Диссертация (1173170), страница 39
Текст из файла (страница 39)
наук.– Иваново, 1999. – 201 с.167. Bednarek, M. Playing with environmental stories in the news – good or badpractice? // Discourse & Communication. – 2010. – Issue 4/1. – P. 5-31.168. Berman, T. The Rape of Mother Nature? Women in the Language ofEnvironmental Discourse // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology andEnvironment / Edited by A. Fill, P.
Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum,2001. – P. 258-270.194169. Chawla, S. Linguistic and Philosophical Roots of Our Environmental Crisis //The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill,P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 115-124.170. Crystal, D. The story of English in 100 words. – London, UK : Profile Books,2012. – 260 p.171.
Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – a Practical Guide, 2008. – 288 p.172. Derni, A. The Ecolinguistic Paradigm: An Integrationist Trend in LanguageStudy // The International Journal of Language Society and Culture. – 2008. – Issue 24.– P. 21-30.173. Divjak, D. Extracting prototypes from exemplars. What can corpus data tellus about concept representation? // Cognitive Linguistics. – 2013. – Issue 24 (2). – P.221-274.174. Divjak, D. Extracting prototypes from corpus data: a distributional account ofrepresenting near-synonymous verbs.
// Proceedings of Verb. InterdisciplinaryWorkshop on Verbs: The Identification and Representation of Verb Features. – Pisa(Italy), 4-5 November 2010. – 5 p.175. Divjak, D. Clusters in the mind? Converging evidence from near synonymyin Russian. / D. Divjak, St. Gries // The Mental Lexicon. – 2008. – Issue 3 (2). – P. 188–213.176. Divjak, D.Frequency and entrenchment // Handbook of CognitiveLinguistics. – Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015. – P. 53 – 75.177.
Divjak, D. Four challenges for usage-based linguistics // Change ofParadigms: New Paradoxes. Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics. – Berlin,Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2015. – P. 297-309.178. Fill, A. Ecolinguistics: State of the Art 1998 // The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London,New York: Continuum, 2001. – P.
43-57.179. Fill, A. Introduction // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology andEnvironment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum,2001. – P. 1 – 13.195180. Fillmore, Ch. J. Corpus linguistics or Computer-aided armchair linguistics //Directions in Corpus Linguistics. – Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992.
– P. 35-60.181. Finke, P. Identity and Manifoldness: New Perspectives in Science, Languageand Politics // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Editedby A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 84-91.182. Goatly, A. Green Grammar and Grammatical Metaphor, or Language andMyth of Power, or Metaphors We Die By // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language,Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York:Continuum, 2001. – P. 203-226.183. Goatly, A. A Response to Schleppegrell: What Makes a Grammar Green? //The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill,P.
Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 229-232.184. Gries, St. Corpora in cognitive linguistics / St. Gries, A. Stefanowitsch. –Berlin : Mouton, 2006. – 352 p.185. Halliday, M. A. K. New Ways of Meaning: The Challenge to AppliedLinguistics // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Editedby A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 175-203.186. Halliday, M. A. K. Current Ideas in Systemic Practice and Theory. – London :Pinter, 1991.187. Haugen, E. The Ecology of Language // The Ecology of Language: essays byEinar Haugen / Selected and Introduced by Anwar S.
Dil. – Stanford, California :Stanford University Press, 1972. – 396 p.188. Haugen, E. The ecology of language // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language,Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York:Continuum, 2001. – P. 57-67.189. Holder, R. W. A Dictionary of Euphemisms. How not to Say What You Mean.– New York : Oxford University Press Inc., 2003. – 501 p.190. Hughes, G. Political correctness. A history of semantics and culture.
–Oxford, UK : Wiley Blackwell, 2010. – 320 p.191. Hewlett, M. Constructing the Environmental Spectacle: Green Advertisementsand the Greening of the CorporateImage, 1910-1990 // The Ecolinguistics Reader:196Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London,New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 245-258.192. Jačková, M.
Euphemisms in today’s English : bachelor thesis. – Tomas BataUniversity in Zlin, 2010. – 51 p.193. Janssen М. Orthographic Neologisms Selection Criteria and Semi-AutomaticDetection[Электронныйресурс]–Режимдоступа:http://maarten.janssenweb.net/Papers/neologisms.pdf.194. Jung, M. Ecological Criticism of Language // The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P.
Mühlhäusler. – London,New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 270-286.195. Kahn, M. The Passive Voice of Science: Language Abuse in the WildlifeProfession // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Editedby A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P.
241-245.196. Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories RevealAbout the Mind. – Chicago : Univ. of Chicago, 1987. – 614 p.197. Lakoff, G. Metaphors We Live By / G. Lakoff, M. Johnson. – Chicago :University of Chicago Press, 1980.
– 191 p.198. Langacker, R. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis ofGrammar. – Berlin – N. Y. : Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. – 395 p.199. Langacker, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites.– Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1987. – 516 p.200. Littlemore, J. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought andCommunication. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015. – 214 p.201.
Lutz, W. Doublespeak: From Revenue Enhancement to Terminal Living: HowGovernment, Business, Advertisers, and Others Use Language to Deceive You. – NewYork, USA : Harper & Row, 1989. – 290 p.202. Mackey, W. F. The Ecology of Language Shift // The Ecolinguistics Reader:Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London,New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 67-75.203.McEnery, T. Corpus Linguistics / T. McEnery, A. Wilson.
– Edinburgh :Edinburgh University Press, 2001. – 235 p.197204. McEnery T. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Analysis, Interpretation. LancasterUniversity[Электронныйресурс]–Режимдоступа:http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/study/free-courses/corpus-linguistics-method-analysisinterpretation/205. Muhlhausler, P. Babel Revisited // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language,Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York:Continuum, 2001. – P. 159-165.206. Muhlhausler, P. Talking about Environmental Issues // The EcolinguisticsReader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. –London, New York: Continuum, 2001.
– P. 31-43.207. O.Donovan R. A Systematic Approach to the Selection of Neologisms forInclusion in a Large Monolingual Dictionary – Barcelona, 2008. – Режим доступа:http://www.euralex.org/elx_proceedings/Euralex2008/102.208. Penman, R. Environmental Matters and Communication Challenges // TheEcolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill,P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 143-154.209. Schleppegrell, M. J. What Makes a Grammar Green? A Reply to Goatly //The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A.
Fill,P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 226-229.210. Schultz, B. Language and the Natural Environment // The EcolinguisticsReader: Language, Ecology and Environment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. –London, New York: Continuum, 2001. – P. 109-115.211. Stenetorp P. Automated Extraction of Swedish Neologisms Using aTemporallyAnnotatedCorpus–Stockholm,2010.–Режимдоступа:http://pontus.stenetorp.se/stenetorp2010automated.pdf.212.
Trampe, W. Language and Ecological Crisis: Extracts from a Dictionary ofIndustrial Agriculture // The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology andEnvironment / Edited by A. Fill, P. Mühlhäusler. – London, New York: Continuum,2001. – P. 232-241.213. Wierzbicka, A. The semantics of grammar. – Amsterdam, 1988. – 617 p.198214. Zunino, F.GoingGreen?EnvironmentalLexicon,GreenspeakandGreenwash: an Overview of Ecological Linguistics.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
