Диссертация (1144157), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
– Vol. 27, № 2. – P. 161-169.59. Golikov V.Yu. Estimation of the mean doses and the effective dose equivalentfrom RANDO phantom measurements / V.Yu. Golikov, V.V. Nikitin // Health.Phys. 1989. Vol. 59, № 1. – P. 111–115.60. Herrmann K. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry for a probe targetingprostate-specific membrane antigen for imaging and therapy / K. Herrmann, C.Bluemel, M. Weineisen, et. al. // J. Nucl. Med. 2015. Vol. 56, № 6. – P. 855-61.61. Hoeschen C. Minimising activity and dose with enhanced image quality byradiopharmaceutical administrations / C.
Hoeschen, S. Mattsson, M.C. Cantone,et. al. // Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2010. Vol. 139. – P. 250–253.62. Hoffman E.J. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effectof object size / E.J. Hoffman, S.C. Huanq, M.E. Phelps // J. Comput. Assist.Tomogr. 1979. – Vol. 3, № 3. – P.
299–308.63. Hornlund M. Estimation of dose conversion factors / Hornlund M. Master ofScience Thesis. – Malmö, Lund Universit: Department of Medical RadiationPhysics, 2013, 38 p.64. Hranitzky C. Patient dosimetry study of a paediatric CT examination / C.Hranitzky, H. Stadtmann // Radiat. Meas.
– 2011. – Vol. 46. – P. 2035-2038.65. http://earl.eanm.org/cms/website.php.Датапоследнегообращения:11.06.2018.66. http://www.cdnm.ru/ дата последнего обращения 11.06.2018.67. Huda W. KERMA ratios in pediatric CT dosimetry / W. Huda, K.M. Ogden, R.L.Lavallee, et. al. // Pediatr. Radiol.
– 2012. – Vol. 42. – P. 527–535.68. Hyun W.G. CT Radiation Dose Optimization and Estimation: an Update forRadiologists / W.G. Hyun // Korean J. Radiol. – 2012. Vol.13, №1. – P.1–11.69. Iball G.R. A national survey of computed tomography doses in hybrid PET-CTand SPECT-CT examinations in the UK / G.R. Iball, N.A. Bebbington, M.Burniston еt.al. // J.
Nucl. Med. 2017. – Vol. 38. – P. 459–470.14170. ICRP Publication 106. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals.Ann. ICRP. 2008. Vol. 38, №1–2. – 197 p.71. ICRP Publication 107. Nuclear Decay Data for Dosimetric Calculations. Ann.ICRP. 2008. Vol. 38, №3. – 96. p.72. ICRP Publication 128. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals: ACompendium of Current Information Related to Frequently Used Substances.Ann.
ICRP. 2015. Vol. 44, №2 Suppl. – 321 p.73. ICRP Publication 135. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging Ann.ICRP – 2017. – Vol. 46, №1.– 144 p.74. ICRP Publication 53. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals.Ann. ICRP. 1988. Vol. 18, №1–4. – 197 p.75. ICRP Publication 80. Doses to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals. Ann.
ICRP.1998. Vol. 28, №3. – 137 p.76. ICRU Publication 70. Image quality in chest radiography // Journal of ICRU. –Nuclear Technology Publishing, Ashford, 2003. – 129 p.77. ICRU Publication 87. Radiation Dosimetry and Image Quality Assessment inComputed Tomography. // Journal of the ICRU. – Vol 12, № 1. – 2012. – 149 p.78. ICRU Report 44. Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement.Bethesda. 1989.79. International Standard 60601-2-44. Medical Electrotechnical EquipmentParticular Requirements for the Safety of X-Ray Equipment for ComputedTomography / International Electrotechnical Commission. – Geneva, 2002.
– 6 p.80. Kaalep A. EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from thefirst 200 accredited imaging systems / A. Kaalep, T. Sera, W. Oyen et al. // Eur.J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2018. – Vol. 45, № 3. – P. 412–422.81. Kalender W.A. A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose valuesin computed tomography. / W.A. Kalender, B. Schmidt, M. Zankl et al. //European Radiology. – 1999.
Vol. 9. – P. 555–562.14282. Kalender W.A. Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, imagequality, applications. 3rd Rev. Edition / W.A. Kalender // Wiley-VCH. –Weinheim, 2011. – 220 p.83. Kalender W.A. Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT / W.A. Kalender,S. Buchenau, P. Deak et.al. // Phys. Med. – 2008. Vol.24, №2.
– P.71–79.84. Kwon H.W. Radiation Dose from Whole-Body F-18 FluorodeoxyglucosePositron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Nationwide Survey inKorea / H.W. Kwon, J.P. Kim, H.J. Lee et. al. // J. Korean. Med. Sci. 2016. Vol.31. – P. S69-74.85. Lamare F. Standardization in PET/CT Imaging Using EARL FDG-PET/CTAccreditation / F. Lamare // GEHC MI Clarity Magazine. 2013. – P. 15-17.86. Lee C.
NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric andadult patients undergoing CT scans / C. Lee, K.P. Kim, W.E. Bolch et al. // J.Radiol. Prot. – 2015. Vol. 35. – P. 891–909.87. Lee C. The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiationdosimetry / C. Lee, D. Lodwick, J. Hurtado et al. // Phys. Med.
Biol. – 2010. Vol.55, №2. – P. 339–363.88. Lee C. Whole-body voxel phantoms of paediatric patients—UF Series B / C. Lee,C. Lee, J.L.Williams // Phys. Med. Biol. – 2006. – Vol. 51. – P. 4649–4661.89. Lee Y.W. Infant Cardiac CT Angiography with 64-Slice and 256-Slice CT:Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality Using a Pediatric Phantom /Y.W. Lee, C.C.
Yang, G.S. Mok, T.H. Wu // PloS ONE. – 2012. – Vol. 7, № 11.– P. e49609.90. Lewis M.A. Estimating patient dose on current CT scanners: Results of theImPACT CT dose survey / M.A. Lewis, S. Edyvean, S.A. Sassi et al.// RadiationsMagazine. – 2000. Vol. 26. – P. 17–18.91. Liang B. Evaluation of effective dose from CT scans for overweight and obeseadult patients using the VirtualDose software / B. Liang, Y. Gao, Z. Chen, X.G.Xu. // Radiat. Prot. Dosim. – 2017. – Vol. 174, № 2. – P. 216–225.14392.
Loevinger R. MIRD Primer for absorbed dose calculations. Revised Edition / R.Loevinger, T.F. Budinger, E.E. Watson // The Society of Nuclear Medicine. –New York, 1991. – 128 p.93. Martí-Climent J.M. Effective dose estimation for oncological and neurologicalPET/CT procedures / J.M.
Martí-Climent, E. Prieto, V. Morán et. al. // EJNMMIRes. 2017. – Vol. 7. – P. 37.94. Martin C.J. Effective dose: How should it be applied to medical exposures? / C.J. Martin // Br. J. Radiol. – 2007. – Vol. 80, № 956. – P. 639–647.95. Martin C.J. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulationsystems / C.J. Martin, S.
Sookpeng // J. Radiol. Prot. – 2016. – Vol. 36, № 3. – P.R74-R95.96. Martin C.J. Unintended and accidental medical radiation exposures in radiology:guidelines on investigation and prevention / C.J. Martin, J. Vassileva, E. Vano,et. al. // J. Radiol. Prot. – 2017. – Vol. 37. – P.
883–906.97. Mattson S. Radiation Dose Management in CT, SPECT/CT and PET/CTTechniques / S. Mattson, M. Söderberg // Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2011. Vol. 147, №1–2. – P. 13–21.98. Mayo-Smith W.W. How I Do It: Managing Radiation Dose in CT / W.W. MayoSmith, A.K. Hara, M.
Mahesh et. al. // Radiology. – 2014. Vol.273, №3. – P.657–672.99. MIRD Pamphlet No. 11. “S,” absorbed dose per unit cumulated activity forselected radionuclides and organs / W.S. Snyder, M.R. Ford, G.G. Warner, S.B.Watson // The Society of Nuclear Medicine. – Reston, 1975. – 257 p.100.MIRD Pamphlet No. 21. A generalized schema for radiopharmaceuticaldosimetry – standardization of nomenclature / W.E. Bolch, E.F. Eckerman, G.Sgouros, S.R. Thomas // J.
Nucl. Med. – 2009. Vol. 50 , № 3. – P. 477–484.101.NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2001: Performance Measurements ofPositron Emission Tomographs. / National Electrical Manufacturers Association(NEMA). – Washington, 2001. – 47 p.144102.Nuclear Medicine Physics. A Handbook for Teachers and Students / D.L. Bailey,J.L. Humm, A. Todd-Pokropek, A. van Aswegen // IAEA.
– Vienna, 2014. – 736p.103.Papadakis A. E. Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size,anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and imagequality / A. E. Papadakis // Eur. Radiol. – 2014. – Vol. 24, № 10. – P.
2520–2531.104.Positron emission tomography: basic sciences / D.L. Bailey, D.W. Townsend,P.E. Valk et. al. // Springer, 2005. – 688 p.105.Radiation Protection 180 pt. 2. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Thirty-sixEuropean Countries. – European Commission, 2014. – 73 p.106.Rampadoa O. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CTtube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom / O.Rampadoa, F. Marchisiob, A. Izzoa et. al.
// Eur. J. Radiol. – 2009. – Vol. 72, №1. – P. 181-187.107.Regulations and general advice on diagnostic standard doses and reference levelswithin medical x-ray diagnostics / Swedish Radiation Protection Authority //Stockholm, 2002 – 9 p.108.Rizzo S. Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulationtechniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis / S. Rizzo //Am. J.
Roentgenol. – 2006. – Vol. 186. – P. 673-679.109.Rousset O. G. Correction for Partial Volume Effects in PET: Principle andValidation / O. G. Rousset, Y. Ma, A. C. Evans // J. Nucl. Med. – 1998. – Vol.39. – P. 904–911.110.Sahbaeea P. Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adultpatients across 13 protocol categories / P. Sahbaeea, W.P. Segars, E. Samei et al.// Med.
Phys. – 2014. Vol. 41, №7. – P. 072104-1-10.111.Sandstrom M. Comparative biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 68GaDOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE in patients with neuroendocrine tumours / M.Sandstrom, I. Velikyan, U. Garske-Román et. al. // J. Nucl. Med. 2013. Vol. 54,№ 10. – P. 1755-1759.145112.Segars W.P. Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms forimaging research and optimization / W.P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
