диссертация (1335932), страница 82
Текст из файла (страница 82)
596 p.298) Holt R.T. Turner J.E. The Methodology of Comparative Research. / R.T. Holt,J.E. Turner. (Eds.) – New York: The Free Press. –1970. – 419 p.299) Hox J.J. A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face to facesurveys: applying multilevel modeling to meta-analysis. / J.J. Hox, E. de Leeuw. //Quality & Quantity. - 1994. - № 28 - P. 329–344.300) Iburg K. Comparative analyses of more than 50 household surveys on healthstatus / K.
Iburg, C. Murray, R. Sadana, C. Mathers, A. Lopez. [Электронныйресурс]: World Health Organization. – 2001 - [сайт]. - URL:https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67777 (дата обращения 15.05.2019).301) ICC/ESOMAR по практике проведения маркетинговых и социальныхисследований, изучения общественного мнения и анализа данных.405[Электронный ресурс] // ESOMAR [сайт]. - URL:https://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/knowledge-and-standards/codes-andguidelines/ICCESOMAR_Code_Russian_.pdf (дата обращения 17.05.2019)302) Inglehart R.
Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006. / R.Inglehart. // West European Politics. - 2008. – Vol. 31 (1-2). - P. 130-146.303) Inglehart R. Happiness and Democracy, 1972-2008. / R. Inglehart, E.D. Ponarin.// The Siberian Federal University Journal. – 2013. - Vol. 8, № 6. – P. 1097-1106.304) Inglehart R. Measuring culture and cultural change / Culture Matters in Russia –and everywhere.
/ R. Inglehart. / Ed. by L. Harrison and E. Yasin. - NY: LexingtonBooks. - 2015. – PP. 345-364.305) Inglehart R., Welzel C. What insights can multi-county surveys provide aboutpeople and societies? / R. Inglehart, C. Welzel. // Comparative Politics.– 2004. – P.14-18.306) Inkeles A., Sasaki M. Comparing nations and cultures. / A. Inkeles, M. Sasaki.
//Prentice Hall, Engleweed Cliffs, New-York, 1996. – 626 p.307) Jäckle A. The effect of interviewer experience, attitudes, personality and skills onrespondent co-operation with face-to-face surveys / A. Jäckle, P. Lynn, J. Sinibaldi,S. Tipping. // Survey Research Methods. – 2013. – Vol.7(1). – P. 1-15.308) Jäckle A., C. Roberts, P. Lynn. Assessing the Effect of Data Collection Mode onMeasurement. [Электронный ресурс] / A.
Jäckle, C. Roberts, P. Lynn. // ISERworking papers. - 2008. - №08 – P. 1-23. – URL:https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2008-08.pdf(дата обращения 17.05.2019)309) Jackman M. Education and prejudice or education and response set? / M.Jackman. // American Sociological Review. - 1973. - Vol. 38, № 3. - P. 327-339.310) Javeline D. Response effects in polite cultures. A test of acquiescence inKazakhstan / D. Javeline // Public Opinion Quarterly.
- 1999. – Vol. 63(1) - P. 1-28.311) Jennings M.K., van Deth J. Continuities in Political Action - A LongitudinalStudy of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies. / M.K. Jennings, J.406van Deth, S. Barnes, D. Fuchs, F. Heunks, R. Inglehart, M. Kaase, H.-D.Klingemann, J.A. Thomassen. - Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990. - 434 p.312) Joe K. The ethical issues of survey and market research. / K. Joe, F. Raben, A.Phillips // The sage handbook of survey methodology. / Ed. C.
Wolf, D. Joye, T.Smith and Y-C. Fu. – London Sage publications, 2016. – P. 77-86.313) Johnson T. The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19countries / T. Johnson, P. Kulesa, Y. I. Cho, S. Shavitt // Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology. - 2005. – Vol.36, №2. - P. 264-277.314) Johnson T.
Social desirability in cross-cultural research / T.P. Johnson, F.J.R. vande Vijver // Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. / Ed. by J.A. Harkness, F.L. van deViiver and P.P. Mohler. - NY: Wiley, 2003. – P. 195-204.315) Johnson T. Cross-cultural issues in survey methodology. / T. Johnson.
// PublicOpinion Quarterly. - 2015. - Vol. №79, Special Issue. - P. 211–213.316) Jowell R. International Social Attitudes: The 10th BSA Report. / R. Jowell, L.Brook, L. Dowds (eds.). - Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing, 1995. - 300 p.317) Jowell R. Measuring Attitudes Cross-nationally: Lessons from the EuropeanSocial Survey. / R. Jowell (ed).
– Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. – 2007.– 272 p.318) Jowell R. How comparative is comparative research? / R. Jowell. // AmericanBehavioral scientist. - 1998. - Vol. 42(2). – P. 168-177.319) Karp J.A. Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis ofOverreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries / J.A. Karp, D. Brockington. //Journal of Politics. - 2005. - Vol. 67, Issue 3. - P.
825–840.320) Kendall P., Lazarsfeld P. Problems of survey analysis/ Continuities in socialresearch: studies in the scope and the method of American Soldier. / R. Merton, P.Lazarsfeld P. (eds.). – Glencoe: Free Press. – 1950. – P.133-196.321) Kemmelmeier M. Cultural differences in survey responding: Issues and insightsin the study of response biases / M. Kemmelmeier // International Journal ofPsychology.
- 2016. – Vol.51 - P. 439-444.322) Kish L. Survey Sampling. / L. Kish./ New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965. - 643p.407323) Kish L. Statistical Design for Research . / L. Kish./ New York: Wiley & Sons,1987. - 267 P.324) Klingemann H.-D. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Parties, Electorates andGovernments in Eastern Europe and the OECD 1990-2003. / H.-D. Klingemann, A.Volkens, I. Budge, J.
Bara, M. McDonald. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.- 304 p.325) Klingemann H.-D. Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe. / H.-D.Klingemann, D. Fuchs, J. Zielonka (Eds.). - London: Routledge, 2006. – 412 p.326) Klingemann H.-D. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. / H.-D.Klingemann (ed). – Oxford University Press, 2012, - 450 p.327) Kohn M.L. Cross-national research as an analytic strategy: American sociologicalAssociation, 1987 Presidential Address.
/ M.L. Kohn. // American SociologicalReview. – 1987. - Vol. 52, № 6. - P. 713-731.328) Kohn M.L. Cross-national research in Sociology. / M.L. Kohn, eds. - NewburyPark: Sage Publications, 1989 – 424 p.329) Kohn R. Health care: An international study. / R.
Kohn, K.L. White (eds.). /Report of the World Health Organization // International Collaborating Study ofMedical Care Utilization. – London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.- 557 p.330) Kreuter F. Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys the effects ofmode and question sensitivity / F. Kreuter, S. Presser, R. Tourangeau // PublicOpinion Quarterly. – 2008. - Vol.
72, Issue 5. – P. 847–865.331) Krosnick J.A. An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects insurvey measurement / J.A. Krosnick, D.F. Alwin // Public Opinion Quarterly. –1987. – Vol.51, №2. – P.201-219.332) Krosnick J. A. Survey research.
/ J.A. Krosnick // Annual Review of Psychology.- 1999. - Vol.50. - P. 537-567.333) Krosnick J. A. The causes of no-opinion responses to attitude measures insurveys: They are rarely what they appear to be. / J. A. Krosnick. // Survey408Nonresponse. R.M. Groves, D. Dillman, J.N. Eltinge, R.J.A. Little (Eds.). - NewYork: Wiley-lnterscience, 2002. - P. 87-100.334) Lagos M. International Comparative Surveys: their Purpose, content, andmethodological challenges/ M. Lagos. / Handbook of Public Opinion Research/ W.Donsbach, M Traugott (Eds.). – London: Sage, 2008 – P.
580–593.335) Landsberger H. Response Set in Developing Countries / H. Landsberger, A.Saavedra // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1967. – Vol. 31 - P. 214-229.336) Leiulfsrud H. Social class in Europe II, The European Social Survey 2002-2008.
/H. Leiulfsrud, I. Bison, E. Solheim. - NTNU Samfunnsforskning/NTNU SocialResearch Ltd., 2010. – 170 c.337) Lijphart A. The comparable cases strategy in comparative research / A. Lijphart.// Comparative political studies. – 1975. – Vol.8. – P. 158-177.338) Lijphart A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.
/ A. Lijphart. //American Political Science Review. – 1971. – Vol.65, №3. - P. 682-693.339) Lerner D. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. / D.Lerner. / Second Printing. - Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1958. – 466 p.340) Lessler J. Measurement error in surveys.
/ J. Lessler. // Surveying Subjectivephenomena. - C.E. Turner, E. Maring (Eds.). - New York: Russel Sage, 1984. - P.405-440.341) Lipps O. Effects of interviewer experience on components of nonresponse in theEuropean Social Survey. / O. Lipps, A. Pollien // Field Methods. - 2011. - Vol.23(2).- P. 156–172.342) Lohr S. Sampling: Design and Analysis. / S. Lohr. – Duxbury Press. – 1999. –596 p.343) Lonner W., Berry J. Field methods in cross-cultural research. / W.
Lonner, J.Berry, (Eds.). - Newbury Park, CA: Sage. –1986 – 360 p.344) Lynn P. What‘s So Special about Cross-national Surveys? / P. Lynn, L. Japec, L.Lyberg. / Conducting Cross-national and Cross-cultural Surveys. / Ed. by J.Harkness. - Mannheim: Zuma. - 2006. - Vol. 12. - P.
7–21.409345) Lynn P. Understanding Cross-National Differences in Unit Non-Response: TheRole of Contact Data [Электронный ресурс] / P. Lynn, A. Jäckle, A.G. Blom. //Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), 2008. - №1. – 28p. - URL:https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2008-01.pdf(дата обращения 16.05.2019).346) Lynn P. The impact of incentives on response rates to personal interview surveys:role and perceptions of interviewers: research note.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
