Диссертация (1155314), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
– Moscow: izd-vo RUDN, 2017. – p. 305 – 320.103.Chomsky N. Deterring Democracy. New York: Hill and Wang, 1992 – p.432.104.Chomsky N. Necessary Illusions. Thought Control in Democratic Societies.New York: South End Press, 1989 – p. 35.202105. Choulioraki L. Media discourse and the public sphere// Discourse theory inEuropean politics. Identity, policy and governance.
– London: PalgraveMacmillan Ltd., 2005. – p. 275 – 296.106. Coulthard M. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. – London: 1977. – p.89.107.Deutsch K. Nationalism and social communication. – Cambridge:Technology press, 1953. – p. 304.108. Fairclough N. Analysing Discourse: Textual analysis for social research. –London: Routledge, 2003. – p. 51.109. Fairclough N.
Discourse and Social Change. – Cambridge: Polity Press,1992. – p. 12.110. Fairclough N. and Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis // DiscourseStudies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 2. Discourse as SocialInteraction. – London: Thousand Oaks, 1996. – p. 273.111.Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change. – Cambridge: Polity Press,1992. – p. 1-15.112.Fasold R. Sociolinguistics of Language / R.
Fasold. – London: 1990. p. –353.113.Fillmore Ch. J. Towards a Frame-based Lexicon: the semantics of risk andits neighbors. In A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds.), frames, fields and contrasts.– NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, 1992.114.Fauconnier G. Compression and global insight // Cognitive science. V.11.№3/4. – Stanford: A. Goldberg ed., 2000. – p. 133 – 187.115. Givón T. Functionalism and Grammar. – Amsterdam: Philadelphia, 1995. –p. 1 – 20.116.
Goffman E. Forms of Talk. – Oxford: Oxford university press, 1981. – p.344.117. Habermas U. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. –Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. – p. 197.203118.Halverson R. systems of practice: how leaders use artifacts to createprofessional community in schools// Educational policy and analysis archives,11 (37).
– New York: Princetone, 2003. – p. 17 – 52.119.Jaynes J. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameralmind. – Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976. – p.491.120. Johnson K., Lee I-Ta. Ideological Phrase Indicators for Classification ofPolitical Discourse Framing on Twitter. – Purdue: Purdue University press:2016. – p. 5 – 15.121.Juraj Horváth Critical Discourse Analysis of Obama’s Political Discourse.University of Prešov. Slovakia: University of Prešov press, 2009. – p.
1 – 10.122.Kress G. Ideological structures in discourse// Handbook of discourseanalysis. Vol.4. Discourse Analysis in society. – London: Academic press,1985. – p. 27.123. Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a RadicalDemocratic Politics// E. Laclau, C. Mouffe. – London: Verso, 1985. – p. 164.124.Lakoff G. Moral politics. – Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1990. – p. 421.125. Lasswell H. Propaganda, communication and public order. – NewYork:Princeton, 1946.
– p. 446.126. Lazarsfield P. The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in apresidential. – New York: Paperback, 1944. – p. 309.127.Lippmann W. Public opinion. – New York: Hancourt, Brace and Company,1922. – p. 449.128.Lippmann W.
The method of freedom. – New York: The new school, 1934.– p. 392.129. Liu B. Opinions, Sentiment, and Emotion in Text. 1st edition. – New York:Cambridge University Press, 2015 – p. 60.130. Miliband R. Parliamentary socialism: a study in the politics of labor. –London: Merlin Press, 1972. – p. 356.204131. Ninio A. Snow C. E. Pragmatic Development. — Cambridge: MA, 1996.
–p. 189 – 196.132. Nunan A. Introducing Discourse Analysis. — London: Praeger, 1993. – p.134.133. Nuyts J. Functionalism vs. formalism // Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual.— Amsterdam: Philadelphia, 1995. — p. 293—300.134. Nuyts J. Intentions in Language Use. — Antwerp: 1993.135. Ochs E. Planned and unplanned discourse // Syntax and Semantics. — Vol.12: Discourse and Syntax. — New York: Crown publishers Inc., 1979. — p.51—80.136.
Ochs E. Transcription as theory // Developmental Pragmatics. — New York:Crown publishers Inc., 1979. — p. 43—72.137. Ochs E., Schieffelin B. B. Acquiring Conversational Competence. —London: Praeger, 1983. – p. 7 – 8.138. O'Connell D. C., Kowal S. Basic principles of transcription // RethinkingMethods in Psychology. — London: Praeger, 1995(a).
— p. 93—105.139. O'Connell D. C., Kowal S. Transcription systems for spoken discourse //Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. — Amsterdam: Philadelphia, 1995(b). — p.646—656.140. O'Grady W. Dobrovolsky M. (eds.) Contemporary Linguistics: AnIntroduction. — 2nd ed. — New York: Routlege, 1993. – p.16 – 18.141. О'Keefe D. J. Logical Empiricism and the Study of Human Communication// Speech Monographs. — London: MS Cotton, 1975. Vol.
42. — p. 169—183.142. О'Leary S. D. Arguing the Apocalypse: a Theory of Millennial Rhetoric. —Oxford: MS Cotton, 1994. – p. 20 – 22.143. Orletti F. (ed.) Fra conversazione e discorso: l'analisi dell'internazioneverbale. — Roma, 1994. – p. 5 – 9.144. Orwell G. Nineteen eighty-four. – London: Secker and Warburg, 1949. – p.502.205145. Östman J. «You Know»: A Discourse-Functional Approach. — Amsterdam:Philadelphia, 1981. – p. 7 – 8.146.
Östman J., Virtanen T. Discourse analysis // Handbook of Pragmatics:Manual. — Amsterdam: Philadelphia, 1995. — p. 239—253.147. Otero C. P. (ed.) Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments. — Vol. 4: FromArtificial Intelligence to Theology: Chomsky's Impact on ContemporaryThought. — London: 1994.
– p. 48 – 50.148. Owen M. Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Usein Social Interaction. — New York: Amsterdam, 1983. – p. 5 – 7.149. Parisi D., Castelfranchi Ch. A goal analysis of some pragmatic aspects oflanguage // Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. — Amsterdam:Philadelphia, 1981. — p. 551—567.150.
Pecheux M., Henry P., Poitou J-P et Haroche. C.: Une exemple d’ambiguitéidéologique: Le rapport Mancholt // Technologies, Ideologies et Pratiques.Paris: 1979. №1 (2). – p. 1 – 8.151. Torfing J. Discourse Theory: Achievements, Arguments, and Challenges /ed. D. Howarth and J. Torfing // Discourse Theory in European Politics:Identity, Policy and Governance. – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
–p. 1 – 32.152. Schiffrin D. Approaches to Discourse. — Oxford; Cambridge: MA, 1994. –p. 10.153. Shiffrin Deborah. The textual and contextual basis of discourse. Semiotica.– Oxford: University press, 1994 – p. 101.154. Singer M. Psychology of Language. — New York: Academic press: 1990.155. Smedslund J. Psycho-Logic. — New York: Heidelberg, 1988.156. Smedslund J. Psychologic: A technical language for psychology // PsychologicalInquiry.
— Oslo: Oslo university press, 1991. — Vol. 2. — p. 376—382.157. Smedslund J. Psychologic: Common sense and the pseudo empirical //Rethinking Psychology. — Oslo: Oslo university press, 1995. — p. 196—206.158. Smith J. A., Harré R., Langenhove L. van Rethinking: Methods in206Psychology. — London: Praeger, 1995. – p. 11 – 12.159. Smith J. A., Harré R., Langenhove L. van Rethinking Psychology. —London: Praeger, 1995. – p.
6 – 8.160. Soames S. How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projectionProblem // Pragmatics: A Reader. — New York: Oxford, 1991. — p. 428 – 470.161. Spencer-Oatey H. Reconsidering Power and Distance // Journal ofPragmatics. — Vol. 26, No. 1. — Warwic: Elsevier B. V. 1996. — p. 1—24.162. Sperber D., Wilson D. Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories ofcomprehension // Mutual Knowledge. — London: 1982. — p. 61—131.163. Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition.
— 2nded. — Oxford: Cambridge, MA, 1995. – p. 9.164. Stalnaker R. Pragmatic presupposition // Semantics and Philosophy. — NewYork: 1974. — p. 197— 214.165. Stalnaker R. Pragmatics // Semantics of Natural Language. — Boston: 1972.— p. 380—397.166. StegerH.,DeutrichK.-H.,SchankG.RedekonstellationundSprachverhalten // Lehrgang Sprache: Einführung in die moderne Linguistik. —Tübingen: 1974. — s. 1011—1056.167. Stein D., Wright S. (eds.) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: LinguisticPerspectives.
— Cambridge: 1995.168. Steinberg D. D. An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. — London: 1993.169. Stubbs M. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of NaturalLanguage. – Oxford: 1983. — p. 25.170. Van Dijk T. Discourse, Power and Access. – London: Routledge, 1991. —p. 8.171.Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse as Social Interaction.London: Sage Publications, 1997. – Vol. 2. – p. 197 – 216.172.
Wodak R., Meyer M. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis // Dijk T. A.van. Multidisciplinary CDA: a Plea for Diversity. – London: Sage Publications,2001. – p. 95 – 121.207173. Wodak R. Politics of fear: what right-wind populist discourse mean? –London: Sage Publications, 2015.
– p. 238.174.Yule G. Pragmatics. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – p. 138.175. Официальный сайт администрации президента Франции: – URL:http://www.elysee.fr/ (дата обращения: октябрь 2015).176. Britannica online encyclopedia. URL: https://www.britannica.com/ (датаобращения: ноябрь 2016).177.
U.S.Departmentofstateofficialwebsite.https://www.state.gov/secretary/ (дата обращения: август 2015).208URL:Приложение1) Барак Обама2) Дональд Трамп2093) Джон Керри4) Франсуа Олланд5) Марин Лё Пен2106) Жан-Марк Эро211212213214.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
