Диссертация (1151150), страница 51
Текст из файла (страница 51)
— 1984. — Vol. 27. — №1. — Pp. 42—56.109. CorporateRegister.com: Livecharts [Электронный ресурс]. — CorporateRegister.com Ltd.— 2017. — Режим доступа: http://www.corporateregister.com/livecharts/.110. Davenport, K. Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate SocialPerformance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It / K. Davenport // Business and Society.— 2000. — Vol. 39. — №2. — Pp. 210—219.111. Davenport, T. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology /T. Davenport.
— Harvard Business Press, 1992. — 352 p.112. Devinney, T.M. Is the Socially Responsible Corporation a Myth? The Good, the Bad, and theUgly of Corporate Social Responsibility / T. M. Devinney // Academy of ManagementPerspectives. — 2009. — May. — Pp. 44—56.215113. Demystifying Responsible Investment Performance: A Review of Key Academic and BrokerResearch on ESG Factors. — A Joint Report by The Asset Management Working Group of theUnited Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative and Mercer.
— October 2007. —76 p.114. Dow Jones Sustainability Indices Methodology. — S&P Dow Jones Indices, McGraw HillFinancial, 2016. — 39 p.115. Dowell, G.A. Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?/ G.A. Dowell et al. // Management Science.
— 2000. — Vol. 46. — №8. — Pp. 1059—1074.116. Drucker, P.F. The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility / P.F. Drucker // CaliforniaManagement Review. — 1984. — Vol. 26. — №2. — Pp. 53—63.117. Eisner, E. Taking a Second Look: Educational Connoisseurship Revisited / E. Eisner //Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century (90th Yearbook of the National Society for theStudy of Education, Part II) / Ed. by M. W.
McLaughlin, D. C. Phillips. — Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press, 1991. — 176 p.118. Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks: Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business / J. Elkington.— Capstone Publishing Ltd, 1999. — 424 p.119. Emerson, J. Social Return on Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation in the Non–profit Sector [Электронный ресурс] / J.
Emerson et al. — Harvard Business School: WorkingKnowledge. — 2001. — Режим доступа: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/1957.html.120. Emerson, J. The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns /J. Emerson // California Management Review. — 2003. — Summer. — Vol.
45. — №4. —Pp. 35—51.121. Epstein, M.J. Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers/ M.J. Epstein, M.–J. Roy // Long Range Planning. — 2001. — Vol. 34(5). — Pp. 585—604.122. Erhemjamts, O. Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy,Organizational Structure, and Performance / O. Erhemjamts et al. // Journal of Business Ethics.— 2013. — December. — Vol. 118. — №2. — Pp. 395—412.123. Fiennes, C.
How Funders Can Better Understand Their Performance: Five Easy Tools /C. Fiennes, L. Wulf. — Giving Evidence. — February 2014. — 13 p.124. Figge, F. What Is «Stakeholder Value»? Developing a Catchphrase into a Benchmarking Tool/ F. Figge, S.
Schaltegger. — Luneburg: University of Luneburg in association with UnitedNations Environment Program (UNEP), 2000. — 57 p.125. Foo, L.M. Stakeholder Engagement in Emerging Economies: Considering the StrategicBenefits of Stakeholder Management in a Cross–cultural and Geopolitical Context / L.M. Foo// Corporate Governance. — 2007. — Vol. 7. — №4. — Pp. 379—387.216126. Francis, B. The Effects of Institutional Corporate Social Responsibility on Bank Loans /B.
Francis et al. // Business & Society. — 2016. — May. — Pp. 1—33.127. Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach / R.E. Freeman. — Boston:Pitman Publishing, 1984. — 276 p.128. Friedman, M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits / M. Friedman //The New York Times Magazine. — 1970. — September 13. — Pp. 122—126.129. Frisbie, R.D. The Use of Microcomputer Programs to Improve the Reliability and Validity ofContent Analysis in Evaluation: Doctoral dissertation / R.D.
Frisbie. — Western MichiganUniversity. — Michigan, 1986. — 233 p.130. Fujiwara, D. The Seven Principle Problems of SROI / D. Fujiwara. — SIMETRICA LTD, 2015.— 19 p.131. G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines [Электронный ресурс]. — Global Strategic Alliances.——2017.Режимдоступа:ttps://www.globalreporting.org/information/g4/Pages/default.aspx.132. Garcia-Castro, R. Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accountingfor Endogeneity / R.
Garcia–Castro et al. // Journal of Business Ethics. — 2010. — Vol. 92. —Pp. 107—126.133. Gatewood, R. Assessment of Ethical Performance of Organization Members: A ConceptualFramework / R. Gatewood, A. Carroll // Academy of Management Review. — 1991. — Vol. 16.— №4. — Pp. 667—690.134. Gentile, M.C. Social Impact Management: A Definition / M.C. Gentile. — The Aspen InstituteBusiness and Society Program: Discussion Paper Series, 2002. — 11 p.135. Godfrey, P.C. The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: ARisk Management Perspective / P.C. Godfrey // Academy of Management Review. — 2005.— №30.
— Pp. 777—798.136. Grayson, D. Forget Responsibility, Think Opportunities / D. Grayson, A. Hodges // TheGuardian. — 2004. — Sunday 4 July.137. Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility[Электронныйресурс].—EuropeanUnion.—2001.—Режимдоступа:europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-9_en.pdf.138. Greco, L. Investing in Community Change: An Evaluation of a Decade of Data-DrivenGrantmaking / L.
Greco et al. // The Foundation Review. — 2015. — Vol. 7. — Issue 3. PlaceBased Philanthropy. — Pp. 51—71.139. Griffin, J.J. Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century /J.J. Griffin // Business and Society. — 2000. — Vol. 39. — №4. — Pp. 479—491.217140. Griffin, J.J. Does Industry Matter When Managing Stakeholder Relations? / J.J. Griffin,Ch.P. Koerber // Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, 2006.
— 6 p.141. Griffin, J.J. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate:Twenty–Five Years of Incomparable Research / J.J. Griffin, J.F. Mahon // Business and Society.— 1997. — March. — Vol. 36. — №1. — Pp. 5—31.142. Guenster, N. The Economic Value of Corporate Eco–Efficiency / N. Guenster et al. —Academy of Management Conference Paper, 2005. — 36 p.143. Gulick, L. Notes on the Theory of Organization. Papers on the science of administration. Ch. 1/ L. Gulick. — Columbia University. Institute of Public Administration, 1937. — 45 p.144. Halme, M. Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and SocietalOutcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility / M.
Halme, J. Laurila // Journal ofBusiness Ethics. — 2009. — Vol. 84. — №3. — Pp. 325—339.145. Heinze, D. Relations Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Soundness andInvestment Value in 22 Manufacturing Industry Groups / D. Heinze et al. // Ethics andBehavior. — 1999. — Vol. 9. — №4. — Pp. 331—347.146. Herremans, I.M. An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and EconomicPerformance / I.M. Herremans et al. // Accounting, Organizations and Society.
— 1993. —№18. — Pp. 587—604.147. House, E.R. Assumptions Underlying Evaluation Models / E.R. House // EducationalResearcher. — 1978. — №7 (3). — P. 4—12.148. How to Measure and Report Social Impact. — The Social Investment Business Group, 2014.— 29 p.149. Increasing Impact, Enhancing Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Leading CorporatePhilanthropy. — Council on Foundations, 2012. — 52 p.150. Index Inclusion Rules for the FTSE4Good Index Series: v1.7. — FTSE Russell, 2016. — 8 p.151. Integrated Reporting: Elevating Value / Ernst&Young. — 2014.
— EYGM Limited, 2014. —50 p.152. Integrated Reporting. What? The Tool for Better Reporting [Электронный ресурс]. — TheIIRC, 2016. — Режим доступа: http://integratedreporting.org/what-the-tool-for-betterreporting/.153. ISO 14001:2015. Environmental Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance forUse[Электронныйресурс].—ISO,2015.https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14001:ed-3:v1:en.—Режимдоступа:218154. Issues in Social Investing: Workplace Drivers and Shareholder Value [Электронный ресурс]/ Smith Barney Asset Management.
— 2004. — Fairleigh Dickinson University. — 2004—2015. — Режим доступа: http://view.fdu.edu/files/brkpreskahn1.pdf.155. Jin, K.G. Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate SocialResponsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study ofInformation Technology Professionals / K.G. Jin, R.G. Drozdenko // Journal of Business Ethics.— 2010.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
