диссертация (1169724), страница 77
Текст из файла (страница 77)
– 2000. – Vol. 1. – P. 1 – 22.236.Hensel, P. Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict [Text] // What Do WeKnow About War? / J. Vasquez (ed.). – Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. – P. 57 – 84.247237.Husain, A.M. Hong Kong, China in Transition [Text] // Finance & Development. – 1997. – P. 1– 6.238.Huth, P.K. Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Dispute?Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945 [Text] / P.K. Huth, S.E. Croco, B.J.Appel // The American Political Science Review. – 2011. – Vol.
105, No. 2. – P. 415 – 436.239.Huth, P.K. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict [Text]. –Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996 [2000]. – X, 275 p.240.Huth, P.K. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century [Text] /P.K. Huth, T.L.
Allee. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. – XVII, 488 p.241.Hyun-kyung, K. Japan Differs over Dokdo, Kuril Islands [Electronic source]. URL:http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2012/08/116_117446.html.242.Jacobini, H.B. International Law: A Text [Text]. – Homewood, Ill.: [The Dorsey Press], 1968.– XV, 456 p.243.Japan’s Territorial Issues and the Historical Understandings of the Concerned Countries.
CaseStudies on the Senkaku Islands, Takeshima and the Northern Territories [Electronic source] / TheJapanInstituteofInternationalAffairs,March2014.–43p.–URL:https://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/pdf/research/FY2013_Japan_Territorial_Issues_and_Historical_Understandings/Japan_Territorial_Issues_and_Historical_Understandings_FY2013.pdf244.Jennings, R., Watts, A. Oppenheim’s International Law. Vol.
I: Peace [Text]. – 9th ed. –Harlow: Longman, 1992. – 2 bks, 1572 p.245.Jennings, R.Y. The Acquisition of Territory in International Law [Text]. – Manchester:Manchester University Press, 1963. – VII, 130 p.246.Jessup, P.C. The Law of Territorial Waters and Maritime Jurisdiction [Text]. – New York:G.A. Jennings Co., Inc., 1927.
– 548 p.247.Johnson, D.H.N. Acquisitive Prescription in International Law [Text] // British Year Book ofInternational Law, 1950. – London etc., 1951. – Vol 27. – P. 332 – 354.248.Juridical Regime of Historic Waters Including Historic Bays [Text]: Study prepared by theSecretariat // Yearbook of the International Law Commission / United Nations. Vol. II: 1962.A/CN.4/143.249.Kacowicz, A.M. The Problem of Peaceful Territorial Change [Text] // International StudiesQuarterly. – 1994. – Vol. 38, No. 2. – P.
219 – 254250.Kaczorowska, A. Public International Law [Text]. – 4th ed. – New York: Routledge, 2010. –XV, 877 p.251.Kaikobad, K.H. Interpretation and Revision of International Boundary Decisions. – Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 2007. – XII, 340 p.248252.Kaikobad, K.H. Some Observations on the Doctrine of Continuity and Finality of Boundaries //British Yearbook of International Law, 1983. – London etc., 1985.
– Vol. 54, No. 1. – P. 119 –141.253.Kazuhiko, T. Japan’s Territorial Problem: The Northern Territories, Takeshima, and theSenkaku Islands [Text] // The National Bureau of Asian Research. – 8 May 2012.254.Kazumine, A. The Strategic Value of Territorial Islands from the Perspective of NationalSecurity [Electronic source] // Review of Island Studies. October 9, 2013. Translated from“Toshono senryakuteki kachi” = Tosho Kenkyu Journal, Vol. 1 (June 2012), p.
54 – 69. URL:https://www.spf.org/islandstudies/research/a00008/255.Kelsen, H. Principles of International Law [Text]. – New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc.,1952. – XVII, 461 p.256.Kimura, H. The Kurilian Knot: The History of Japanese-Russian Border Negotiations [Text]. –California: Stanford University Press, 2008. – 260 p.257.Ko, S.S. Nationality and International Law in Asian Perspective [Text]. – Dodrecht [etc.]:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1990.
– L, 506 p.258.Korman, S. The Right of Conquest. The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Lawand Practice [Text]. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003. – X, 346 p.259.Koskenniemi, M. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument[Text]. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 683 p.260.Kozlowski, A. The Legal Construct of Historic Title to Territory in International Law – anOverview [Text] // Polish Yearbook of International Law. – 2010. – Vol. 30.
– P. 61 – 100.261.Krasheninnikov, S.P. The history of Kamtschatka, and the Kurilski Islands, with the countriesadjacent [Text]; illustrated with maps and cuts. – Glocester: printed by R. Raikes for T. Jefferys,1764. – 280 p.262.Kuroiwa, Yu. Russo-Japanese Territorial Dispute from the Border Region Perspective [Text] //UNISCI Discussion Papers. – 2013, May. – No. 32. – P. 187 – 2014. ISSN 1696-2206.263.La Guardia, E. de.
La question des îles Kouriles [Texte] // Annuaire français de droitinternational. – 1991. – Vol. 37. – P. 407 – 418.264.Lalonde, S. Determining Boundaries in a Conflicted World. The Role of Uti Possidetis [Text].– Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002. – 351 p.265.Lambacher, J. Nesting cranes: Envisioning a Russo-Japanese peace park in the Kuril Islands[Text] // Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution / S.H.
Ali (ed.). – Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2007. – P. 261 – 276.249266.Langer, R. Seizure of Territory. The Stimson Doctrine and Related Principles in Legal Theoryand Diplomatic Practice [Text]. – Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1947. – 313p.267.Lara, R.L. The Problem of Sovereignty, International Law, and Intellectual Conscience [Text]// Journal of the Philosophy of International Law.
– 2014. – Vol. 5, No. 1. – P. 40 – 44.268.Lauterpacht, H. Recognition in International Law [Text]. – Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1947. – LIX, 443 p.269.Lawrence, T.J. The Principles of International Law [Text]. – 7th ed. – London: Macmillan &Co., Ltd., [1937]. – XIX, 766 p.270.Lee, S.-W. The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan and the Territorial Disputes inEast Asia [Text] // Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal. – 2002.
– Vol. 11, No. 1. – P. 63 – 146.271.Lee, S.-W. Towards a Framework for the Resolution of the Territorial Dispute over the KurileIslands [Text]. – Durham, UK: International Boundaries Research Unit; University of Durham,2001. – 55 p.
– (Boundary & Territory Briefing; Vol. 3, No. 6).272.Lesaffer, R. Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law: Occupation andAcquisitive Prescription [Text] // The European Journal of International Law. – 2005. – Vol. 16,No. 1. – P. 25 – 58.273.Lowe, P. After Fifty Years: The San Francisco Peace Treaty in the Context of Anglo-JapaneseRelations [Text] // Japan Forum. – 2003.
– Vol. 15, No. 3. – P. 389 – 398.274.MacGibbon, I.C. Estoppel in International Law [Text] // The International and ComparativeLaw Quarterly. – 1958. – Vol. 7, No. 3. – P. 468 – 513.275.MacGibbon, I.C. The Scope of Acquiescence in International Law [Text] // British Yearbookof International Law, 1954. – London etc., 1956. – Vol. 31. – P. 143 – 186.276.MacIntyre, T.S. Impact of the Sino-British Agreement on Hong Kong’s Economic Future[Text] // Journal of Comparative Business and Capital Market Law. – 1985. – Vol. 7.
– P. 197 –213.277.Managing Fragile Relations: Method and Application [Text] / R. Guo, C. Freeman (Eds.). –Dodrecht: Springer, 2011. – 174 p.278.Manual of Public International Law [Text] / Sørensen M. (Ed.). – London: Macmillan, 1968. –LXV, 930 p.279.McAdam, J. Climate Change, Forced Migration, and International Law [Text]. – Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2012. – 338 p.280.McAdam, J. Disappearing States, Statelessness and the Boundaries of International Law[Electronic source]. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539766250281.McCorquodale, R. Pushing Back the Limitations of Territorial Boundaries [Text] / R.McCorquodale, R.
Pangalangan // European Journal of International Law. – 2001. – Vol. 12, No. 5.– P. 867 – 888.282.Mellor, R.E.H. Nation, State and Territory [Text]. – London: Routledge, 1989. – 218 p.283.Milano, E. Unlawful Territorial Situations in International Law. Reconciling Effectiveness,Legality and Legitimacy [Text]. – Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006. – 304 p.284.Miller, R.J. Discovering Indigenous Lands: The Doctrine of Discovery in the English Colonies[Text] / R.J.
Miller, J. Ruru, L. Behrendt, T. Lindberg (Eds.). – Oxford: Oxford University Press,2010. – XX, 294 p.285.Miller, R.J. The Doctrine of Discovery in American Indian Law [Electronic source] // IdahoLawReview.–2005.–Vol.42,No.1.–P.1-122.–URL:SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=721631286.Moosa, I. Determinants of the Status of an International Financial Centre [Text] / I. Moosa, L.Li, R.
Jiang // The World Economy. – 2016. – Vol. 39, No. 12. – P. 2074 – 2096.287.Mormanne, T. Le problème des Kouriles: pour un retour à Saint-Pétersbourg. 1991.[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://inalcocej.free.fr/travaux/documents/cip1pdf/Cip.1.5.Mormanne.pdf288.Morris, G.L. Japan, Russia and The “Northern Territories” Dispute: Neighbors in Search of aGood Fence: Thesis. – [United States]: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, Ca, 2002. – 120 p.289.Mueller, B.M.
Falkland Islands: Will the Real Owner Please Stand Up [Text] // Notre DameLaw Review. – 1983. – Vol. 58, No. 3 – P. 616 – 634.290.Munkman, A.L.W. Adjudication and Adjustment. International Judicial Decision and theSettlement of Territorial and Boundary Disputes [Text] // British Yearbook of International Law,1972. – London etc., 1973. – Vol. 46. – P. 93 – 107.291.Murphy, A.B. Historical Justifications for Territorial Claims [Text] // Annals of the Associationof American Georgaphers.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
