2Резюме_Порошин_Рус_12.12.2018 (1136352), страница 3
Текст из файла (страница 3)
The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan // Diamond L., Gunther R. (eds.) Political Parties andDemocracy. – Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002; Chu Y. A Born-Again Dominant Party? The Transformation ofthe Kuomintang and Taiwan’s Regime Transition // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: Oneparty Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.68Magaloni B.
Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. - Cambridge UniversityPress, 2006; Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B. (2001) Party Dominance and the Logic of Electoral Design in Mexico’sTransition to Democracy // Journal of theoretical Politics, 13(3).69Zolberg A.R.
Creating Political Order: The Party-States of West Africa. – Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.70Esping-Andersen G. Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: the Saga of Social Democracy // Pempel T.J. (ed.)Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.71Mabry D.J. Mexico’s Accion Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution. – Syracuse: Syracuse UniversityPress, 1973.72Slater D. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. – Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2010.73Pontusson J.
Conditions of Labor-Party Dominance: Sweden and Britain Compared // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.74Boucek F. The Factional Politics of Dominant Parties: Evidence from Britain, Italy and Japan // Bogaards M.,Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – NewYork: Routledge, 2010.75Shalev M. The Political Economy of Labor-Party Dominance and Decline in Israel // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.76Johnson S.
Opposition Politics in Japan: Strategies under a One-Party Dominant Regime. – London and New York:Nissan Institute/Routledge, 2000.77Cornelius W., Craig A. The Mexican Political System in Transition. – Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, 1991.78Lin C.-L. Paths to Democracy: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation. – YaleUniversity, 1998.647Германии79, Г.Бинена об африканских режимах80, Дж.Майбурга и Х.Гильомао ЮАР81, Т.Иногучи о Японии82, М.Богаардса об африканских режимах83,Э.Краусса и Й.Пьерре о режимах в Швеции и Японии84, М.Кройзера оГермании85, А.Левита и С.Тарроу об Израиле и Италии86, М.Ароноффа обИзраиле87, К.Матлозы и Ш.Карьюма о ЮАР88, М.Мураматсу и Э.Краусса оЯпонии89, А.Абеди и С.Шнайдера о режимах в Канаде, Австралии, Германиии Австрии90, Б.Эймса о Мексике91, С.Тарроу об Италии92, Т.Эйзенштадта оМексике93, С.Линдберга и Дж.Джонса об африканских режимах94, С.Фридмана79Otake H. Defense Controversies and One-party Dominance: the Opposition in Japan and West Germany // PempelT.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes.
– Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.80Bienen H. Armies and Parties in Africa. – New York: Africana, 1978.81Myburgh J., Giliomee H. One-Party Dominance in South-Africa // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) DominantPolitical Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.82Inoguchi T. The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence under Recession: Public Policies and PoliticalSupport in Japan, 1977-1983 // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. –Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.83Bogaards M.
(2004) Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party System in Africa // European Journal ofPolitical Research, 43.84Krauss E.S., Pierre J. The Decline of Dominant Parties: Parliamentary Politics in Sweden and Japan in the 1970s //Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes.
– Ithaca: Cornell University Press,1990.85Kreuzer M. (2009) How Party Systems Form: Path Dependency and the Institutionalization of the Postwar GermanParty System // British Journal of Political Science, 39.86Levite A. Tarrow S. (1983) The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems: A Comparison ofIsrael and Italy // Comparative Politics, 15(3).87Aronoff M. Israel under Labor and the Likud: the Role of Dominance Considered // Pempel T.J.
(ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.88Matlosa K., Karume S. (2004) Ten Years of Democracy and the Dominant Party System in South Africa // ElectionUpdate 2004: South Africa, 5(10).89Muramatsu M., Krauss E.S. The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions in Japan // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.90Abedi A., Schneider S.G.
Federalism, Parliamentary Government, and Single-Party Dominance: An Examinationof Dominant Party Regimes in Canada, Australia, Germany, and Austria. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting ofthe American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 2006.91Ames B. (1970) Bases of Support for Mexico’s Dominant Party // American Political Science Review, 64.92Tarrow S. Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: "The Softer they Rise, the Slower they Fall!" // Pempel T.J. (ed.)Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.93Eisenstadt T. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions.
– New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004.94Lindberg S.I., Jones J. Laying a Foundation for Democracy or Undermining It? Dominant Parties in Africa’sBurgeoning Democracies // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts,Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.8о ЮАР95, Р.Кауфмана о Мексике96, П.Туа о Замбии и Малави97, Х.Гильома иЧ.Симкинса о ЮАР и Мексике98, Р.Колье о Мексике99, П.Келлнера обЯпонии100, М.Кук о Мексике101, Т.Ченга о Мексике, Тайване и Турции102,К.Кэрти о Канаде103, Х.Адама о ЮАР104, Л.Шлеммер о ЮАР105, А.Диао иМ.Диуфа о Сенегале106, Ш.Риггер о Тайване107.Вработахфункционированиядоминантнойроссийскихпартийныхпартиейавторовсистемзатрагивается95проблематикаиполитическихвработахособенностейрежимовсЕ.Мелешкиной108,Friedman S. No Easy Stroll to Dominance: Party Dominance, Opposition and Civil Society in South Africa //Giliomee H., Simkins C.
(eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam:Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.96Kaufman R.R. Dominant Party and Opposition Parties in Mexico: From Crisis to Reform to Crisis // Giliomee H.,Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood AcademicPublishers, 1999.97Toit P. Bridge or Bridgehead? Comparing the Party Systems of Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi// Giliomee H., Simkins C.
(eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam:Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.98Giliomee H., Simkins C. The Dominant Party Regimes of South Africa, Mexico, Taiwan and Malaysia: AComparative Assessment // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination andDemocracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.99Collier R.B. The Сontradictory Alliance: State-labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico, University ofCalifornia (Berkeley), 1992; Collier R.B. The Transformation of Labor-Based One-Partyism at the End of the 20thCentury: The Case of Mexico // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination andDemocracy.
– Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.100Köllner P. (2006) The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominance and Change in the Koizumi Era //Social Science Japan Journal, 9(2).101Cook M.L. The Mexican Paradox: Neo-Liberalism and Labor Entrenchment in Mexico’s Ruling Party // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.102Cheng T. (2001) One-Party Hegemony and Democratic Transition: Comparing Mexico, Taiwan and Turkey //Conference on The Rise of the DPP and PAN in Taiwan and Mexico, Duke University.103Carty R.K.
Dominance without Factions: The Liberal Party of Canada // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) DominantPolitical Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.104Adam H. Corporatism as Minority Veto under ANC Hegemony in South Africa // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.)The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.105Schlemmer L.
Democracy or Democratic Hegemony? The Future of Political Pluralism in South Africa // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.106Diaw A., Diouf M. The Senegalese Opposition and its Quest for Power // Olukoshi A.O. (ed.) The Politics ofOpposition in Contemporary Africa. – Nordic Africa Institute, 1998.107Rigger S. Grassroots Electoral Organization and Political Reform in the ROC on Taiwan and Mexico // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999; Rigger S. From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party.
– Boulder:Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001; Rigger S. Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. – New York: Routledge, 1999.108Мелешкина Е.Ю. Доминирование по-русски или мировой феномен? // Политическая наука. – 2006. – №1;Голосов Г.В., Мелешкина Е.Ю. Политические партии и выборы. – СПб.: Борей-арт, 2001.9Ю.Коргунюка109,Б.Макаренко110,Г.Голосова111,О.Харитоновой112,М.А.Завадской113, С.Шкеля114, А.Мельвиля115, Д.Стрельцова116.Кроме того, российские авторы достаточно активно участвуют вдискуссии о проблематике однопартийного доминирования через обсуждениеперспектив формирования партийной системы с доминантной партией вРоссии.
Среди работ российских авторов о трансформации партийнойсистемы и политического режима в России к однопартийному доминированиюважноотметитьисследованияЕ.Мелешкиной117,В.Гельмана118,Коргунюк Ю.Г. Становление партийной системы в современной России. – М.: Фонд ИНДЕМ, Московскийгородской педагогический университет, 2007.110Макаренко Б.И. Партии без демократии // Коргунюк Ю.Г., Мелешкина Е.Ю., Подвиденцев О., Шашкова Я.Партийная организация и партийная конкуренция в «недодемократических» режимах. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2012;Макаренко Б.И., Локшин И.М., Мелешкина Е.Ю., Миронюк М.Г., Петров Н.В.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
