particular reference to the right of access to court // African Journal ofInternational and Comparative Law. 2011. 19(2). P. 236-282.195) Christer Soderlund. Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel JudicialProceedings // Journal of International Arbitration. 2005. 22(4). P. 301-322.196) Elizabeth Edinger. The Problem of Parallel Actions: The Softer Alternative //University of New Brunswick Law Journal.
116. 2011. P. 116-138.197) Emil Brengesjo. Lis Alibi Pendens in International Arbitration. Reflections onthe Swedish Position in the Context of International Trends and Approaches.Stockholm University. Faculty of Law. 2013. P. 79.195198) Emmanuel Galliard. Anti-Suit Injunction Issued by Arbitrators.
InternationalArbitration. 2006. ICCA Congress Series. 13 (2007). P. 235-266.199) Fawcett, J.J. Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law: Reports to theXIVth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, Athens,August 1994 (Oxford, England: Clarendon Press 1995). P. 447.200) Ferdinando Emanuele, Milo Molfa. Litigation & Dispute Resolution SecondEdition.
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. 2013. P. 283.201) Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman. On International Commercial Arbitration.Kluwer Law International. 1999. P. 1280.202) G A Bermann, Parallel Litigation: Is Convergence Possible? in K BoeleWoelki, T Einhorn, D Girsberger and S Symeonides (eds), Convergence andDivergence in Private International Law – Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr (ElevenInternational Publishing, 2010). P. 895.203) Geimer R. Internationales Zivilprozessrecht / Unter Mitarbeit von E. Geimer;5.
Aufl. Koln: O. Schmidt, 2005. S. 1522.204) Geoffrey Samuel. Common Law, in Jan M. Smits (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia ofComparative Law. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2006. P. 821.205) Giovanni Zarra. Parallel proceedings in investment arbitration. 2016. ElevenInternational Publishing. P. 250.206) Helene van Lith.
International Jurisdiction and Commercial Litigation.Uniform Rules for Contract Disputes. T.M.C. Asser Press. 2009. P. 624.207) James P. George, Parallel Litigation, 51 Baylor L. Rev. 769 (1999). P. 769986.208) James P. George. International Parallel Litigation – A Survey of CurrentConventions and Model Laws // Texas International Law Journal. Vol. 37:499.P. 500-542.209) Jennifer M. Anglim. Crossroads in the Great Race: Moving Beyond theInternational Race to Judgements in Disputes over Artwork and Other Chattels.Volume 45. Number 1.
Winter 2004. P. 239-301.196210) Joel R. Paul. The Transformation of International Comity. Law andContemporaryProblemsDuke University School of Law. 2008. Vol. 71:19. P. 19-38.211) John Fellas. Strategy in International Litigation. Hughes Hubbard & ReedLLP. 2013. P. 109.212) John O. Haley. Fundamentals of Transnational Litigation: The United States,Canada, Japan and the European Union. Lexis Nexis. 2012. P. 988.213) Jr. Hazard, M. Taruffo et al., ALI/Unidroit Principles and Rules ofTransnational Civil Procedure. Rome. April 2003. P.
177.214) Justin P. Cook. Pragmatism in the European Union: Recasting the Brussels IRegulation to Ensure the Effectiveness of Exclusive Choice-of-CourtAgreement. Aberdeen Student Law Review. 2013. Vol. 4. Aberdeen. P. 76-91.215) Kevin M. Clermont. A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgements: Views fromthe United States and Japan. Cornell International Law Journal: Vol.
37: Iss. 1,Article 1. P. 1-26.216) Maria Filippozzi. Brazil: arbitration – foreign arbitration awards. InternationalCompany and Commercial Law Review. 2006. 17(5). P. 36-37.217) Markus Petsche. A critique of the doctrine of forum non convenience //Taylor’s University. 2011. October 18. P. 2-34.218) Michael M. Wilson. Federal Court Stays and Dismissals in Deference toParallel State Court Proceedings: The Impact of Colorado River // Universityof Chicago Law Review. Volume 44, Issue 3. P. 640-680.219) Mukarrum Ahmed.
The enforcement of settlement and jurisdiction agreementsand parallel proceedings in the European Union: The Alexandros T litigationin the English courts. Journal of Private International Law. 2015 (12). P. 431.220) N. Jansen Calamita. Rethinking Comity: Towards a Coherent Treatment ofInternational Parallel Proceedings // Journal of International Law. Volume 27.Issue 3. 2006. P. 601-680.197221) Nadja Erk-Kubat.
Jurisdictional Disputes in Parallel Proceedings: AComparative European Perspective on Parallel Proceedings Before NationalCourts and Arbitral Tribunals. 2014. P. 293.222) Nicholas Poon. The Use and Abuse of Anti-Arbitration Injunctions: A WayForward for Singapore // Singapore Academy of Law Journal. (2013) 25SAcLJ. P. 244-295.223) Ozlem Susler. The English Approach to Competence-Competence //Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Journal. Vol.
13. 2013. P. 415-440.224) P. Lagarde. Le principe de proximité dans le droit internationale privécontemporain. Cours général de droit international privé, 196 Recueil des cours(1986), P. 238.225) Parrish, Austin L. Comity and Foreign Parallel Proceedings: Reply to Blackand Swan. Lloyd’s Underwriters v Comonco LTD. (2009). P. 209-224.226) Qingjiang Kong, Hu Minfei.
The Chinese Practice of Private International Law// Melbourne Journal of International Law. 2002. 3(414). P. 414-435.227) Rahim Moloo. Arbitrator Granting Antisuit Orders: When Should They and onWhat Authority? 2009. 26(5) // Journal of International Arbitration. P. 675-700.228) S. Kröll, L.A. Mistelis, P. Perales Viscasillas & V. Rogers (eds), LiberAmicorum Eric Bergsten.
International Arbitration and InternationalCommercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution. 2011. P. 880.229) Trevor C. Hartley. The European Union and the systematic dismantling of thecommon law of conflict of laws. International & Comparative Law Quarterly.2005. 54(4). P. 814.230) William S. Dodge. International Comity in American Law // Columbia LawReview. Vol. 115. 2015. No.
8. P. 2071-2141.231) Yasunobu Sato. The 1998 civil procedure reform in Japan and its applications// Civil Justice Quarterly. 2000. 19 (Jul). P. 224-266.232) Yoshimasa Furuta. International Parallel Litigation: Disposition of DuplicativeCivil Proceedings in the United States and Japan // Pacific Rim Law & PolicyAssociation. 1995. Vol. 5 No. 1. P. 1-58.198233) Zheng Sophia Tang. Declining Jurisdiction by Forum Non Convenience inChinese Courts // Hong Kong Law Journal. 45.
2015. P. 351-372.4. Ссылки на ресурсы в сети «Интернет»234) Black’s Law Dictionary 942-42 (7ed. 1999). [Электронный ресурс]: URL:https://thelawdictionary.org/ (дата обращения 12.02.2019).235) Comparative Study of Residual Jurisdiction in Civil and Commercial Disputesin the EU // National Report for England. P. 1 [Электронный ресурс]: // (URL:http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_resid_jurisd_england_en.pdf.(дата обращения 12.02.2019).236) ILA Recommendations on Lis Pendens and Res Judicata and Arbitration.[Электронный ресурс]: // URL: https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/articleabstract/25/1/83/208252?redirectedFrom=fulltext(датаобращения12.02.2019).237) Государственный реестр судебных решений Литвы.
[Электронныйресурс]:URL:http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/detalipaieska.aspx?detali=2(дата обращения 12.02.2019).238) Единыйгосударственный[Электронныйресурс]:реестрURL:судебныхрешенийУкраины.http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/(датаобращения 12.02.2019).239) Интернет-интервьюсА.С.Комаровым,Председателем Международного коммерческого арбитражного суда:«Международный коммерческий арбитраж в России: актуальныевопросы практики разрешения споров» // [Электронный ресурс]: URL:http://www.consultant.ru/law/interview/komarov/(датаобращения12.02.2019).240) Картотека арбитражных дел арбитражных судов Российской Федерации.[Электронныйресурс]:URL:http://kad.arbitr.ru/12.02.2019).199(дата обращения241) Официальный комментарий к Проекту Конвенции по признанию иприведениювисполнениеиностранныхсудебныхрешений.[Электронный ресурс]: URL: https://www.hcch.net/en/projects/legislativeprojects/judgments/special-commission (дата обращения 12.02.2019).242) Официальный сайт Верховного суда США.
Электронный ресурс:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/330/501/case.html(датаобращения 12.02.2019).243) Проект Конвенции по признанию и приведению в исполнениеиностранныхсудебныхрешений.[Электронныйресурс]:https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=78URL:(датаобращения 12.02.2019).244) РасписаниесудебныхзаседанийсудовРеспубликиБелоруссия.[Электронный ресурс]: URL: http://service.court.by/ru/public/schedule (датаобращения 12.02.2019).5.Диссертации245) Баталова М.Р.
Международное частное право Турецкой Республики(опыт кодификации). Дисс. … канд. юрид. наук. Москва, 2014. 246 с.246) ВоронцоваИ.В.Нормымеждународногоправакакисточникгражданского процессуального права. Дисс. … докт. юрид. наук. Саратов,2015. 432 с.247) ГармозаА.П.Определениекомпетенциисоставаарбитража,сформированного на основании международного инвестиционногосоглашения. Дисс…канд. юрид. наук. М. 2011. 267 с.248) ГафаровС.Э.Основныемоделимеждународнойподсудностигражданских дел в национальном праве. Дисс.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
