Диссертация (1154822), страница 14
Текст из файла (страница 14)
Кешишев, Ш.Ш. Гурбанов [идр.] // Экспериментальная и клиническая урология.– 2016.– № 3.– С. 90–94.45.Халафян, А.А. Современные статистические методы медицинскихисследований. 3-е изд. / А.А. Халафян.– М.: Ленанд, 2014.– 320 с.46.Шайдуллин,Р.М.Выборметодаоперативноголеченияаденомыпредстательной железы / Р.М. Шайдуллин, Э.Н. Ситдыков, А.Ю.
Зубков //Казанский медицинский журнал.– 2013.– Т. 94, № 3.– С. 409–412.47.Шахмачев, В.Н. Сравнительная оценка методов гемостаза при открытойаденомэктомии / В.Н. Шахмачев // Урология.– 2010.– № 6.– С. 20–23.48.Шварев,И.Н.Трансуретральнаяэнуклеациядоброкачественнойгиперплазии предстательной железы больших размеров в растворе хлориданатрия / И.Н. Шварев, С.С. Андреев, В.В. Савич // Андрология и генитальнаяхирургия.– 2016.– Т. 17, № 1.– С. 18–20.49.Экстраперитонеоскопическаяаденомэктомияпридоброкачественнойгиперплазии предстательной железы больших размеров / З.А. Кадыров, С.И.Сулейманов, Г.М. Эремеишвили [и др.] // Андрология и генитальнаяхирургия.– 2012.– № 3.– С.
19–24.50.Эякуляторно-протективная трансуретральная резекция предстательнойжелезы / А.Г. Мартов, А.С. Андронов, С.В. Дутов, Н.А. Байков // Урология.–2014.– № 4.– С. 69–75.51.Яровой, С.Ю. Редкое осложнение трансуретральной лазерной энуклеацииаденомы предстательной железы / С.Ю. Яровой, А.Г. Мартов, В.А.
Максимов //Урология.– 2012.– № 6.– С. 92–93.52.«Knotless» Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Adenomectomy / A. Garcia-Segui, A.102Verges, J.A. Galán-Llopis [et al.] // Actas. Urol. Esp.– 2015.– Vol. 39, N 2.– P. 128–136.53.180-W XPS GreenLight laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: earlysafety, efficacy, and perioperative outcome after 201 procedures / A. Bachmann,G.H. Muir, E.J. Collins [et al.] // Eur. Urol.– 2012.– Vol. 61, N 3.– Р. 600–607.54.180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporization for benign prostate hyperplasia: 12month safety and efficacy results for glands larger than 80 mL / B.
Altay, B. Erkurt,M.C. Kiremit [et al.] // Lasers Med. Sci.– 2015.– Vol. 30, N 1.– P. 317–323.55.2010 Update: Guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia /J.C. Nickel, C.E. Méndez-Probst, T.F. Whelan [et al.] // Can. Urol. Assoc. J.– 2010.–Vol. 4, N 5.– P. 310–316.56.A National, Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open andMinimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy / J.K. Parsons, S.S.
Rangarajan, K.Palazzi, D. Chang // J. Endourol.– 2015.– Vol. 29, N 8.– Р. 919–924.57.A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resectionof the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL / R. Ou, M. You, P. Tang [et al.] //Urology.– 2010.– Vol. 76, N 4.– P. 958–961.58.A review of the recent evidence (2006-2008) for 532-nm photoselective laservaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate / R. Naspro, A.Bachmann, P. Gilling [et al.] / Eur. Urol.– 2009.– Vol. 55, N 6.– P. 1345–1357.59.A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes andcomplications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptomsresulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update / J.N. Cornu, S.
Ahyai, A.Bachmann [et al.] // Eur. Urol.– 2015.– Vol. 67, N 6.– P. 1066–1096.60.Ahmed Gadam, I. Ten-year experience with open prostatectomy in Maiduguri[Electronic resource] / I. Ahmed Gadam, A. Nuhu, S. Aliyu // ISRN Urol.– 2012.–Режим доступа : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3514824.61.Aho, T.F. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a paradigm shift in benignprostatic hyperplasia surgery / T.F. Aho // Ther. Adv. Urol.– 2013.– Vol.
5, N 5.– P.103245–253.62.Amen-Palma,J.A.Hemostatictechnique:extracapsularprostaticadenomectomy / J.A. Amen-Palma, R.B. Arteaga // J. Urol.– 2001.– Vol. 166, N 4.–Р. 1364–1367.63.American Urological Association guideline: management of benign prostatichyperplasia(BPH).2010[Electronicresource].–Режимдоступа:http://www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care.64.An appraisal of a technical modification for prevention of bladder neck stenosisin retropubic prostatectomy: An initial report / A.A. Ajape, S.A.
Kuranga, A. Babata[et al.] // Urol. Ann.– 2016.– Vol. 8, N 1.– Р. 1–5.65.An improved technique for controlling bleeding during simple retropubicprostatectomy / M. Srougi, M.F. Dall'oglio, A.C. Bomfim [et al.] // BJU Int.– 2003.–Vol. 92, N 7.– Р. 813–817.66.Bernie, J.E. Simple perineal prostatectomy: lessons learned from a modernseries / J.E. Bernie, J.D. Schmidt // J. Urol.– 2003.– Vol. 170, N 1.– P.
115–118.67.Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate in 132 consecutivepatients with large gland: three-year follow-up results / G. Zhu, C. Xie, X. Wang, X.Tang // Urology.– 2012.– Vol. 79, N 2.– Р. 397–402.68.Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection forbenign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Y. Tang, J. Li,C. Pu [et al.] // J. Endourol.– 2014.– Vol. 28, N 9.– P.
1107–1114.69.Can 80 W KTP laser vaporization effectively relieve the obstruction in benignprostatic hyperplasia?: a nonrandomized trial / D.H. Han, S.H. Choo, J.W. Chung [etal.] // World J. Mens Health.– 2012.– Vol. 30, N 3.– P. 160–165.70.Comparative analysis of photoselective vaporization of the prostate with theGreenlight laser and open prostatectomy for high volume prostate hypertrophy / M.Raimbault, S. Watt, H. Bourgoin [et al.] // Prog. Urol.– 2014.– Vol. 24, N 7.– P.470–476.71.Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of treatment of BOO due104to BPH in patients with prostate up to 100 gr by endoscopic gyrus prostate resectionversus open prostatectomy.
Preliminary data / R. Giulianelli, S. Brunori, B.C.Gentile [et al.] // Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl.– 2011.– Vol. 83, N 2.– P. 88–94.72.Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatichyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS) / J.C.Nickel, P.
Gilling, T.L. Tammela [et al.] // BJU Int.– 2011.– Vol. 108, N 3.– P. 388–394.73.Comparison of effectiveness of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection ofthe prostate and open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia / J.S.Kwon, J.W. Lee, S.W. Lee [et al.] // Korean J. Urol.– 2011.– Vol. 52, N 4.– P. 269–273.74.Comparison of transurethral plasmakinetic and transvesical prostatectomy intreatment of 100-149 mL benign prostatic hyperplasia / Z. Long, Y.C. Zhang, L.Y.He [et al.] // Asian. J. Surg.– 2014.– Vol. 37, N 2.– Р. 58–64.75.Critical review of lasers in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) / S. Gravas, A.Bachmann, O. Reich [et al.] // BJU Int.– 2011.– Vol.
107, N 7.– P. 1030–1043.76.Cynk, M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a review of the clinicaltrial evidence / M. Cynk // Ther. Adv. Urol.– 2014.– Vol. 6, N 2.– P. 62–73.77.Does size really matter? The impact of prostate volume on the efficacy andsafety of GreenLight HPS™ laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate / X.Gu, G.J. Vricella, M. Spaliviero, C. Wong // J.
Endourol.– 2012.– Vol. 26, N 5.– Р.525–530.78.EAU Guidelines on Management of Non-Neurogenic Male Lower UrinaryTract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO). 2016[Electronic resource] / S. Gravas, T. Bach, A. Bachmann [et al.].– Режим доступа :http://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/#5.79.EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lowerurinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction / M. Oelke, A.Bachmann, A. Descazeaud [et al.] // Eur. Urol.– 2013.– Vol.
64, N 1.– P. 118–140.10580.Efficacy and safety of 120-W GreenLight High-Performance System laserphoto vaporization of the prostate: 3-year results with specific considerations / Y.S.Choi, W.J. Bae, S.J. Kim [et al.] // Prostate Int.– 2013.– Vol. 1, N 4.– Р. 169–176.81.Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with "buttontype" electrode compared with transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatichyperplasia / S.Y. Zhang, H. Hu, X.P. Zhang [et al.] // Chin. Med.
J.– 2012.– Vol.125, N 21.– P. 3811–3814.82.Elkoushy, M.A. Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Larger than100 ml: Simple Open Enucleation Versus Transurethral Laser Prostatectomy / M.A.Elkoushy, M.M. Elhilali // Curr. Urol. Rep.– 2016.– Vol. 17, N 6.– Р. 44.83.Endoscopic simple prostatectomy / R. Sosnowski, T. Borkowski, P. Chłosta [etal.] // Cent. European. J. Urol.– 2014.– Vol. 67, N 4.– Р. 377–384.84.Evidence suggesting PSA cutpoint of 2.5 ng/mL for prompting prostate biopsy:review of 36,316 biopsies / S.M. Gilbert, C.B.
Cavallo, H. Kahane, F.C. Lowe //Urology.– 2005.– Vol. 65, N 3.– P. 549–553.85.Examining the 'gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of threeconsecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)outcomes / E.K. Mayer, S.G. Kroeze, S. Chopra [et al.] // BJU Int.– 2012.– Vol. 110,N 11.– P. 1595–1601.86.Extraperitoneal approach for robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy / J.U.Stolzenburg, P.
Kallidonis, H. Qazi [et al.] // Urology.– 2014.– Vol. 84, N 5.– Р.1099–1105.87.Ferretti, M. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic androbotic techniques / M. Ferretti, J. Phillips // Can. J. Urol.– 2015.– Vol. 22, Suppl.1.– Р. 60–66.88.Fitzpatrick, J.M. Millin retropubic prostatectomy / J.M. Fitzpatrick // BJU Int.–2008.– Vol.
102, N 7.– Р. 906–916.89.Five-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial comparing bipolarplasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate / C.Y. Xie, G.B.106Zhu, X.H. Wang, X.B. Liu // Yonsei. Med. J.– 2012.– Vol. 53, N 4.– P. 734–741.90.García-Segui, A. Comparative study between laparoscopic extraperitoneal andopen adenomectomy / A. García-Segui, M. Gascón-Mir // Actas. Urol. Esp.– 2012.–Vol. 36, N 2.– P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
