Диссертация (1148476), страница 21
Текст из файла (страница 21)
— С. 128–139.14320.Кривнова, О.Ф. Временные характеристики русских гласных в слитной речи(количественная модель). / О.Ф. Кривнова // Труды XIХ сессии Российскогоакустического общества РАО. — Нижний Новгород, 2007. — Т. 3. — С. 81–84.21.Галеева, М.М. Элементы интонации и их взаимодействие в синтагмахповествовательного предложения в русском языке (экспериментальнофонетическое исследование): диссертация на соискание ученой степеникандидата филологических наук / Галеева Маргарита Михайловна. —Ленинград: ЛГУ, 1968. — 137 с.22.Nooteboom, S.G.
Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences./ S.G. Nooteboom, G.J. Doodeman // The Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica. 1980. — Vol. 67. — № 1. — P. 276–287.23.Gussenhoven, C. Intonation contours, prosodic structure, and preboundarylengthening. / C. Gussenhoven, A.C.M.
Rietveld // Journal of Phonetics. 1992. —Vol. 20. — P. 283–303.24.Cho, T. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening inKorean. / T. Cho, P.A. Keating // Journal of Phonetics. 2001. — Vol. 29. — № 2.— P. 155–190.25.Keating, P. Domain-Initial Articulatory Strengthening in Four Languages. / P.Keating, T. Cho, C. Fougeron, C. Hsu // Phonetic Interpretation (Papers inLaboratory Phonology 6). — Cambridge University Press, 2003. — P. 143–161.26.Peterson, G.E. Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English.
/ G.E. Peterson, I. Lehiste// The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1960. — Vol. 32. — № 6. —P. 693–703.27.Чистович, Л.А. Речь. Артикуляция и восприятие. / Л.А. Чистович, В.А.Кожевников. — М.-Л.: Наука, 1965. — 240 с.28.Lehiste, I. Suprasegmentals. / I. Lehiste. — Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press,1977. — 194 p.14429.Trouvain, J. Tempo Variation in Speech Production: Implications for SpeechSynthesis.
/ J. Trouvain. — Institut für Phonetik, Universität des Saarlandes,2004. — 129 p.30.Klatt, D.H. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic andperceptual evidence. / D.H. Klatt // The Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica. 1976. — Vol. 59. — № 5. — P. 1208–1221.31.Klatt, D.H. Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. / D.H. Klatt // TheJournal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1987. — Vol. 82.
— № 3. — P.737–793.32.Klatt, D.H. Interaction between two factors that influence vowel duration. / D.H.Klatt // The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1973. — Vol. 54. — №4. — P. 1102–1104.33.O’Shaughnessy, D. A multispeaker analysis of durations in read Frenchparagraphs. / D. O’Shaughnessy // The Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica. 1984. — Vol. 76. — № 6. — P.
1664–1672.34.Bartkova, K. Model of Segmental Duration for Speech Synthesis in French. / K.Bartkova, C. Sorin // Speech Communication. 1987. — Vol. 6. — № 3. — P.245–260.35.Laver, J. Principles of Phonetics. / J. Laver. — Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1994. — 707 p.36.Van Santen, J.P.H. The analysis of contextual effects on segmental duration. /J.P.H. van Santen, J.P. Olive // Computer Speech & Language.
1990. — Vol. 4.— № 4. — P. 359–390.37.Van Santen, J.P.H. Quantitative Modeling of Segmental Duration. / J.P.H. vanSanten // Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology. —Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1993. — P.323–328.14538.Erickson, M.L. Simultaneous effects on vowel duration in American English: acovariance structure modeling approach. / M.L. Erickson // The Journal of theAcoustical Society of America. 2000.
— Vol. 108. — № 6. — P. 2980–2995.39.Campbell, W.N. Syllable-based segmental duration. / W.N. Campbell // InTalking Machines: Theories, Models and Designs / под ред. Bailly C.B.G.,Sawallis T.R. — Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992. — P. 211–224.40.Turk, A. Acoustic Segment Durations in Prosodic Research: A Practical Guide. /A. Turk, S. Nakai, M. Sugahara // Methods in Empirical Prosody Research / Eds.Sudhoff S. et al. — Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. — P. 1–26.41.Campbell, W.N.
Evidence for a Syllable-Based Model of Speech Timing. / W.N.Campbell // Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken LanguageProcessing. 1990. — P. 9–12.42.Ostendorf, M. The Use of Relative Duration in Syntactic Disambiguation. / M.Ostendorf, P.J. Price, J. Bear, C.W.
Wightman // Proceedings of the Workshop onSpeech and Natural Language. — Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association forComputational Linguistics, 1990. — P. 26–31.43.Price, P.J. Prosody and Parsing. / P.J. Price, M. Ostendorf, C.W. Wightman //Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language. — Stroudsburg,PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1989. — P. 5–11.44.Yoon, T.-J. Prosodic Boundary Levels Conditioned by Syllable-final VocalicDuration.
/ T.-J. Yoon // Proceedings of the 17th International Congress ofPhonetic Sciences. 2011. — P. 2220–2223.45.Jones, M. Using relative duration in large vocabulary speech recognition. / M.Jones, P.C. Woodland // Proceedings of the Third European Conference onSpeech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1993. — Berlin, 1993.— Vol.
1. — P. 311–314.46.Брызгунова, Е.А. Практическая фонетика и интонация русского языка. /Е.А. Брызгунова. — Изд-во Московского университета, 1963. — 306 с.14647.Cambier-Langeveld, T. Temporal marking of accents and boundaries. / T.Cambier-Langeveld. — University of Amsterdam, 2000. — 170 p.48.Nespor, M. Prosodic Phonology. / M.
Nespor, I. Vogel. — Berlin, Boston: DeGruyter Mouton, 2012. — 327 p.49.Pijper, J.R. de. On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relationto suprasegmental cues. / J.R. de Pijper, A.A. Sanderman // The Journal of theAcoustical Society of America. 1994. — Vol. 96. — № 4. — P. 2037–2047.50.Lehiste, I. Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences./ I. Lehiste, J.P. Olive, L.A.
Streeter // The Journal of the Acoustical Society ofAmerica. 1976. — Vol. 60. — № 5. — P. 1199–1202.51.Streeter, L.A. Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. / L.A.Streeter // The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1978. — Vol. 64. —№ 6.
— P. 1582–1592.52.O’Malley, M. Recovering parentheses from spoken algebraic expressions. / M.O’Malley, D. Kloker, B. Dara-Abrams // IEEE Transactions on Audio andElectroacoustics. 1973. — Vol. 21. — № 3. — P. 217–220.53.Bartkova, K. Rhythmic patterns and their automatic retrieval in spontaneousFrench. / K. Bartkova // Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2008 Conference.2008.
— P. 351–354.54.Mertens, P.Towards automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in spokenFrench. / P. Mertens, A.C. Simon // Proceedings of the Prosody-DiscourseInterface Conference. — Leuven, Belgium, 2013. — P. 81–87.55.Cambier-Langeveld, T. The domain of final lengthening in production andperception in Dutch. / T. Cambier-Langeveld, M.
Nespor, V.J. van Heuven //Fifth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology,EUROSPEECH 1997, Rhodes, Greece, September 22-25, 1997 / Eds. KokkinakisG., Fakotakis N., Dermatas E. — ISCA, 1997. — P. 931–934.14756.Choi, J.-Y. Finding intonational boundaries using acoustic cues related to thevoice source.
/ J.-Y. Choi, M. Hasegawa-Johnson, J. Cole // The Journal of theAcoustical Society of America. 2005. — Vol. 118. — № 4. — P. 2579–2587.57.Tabain, M. Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results. / M.Tabain // The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003. — Vol. 113.— № 1. — P. 516–531.58.Кривнова, О.Ф. Глоттализация на границах фонетических составляющих вженской речи (на русском материале). / О.Ф. Кривнова // Проблемы иметоды экспериментально-фонетических исследований.
— СПб, 2002. — С.165–189.59.Кривнова, О.Ф. Ларингализация как граничный маркер в устной речи. /О.Ф. Кривнова // Труды XVI сессии Российского акустического обществаРАО-16. — М., 2005. — С. 14–18.60.Snow, D. Phrase-final syllable lengthening and intonation in early child speech. /D. Snow // J Speech Hear Res.
1994. — Vol. 37. — № 4. — P. 831–840.61.Wells, B. Intonation development from five to thirteen. / B. Wells, S. Peppé, N.Goulandris // J Child Lang. 2004. — Vol. 31. — № 4. — P. 749–778.62.Nelson, D.G.K. The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditoryperception. / D.G.K. Nelson, P.W. Jusczyk // Infant Behavior and Development.1995.
— № 1. — P. 111–116.63.Wellmann, C. How Each Prosodic Boundary Cue Matters: Evidence fromGerman Infants. / C. Wellmann, J. Holzgrefe, H. Truckenbrot, I. Wartenburger,B. Hohle // Frontiers in Psychology. 2012. — Vol. 3. — P. 1–13.64.Потапова, Р.К. Средства фонетического членения речевого потока внемецком и русском языках. / Р.К.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
