Диссертация (1136345), страница 45
Текст из файла (страница 45)
489–506.102. Hilbink, L. Judges beyond politics in democracy and dictatorship: Lessons fromChile. Cambridge University Press, 2007.103. Hinich, M.J., Munger, M.C. Analytical politics. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1997.104. Hirschl, R. The political origins of judicial empowerment throughconstitutionalization: Lessons from four constitutional revolutions // Law &Social Inquiry.
2000. Том 25. № 1. С. 91–149.105. Hodgson G., What Are Institutions? // Journal of Economic Issues, 2006. Том40. №1.106. Huntington, S. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century.University of Oklahoma Press, 1991. 388 с.107. Iaryczower, M., Spiller, P.T., Tommasi, M. Judicial Independence in UnstableEnvironments, Argentina 1935-1998 // American Journal of Political Science.2002.
Том 46. № 4. С. 699–716.108. Ip, E.C. The democratic foundations of judicial review under authoritarianism:Theory and evidence from Hong Kong // Int J Constitutional Law. 2014. Том 12.№ 2. С. 330–353.109. Ip, E.C. The High Court of the People: Popular Constitutionalism in Hong Kongunder Chinese Sovereignty // Law & Policy. 2014. Том 36. № 3. С. 314–338.110. Ishiyama Smithey, S., Ishiyama, J. Judicial activism in post-communist politics// Law and Society Review. 2002. С. 719–742.111. Judicial politics and policy-making in Western Europe / ред. M.
L. Volcansek.London: Frank Cass, 1992. 163 с.112. Kantorowicz, J., Garoupa, N. An empirical analysis of constitutional reviewvoting in the Polish Constitutional tribunal, 2003–2014 // Constitutional PoliticalEconomy. 2016. Том 27. С. 66–92.113. Kapiszewski, D. Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision Making on PoliticallyCrucial Cases // Law & Society Review.
2011. Том 45. № 2. С. 471–506.114. Kastellec, J.P. Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courts of235Appeals // JLEO. 2007. Том 23. № 2. С. 421–441.115. Kelsen, H. Judicial Review of Legislation // The Journal of Politics. 1942. Том4. № 2. С. 183–200.116. Kommers, D.P. Judicial Politics in West Germany: A Study of the FederalConstitutional Court. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976.117. Landes W., Posner R.
The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-GroupPerspective // The Journal of Law and Economics. 1975. Том 18. №3. Сс. 875901.118. Lasswell, H.D. Politics: Who gets what, when, how. Cleveland, Ohio: Meridian,1958. 264 с.119. Lasswell, H.D., Kaplan, A. Power and society: A framework for politicalinquiry. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2013.120.
Latour, B. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil D’Etat. Polity,2010. 310 с.121. Lauderdale, B.E., Clark, T.S. The Supreme Court’s Many Median Justices //American Political Science Review. 2012. Том 106. № 04. С. 847–866.122. Lavapuro, J., Ojanen, T., Scheinin, M.
Rights-based constitutionalism in Finlandand the development of pluralist constitutional review // International Journal ofConstitutional Law. 2011. Том 9. № 2. С. 505–531.123. Lax, J.R., Cameron, C.M. Bargaining and opinion assignment on the USSupreme Court // Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 2007. Том 23.№ 2. С. 276–302.124. Leftwich, A. What is Politics: The Activity and its Study. Cambridge: Polity,2004. 215 с.125. Levitsky, S., Way, L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after theCold War.
Cambridge University Press, 2010.126. Lijphart, A. Comparative politics and the comparative method // Americanpolitical science review. 1971. Том 65. № 3. С. 682–693.127. Magalhães, P. The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe // ComparativePolitics. 1999. Том 32. № 1. С. 43–62.128. Magaloni, B. Enforcing the autocratic political order and the role of courts: Thecase of Mexico // Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes236/ ред. T. Ginsburg, T.
Moustafa. Cambridge University Press, 2008. С. 180–206.129. Martin, A.D., Quinn, K.M. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov ChainMonte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 // Political Analysis. 2002.Том 10. № 2. С. 134–153.130. Mattli, W., Slaughter, A.-M. Law and politics in the European Union: a reply toGarrett // International Organization. 1995. Том 49. № 1. С. 183–190.131. Maveety, N. The study of judicial behavior and the discipline of political science// The pioneers of judicial behavior / ред. N.
Maveety. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press, 2003. С. 1–51.132. Medushevskiy A.N. Russian Constitutional Development: Formal and InformalPractices // Higher School of Economics Basic Research Program WorkingPapers. Series “Political Science”. No. WP BRP 27/PS/2015, 2015.133. Medushevsky A. Russian Constitutionalism: Historical and ContemporaryDevelopment. London: Routledge, 2006.134. Moe, T.M.
The new economics of organization // American journal of politicalscience. 1984. Том 28. № 4. С. 739–777.135. Moustafa, T. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, andEconomic Development in Egypt. Cambridge University Press, 2007.136. Murphy, W. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress, 1964.137. Murphy, W.F. Charles Herman Pritchett // PS: Political Science & Politics. 1995.Том 28. № 4.
С. 748–750.138. North, D.С. Institutions and Credible Commitment // Journal of Institutional andTheoretical Economics, 1993. Том 149. № 1. Сс. 11-23.139. North, D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
159 с.140. O’Donnell G., Schmitter P. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: TentativeConclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, 1986.141. Owens, R.J., Simon, D.A. Explaining the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Docket //Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2012. Том 53. С. 1219–1285.142. Owens, R.J., Wedeking, J., Wohlfarth, P.C. How the Supreme Court Alters237Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review // Journal of Law andCourts. 2013. Том 1. № 1.
С. 35–59.143. Pepinsky, T. The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism // BritishJournal of Political Science. 2014. Том 44. № 3. С. 631–653.144. Peppers, T.C. Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise And Influence of theSupreme Court Law Clerk. Stanford University Press, 2006. 332 с.145. Peppers, T.C., Zorn, C.
Law Clerk Influence on Supreme Court DecisionMaking: An Empirical Assessment // DePaul L. Rev. 2008. Том 58. С. 51.146. Perry, H.W. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States SupremeCourt. Harvard University Press, 1991. 340 с.147. Pildes, R.H. Is the Supreme Court a “Majoritarian” Institution? // The SupremeCourt Review. 2011. Том 2010. № 1. С. 103–158.148. Pritchett, C.H. Civil Liberties and the Vinson Court.
Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1954.149. Pritchett, C.H. Dissent on the Supreme Court, 1943–44 // American PoliticalScience Review. 1945. Том 39. № 1. С. 42–54.150. Pritchett, C.H. Divisions of opinion among justices of the US Supreme Court,1939-1941 // The American Political Science Review. 1941. Том 35.
№ 5. С.890–898.151. Pritchett, C.H. Politics and Value Systems: The Supreme Court, 1945–1946 //The Journal of Politics. 1946. Том 8. № 4. С. 499–519.152. Pritchett, C.H. Public Law and Judicial Behavior // The Journal of Politics.1968. Том 30. № 2. С. 480–509.153. Pritchett, C.H. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values,1937-1947. New York: Macmillan, 1948.154.
Pritchett, C.H. The voting behavior of the Supreme Court, 1941–42 // TheJournal of Politics. 1942. Том 4. № 4. С. 491–506.155. Provine, D.M. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court. University ofChicago Press, 1980. 234 с.156. Ramseyer, J.M. The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A ComparativeApproach // The Journal of Legal Studies. 1994. Том 23.
№ 2. С. 721–747.238157. Rohde, D.W., Spaeth, H.J. Supreme Court decision making. San Francisco:W.H. Freeman, 1976.158. Ruger, T.W., Kim, P.T., Martin, A.D., Quinn, K.M. The Supreme CourtForecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to PredictingSupreme Court Decisionmaking // Columbia Law Review. 2004. Том 104. № 4.С. 1150–1210.159. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes / ред. T.Ginsburg, T. Moustafa.
Cambridge University Press, 2008.160. Rutledge, P. Clerks // University of Chicago Law Review. 2007. Том 74. № 1.С. 369–406.161. Sadurski, W. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy andConstitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective.Springer, 2002. 472 с.162. Satterthwaite, M.A. Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence andcorrespondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions //Journal of economic theory. 1975. Том 10. № 2. С.
187–217.163. Schedler, A. The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism // ElectoralAuthoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition / ред. A. Schedler.Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2006. С. 2–35.164. Schedler, A. What is democratic consolidation? // Journal of Democracy. 1998.Том 9. № 2. С. 91–107.165. Schmitz, G.
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Austria 1918–1920 //Ratio Juris. 2003. Том 16. № 2. С. 240–265.166. Schubert, G. Future of Public Law // Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1965. Том 34. С. 593.167. Schubert, G.A. Quantitative analysis of judicial behavior. Glencoe: Free Press,1959.168. Schubert, G.A. The Judicial Mind Revisited: A Psychometric Analysis ofSupreme Court Ideology.
New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.169. Schubert, G.A. The judicial mind: The attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Courtjustices, 1946-1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1965.170. Schubert, G.A. The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of PoliticalBehavior. // American Political Science Review. 1958.
Том 52. № 4. С. 1007–2391025.171. Segal G., Spaeth H. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited.Cambridge University Press, 2002.172. Segal, J.A. Glendon Schubert: The Judicial Mind // The pioneers of judicialbehavior / ред. N. Maveety. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. С.78–100.173. Segal, J.A. Separation-of-powers games in the positive theory of congress andcourts // American Political Science Review.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
