Диссертация (1173502), страница 27
Текст из файла (страница 27)
С. 155–159.89. Чурляев М.А.Социолингвистические способы имплементацииорфографической нормы // Журнал научных публикаций аспирантов идокторантов. Курск, 2016. № 5 (119). С. 135–137.90. ЧурляевМ.А.,БирюковаЕ.В.Орфографическаянормасреднеанглийских рукописей XII века: особенности словоделения //Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики.
Тамбов: Грамота,2017. №2 (68). Ч 1. С. 166–169.91. Шурыгина И.А. Соотношение нормы и узуса: Лингвистические исоциокультурные аспекты реформы немецкой орфографии: дис. … канд.филол. наук. М.: МГУ, 2002. 190 с.17192. Algeo J. The Origins and Development of the English Language. 6thed. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2010. 368 p.93.
Androutsopoulos J.K. Non-standard spellings in media texts: the caseof German fanzines // Journal of Sociolinguistics. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell,2010. №10 (4/4). P 514–533.94. Arnovick L.K. Middle English: literary language // English historicallinguistics: an international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: DeGruyter Mouton, 2012. V. 1. P. 551–576.95. Berger C.B. Is a syntactic dialectology possible? Contributions fromSwiss German // Methods in contemporary linguistics. Berlin: De GruyterMouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012. P. 93–120.96.
Boor H. de, Wisniewski R. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 1973. 160 S.97. Braune W., Reiffenstein I. Althochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen:Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2004. 412 p.98. Burrow J.A., Turville-Petre Th. A book of Middle English. Malden:Blackwell Publishing; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; Carlton: BlackwellPublishing, 2005. – 433 p.99. CurcioM.N.Wörterbuchkritik–AllgemeineeinsprachigeWörterbücher // Wörterbuchkritik.
Dictionary criticism. Lexicographica. Berlin:De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2017. S. 283–303.100. Curzan A. Interdisciplinarity and historiography: periodization in thehistory of the English language // English historical linguistics: an internationalhandbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012. V. 2.P. 1233–1256.101. DovalilV.SozialesKräftefeldeinerStandardvarietätalsmethodologischer Impuls für die Debatte über die Standardnormen // Vielfalt,Variation und Stellung der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton;Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013.
P. 65–78.172102. Eisenberg P. Deutsche Orthografie. Regelwerk und Kommentar.Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2017. 117 S.103. Embick D. The morpheme: a theoretical introduction. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2015. 247 p.104. Gelderen, E. van. A history of the English language.
Revised ed.Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company; Philadelpia: John BenjaminsPublishing Company, 2014. 338 p.105. Gneuss H. Guide to the Editing and Preparation of Texts for theDictionary of Old English. // The Editing of Old English: Papers from the 1990Manchester Conference. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer Ltd. 1994. P. 7–26.106. Godden M.
Ælfric as Grammarian // Early Medieval English Textsand Interpretations: Studies Presented to Donald G. Scragg. Tempe: ArizonaCenter for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2003. P. 13–30.107. Gouws R.H. Dictionary criticism and dictionary critics //Wörterbuchkritik. Dictionary criticism. Lexicographica. Berlin: De GruyterMouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2017. S. 33–50.108. Haspelmath M. An Empirical Test of the Agglutination Hypothesis.[Электронныйресурс].http://email.eva.mpg.de/~haspelmt/Agglutination.pdfURL:(датаобращения:10.10.2016).109. Haspelmath M.
Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold; NewYork: Oxford Univercity Press, 2002. 290 p.110. Hennings T. Einführung in das Mittelhochdeutsche. 3rd revisededition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012. – 254 p.111. Herberg D. Deutsche Rechtschreibwörterbücher – wie sie sind undwie sie sein sollten. Aus Anlaß des Erscheinens der 20.
Duden-Auflage //Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston:De Gruyter Mouton, 1993. №21. S. 334–353.112. Hermann P. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Tübingen: MaxNiemeyer Verlag, 2007. 624 S.173113. Irvine S. Introduction // The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle Volume 7 Ms.
E.Cambridge: D.S.Brewer, 2004. P. xi-clxxi.114. Jaffe A. Introduction: Non-standard orthography and non-standardspeech // Journal of Sociolinguistics 4/4, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2000. – P.497–513.115. Jaffe A. Transcription in practice: Nonstandard orthography. //Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, Spelling, Identity and Power.
Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012. P. 203–224.116. Janzen T., Shaffer B. The interpreter’s stance in intersubjectivediscourse. // Sign language research, uses and practices. Crossing views ontheoretical and applied sign language linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton;Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. P. 63–84.117. Johnson S. Orthography, publics, and legitimation crisis: The 1996reform of German // Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, Spelling, Identityand Power. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012.
– P.21–42.118. Katz L. Frost R. The Reading Process is Different for DifferentOrthographies: The Orthographic Depth Hypothesis // Orthography, Phonology.Morphology, and Meaning. Amsterdam: Ekevier Science Publishers, 1992. P.67–84.119. Kastovsky D. Linguistics level: Morphology // English historicallinguistics: an international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: DeGruyter Mouton, 2012. V. 1.
P. 129–147.120. Kellermeier-Rehbein B. Standard oder Nonstandard? UngelösteProbleme der Abgrenzung // Vielfalt, Variation und Stellung der deutschenSprache. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. P. 3–22.121. Kemmer S. Spelling and Standardization in English: HistoricalOverview.[Электронныйресурс].URL:174http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Histengl/spelling.html(датаобращения:10.09.2016)122. Kornexl L. Old English: standardisation // English historicallinguistics: an international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: DeGruyter Mouton, 2012. V.
1. P. 373–385.123. KüppersH.G.OrthographiereformundÖffentlichkeit.ZurEntwicklung und Diskussion der Rechtschreibreformbemühungen zwischen1876 und 1982. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1984. 358 S.124. Lapidge M. On the Emendation of Old English Texts // The Editingof Old English: Papers From the 1990 Manchester Conference. Woodbridge:Boydell & Brewer Ltd. 1994. P. 53–68.125. Lasselsberger A.M. Die Kodifizierung der Orthographie imRechtschreibwörterbuch: eine Untersuchung zur Rechtschreibung im „Duden"und im „österreichischen Wörterbuch". Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2000. 318 S.126.
Lobenstein-ReichmannA.WörterbuchkritikundWörterbuchrezension als Teil der Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. //Wörterbuchkritik. Dictionary criticism. Lexicographica. Berlin: De GruyterMouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2017. S. 51–80.127. Mattielo E. Extra-grammatical morphology in English: abbreviations,blends, reduplicatives and related phenomena. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton;Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013.
340 p.128. Mengden F. von. Periods: Old English // English historicallinguistics: an international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: DeGruyter Mouton, 2012. V. 1. P. 19–32.129. Mollica F. Wörterbuchkritik und Wörterbuchbenutzungsforschung //Wörterbuchkritik. Dictionary criticism. Lexicographica. Berlin: De GruyterMouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. S. 133–173.130.
Murdoch В. Introduction // The Camden House History of GermanLiterature. Volume 2. German Literature of the Early Middle Ages. Woodbridge:Camden House, 2004. P. 1–34.175131. Nunberg G. The linguistics of punctuation. Stanford: CSLI, 1990.141 p.132. Pettita G., Di Renzo A., Chiari I., Rossini P. Sign languagerepresentation: new approaches to study of Italian Sign Language // Signlanguage research, uses and practices.
Crossing views on theoretical and appliedsign language linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De GruyterMouton, 2013. P. 137–158.133. Primus B. Satzbegriffe und Interpunktion // Zur Neuregelung derdeutschen Orthographie: Begründung und Kritik. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton;Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. P. 463–488.134. Pirkola A. Morphological Typology of Languages for IR.[Электронныйресурс]–http://www.sis.uta.fi/infim/julkaisut/fire/morphological_typology.pdfURL:(датаобращения: 10.10.2016).135.
Safar A., Crasborn O. A corpus based approach to manualsimultancity // Sign language research, uses and practices. Crossing views ontheoretical and applied sign language linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton;Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. P. 179–204.136. Sebba M. Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity andpower // Orthography as Social Action: Scripts, Spelling, Identity and Power.Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2012. P 1–20.137.
Sebba M. Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research //Writing systems research. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2009. №1. P. 35–49.138. Sebba M. Spelling and Society: The Culture and Politics ofOrthography around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.190 p.139. Schaefer U. Middle English: standardisation // English historicallinguistics: an international handbook.
Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: DeGruyter Mouton, 2012. V. 1. P. 519–533.176140. Schneider K. Paläographie und Handschriftenkunde für Germanisten.Eine Einführung. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton,2014. 246 S.141. Schubert M. Schreiborte des deutschen Mittelalters. Skriptorien –Werke – Mäzene. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton,2013. 777 S.142. Sgall P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
