Диссертация (1148476), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
Потапова, Л.П. Блохина. — М.: МГИИЯим. М. Тореза, 1986. — 115 с.65.Umeda, N. Vowel duration in American English. / N. Umeda // The Journal ofthe Acoustical Society of America. 1975. — Vol. 58. — № 2. — P. 434–445.14866.Turk, A. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words./ A. Turk, S.
Shattuck-Hufnagel // Journal of Phonetics. 2007. — Vol. 35. — P.445–472.67.Klatt, D. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse./ D. Klatt // Journal of Phonetics. 1975. — Vol. 3. — P. 129–140.68.Kohler, K.J. Prosodic Boundary Signals in German. / K.J. Kohler // Phonetica.1983. — Vol. 40. — № 2. — P. 89–134.69.Vaissière, J. Prosodic constituents in French: a data-driven approach. / J.Vaissière, A. Michaud // Prosody and syntax / Eds. Fónagy I., Kawaguchi Y.,Moriguchi T.
— Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. — P. 47–64.70.Rao, R. Final Lengthening and Pause Duration in Three Dialects of Spanish. / R.Rao // Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches toSpanish Phonology / Eds. Marta Ortega-Llebaria. — Somerville, MA, USA:Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2010.
— P. 69–82.71.Hajek, J. Vowel duration, compression and lengthening in stressed syllables inItalian. / J. Hajek, M. Stevens // Proceedings of Interspeech 2008. — Adelaide, S.Aust.: Causal Productions [for] ISCA, 2008. — P. 516–519.72.Horne, M. Prosodic Boundary Strength In Swedish: Final Lengthening AndSilent Interval Duration. / M. Horne, E. Strangert, M. Heldner // Proceedings ofthe XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. — Stockholm: KTH andStockholm University, 1995. — Vol. 1. — P. 170–173.73.Hofhuis, E.M.F.J. Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch.
/ E.M.F.J.Hofhuis, C. Gussenhoven, T. Rietveld // Proceedings of the XIIIth InternationalCongress of Phonetic Sciences. — Stockholm: Stockholm University, 1995. —Vol. 1. — P. 154–157.74.Nakai, S. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. / S.Nakai, S. Kunnari, A. Turk, K.
Suomi, R. Ylitalo, // Journal of Phonetics. 2009.— Т. 37. — № 1. — С. 29–45.14975.Plüschke, M. The domain of phrase-final lengthening in Estonian. / M. Plüschke,J. Harrington // Nordic Prosody. Proceedings of the XIth Conference / Eds. Asu,E.L., Lippus P. — Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York,Oxford, Wien, 2013. — P. 293–302.76.Hockey, B.A.
Pre-boundary lengthening: Universal or language specific? Thecase of Hungarian. / B.A. Hockey, Z. Fagyal // Proceedings of the 22nd AnnualPenn Linguistics Colloquium. — Philadelphia, USA, 1998. — P. 71–82.77.Hockey,B.A.PhonemicLengthandPre-BoundaryLengthening:Anexperimental investigation on the use of durational cues in Hungarian. / B.A.Hockey, Z.
Fagyal // Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress ofPhonetic Sciences. — San Francisco. — P. 313–316.78.Shepherd, M.A. The scope and effects of preboundary prosodic lengthening inJapanese. / M.A. Shepherd // USC Working Papers in Linguistics. 2008. — Vol.4. — P. 1–14.79.Berkovits, R. Durational Effects in Final Lengthening, Gapping, and ContrastiveStress. / R. Berkovits // Language and Speech. 1994. — Vol. 37. — № 3. — P.237–250.80.Jing, J.-Y. The influence of speaking rates and utterance units on segmentalduration of Mandarin speech. / J.-Y.
Jing // The Journal of the Acoustical Societyof America. 2004. — Vol. 116. — № 4. — P. 2628–2628.81.Кривнова, О.Ф. Препаузальное продление гласных в связном тексте. / О.Ф.Кривнова // Автоматическое распознавание слуховых образов: тезисыдокладов 16-го всесоюзного семинара (АРСО-16). — М., 1991. — С. 153–154.82.Ormel, E. Prosodic Correlates of Sentences in Signed Languages: A LiteratureReview and Suggestions for New Types of Studies.
/ E. Ormel, O. Crasborn //Sign Language Studies. 2012. — Vol. 12. — № 2. — P. 279–315.83.Gaitenby, J. The Elastic Word. / J. Gaitenby // Status Report on Speech ResearchSR-z. — New York: Haskins Laboratories, 1965. — P. 3.1–3.12.15084.Martin, J.G. On judging pauses in spontaneous speech. / J.G. Martin // Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.
1970. — Vol. 9. — № 1. — P. 75–78.85.Klatt, D.H. Generative Theory of Segmental Duration in English. / D.H. Klatt //The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1972. — Vol. 51. — № 1A. —P. 101–101.86.Byrd, D. The Elastic Phrase: Modeling the Dynamics of Boundary-AdjacentLengthening. / D. Byrd, E. Saltzman // Journal of Phonetics. 2003. — Vol. 31. —P. 149–180.87.Crystal, T.H. Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups inconnected speech. / T.H. Crystal, A.S. House // The Journal of the AcousticalSociety of America. 1990. — Vol.
88. — № 1. — P. 101–112.88.Flege, J.E. Effects of utterance position on English speech timing. / J.E. Flege,W.S. Brown Jr // Phonetica. 1982. — Vol. 39. — № 6. — P. 337–357.89.Nakai, S. Quantity constraints on the temporal implementation of phrasal prosodyin Northern Finnish. / S. Nakai, A. Turk, K. Suomi, S. Granlund, R. Ylitalo, S.Kunnari // Journal of Phonetics.
2012. — Vol. 40. — № 6. — P. 796–807.90.Cooper, W.E. Segmental and Temporal Aspects of Utterance-Final Lengthening./ W.E. Cooper, M. Danly // Phonetica. 1981. — Vol. 38. — № 1-3. — P. 106–115.91.Oller, D.K. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration inEnglish. / D.K. Oller // The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1973.— Vol.
54. — № 5. — P. 1235–1247.92.Chow, I. Quantitative analysis of preboundary lengthening in Cantonese. / I.Chow // Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference. 2008. — P. 543–546.93.Златоустова, Л.В. Фонетическая структура слова в потоке речи. / Л.В.Златоустова. — Казань: Изд-во Казанского университета, 1962. — 155 с.94.Златоустова, Л.В. Фонетические единицы русской речи. / Л.В. Златоустова.Издательство Московского Университета. — М., 1981.
— 104 с.15195.Fougeron, C. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. / C.Fougeron, P.A. Keating // The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.1997. — Vol. 101. — № 6. — P. 3728–3740.96.Отчет по теме «Исследование просодических характеристик речи» (IVэтап). — Ленинград: ЛГУ, Кафедра фонетики, 1974.97.Отчет по теме «Изучение просодических характеристик речи» (II этап). —Ленинград: ЛГУ, Кафедра фонетики, 1972.98.Volskaya, N.B.
On the temporal component of intonational phrasing. / N.B.Volskaya, S. Stepanova // Proceedings - SPECOM 2004, 9th InternationalConference Speech and Computer. — St. Petersburg, Russia: Anatolya, 2004. —P. 641–644.99.Комарова, И.А. Конечное продление в различных жанрах речи и музыки. /И.А. Комарова // Проблемы фонетики IV / под ред. Касаткиной Р.Ф. — М.:Наука, 2002.
— С. 157–169.100.Skrelin, P.A. A Fully Annotated Corpus of Russian Speech. / P.A. Skrelin,N.B. Volskaya, D. Kocharov, K. Evgrafova, O. Glotova, V. Evdokimova //Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources andEvaluation (LREC’10). — European Language Resources Association (ELRA),2010. — P. 109–112.101.Skrelin, P. CORPRES. / P. Skrelin, N.B.
Volskaya, D. Kocharov, K.Evgrafova, O. Glotova, V. Evdokimova. // Text, Speech and Dialogue / Eds.Sojka P. et al. — Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. — P. 392–399.102.Welch, B.L. The generalisation of student’s problems when severaldifferent population variances are involved. / B.L. Welch // Biometrika. 1947. —Vol. 34. — № 1-2. — P. 28–35.103.Miller Jr, R.G. Beyond ANOVA: Basics of Applied Statistics. / R.G.Miller Jr. — London; New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1997. — 336 p.152104.Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditorysentence processing.
/ S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, A.E. Turk // Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research. 1996. — Vol. 25. — № 2. — P. 193–247.105.Shapiro, S.S. An analysis of variance test for normality (completesamples). / S.S. Shapiro, M.B. Wilk // Biometrika. 1965. — Vol. 52. — № 3-4.— P. 591–611.106.Lehmann, E.L. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. /E.L.
Lehmann, H.J.M. D’Abrera. 1st ed. 1975. Revised edition 2006 edition. —New York: Springer, 2006. — 464 p.107.Kruskal, W. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. / W.Kruskal, A. Wallis // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1952. —Vol. 47. — № 260. — P. 583–621.153Список использованной литературы1. Баталин, С.В. О двух подходах к описанию длительностей звуковыхсегментов в зависимости от их позиции во фразе. / С.В. Баталин // LinguaMobilis. 2012.
— № 3 (36). — С. 43–56.2. Бондарко, Л.В. Основы общей фонетики. / Л.В. Бондарко, Л.А. Вербицкая,М.В. Гордина. — СПб: Изд-во Санкт-Петербургского университета, 1991.— 152 с.3. Брызгунова, Е.А. Практическая фонетика и интонация русского языка. /Е.А. Брызгунова. — Изд-во Московского университета, 1963. — 306 с.4. Вольская, Н.Б. Предпаузальное удлинение в русском языке. / Н.Б. Вольская,С.Б. Степанова // Экспериментально-фонетический анализ речи: проблемыи методы. Вып.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
