диссертация (1335932), страница 83
Текст из файла (страница 83)
/ P. Lynn // International Journalof Public Opinion Research. – 2001. – Vol. 13(3). - P. 326-336.347) Lynn P. Separating refusal bias and non-contact bias: evidence from UK nationalsurveys / P. Lynn, P. Clarke. // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D(The Statistician). – 2002. – Vol. 51(3). – P. 319-333.348) Lynn P., Gabler S., Häder S., Laaksonen S.
Methods for achieving equivalence ofsamples in cross-national surveys / P. Lynn, S. Gabler, S. Häder, S. Laaksonen //Journal of Official Statistics, 23(1). –2007. –P. 107-124.349) Lynn P., Sala E. The potential of a multi-mode data collection design to reducenon-response bias. The case of a survey of employers / P.
Lynn, E. Sala. // Qualityand Quantity. – 43(1).– 2009. – P. 123-136.350) MacIsaac D. Strategic Bombing in World War Two: The Story of the UnitedStates Strategic Bombing Survey. / D. MacIsaac. – N.Y.: Garland, 1976. – 231 p.351) Mahon-Haft T.A. Does Visual Appeal Matter? Effects of Web Survey Aestheticson Survey Quality. / T.A. Mahon-Haft, D. Dillman. // Survey Research Methods. –2010 – Vol.4, №.1. – P. 43-59.352) Magun V., Rudnev M.
The Value Heterogeneity of the European CountriesPopulation: Typology Based on R. Inglehart Indicators. / V. Magun, M. Rudnev. //The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions. - 2012. – Vol. 3-4(113). - P.12-25.353) March R. Comparative sociology: Codification of cross-societal analysis. / R.March. - New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1967. – 152 p.354) Marin G. Research with Hispanic Populations. / G. Marin, B.V. Marin.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991. - 144 p.410355) Martin P. A Good Mix? Mixed Mode Data Collection and Cross-national Surveys/ P. Martin // Research and Methods. - 2011. - Vol. 20(1). - P. 5-26.356) McCarty J.A. Current theory and research on cross-cultural factors in consumerbehaviors.
/ J.A. McCarty. // Advances in consumer research. - 1989. - Vol.16. – P.127-129.357) McClendon M.J. Acquiescence and recency response-order effects in interviewsurveys. / M.J. McClendon // Sociological Methods and Research. - 1991. – Vol.20(1).– P. 60-103.358) Menold N., Andreenkova A. Measurement equivalence of item sets with agreedisagree rating scale format in European Social Survey / N. Menold N., A.Andreenkova.
/ Paper on II International conference on the European Social Survey,Cyprus.– 23-25 November 2012.359) Menold N., Bluemke M., Andreenkova A. Measurement Quality ofAgree/Disagree and Item-Specific Response Options. / N. Menold, M. Bluemke, А.Andreenkova. / Paper presented in Second International Conference on SurveyMethods in Multinational, Multiregional and Multicultural Contexts (3MC).–Chicago, July 26-29.– 2016.360) Menold N., Bogner К. Design of Rating Scales in Questionnaires.
/ N. Menold, К.Bogner. - GESIS Survey Guidelines. - Mannheim, Germany: GESIS, 2016. - 14 p.361) Merritt R. Comparative Government and Cross-National Research. / R. Merritt. //The American Political Science Review. – 1966. - Vol. 60, №4. - P. 1047-1056.362) Merton R. Introduction/ R.Merton./ Comparative Sociology. A codification forcross-societal analysis. / Marsh R.M. (Ed.). - New York: Harcourt, Brace and World,1967.
– 528 p.363) Methodology of the European Crime and Safety survey, EU ICS Working paperseries. [Электронный ресурс]: EU ICS Working paper series, 2005. – 16 с. – URL:http://wp.unil.ch/icvs/files/2012/11/WP_methodology.pdf (дата обращения16.05.2019).411364) Meuleman B. Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling for cross-nationalcomparative research. / B. Meuleman. - KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologieund Sozialpsychologie. – 2019. - Vol.
71. - P. 129 – 155.365) Meuleman B., Davidov E. Editorial: Comparative Survey Analysis Comparability and Equivalence of Measures. / B. Meuleman, E. Davidov, D. Seddig.// Methods, data, analyses (mda). - 2018. - Vol. 12, iss. 1. - P.
3-6.366) Meuleman B., Schlüter E. Explaining Cross-National MeasurementInequivalence: A Bayesian Multilevel CFA With Random Loadings. / B. Meuleman,E. Schlüter. // Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. - Ed.: 2nd. New York: Routledge, 2018. – P. 363-392.367) Miller D. Material culture and mass consumption. / D. Miller.
- Oxford, N.Y.: B.Blackwell, 1987. – 240 p.368) Miller K. Design and analysis of cognitive interviews for cross national testing /K. Miller // Paper on the second European survey Research Association conference,Prague. – 2007.369) Miller K. Design and analysis of cognitive interviews for cross-national testing/ K.Miller, R. Fitzgerald, R. Caspar, M. Dimov, M. Gray, D. Nunes, J.L. Padilla, P.Pruefer, N.
Schoebi, A. Schoua-Glusberg, S. Widdop, S. Willson. / Paper on 3MCConference, Berlin. – 25-28 June 2008.370) Mochmann E. Inventory of national election studies in Europe 1945-1995. / E.Mochmann, I.C. Oedegard, R. Mauer. - Bergisch Gladbach: Edwin Ferger Verlag,1998. – 408 p.371) Mohler P.
Documenting Comparative surveys for secondary analysis / P. Mohler,R. Uher. // Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. / Ed. by J.A. Harkness, F.L. van deViiver, P.P. Mohler. - Hoboken NY: Wiley, 2003. – P. 311-328.372) Mohler P. Respondents‘ ratings of expressions from response scales: A twocountry, two-language investigation on equivalence and translation. / P.P.
Mohler,T.W. Smith, J.A. Harkness. // Cross-Cultural Survey Equivalence. Ed. by J.A.Harkness. - Zuma-Nachrichten Spezial, vol.3. - Mannheim: Zuma, 1998. - P. 159184.412373) Mohler P., Johnson T. Equivalence, comparability and methodology progress. /Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. / Ed.by J.A. Harkness, B. Edwards, M.
Braun, T. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P. Mohler, B-E.Pennell and T.W. Smith T.W. - New York: Wiley, 2010. – P.17-29.374) Nieben M. Qualitative aspects in cross-national comparative research and theproblem of functional equivalence / M. Nieben. // Paper on InternationalComparative Research. Problem of Theory, Methodology and Organization inEastern and Western Europe.– Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.
–P.83-108.375) Niikura R. Assertiveness among Japanese, Malaysian, Filipino, and U.S. whitecollar workers. / R. Niikura // Journal of Social Psychology. - 1999. – Vol.139. - P.690-699.376) Norris P. The globalization of comparative public opinion research/ P. Norris/The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics. – Landman T., Robinson N. (Eds.). –Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009.
– P. 522-40.377) Oberski D. Why are there differences in measurement error across countries? / D.Oberski, W.E. Saris, J.A.P. Hagenaars. // Measuring meaningful Data in SocialResearch / Ed. by G. Loosveldt, M. Swyngedouw and B. Cambré. – Acco: Leuven,2007. – P. 281-300.378) Oleksiyenko O., Wysmulek I., Vangeli A. Identification of processing errors incross-national surveys / O.
Oleksiyenko, I. Wysmulek, A. Vangeli. // Advances inComparative Survey Methodology. / First Edition, ed. by T. Johnson, B-E. Pennell,I. Stoop, B. Dorer. – NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2019. – P. 985-1010.379) Ostroot N., Snyder W. Measuring cultural bias in a cross-national study. / N.Ostroot, W. Snyder. // Social Indicators Research. - 1985. – Vol.17. - P.
243–251.380) Osgood C.E. Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. / C.E. Osgood,W.H. May, M.S. Miron. - Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1975. - 486 p.381) Osgood C.E. The measurement of meaning. / C.E. Osgood, G.J. Suci, P.H.Tannenbaum. - Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press, 1957. – 342 p.382) Ouweneel P., Veenhoven R. Cross national differences in happiness: Culturalbias or societal quality.
/ P. Ouweneel, R. Veenhoven. // Eds. N. Bleichrodt, P.413Drenth. - Contemporary Issues in Cross Cultural Psychology. - Swets and Zeitlinger,Amsterdam/Lisse, The Netherlands, 1991. - P. 168–184.383) Oyen E. Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International SocialResearch./ E.
Oyen. // Sage Studies in International Sociology. – London: Sage,1990. – Vol. 40. – 240 p.384) Oyen E. The imperfection of comparisons in Comparative Methodology. / E.Oyen. // Theory and practice in international social research. Ed.by E. Oyen. London: Sage, 1990. – 227 p.385) Oyserman D. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation oftheoretical assumptions and meta-analysis / D.
Oyserman, H.M. Coon, M.Kemmelmeier. // Psychological Bulletin. - 2002. – Vol.128, №1. – P. 3-72.386) Pennel B-E, Lyberg L., Mohler P.P. A total survey error perspective on surveys inmultinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts/ B-E. Pennel, L. Lyberg, P.P.Mohler.
// Total Survey error in Practice. / Ed. by P. Biemer, E. de Leeuw, S.Eckman. - Hoboken, NY: Wiley, 2017. - P. 179-201.387) Phillips H.P. Problems of translation and meaning in field work. / H.P. Phillips. //Human Organisation Research: Field Relations and Techniques. / Ed. by R. N.Adams and J.
J. Preiss. - Homewood, ILL: Dorsey Press Inc., 1960. – P. 290-307.388) Pickery J. The effect of interviewer and respondent characteristics on responsebehaviour in panel surveys: A multilevel approach / J. Pickery, G. Loosveldt, A.Carton // Sociological Methods & Research.
- 2001. - Vol. 29, №4. - P. 509–523.389) Pollack S., Friedman H., Presby L. Two salient factors in the construction ofrating scales: Strength and direction of anchoring adjectives / S. Pollack S., H.Friedman, L. Presby. // International Conference of Measurement Errors in Surveys.Tucson, Arizona. – November 11-14, 1990.390) Presser S. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
