Диссертация (1136345), страница 46
Текст из файла (страница 46)
1997. Том 91. № 1. С. 28–44.174. Segal, J.A., Cover, A.D. Ideological Values and the Votes of US Supreme CourtJustices // American Political Science Review. 1989. Том 83. № 2. С. 557–565.175. Segal, J.A., Epstein, L., Cameron, C.M., Spaeth, H.J. Ideological values and thevotes of US Supreme Court justices revisited // Journal of Politics. 1995.
Том57. № 3. С. 812–23.176. Segal, J.A., Spaeth, H.J. The influence of stare decisis on the votes of UnitedStates Supreme Court justices // American Journal of Political Science. 1996.Том 40. № 4. С. 971–1003.177. Segal, J.A., Spaeth, H.J. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal ModelRevisited.
Cambridge University Press, 2002.178. Segal, J.A., Spaeth, H.J. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 1993.179. Shapiro M. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of ChicagoPress, 2013.180. Shapiro M. Judges as Liars // Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. 1994.Том 17. №1.
С.181. Shapiro, M. Public Law and Judicial Politics // Political Science: The State ofthe Discipline II / ред. A. Finifter. American Political Science Association, 1993.182. Sharlet, R. Chief Justice as judicial politician // East European ConstitutionalReview. 1993. Том 2. С. 32.183. Sharlet, R. Russian Constitutional Crisis: Law and Politics Under Yel’tsin //Post-Soviet Affairs. 1993. Том 9. № 4. С. 314–336.184. Shepsle K. Rational Choice Institutionalism // The Oxford Handbook of PoliticalInstitutions, ed.
by R.A.W.Rhodes, S.A.Binder, B.A.Rockman. Oxford, 2008.240DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0002. P. 23–38.185. Snyder, E.C. The Supreme Court as a small group // Social Forces. 1958. Том36. № 3. С. 232–238.186. Solomon Jr, P.H. Local political power and Soviet criminal justice, 1922–41 //Europe‐ Asia Studies. 1985. Том 37. № 3. С. 305–329.187. Solomon Jr, P.H. The case of the vanishing acquittal: informal norms and thepractice of Soviet criminal justice // Europe-Asia Studies. 1987.
Том 39. № 4. С.531–555.188. Solomon, P.H. Criminalization and Decriminalization in Soviet Criminal Policy,1917-1941 // Law & Society Review. 1981. Том 16. № 1. С. 9–43.189. Solomon, P.H. Soviet Criminal Justice and the Great Terror // Slavic Review.1987. Том 46. № 3/4. С. 391–413.190. Solomon, P.H. The U. S. S. R. Supreme Court: History, Role, and FutureProspects // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1990.
Том 38. № 1. С.127–142.191. Somit, A., Tanenhaus, J. American political science: a profile of a discipline.New York: Atherton Press, 1964.192. Spaeth, H.J., Segal, J.A. Majority rule or minority will: Adherence to precedenton the US Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.193. Sprague, J.D. Voting patterns of the United States Supreme Court: Cases infederalism, 1889-1959. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968. 164 с.194. Staton, J.K., Vanberg, G. The value of vagueness: delegation, defiance, andjudicial opinions // American Journal of Political Science.
2008. Том 52. № 3. С.504–519.195. Stearns, M.L. Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of SupremeCourt Decision Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002. 460 с.196. Sternberg, J. Deciding Not to Decide: The Judiciary Act of 1925 and theDiscretionary Court // Journal of Supreme Court History. 2008. Том 33. № 1. С.1–16.197. Stras, D. The Supreme Court’s Declining Plenary Docket: A Membership-BasedExplanation // Const. Comment. 2010. Том 27. С. 151.198.
Stras, D. The Supreme Court’s Gatekeepers: The Role of Law Clerks in the241Certiorari Process // Texas Law Review. 2007. Том 85. С. 06-61.199. Sweet, A.S. Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy // WestEuropean Politics. 2002. Том 25. № 1. С. 77–100.200. Sweet, A.S. The birth of judicial politics in France: The Constitutional Councilin comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
320 с.201. Sweet, A.S. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2004. 279 с.202. Tate, C.N., Haynie, S.L. Authoritarianism and the functions of courts: A timeseries analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1987 // Law and SocietyReview. 1993. Том 27. № 4. С. 707–740.203. Teitel, R. Post-Communist Constitutionalism: A Transitional Perspective //Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 1994.
Том 26. С. 167.204. The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior / ред. N. L. Maveety. University of MichiganPress, 2009. 446 с.205. Thorson, C. Why politicians want constitutional courts: the Russian case //Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2004. Том 37. № 2. С. 187–211.206. Toharia, J.J. Judicial independence in an authoritarian regime: the case ofcontemporary Spain // Law & Soc’y Rev. 1975. Том 9. № 3.
С. 475–496.207. Trochev A. Implementing Russian Constitutional Court Decisions // EastEuropean Constitutional Review. 2002. Том 11. № 1-2. С. 95-103.208. Trochev A. Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990-2006.Cambridge University Press, 2008. 305 с.209. Tsai, K.S. Adaptive Informal Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Changein China // World Politics. 2006. Том 59.
№ 1. С. 116–141.210. Tushnet, M. Marbury v. Madison Around the World // Tennessee Law Review.2003. Том 71. С. 251-274.211. Tushnet, M. Marbury v. Madison Around the World // Tennessee Law Review.2003. Том 71. Сс. 251–274.212. Uribe, A., Spriggs, J.F., Hansford, T.G. The Influence of CongressionalPreferences on Legislative Overrides of Supreme Court Decisions // Law &Soc’y Rev. 2014. Том 48. № 4.
С. 921–945.242213. Vallinder, T. The Judicialization of Politics—A World-wide Phenomenon:Introduction // International Political Science Review. 1994. Том 15. № 2. С.91–99.214. Vanberg, G. Legislative-judicial relations: A game-theoretic approach toconstitutional review // American Journal of Political Science. 2001. Том 45. №2. С. 346–361.215. Vanberg, G. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany.
CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005. 209 с.216. Wahman, M., Teorell, J., Hadenius, A. Authoritarian regime types revisited:updated data in comparative perspective // Contemporary Politics. 2013. Том 19.№ 1. Сс. 19–34.217. Ward, A. Deciding to leave: The politics of retirement from the United StatesSupreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003. 344 с.218. Ward, A., Weiden, D.L. Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at theUnited States Supreme Court. New York University Press, 2006. 337 с.219.
Warren, M.E. What is Political? // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1999. Том 11.№ 2. С. 207–231.220. Weiler, J. A Quiet Revolution: The European Court of Justice and itsInterlocutors // Comparative Political Studies. 1994. Том 26. № 4. С. 510–534.221. Westerland, C., Segal, J.A., Epstein, L., Cameron, C.M., Comparato, S. StrategicDefiance and Compliance in the U.S. Courts of Appeals // American Journal ofPolitical Science. 2010. Том 54.
№ 4. С. 891–905.222. Wieland, J. The Role of the Legal Assistants at the German FederalConstitutional Court // Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The US SupremeCourt and the German Federal Constitutional Court / ред. R. Rogowski, T.Gawron. Berghahn Books, 2002. С. 197–207.223. Wright J. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures AffectEconomic Growth and Investment // American Journal of Political Science,2008.
Том 52. № 2. Сс. 322–343..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
