диссертация (1169724), страница 76
Текст из файла (страница 76)
(eds.). – Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009. – P.520 – 525.182.Blum, Y.Z. Historic Titles in International Law [Text]. – Dodrecht: Springer Science+BusinessMedia B.V., 1965. – XXIII, 360 p.183.Boothe, J.M. Kuril Islands Dispute: Case Study of Russian-Japanese Relations, 2013[Electronic source]. URL: https://ru.scribd.com/document/134805746184.Bowman, G. Why Now Is the Time to Resolve the Dokdo/Takeshima Dispute [Text] // CaseWestern Reserve Journal of International Law. – 2013. – Vol. 46, No. – P.
433 – 462.185.Brown, J.D.J. Japan, Russia and Their Territorial Dispute: The Northern Delusion [Text]. –New York: Routledge, 2016. – 161 p.186.Bundy, A.J. The Reunification of China with Hong Kong and Its Implications for Taiwan: AnAnalysis of the “One Country, Two Systems” Model [Text] // California Western InternationalLaw Journal. – 1988.
– Vol. 19, No. 2, Art. 3. – P. 273 – 282.187.Caddell, R. Secret Treaties [Electronic source] // Max Planck Encyclopedia of PublicInternationalLaw(lastupdated:June2006).URL:http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690e1489?rskey=3sO5Jw&result=1&prd=EPIL188.Call, K.A. Southern Kurils or Northern Territories?: Resolving the Russo-Japanese BorderDispute [Text] // Brigham Young University Law Review. – 1992.
– No. 3. – P. 727 – 758.189.Carter, D.B. The Making of the Territorial Order: New Borders and the Emergence ofInterstate Conflict [Electronic source]/ D.B. Carter, H.E. Goemans // International Organization.URL: http://www.rochester.edu/college/faculty/hgoemans/Publications/NewBorders34.info.pdf244190.Carty, A.
The Black Hole of Modernity: From Sovereignty to International Legal Order andBack Again! [Text] // Journal of the Philosophy of International Law. – 2006. – Vol. 1, No. 1. – P.7 – 37.191.Chan, J. Japan and Russia in Diplomatic Row over Disputed Kuril Islands [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/02/jpru-f17.html192.Charney, J.I. The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary InternationalLaw [Text] // British Yearbook of International Law, 1986. – Oxford, 1987.
– Vol. 56. – P. 1 – 24.193.Cheng, B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals [Text].–Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 544 p.194.Chotani, V.M. Can Japan and Russia Reconcile? [Text] / V.M. Chotani, U. Purushothaman //ORF Issue Brief. –2015, October. – No. 110. – P. 1 – 7.195.Clark,G.Tokyo’sClaimtotheKurilsisShaky [Electronicsource].URL:http://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/18/opinion/18iht-edcl_0.html196.Collins, R.A. The Russo-Japanese Dispute over the Ownership of the Southern Kuril Islands[Text]. – Bangkok: Webster University, 2013. – 51 p.197.Craven, M.
The Problem of State Succession and the Identity of States under International Law[Text] // European Journal of International Law. – 1998. – Vol. 9. – P. 142 – 162.198.Crawford, J. Brownlie’s Principles of International Law [Text]. – 8th ed. – Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2012. – 888 p.199.Crawford, J.
Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law [Text]. – The Hague:Hague Academy of International Law, 2014. – 537 p.200.Crawford, J. The Creation of States in International Law [Text]. – 2nd ed. – Oxford: ClarendonPress, 2007. – 870 p.201.Cukwurah, A.O. The Settlement of Boundary Disputes in International Law [Text]. –Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1967. – XLIX, 273 p.202.Davidson, R.H. The Far East Agreements of the Yalta Conference of February 4-11, 1945, andthe Sino-Soviet Agreements of August, 1945 [Text]: Thesis. – [Portland, Or.], 1969. – 198 p.203.Davidson, S.
The Law of Treaties [Text]. – Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2004. –580 p.204.Davis, G.B. The Effects of War Upon International Conventions and Private Contracts [Text] //Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1907 – 1917). –April 25-27, 1912. – Vol.
6. – P. 124 – 132.205.Deeks, A.S. A (Qualified) Defense of Secret Agreements [Text] // Arizona State Law Journal. –2017. – Vol. 49. – P. 713 – 794.245206.Donohue, B. An Ontological Approach to Territorial Disputes [Text] / B. Donohue, N.
Otte, B.Smith // Proceedings of the Conference on Semantic Technology in Intelligence, Defense andSecurity (STIDS 2014), CEUR. – Vol. 1304. – P. 2 – 9.207.Downing, D. An Atlas of Territorial and Border Disputes [Text]. – L.: New English Library,1980. – 121 p.208.Dudden,Japan’sA.IslandProblem[Электронныйресурс].URLhttp://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/japans-island-problem209.Dugard, J.
The Secession of States and Their Recognition in the Wake of Kosovo [Text]. –The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2013. – 297 p.210.Elias, T.O. The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law [Text] // American Journal of InternationalLaw. – 1980. – Vol.
74. – P. 285 – 307.211.Emmers, R. Resource Management and Contested Territories in East Asia [Text]. – New York:Palgrave, 2013. – 96 p.212.Eveno, Ch. Le contentieux des îles Kouriles [Texte] / Centre d’Études Supérieures de laMarine. – [S.l., s.a.]. – 32 p.213.Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties [Text] / Coomans F., Kamminga M.(Eds.). – Antwerp: Intersentia, 2004. – 281 p.214.Fazal, T.
State Death in the International System [Text] // International Organization. – 2004. –Vol. 58, No. 2. – P. 311 – 344.215.Fouquoire-Brillet, E. Un contentieux insulaire majeur en Extrême-Orient les Kouriles,19.04.2016[Sourceélectronique].URL:http://www.institut-strategie.fr/strat_050_FOUQOUIREJ.html216.Fraser, R.J.
Jr. The Kuril Islands Dispute: an Obstacle in Russo-Japanese Relations, 1993[Electronicsource](ThesesandMajorPapers,Paper371).URL:http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ma_etds/371/217.Fravel, T. Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromisesin Territorial Disputes [Text] // International Security. 2005. – Vol. 30, No. 2. – P. 46 – 83.218.Gavrilov, V.V.
Challenges and Prospects of the Southern Kuril Islands’ Status [Text] //Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. – 2016, January. – Vol. 7, No. 1. – P. 301 – 305.219.George, D.A. The Southern Kurile Islands: Shrouded in Eternal Fog [Text] // The U.S. ArmyWar College. – [Carlisle, Pa], 2012. – 87 p.220.Giraudeau, G. Les differends territoriaux devant le juge international: entre droit et transaction[Texte]. – Leiden: Martinus Nujhoff Publishers, 2013.
– 547 p.221.Glahn, G., von. Law Among Nations [Text]: An Introduction to Public International Law. – 4thed. – New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1981. – XV, 810 p.246222.Goertz, G. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. Studies in International Conflict.Volume 5 [Text] / G. Goertz, P.F. Diehl. – London & New York: Routledge, 2002. – XI, 179 p.223.Gonzalez, M.A. The Genesis of the Falklands (Malvinas) Conflict [Text]. – New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
– XVII, 258 p.224.Gorenburg, D. The Southern Kuril Islands Dispute [Text] // PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo. –2012, September. – No. 226. – P. 1-7.225.Graf, V.B. The Russians Debate the Kuril Islands Territorial Dispute: An Aspect of Russo-Japanese Relations in the Post-Cold War World [Text]: Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs).– [Monterey, Calif.: U.S. Naval Postgraduate School], 1993. – 160 p.226.Greenwood, C. Sovereignty: A View from the International Bench [Text] // R.Rawlings, P.Leyland, A.L. Young (eds.) / Sovereignty and the Law. Domestic, European, and InternationalPErspectives. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
– P. 251 – 268.227.Grotius, H. The Freedom of the Seas or the Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part inthe East Indian Trade [Text]: A Dissertation / by Hugo Grotius; translated with a revision of theLatin text of 1633 by Ralph Van Deman Magoffin, Ph.D. – New York: Oxford University Press,1916. – XV, p. 83.228.Gustafson, L.S. The Sovereignty Dispute over the Falkland (Malvinas) Islands [Text]. – NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1988.
– XII, 268 p.229.Hakamada, S. On Trenin’s Proposal for Russia to Return Four Disputed Islands to Japan[Electronic resource] // GFL Commentary. – 28 February 2013.230.Hakamada, Sh. On Trenin’s Proposal for Russia to Return Four Disputed Islands to Japan[Text] // GFJ Commentary. – February 28, 2013.231.Hara, K.
Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided Territories in the San FranciscoSystem [Text]. – London, New York: Routledge, 2007. – XVII, 247 p.232.Hara, K. Japanese-Soviet/Russian Relations Since 1945 [Text]. – London: Routledge, 1998. –257 p.233.Harrison, S. The Indigenous Ainu of Japan and the “Northern Territories” Dispute [Text]:Thesis / M.A.
University of Waterloo. – Ontario, Canada, 2007. – 152 p.234.Hasegawa, T. The Soviet Factor in Ending the Pacific War: From the Hirota-MalikNegotiations to Soviet Entry into the War [Text]. – Washington: The National Council forEurasian and East European Research, 2003. – 29 p.235.Heflin, W.B. Diayou/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Japan and China, Oceans Apart [Text] // Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
