диссертация (1169662), страница 28
Текст из файла (страница 28)
Margaritis // University of Amsterdam. – 2011.67.Human Rights and the European Court of Justice: An Appraisal /Elizabeth F. Defeis // Fordham International Law Journal, Volume31, Issue 5, 2007.68.Social Rights in Europe / Gráinne de Búrca and Bruno de Witte //Oxford Press, 2005.69.The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the TwoEuropean Courts. Tobias Lock. // The Law and Practice ofInternational Courts and Tribunals 8 (2009) 375-398.70.The EU and Human Rights / P.
Alston. – Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1999.71.The European Convention on Human Rights / Francis G. Jacobs,Robin C. A. White // Oxford University Press, 1996.72.The European Convention on human rights, the UE Charter offundamental rights and the European Court of Justice. The impact ofEuropean Union accession to the European Convention on HumanRights / Francis G.
Jacobs, 2006.18473.The European Union as a human rights organization? Human rightsand the core of the European Union / A. Von Bogdandy // CommonMarket Law Review. – 2000. – Vol. 37.74.The Human Rights Act 1998. What it Means. The incorporation ofthe European Convention on Human Rights into the Legal Order ofthe United Kingdom / Betten L. ed. // Kluwer Law International,1999.75.The incorporation of fundamental tights in the legal order of theEuropean Communities / L. Betten // The Hague, 1985.76.The protection of fundamental social rights in the European Union /L.
Betten & D. Macdevitt eds. // Kluwer Law International, 1996.Судебная практика:77.Постановление Суда ЕС по вопросу о соответствии проектаСоглашения о присоединении ЕС к Европейской конвенции озащите прав человека и основных свобод 1950 г. от 18 декабря2014 г.78.Opinion of the Court 2/94 of 28.03.1996.
(Accession by theCommunity to the European Convention for the Protection ofHuman Rights and Fundamental Freedoms). URL:http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61994CV0002:EN:PDF79.Opinion pursuant to article 228 of the ECC Treaty. Opinion of theCourt №1/91.80.Åklagaren v. Hans Åkerberg Fransson. Case 617/10 [2013].81.Alassini. Case 317/08, Case 320/08 [2010].82.Annibaldi. Case 309/96.
[1997].18583.Bayatyan v. Armenia. Application 23459/03.84.Bavarian Lager. Case 28/08 [2010].85.Bosphorus Airways v. Ireland [2005]. Application 45036/98.86.Cantoni v. France [1996]. Application 17862/91.87.Chalkor. Case 386/10 [2011].88.Chappell v. United Kingdom. Application 10461/83. [1989].89.CooperatieveProducentenorganisatievandeNederlandseKokkelvisserij U.A.
v. The Netherlands [2009]. Application13645/05.90.DEB. Case 279/09 [2010].91.Dieter Krombach v. Andre Bamberski [2000].92.Elliniki Radiophonia Tiléorassi AE and Panellinia OmospondiaSyllogon Prossopikou v Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis and SotiriosKouvelas and Nicolaos Avdellas and others. [1991].93.Emott v. Minister for Social Welfare and Attorney General [1991].94.Herbert Wachauf v.
Bundesamt fur Ernahrung und Forstwirtschaft.Case 5/88. [1989].95.Hoechst AG v. Commission. Joint cases 46/87 and 227/88. [1989].96.Informationsverein Lentia and others v. Austria. Applications13914/88, 15041/89, 15717/89, 15779/89, 17207/90. [1993].97.Engel and Others v. the Netherlands. Application 5100/71; 5101/71;5102/71; 5354/72; 5370/72 [1976].98.Etienne Tete v. France [1987]. Application 11123/84.99.Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v.
Office national de l’emploi (ONEm).Case 34/09. [2011].186100. InternationaleHandelsgesellschaftmbHv.Einfuhr-undVorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel. Case 11/70 [1970].101. K.R.S. v. The United Kingdom [2008].102. Karoyssiotis v. Portugal. Application 23205/08, 01.05.2011.103. Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and others v. Commission. [2012].104. M & Co. v. Germany [1990].
Application 13258/87.105. M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece. Application 30696/09.106. Matthews v. the United Kingdom ECHR [1999] Application24833/94.107. Melloni v. Ministerio Fiscal. Case 399/11. [2013].108. McB v. L.E Case 400/10 [2010].109. National Panasonic (UK) Ltd. v. Commission, Case 136/79. [1980].110.
Neulinger und Shuruk v. Switzerland [2010].111. Niemietz v. Germany. Application 13710/88. [1992].112. Nold v. Commission of the European Communities, Case 4/73[1974] ECR 491.113. Roland Rutili v. Ministre de l'interieur, Case 36/75 [1975].European Court Reports, 1975, 01219.114. S.A. Dangeville v. France [2002]. Application 36677/97.115. Scopolla v. Italy. Application 126/05. [2012].116. Schalk and Kopf v. Austria. Application 30141/04 [2010].117. Societe Colas Est and others v.
France. Application 37971/97.[2002].118. Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v. Ministry of Health.Application 283/81.119. Stauder v. City of Ulm, Case 29/69 [1969] ECR 419.187120. T.I. v. The United Kingdom [2000].121. Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium. Applications 3989/07,38535/07 [2011].122. Vereinigte Familiapress Zeitungsverlags und vertriebs GmbH v.Heinrich Bauer Verlag, Case368/95 [1997].188.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
