Диссертация (1173182), страница 33
Текст из файла (страница 33)
30(1). – P. 63–78.126) Harrington J., Palethorpe S., Watson C.I., 2007. Age-related changes infundamental frequency and formants: a longitudinal study of four speakers //INTERSPEECH-2007. – Antwerp, 2007. – P. 2753–2756.127) Hartman D. The perceptual identity and characteristics of aging in normal maleadult speakers // Journal of Communication Disorders. – 1979. – No. 12. – P. 53–61.184128) Hartman J.
Guide to pronunciation // Preface to the Dictionary of AmericanRegional English / F.J. Cassidy (Ed.). – Cambridge MA: Harvard University’sBelknap Press, 1985. – P. xii–lxi.129) Hay J. Statistical analysis // Sociophonetics. A Student's Guide / M. Di Paolo,M. Yaeger-Dror (Eds.). – Routledge. – 2010. – P. 198–217.130) Helfrich H. Age markers in speech // Social markers in speech / K. Scherer, H.Giles (Eds.). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
– P. 63–93.131) Hoequist Jr. C. Durational correlates of linguistic rhythm categories // Phonetica.– 1983a. – No. 40. – P. 19–31.132) Hoequist Jr. C. Syllable duration in stress-, syllable- and mora-timed languages //Phonetica. – 1983b. – No. 40. – P. 203–237.133) Hollien H., Shipp T. Speaking fundamental frequency and chronologic age inmales // Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. – 1972. – No.
15. P. 155–159.134) Jacewicz E., Fox R., O’Neil C., Salmons J. Articulation rate across dialect, ageand gender // Language variation and change. – 2009. – V. 21(2). – P. 233–251.135) Jones D. The Pronunciation of English. – Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1950.136) Kachru B.B.
The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. – Urbana: University ofIllinois Press, 1992. – 384 p.137) Keating P., Buhr R. Fundamental frequency in the speech of infants and children// Journal of the Acoustic Society of America. – 1978. – No. 63. – P. 567–571.138) Kemper S. Elderspeak: Speech accommodations to older adults // Aging andCognition. – 1994.
– No. 1. – P. 17– 28.139) Kemper S., Harden T. Experimentally disentangling what’s beneficial aboutelderspeak from what’s not // Psychology and aging. – 1999. – No. 14. – P. 656–670.140) Klatt D.H. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connecteddiscourse // Journal of Phonetics. – 1975. – No. 3(3). – P. 129–140.141) Kohler K. Rhythm in Speech and Language. A New Research Paradigm. //Phonetica.
– 2009. – Vol.66. – No. 1–2. – P. 29–45.185142) Labov W., Ash Sh., Boberg Ch. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics,Phonology and Sound Change. – Berlin, New-York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. –335p.143) Labov W. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of PennsylvaniaPress, 1972.
– 344 p.144) Labov W. Internal factors // Principles of Linguistic Changes. – Oxford:Blackwell, 1994. – Vol. 1. – 664 p.145) Labov W. Social factors // Principles of Linguistic Changes. – Oxford: Blackwell,2001. – Vol. 2. – 592 p.146) Labov W. Dialect diversity in America: the politics of language change. –Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2012. – 175 p.147) Ladefoged P.
A Course in Phonetics. – New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1975. – 296 p.148) Laver J. Principles of Phonetics. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1994. – 707 p.149) Laver J., Trudgill K. Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech // Social Markersin Speech (European Studies in Social Psychology) / K.R. Scherer, H. Giles (Eds.). –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. – P. 1–32.150) Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970. – 194 p.151) Lehiste I.
Some aspects of the phonetics of metrics // Nordic Prosody / V.K.Wiik, I. Ramo (Eds.). – Turku: University of Turku, 1990. – P. 206–218.152) Levitan R., Gravano A., Hirshberg J. Entrainment in Speech Preceding // HLT '11Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics: Human Language Technologies. – 2011. – [Электронный ресурс]. –Режим доступа: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~rlevitan/papers/acl-hlt2011.pdf.153) Levitan R., Hirshberg J.
Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect tomultiple levels and dimensions // INTERSPEECH 2011. – 2011. – [Электронныйресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221479137.154) Lieberman P. Intonation, Perception and Language. – Cambridge, MA: MITPress, 1967. – 210 p.186155) Lin H., Wang Q. Vowel quality and consonant variance: a comparison betweenChinese and English // Proceedings of Between Stress and Tone. – Leiden, June,2005.156) Linville S.E. The sound of senescence // Journal of Voice. – 1996.
– No. 10. – P.190–200.157) Linville S.E. Vocal Aging. – San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 2001. –320 p.158) Linville S.E., Fisher H. Acoustic characteristics of women’s voices withadvancing age // Journal of Gerontology. – 1985. – No. 40(3). – P. 324–330.159) Liss J., Weismer G., Rosenbek J. Selected acoustic characteristics of speechproduction in very old males // Journal of Gerontology Psychological Sciences.
–1990. – No. 45. – P. 35–45.160) Lloyd James A. Speech Signals in Telephony. – London: Sir I. Pitman and Sons,1940. – 49 p.161) Loukina A., Kochanski G., Shih C., Keane E., Watson I. Rhythm Measures withLanguage-Independent Segmentation // Proceedings of Interspeech 2009: speechand intelligence. – Brighton, UK, 2009.
– P. 1531–1534.162) Low E.-L. Intonation Patterns in Singapore English // M Phil. Dissertation. –University of Cambridge, 1994.163) Low E.-L. Prosodic Prominence in Singapore English // PhD Dissertation. –University of Cambridge, 1998.164) Low E.-L. A review of recent research on speech rhythm: some insights forlanguage acquisition, language disorders and language teaching // Spoken English,TESOL and Applied Linguistics: Challenges for Theory and Practice / R. Hughes(ed.). – Houndmills, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. – P. 99–125.165) Low E.-L. The acoustic reality of the Kachruvian circles: a rhythmic perspective// World Englishes. – 2010.
– No. 29(3). – P. 394–405.166) Low E., Grabe E. Prosodic patterns in Singapore English // Proceedings of theXIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. – Stockholm, 1995. – Vol. 3. –P. 636–639.187167) Low E., Grabe E., Nolan, F. Quantitative Characterization of Speech Rhythm:Syllable-Timing in Singapore English // Language and Speech.
– 2000. – No. 43(4).– P. 377–401.168) McQueen J.M., Cutler A. Cognitive Processes in Speech Perception // TheHandbook of Phonetic Sciences, Second edition / W.J. Hardcastle, J. Laver, F.E.Gibbon (Eds.). – Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. – P. 489–520.169) Miller M. On the perception of rhythm // Journal of Phonetics. – 1984. – No. 12.– P. 75–83.170) Mok P.P.K. The acquisition of speech rhythm by three-year-old bilingual andmonolingual children: Cantonese and English // Bilingualism: Language andCognition.
– 2011. – No. 14. – P. 458–472.171) Mok P.P.K. Speech rhythm of monolingual and bilingual children at 2;6:Cantonese and English // Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. – 2013. – No. 16.– P. 693–703.172) Mok P.P.K., Dellwo V. Comparing native and non-native speech rhythm usingacoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English //Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody, Campinas, Brazil, 2008. – P. 423–426.173) Morris R., Brown W. Age-related voice measures among adult women // Journalof Voice.
– 1987. – No. 1. – P. 38–43.174) Mysak E.D. Pitch and duration characteristics of older males // Journal of Speechand Hearing Research. – 1959. – No. 2. – P. 46–54.175) Nakamura S. Characteristics of contrast between the stressed and the unstressedin rhythm units observed in duration structure in English speech by Japaneselearners // Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics.
– 2011. – No. 15(1). –P. 177–189.176) Nakatani L.H., O’Connor J.D., Aston C.H. Prosodic aspects of American Englishspeech rhythm // Phonetica. – 1981. – No. 38. – P. 84–105.177) Nespor M. On the rhythm parameter in phonology // Logical Issues in LanguageAcquisition / I. Roca (ed.). – Dordrecht: Foris, 1990. – P. 157–175.188178) Nokes J., Hay J.
Acoustic Correlates of Rhythm in New Zealand English: ADiachronic Study // Language Variation and Change. – 2012. – No. 24. – P. 1–31.179) Nolan F., Asu E.L. The Pairwise Variability Index and Coexisting Rhythms inLanguage // Phonetika. – 2009. – No. 66.
– P. 64–77.180) O'Connor J. D., Arnold G. Intonation of Colloquial English. 2nd edition. –London: Longman, 1973. – 288 p.181) Oyakawa T. On the directionality of segmental conditioning in Japanese //Monthly Internal Memo. – California: University of Berkley, 1971. – P. 81–103.182) Payne E., Post B., Astruc L., Prieto P., Vanrell M.M.
Measuring child rhythm //Language and Speech. – 2012. – No. 55(2). – P. 203–229.183) Pijper J.R. Semitone conversions. URL:http://users.utu.fi/jyrtuoma/speech/semitone.html (дата обращения: 20.03.2015).184) Pike K.L. The Intonation of American English. – Ann Arbor, MI: University ofMichigan Press, 1945. – 203 p.185) Pointon G.E.
Is Spanish really syllable-timed? // Journal of Phonetics. – 1980. –No. 8. – P. 293–304.186) Preston D.R. Folk Dialectology // American Dialect Research / D. Preston (ed.). –Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1993. – P. 333–377.187) Prieto P., Vanrell M., Astruc L., Payne E., Post B. Phonotactic and phrasalproperties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish // SpeechCommunication. – 2012. – No. 54. – P. 681–702.188) Quene H. On the just noticeable difference for tempo in speech // Journal ofPhonetics. – 2007. – No.
35. – P. 353–362.189) Ramig L. Effects of physiological aging on speaking and reading rates // Journalof Communication Disorders. – 1983. – No. 16. – P. 217–226.190) Ramig L. Aging speech: Physiological and sociological aspects // Language andCommunication. – 1986. – No. 6. – P. 25–34.191) Ramus F.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
