Диссертация (1137479), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
(eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2000, pp. 121–159.109. Crysmann B. Constraint-Based Coanalysis: Portuguese Cliticisation andMorphology-Syntax Interaction in HPSG. Saarbrücken Dissertations inComputational Linguistics and Language Technology 15. Saarbrücken:Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz and Universität desSaarlandes, 2002.110.
Dalrymple M. Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press,2001.111. Desmet T., De Baecke C., Drieghe D., Brysbaert M., Vonk W. Relative clauseattachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencieswhen lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes21 (4), 2006, pp. 453–485.112. Dunn G. Enclitic pronoun movement and the ancient Greek sentence accent. InGlotta. T.
67. 1989.209113. Ellis N.C., Simpson-Vlach R. Formulaic language in native speakers:Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. CorpusLinguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1), 2009, pp. 61-78.114. Embick D., Noyer R.R. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32,2001, pp.
555–595.115. Embick D., Noyer R.R. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphologyinterface. In Ramchand G., Reiss C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of LinguisticInterfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 239–288.116. Everett D.L. Pirahã clitic doubling. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5,1987, pp. 245–276.117.
Fontana J.M. Phonology and syntax in the interpretation of the Tobler-MussafiaLaw. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second PositionClitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 41–83.118. Franks S.
Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex. Journalof Slavic Linguistics, 16, 2008, pp. 91–127.119. Gahl S. Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental andcorpus linguistic study. Aphasiology 16 (12), 2002, pp. 1173–1198.120.
Gibson E., Schütze C.T. Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunctiondo not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language 40 (2), 1999,pp. 263–279.121. Gilquin G. To err is not all. What corpus and elicitation can reveal about the useof collocations by learners. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Vol. 55,No. 3, 2007, pp. 273–291.122. Gilquin G., Gries S.Th. Corpora and experimental methods: a state-of-the-artreview. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Vol.
5, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-26.123. Granger S. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations andformulae. Phraseology. Theory, Analysis, and Applications. In Cowie A.P. (ed.).Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 145–160.210124. Gross D., Allen J.F., Traum D.R. The TRAINS91 Dialogues (TRAINS Tech.NoteNo. 92–1). Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, New York,1993.125. Hale M.
Deriving Wackernagel’s Law: prosodic and syntactic factors determiningclitic placement in the language of the Rigveda. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.),Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford,CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 165–197.126. Halle M., Marantz A. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In HaleK., Keyser S.J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of SylvainBromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1993, pp.
111–176.127. Halpern A. On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics. Dissertations inLinguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1995.128. Harris A. Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language, 76, 2000, pp. 593–616.129. Harris A. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 2002.130. Hay J. From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited.Language 78 (3), 2002, pp.
527–555.131. Heggie L., Ordóñez F. Clitic ordering phenomena: the path to generalizations. InHeggie L., Ordóñez F. (eds.), Clitic and Affix Combinations. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins, 2005.132. Hock H. Who’s on first? Toward a prosodic account of P2 clitics. In Halpern A.,Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and RelatedPhenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp.199–270.133.
Jaeggli O. A. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1982.134. Johansson S. Times change, and so do corpora. In Aijmer K., Altenberg B. (eds.),English Corpus Linguistics. London: Longman; 1991, pp. 305–314.135. Kager R. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.136. Kathol A. Linear Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.211137. Kayne R.S. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: TheMIT Press, 1975.138. Källkvist M.
Lexical infelicity in English: The case of nouns and verbs.Perspectives on Lexical Acquisition in a Second Language. In Haastrup K.,Viberg A. (eds.). Lund: Lund University Press, 1998, pp. 149–174.139. Klamer M. Spelling out clitics in Kambera. Linguistics, 35, 1997, pp. 895–927.140. Klamer M. A Grammar of Kambera. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1998a.141. Klamer M.
Kambera intransitive argument linking. Studia Linguistica, 52, 1998b,pp. 77–111.142. Klavans J.L. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization.Language, 61, 1985, pp. 95–120.143. Kennedy G. An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. Longman, 1998.144. Kidd E., Brandt S., Lieven E.V.M., Tomasello M. Object relatives made easy: Across-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’sprocessing of relative clauses.
Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (6), 2007,pp. 860–897.145. Kucera H., Francis W.N. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present-day AmericanEnglish. Providence: Brown University press, 1967.146. Lee J.F.K. Functions of need in Australian English and Hong Kong English.World Englishes, 20 (2), 2001, pp. 133–143.147. Legendre G. Clitics, Verb (Non)-Movement, and Optimality in Bulgarian.Technical Report JHU-CogSci-95-5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1996.148. Legendre G. Optimal Romanian clitics: a cross-linguistic perspective.
InMotapanye V. (ed.), Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax. Oxford: ElsevierPublishers, 2000a, pp. 227–264.149. Legendre G. Positioning Romanian verbal clitics at PF: an Optimality-Theoreticanalysis. In Gerlach B., Grijzenhout J. (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphologyand Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000b, pp. 219–254.212150. Legendre G. Morphological and prosodic alignment of Bulgarian clitics. InDekkers J., van der Leeuw F., van de Weijer J. (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax,Phonology, and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.
219–254.151. Long D.L., De Ley L. Implicit causality and discourse focus: The interaction oftext and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory andLanguage, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2000, pp. 545–570.152. Luís A., Spencer A. A paradigm function account of ‘mesoclisis’ in EuropeanPortuguese.
In Booij G., van Marle J. (eds.), A Yearbook of Morphology 2004.Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, pp. 177–228.153. Lyons C. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.154. Marantz A.P. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonologicalstructure. In Hammond M., Noonan M. (eds.), Theoretical Morphology. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press, 1988.155. McCarthy J. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2002.156.
McDonald S.A., Shillcock R.C. Rethinking the word frequency effect: Theneglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language andSpeech, 44 (3), 2001, pp. 295–323.157. McEnery T., Wilson A. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, 1996.158. McGee I. Adjective-noun collocations in elicited and corpus data: Similarities,differences, and the whys and wherefores, Corpus Linguistics and LinguisticTheory 5 (1), 2009, pp. 79–103159. McKoon G., MacFarland T. Externally and internally caused change of stateverbs.
Language 76 (4), 2000, pp. 833–858.160. Miller P. Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar. New York:Garland Publications, 1992.161. Miller P., Sag I.A. French clitic movement without clitics or movement. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 15 (3), 1997, pp. 573–639.213162. Monachesi P. A Lexical Approach to Italian Cliticization. Stanford, CA: CSLIPublications, 1999.163.
Monachesi P. Clitic placement in the Romanian verbal complex. In Gerlach B.,Grijzenhout J. (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2000, pp. 255-293.164. Monachesi P. The Verbal Complex in Romance. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2005.165. Monaghan P., Chater N., Christiansen M.H. The differential role of phonologicaland distributional cues in grammatical categorization. Cognition 96 (2), 2005, pp.143–182.166. Murfitt T., McAllister J. The effect of production variables in monolog and dialogon comprehension by novel listeners. Language and Speech, 44 (3), 2001, pp.325–350.167.
Nespor M., Vogel I. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1986.168. Nordquist D. Investigating elicited data from a usage-based perspective. CorpusLinguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1), 2009, pp. 105–130.169. Noyer R.R. Clitic sequences in Nunggubuyu and PF convergence. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 19, 2001, pp. 751–826.170. Paducheva E.V. La particule ŽE: semantique, syntaxe et prosodie. Les particulesénonciatives en Russe contemporain, Vol.
3, 1987, pp. 11–44.171. Paillard D., Markovicz D. Le partage du savoir ou l'ignorance n'est pas unargument. A propos de la particule VED'. // Le particules les énonciatives en russecontemporain. Vol. 1. Paris, 1986.172. Paillard D. Že ou la sortie impossible. // Les particules énonciatives en russecontemporain. Vol. 2. Paris, 1987.173.
Pander Maat H., Sanders T. Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empiricalstudy of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 247–273.214174. Perlmutter D. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt,Reinhart, and Winston, 1971.175. Poesio M., Sturt P., Artstein R., Filik R. Under specification and anaphora:Theoretical issues and preliminary evidence. Discourse Processes 42 (2), 2006,pp. 157–175.176. Prince A., Smolensky P. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in GenerativeGrammar, 1993.177. Progovać L.
Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position. In HalpernA., Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and RelatedPhenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 411–428.178. Quirk R. Towards a description of English Usage. Transactions of the PhilologicalSociety, 1960, pp. 40–61.179. Radanović-Kocić V. The placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: a prosodicapproach. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second PositionClitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 429–445.180.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
