Диссертация (1147872), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
C. Klauer, H.Singmann // Psychological Review. – 2012. – Vol. 119, I. 3. – Pp. 457–479.141.Kihlstrom, J. F. Implicit perception / J. F. Kihlstrom, T. M. Barnhardt,D. J. Tataryn // Perception without awareness : Cognitive, clinical, andsocial perspectives / R. F. Bornstein, T. S. Pittman (Eds.). – New York :Guilford, 1992. – Pp. 17-54.142.Kunst–Wilson, W. R Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot berecognized / W. R. Kunst–Wilson, R.
B. Zajonc // Science. – 1980. –Vol. 207, I. 4430. – Pp. 557–558.143.Kunzendorf, R. G. The return of “the subliminal” / R. G. Kunzendorf, R.McGlinchey–Berroth // Imagination, Cognition, and Personality. – 1998.– Vol. 17. – Pp. 31–43.136144.Lewicki, P. Nonconscious indirect inferences in encoding / P.
Lewicki,T. Hill, M. Czyzewska // Journal of Experimental Psychology : General.– 1994. – Vol. 123. – Pp. 257–263.145.Lewicki, P. Nonconscious acquisition of information / P. Lewicki, T.Hill, M. Czyzewska // American Psychologist. – 1992. – Vol. 47, № 6. –Pp. 796–801.146.Livingston, K. Categorical perception effects induced by categorylearning / K. Livingston, J.
Andrews, S. Harnad // Journal ofExperimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition. – 1998. –Vol. 24, № 3. – Pp. 732–753.147.Mangan,B.Sensation’sghost—thenon–sensory“fringe”ofconsciousness / B. Mangan // Psyche. – 2001. – Vol. 7. – P. 18.148.Mandler, G. Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot berecognized / G. Mandler, Y. Nakamura, B. J. Van Zandt // Journal ofexperimental psychoogy : Learning, Memory, and Cognition. – 1987. –Vol. 13, I.
4. – Pp. 646–648.149.Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: an approach to theralations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes / A.J. Marcel // Cognitive Psychology. – 1983. – Vol. 15. – Pp. 238–300.150.Marr, D. Vision : A computational investigation into the humanrepresentation and processing of visual information / D. Marr. – SanFrancisco : Freeman Publishers, 1982. – 205 p.151.Mattnews, G. Signal probability effects on high–workload vigilancetasks / G.
Mattnews // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. – 1996. – Vol.3, I. 3. – Pp. 339–343.152.McCleary, R. Automatic discrimination without awareness / R.McCleary, R. Lazarus // Journal of Personality. – 1949. – Vol.18. – Pp.171–179.137153.Merikle, P. M. Perception without awareness: perspectives fromcognitive psychology / P. M. Merikle, D. Smilek, J. D.
Eastwood //Cognition. – 2001. – Vol. 79. – Pp. 115–134.154.Miller, G. A. Familiarity of letter sequences and tachistoscopicidentification / G. A. Miller, J. S. Bruner, L. Postman // Journal ofGeneral Psychology. – 1954. – Vol. 50. – Pp. 129–139.155.Mitroff, S. R. The Siren Song of Implicit Change Detection / S. R.Mitroff, D. J. Simons, S.
L. Franconeri // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology : Human Perception and Performance. – 2002. – Vol. 28, №4. – Pp. 798–815.156.Moore C. M. Perception without awareness // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology : Human Perception and Performance. – 1997. – Vol.
23, №2. – Pp. 339–352.157.Murphy, K. Unconscious priming: masked primes facilitate changedetection and change identification performance / K. Murphy, J.Andalis // International Journal of Psychological Studies. – 2013. – Vol.5, № 1. – Pp. 45–54.158.Naccache L. Unconscious masked priming depends on temporalattention / L. Naccache, E. Blandin, S. Dehaene // Psycholical Science. –2002. – Vol. 13, I. 5. – Pp. 416-24.159.Nelson, T. O. Consciousness and metacognition / T.
O. Nelson //American Psychologist. – 1996. – Vol. 51, I. 2. – Pp. 102–116.160.Newell, F. N. Categorical perception of familiar objects / F. N. Newell,H. H. Bülthoff // Cognition. – 2002. – Vol. 85. – Pp. 113–143.161.Newell, A. Computer science as empirical enquiry / A. Newell, H.Simon // Communications of the ACM. – 1976. – Vol.
19. – Pp. 113–126.138162.Oliva, A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation ofthe spatial envelope / A. Oliva, A. Torralba // International Journal ofComputer Vision. – 2001. – Vol. 42. – Pp. 145–175.163.Overgaard, M. Is conscious stimulus identification dependent onknowledgeoftheperceptualmodality?Testingthe“sourcemisidentification hypothesis” (Электронный ресурс) / M. Overgaard (etal.) // Frontiers in psychology. – 2013. – Vol. 4, № 116.
– Режимдоступа:http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00116/abstract164.Overgaard, M. How Unconscious is Subliminal Perception? / M.Overgaard, B. Timmermans // Handbook of phenomenology andcognitive science /Daniel Schmicking, Shaun Gallagher (Eds.). –Orlando : Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
– Pp. 501–518.165.Overgaard, M. Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? Acomparison of report methodologies during a visual task / M. Overgaard(et al.) // Consciousness and Cognition. – 2006. – Vol. 15, I. 4. – Pp.700–708.166.Palmer, J., Verghese, P., Pavel, M. The psychophysics of visual search /J. Palmer, P. Verghese, M.
Pavel // Vision Research. – 2000. – Vol. 40. –Pp. 1227–1268.167.Pashler, H. E. Familiarity and visual change detection / H. E. Pashler //Perception and psychophysics. – 1988. – Vol. 44, I. 4. – Pp. 369–378.168.Perruchet, P. The self–organising consciousness: A framework forimplicit learning / P. Perruchet, A. Vinter // Implicit learning andconsciousness : An empirical, philosophical and computationalconsensus in the making / R. M. French, A. Cleeremans (Eds.). – Hove :Psychology Press, 2002. – Pp.
41–67.139169.Pessiglione, M. How the Brain Translates Money into Force: ANeuroimaging Study of Subliminal Motivation / Pessiglione (et al.) //Science. – 2007. – Vol. 316. – Pp. 904–906.170.Petrusuc,W.calibrationandM.Context,resolutionoffeedbackconfidenceandintheperceptualjudgments / W. M. Petrusuc, J. V. Baranski // American journal ofpsychology. – 1997. –Vol.
110. – Pp. 543–572.171.Plaut, D. C. Semantic and Associative Priming in a Distributed AttractorNetwork / D. C. Plaunt // Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference ofthe Cognitive Science Society. – Hillsdaile, New York : LawrenceErlbaum Associates, 1995. – Pp. 37-42.172.Pleskac, T. J.
Two–stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice,decision time, and confidence / T. J. Pleskac, J. R. Busemeyer //Psychological Review. – 2010. – Vol. 117, I. 3. – Pp. 864–901.173.Pollack, J. Visual discrimination of “unseen” objects: Forced choicetesting of Mayzner-Tresselt sequential blanking effects / J. Pollack //Perception and Psychophisics.
– 1972. – Vol. 9. – Pp. 121-128.174.Potter, M.C Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpse pictures /M. C. Potter, A. Staub, D. H. O'Connor // Journal of ExperimentalPsychology : Human Perception and Performance. – 2004. – Vol. 30. –Pp. 478–489.175.Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of humancognition / C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, H. Müller (Eds.) – New Jersey,London : Psychology Press, 2004. – 544 p.176.Pylyshyn, Z.
Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitiveimpenetrability of visual perception / Z. Pylyshyn // Behavioral andBrain Sciences. – 1999. – Vol. 22, I. 3. – Pp. 341–423.140177.Rabbit, P. Time to detect errors as a function of factors affecting choice–response time / P.
Rabbit // Acta Psychologica. – 1967. – № 27. – Pp.131–142.178.Ratcliff, R. A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy ina brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fakebut plausible data / R. Ratcliff // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. –2002. – Vol. 9, I.
2. – Pp. 278–291.179.Ratcliff, R. Passive parallel automatic minimalist prcessing / R. Ratcliff,G. McKoon // Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind,and implications for institutions / C. Engel, W. Singer (Eds). –Cambridge : MIT Press, 2008. – Pp. 173–189.180.Reber, A. S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge / A. S. Reber //Journal of Experimental Psychology : General. – 1989. – Vol.
118, № 3.– Pp. 219–235.181.Rensink, R. A. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceivechanges in scenes / R. A. Rensink, J. K. O'Regan, J. J. Clark //Psychological Science. – 1997. – Vol. 8, I. 5. – Pp. 368–373.182.Rosenthal, D. M. Consciousness, Content, and Metacognitive Judgments/ D. M.
Rosenthal // Consciousness and Cognition. – 2000. – Vol. 9. –Pp. 203–214.183.Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing:I. Detection, search, and attention / W. Schneider, R. M. Shiffrin //Psychological Review. – 1977. – Vol. 84. – Pp. 1–66.184.Schubert, R. Now you feel it––now you don't: ERP correlates ofsomatosensory awareness / R.
Schubert (et al.) // Psychophysiology. –2006. – Vol. 43, I. 1. – P. 31.141185.Simons, D.J. Failure to detect changes to people during a real–worldinteraction / D. J. Simons, D. T. Levin // Psychonomic Bulletin andReview. – 1998. – Vol. 5, I. 4. – Pp. 644–649.186.Sloman, S.A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning / S. A.Sloman // Psychological Bulletin. – 1996.
– Vol. 119. – Pp. 3–22.187.Snodgrass, M. Unconscious inhibition and facilitation at the objectivedetection threshold: Replicable and qualitatively different unconsciousperceptual effects / M. Snodgrass, H. Shevrin // Cognition. – 2006. –Vol. 101, I. 1, – Pp. 43–79.188.Solomon, R.L. Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognitionthresholds for words / R. L. Solomon, L. Postman // Journal ofexperimental psychology. –1952. – Vol. 13. – Pp. 195–201.189.Somekh, D. Perception without awareness in a dihoptic viewing situation/ D.
Somekh, J. Wilding // British Journal of Psychology. – 1973. – Vol.64. – Pp. 339–349.190.Synodinos, N. E. Review and appraisal of subliminal perception withinthe context of signal detection theory / N. E. Synodinos // Psychologyand marketing. – 1988. – Vol. 5, № 4. – Pp. 317–336.191.Tanner, W. P. A decision–making theory of visual detection / W. P.Tanner, J. A. Swets // Psychological Review.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
