Диссертация (1146878), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and189Teachers. Chicago: Association Press.304. Krauss, M. Exploring and Exploiting the Internet: Concepts and PracticesforTeachingESOL.Retrieved01142014,fromhttp://legacy.lclark.edu/~krauss/pccworkshopfall2000.305. Krauss, M. Integrating the Internet into the Classroom.
1998-2013.Retrieved 01 14 2014, from http://legacy.lclark.edu/~krauss/usia/home.html.306. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: Frommethod to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.307. Leaver, B.L. & J. Willis, J. (2004). Task-based Instruction in ForeignLanguage Education: practices and programs.
Washington: Georgetown UniversityPress.308. Legenhausen, L. (2003). Second language acquisition in an autonomouslearning environment. In: Little, D., J. Ridley and E. Ushioda (Eds.) LearnerAutonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom – Teacher, Learner, Curriculumand Assessment. Dublin: Authentik.309. Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: some fundamentalconsiderations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1.
1, 14–29.310. Little, D. (2002). Learner autonomy and human interdependence: sometheoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition,learning and language in: Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: FutureDirection, edited by B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb, Pp. 15-23. Harlow:Longman/Pearson Education.311.
Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the EuropeanLanguage Portfolio: involving learners and their judgements in the assessmentprocess. Sage Journals Online, 2-17312. Little, D., Ridley, J., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2002). Towards greater learnerautonomy in the foreign language classroom. Dublin: Authentik LanguageLearning Resources Ltd.313. Little, D. (1999). Developing learner autonomy in the foreign languageclassroom: a social-interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical190principles. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 77-88.314.
Littlewood, W. (2001). Students' attitudes to classroom English learning: across-cultural study. Language Teaching Research 5.1: 3-28.315. Long, H. B. (1989). Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practicein: Self-directed Learning: Emerging Theory & Practice. Norman, Oklahoma:Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education,University of Oklahoma.316. Mahmoodi, M., Kalantari, B., Ghaslani, R. (2014).
Self-RegulatedLearning (SRL), Motivation and Language Achievement of Iranian EFL Learners.Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98,1062 – 1068.317. March, T. Working the Web for Education. Theory and Practice onIntegratingtheWebforLearning.Retrieved01142014fromhttp://www.ozline.com/learning/theory.html.318. March, T. Web-Quests for Learning. Retrieved 01 14 2014 fromhttp://www.ozline.com/webquests/intro.html.319.
Marshall, L. & Rowland, F. (1993). A Guide to learning independently.Buckingham: Open University Press.320. Masouleh, N., & Jooneghani, R. (2012). Autonomous learning: A teacherless learning! Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 835 – 842.321. Mauffette-Leenders, L., Erskine, J., & Leenders, M. (2007). Learning withcases. London, Ont.: Richard Ivey School of Business, University of WesternOntario.322.
Merriam, S.B., & Caffarella, R.S. (1991). Learning in Adulthood: AComprehensive Guide. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.323. Mocker, D. W., & Spear, G. E. (1982). Lifelong learning: Formal,nonformal, informal, and self-directed. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse forAdult, Career, and Vocational Education, Ohio State University.324. Murphy, L.
(2011). Autonomy in context: A tale of two learners. In D.Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning, (pp. 17-27). Gaziantep:Zirve University.325. Mutlu A., & Eroz-Tuga B. (2013). The role of computer-assisted language191learning in promoting learner autonomy. Euroasian Journal of EducationalResearch, 51, 107-122.326. Nagy, A. (2005).
The impact of e-learning in: A. E-Content: Technologiesand perspectives for the European Market. Springer, edited by Bruck, P.A.,Buchholz, A., Karssen, Z., & Zerfass. Berlin.327. Nowlan, A. (2008). Motivation autonomy: Activities to encourageindependent study. The Internet TESL Journal, 16, (10).328. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.329. O'Reilly, T. What Is Web 2.0? // Design Patterns and Business Models forthe Next Generation of Software by Tim O'Reilly 09/30/2005. Retrieved 01 142014 from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.330. Oxford, R.
(2011). Research on language learning strategies: Purpose,Methods, Issues. Presentation. Hokkaido: Hokkaido University.331. Ozan, C., Gundogdu, K., & Bay E., (2012).A study on the universitystudents’ self-regulated learning strategies skills and self-efficacy perceptions interms of different variables. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1806 – 1811.332. Paiva, V. L.
M. O. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in secondlanguage acquisition from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. In G.Murray, X. Gao, & L. Lamb, Identity, motivation and autonomy in secondlanguage (pp. 57-75). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.333. Peng, C. (2012). Growing and Educational Environment of CollegeStudents and Their Motivational and Self-regulated Learning. Physics Procedia,33, 1456 – 1460.334. Perry, N.E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L.R.
(2006). Preparing studentteachers to support for self-regulated learning. Elementary School Journal, 106,237-254.335. Ponton, M. K., Derrick, M. G., Hall, J. M., Rhea, N. E., & Carr, P. B.(2005). The relationship between self-efficacy and autonomous learning: Thedevelopment of new instrumentation. International Journal of Self-DirectedLearning,2(1),50-61.Retrieved12122015from192http://www.sdlglobal.com/docs/IJSDL2_1-2005.pdf.336. Popescu, A.-V., & Cohen-Vida, M.-I. (2014).
Communication strategiesfor developing the learner’s autonomy. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3489– 3493.337. Rahimi, M. & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness andsuccess in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Social andBehavioral Sciences, 31, 73 – 81.338. Ravid, G. (1987). Self-directed learning in industry in: Learning in theWorkplace edited by V. J. Marsick. London, UK: Croom Helm.339. Richardson, W. (2003). Weblogs in the English classroom: More than justchat.
English Journal, 7, 57-64.340. Rodden, M., & Parrington, M. (2002). Self-access: A Framework forDiversity. The Journal, 13,156- 160.341. Rubin, J., & Wenden, A. (1987). Learner Strategies in language learning.New Jersey.342. Sadi, O., & Uyar, M. (2013). The relationship between self-efficacy, selfregulated learning strategies and achievement: a path model. Journal of BalticScience Education. – Vol.12 – Issue 1. –P. 21-33.343. Safranj, J.
(2013). Strategies of learning English as a foreign language atFaculty of Technical Sciences. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 775 – 782.344. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn andBacon.345. Smith, R. M. and Associates. (1990). Learning to Learn Across the LifeSpan. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.346. Spear, G.E., & Mocker, D.W. (1984). The organizing circumstance:Environmental determinants in self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly,35, 1-10.347. Stanley, G.
Blogging for ELT. British Council, Barcelona. Retrieved 0115 2014 from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/resources/blogging.shtml.348. Trim, J. Language teaching in the perspective of the predictablerequirements of the twenty-first century. AILA Review. – 1992. – No 9. – P. 76.193349. Trim, J. (1997). Learner autonomy and the Council of Europe. IATEFLNewsletter, 139, 14-16.350. Wang, J. (2011). Improve College Students’ Autonomous English learningEffectiveness with new learning model.
Journal of Language Teaching andResearch. – Vol. 2. – No. 3. – pp. 580-587.351. Wang, C., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2013). Students’ characteristics, selfregulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in onlinelearning. Retrieved 12 12 2015 from Distance Education. – Vol. 34. – No. 3. –302–323, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.352.
Warschauer, M. Technology and school reform: A view from both sides ofthe track. Retrieved from 01 18 2014 from Education Policy Analysis Archives,8(4): http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n4.html.353. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking thedigital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.354.
Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wirelessclassroom. New York: Teachers College Press.355. Wenden, A. (1998). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. HemelHempstead: Prentice Hall.356. Winne, P.H., & Perry N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning in:Handbook of self-regulation edited by P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Seidner,pp. 531-566.Orlando, FL: Academic Press357. Yastibas, A. & Yastibas, G. (2015).
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
