Диссертация (1137597), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
Возникновение и развитие научного факта / пер. с нем., англ.и польск.; общ. ред. В.Н. Поруса. – М.: Дом интеллектуальной книги, 1999.– 220 с.79. Хабермас Ю. Техника и наука как идеология. – М.: Праксис, 2007. –202 с.80. Хаймпель Г. Вина и задача университета // Отечественные записки. –2003. – № 6. – С. 201–212.81. Хасс Дж. Классика теории организации // Вестн. С.-Петерб. ун-та.Сер. 8. – 2007; Вып. 3. – С. 112–125.82. Хелмке Г., Левитски С. Неформальные институты и сравнительнаяполитика // Прогнозис.
– 2007. – № 2. – C. 188-211.17283. Ходжсон Дж. Что такое институты? // Вопросы экономики. – 2007. –№ 8. – С. 28-48.84. Шичалин Ю.А. История античного платонизма в институциональномаспекте. – М.: Греко-латинский кабинет, 2000. – 439 с.85. Шичалинрациональности:Ю.А.развитиеИнституциональныйаспектпроблемыобразовательныхнаучныхшколи//Исторические типы рациональности.
Т.2. – М.: ИФРАН, 1996. – С. 140–172.86. Фихте И.Г. О сущности ученого и ее явлениях в области свободы //Наставления к блаженной жизни. М.: Канон+, 1997. – C. 167–268.87. Шлейермахер Ф. Речи о религии к образованным людям еепрезирающим. Монологи / пер. с нем. яз. и пред. С.Л. Франка. – СПб.:Алетейа, 1994.
– 432 с.88. Шлейермахер Ф. Об отношении научного объединения к государству.О школах, университетах и академиях // Эпистемология и философия науки.– 2008. – Т.16. – №2. – С. 221–238.89. Шнайдер У. Преподавание философии в немецких университетах вXIX веке / пер. с англ. А. Смирнова // Логос. – 2004. – №3-4 (43). – С. 61–90.90. Шнедельбах Г. Университет Гумбольдта // Логос. – 2002.
– N5-6 (35).– С. 1–14.91. Фихте И.Г. Назначение человека // Несколько лекций о назначенииученого. – Мн.: ООО «Попурри», 1998 (а). – C. 61–217.92. Фихте И.Г. Основные черты современной эпохи // Несколько лекцийо назначении ученого. – Мн.: ООО «Попурри», 1998 (b). – С. 217–472.93. A History of the University in Europe.
In 4 Vol. Vol.3 Universities in theNineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (1800-1945) / ed. by W. Rüegg. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 746 p.17394. Alcances y límites de la racionalidad en el conocimiento y la sociedad / ed.T. Santiago México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa / Plaza yValdés, 2000. – 222 p.95.
Ash M. G. Academic politics in the history of science: experimentalpsychology in Germany, 1879–1941 // Central European History. – 1980. – hVol. 13. – P. 255–286.96. Bahti T. Histories of the University: Kant and Humboldt//ModernLanguages Notes. Vol. 102. – 1987. – N3. – P. 437–460.97. Barbour I. Myths, Models, and Paradigms: A Comparative Study inScience and Religion. New York: HarperCollins, 1974.
– 256 рр.98. Barnes B., Bloor D. Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology ofKnowledge // Rationality and Relativism / ed. M. Hollis and S. Lukes. Oxford:Blackwell, 1982. – P. 40–47.99. Ben-Devid J. The rise and decline of France as a scientific centre //Minerva. – 1970. – Vol.8. – № 2. – P.160–180.100.Ben-Devid J. The scientist´s role in society: A comparative study. –Englewood Cliffs., New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1971. – 207 p.101.Ben-Devid J. The profession of science and its powers // Minerva.
–1972. – Vol.10. – № 3. – P.362–383.102.Berger P. L. Reflections on the Twenty-Fifth anniversary of TheSocial Construction of Reality // Perspectives. 1992. 15/2, 1f.103.Bloor D. The Strengths of the Strong Programme // Phil. SOC. Sci. 1981. № 11. – P. 199–213.104.Bloor D. Knowledge and Social Imagery (2nd ed.).
Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1991.− 211 р.105.Boghossian P. Fear of Knowledge. Against Relativism andConstructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: Clarendon Press, 2006. – 139p.174106.Bringmann W.G. et al. Wilhelm Wundt 1832-1920: A briefbiographical sketch // Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. – 1975. –№11. – P.287–97.107.Burr V. Social Constuctionism (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge,2003.
– 229 p.108.Crouter R. Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment andRomanticism. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. – 286 p.109.Collin F. Social Reality. London, GBR: Routledge, 1997. – 252 p.110.Collins H.M., Pinch T.J. The Golem: What Everyone Should Knowabout Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. – 160 p.111.Collins R. A Micro-Macro Theory of Intellectual Creativity: TheCase of German Idealist Philosophy // Sociological Theory.
– 1987. – №5 (1). –P.47–69.112.Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: StanfordUniversity Press, 1990. – 188 p.113.Goldman A.I. Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 1999.114.Goldman A.I. Why Social Epistemology is Real Epistemology? //Social Epistemology / ed. by A. Haddock et al. – New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 2010. – P. 1–28.115.Goodman N. Notes on the Well-Made World // Starmaking: Realism,Anti-Realism, and Irrealism / ed.
P. McCormock. Cambridge; Mass.: The MITPress, 1996. – P. 227–234.116.Gouldner A. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London;New York: Basic Books, 1970. – 528 p.117.DanzigerK.OriginsandbasicprinciplesofWundt'sVölkerpsychologie // British Journal of Social Psychology. – 1983. – № 22.
– P.303‑313.175118.Danziger K. The Origens of the psychological experiment as a socialinstitution // American Psychologist. – 1985. – №40. – Р. 133-140.119.Danziger K. Constructing the subject: Historical origins ofpsychological research. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 268 p.120.DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The New Institutionalism inOrganizational Analysis [Introduction] /ed.
by P.J.DiMaggio, W.W. Powell. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1991. – P. 1–40.121.Eberle T.S. A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Knowledge. “TheSocial construction of reality” after 25 years // Schweiz.Z.Soziol./Rev.suissesociol. 1992, issue 2. – P. 498–502.122.Fuller S., Collier J.H. Philosophy, rhetoric and the end ofknowledge: a new beginning for science and technology studies. – New Jersey,London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. – 367 p.123.Graham H. D., Diamond N. The Rise of American ResearchUniversities.
– Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1997. –328 р.124.Hacking I. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1999. – 261 p.125.Hedfors E. Fleck in Context // Perspectives on Science. Vol. 15. 2007. № 1. Р. 4986.126.Hedfors E. The Reading of Ludwik Fleck: Questions of Sources andImpetus // Social Epistemology. 2006. № 2. Vol.
20. Р. 131161.127.Jacobs S. Scientific Community: Formulations and Critique ofSociological Motif // The British Journal of Sociology. 1987. № 2. Vol. 38. Р. 266276.128.Jefferson R.L. Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism// The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis / ed. by W. W.
Powell,P.J. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. – P. 142–163.176129.Knorr-Cetina K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on theConstructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. – Oxford: Pergamon Press,1981. – 200 p.130.Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences MakeKnowledge. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1999. – 340 p.131.Knorr-Cetina K. Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: KnowledgeCultures and Epistemic Cultures // The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology ofCulture /ed. by M.D. Jacobs, N.W. Hanrahan. Oxford: Blackwell PublishingLtd., 2005. – P. 65–79.132.Knorr-Cetina K.
Objectual practice // The Practice Turn inContemporary Theory /ed. by T.R. Schatzki et al. London: Routledge, 2001. –P. 175–188.133.Kruze O. The Origins of Writing in the Disciplines Traditions ofSeminar Writing and the Humboldtian Ideal of the Research University // WrittenCommunication. – 2006. – №3 (23). – P. 331–352.134.Kukla A. Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge, 2000. – 170 p.135.Kusch M. Psychologism. A case study in the sociology ofphilosophical knowledge.
– London/New York: Routledge, 1995. – 352 p.136.Kusch M. (ed.) The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. –Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. – 240.137.Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory Life. The Construction ofScientific Facts. Princeton, New Jersey, 1986 (2nd ed). – 296 p.138.Latour B. Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists andEngineers Through Society.
Cambridge Mass., USA: Harvard University Press,1987. – 274 p.139.Laudan L. The Pseudo-science of Science? // Philosophy of SocialScience. 1981. № 11. – P. 173–198.177140.Löhkivi E. The “Science Wars” and the Duhem-Quine Argument ofUnderdetermination // TRAMES. 2002. № 2. Vol. 6. – P. 141–172.141.Luckmann T. Social Construction and After // Perspectives. 1992. № 15/2, 4f.142.LynchM.TowardsaConstructivistGenealogyofSocialConstructivism // The Politics of Constructionism / еd. I. Velody, R.Williams. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1998.
Р. 13–32.143.Meyer J.W. Reflections of Institutional Theories of Organizations.In: Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism /ed. by R. Greenwood etal). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008. – P.788–809.144.Newton-Smith W.H.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
