диссертация (1169467), страница 33
Текст из файла (страница 33)
- Paris: OECD, 1999. - 112 p.239.Maslow A. Self-actualizing and Beyond. – N.Y.: Challenges of HumanisticPsychology, 1967. – 345 p.240.Matsumoto D., Juang L. Culture and psychology. – Massachussets:Cengage Learning, 2012. – 536 p.241.Merton R. On Social Structure and Science. - Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1996. - 386 p.242.Merton.
R. On the Shoulders on the Giants. - Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1993. - 148 p.243.Merton. R. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-CenturyEngland. -N.Y.: Howard Fertig, 2002. - 344 p.244.Merton. R. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and EmpiricalInvestigations. - Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1972.
- 605 p.245.Moravcsik M. How to Grow Science. - N.Y.: Universe Books, 1980. - 206p.246.Mulkay M. Sociology of Science: a Sociological Pilgrimage. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991. - 227 p.247.Neal H. A., Smith T., Mccormick J. Beyond sputnik: US science policy inthe twenty-first century. – M.: The University of Michigan Press, 2008. - 386 p.248.Olivero I. L'invention de la collection: de la diffusion de la littérature et dessavoirs à la formation du citoyen au XIX0 siècle. – Éditions de l'IMEC, 1999. –Т. 6.249.Parsons T., Platt G. The American University.
- Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press, 1973. - 463 p.250.Paul H. W. From knowledge to power: the rise of the science empire inFrance, 1860-1939. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 743 p.251.Perry R. B. General theory of value: Its meaning and basic principlesconstructed in terms of interest. – N.Y.: Longmans, Green And Company, 1926.– 108 p.252.Picon G. Panorama das idéias contemporâneas. – Lisboa: Estúdios Cor,1968. – 75 p.253.Price, D. J. de Solla, Little Science, Big Science. – N.Y.: ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1963. – 56 p.159254.Rouche M., Parias L. H. Histoire générale de l'enseignement et del'éducation en France: De la Révolution à l'école républicaine.
– P.: Nouv. Libr.de France, 1981. - 167 p.255.Rüegg W. A History of the University in Europe. – Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004. – 87 p.256.Solla Price D. Little Science, Big Science. - N.Y.: Columbia UniversityPress, 1963. - 118 p.257.Stehr N., Meja V. (eds.) Society and Knowledge: ContemporaryPerspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge. - New Brunswik, N.J.: Transaction,1984.
- 451 p.258.Storer N.W. The Social System of Science. - N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart &Wilson, 1966. - 180 p.259.The Knowledge-Based Economy. - Paris: OECD Publications, 1996. - 46p.260.The Management of Science Systems. - Paris: OECD Publications, 1998. 41 p.261.Urban W. M. Valuation, its Nature and Laws, being an Introduction to theGeneral Theory of Value.
— N.Y.: Macmillan, 1909. – 126 p.262.Woolgar S. Science, the very idea. – London:Tavistock, 1988. – 254 p.Статьи в периодических изданиях на иностранных языках263.Angulo A. J. The Polytechnic comes to America: how French approachesto science instruction influenced mid-nineteenth century American highereducation //History of Science.
- 2012. - Vol 50. - No 168. – P. 315-342.264.Berkley A. J. et al. Tunneling spectroscopy using a probe qubit //PhysicalReview B. – 2013. – Vol. 87. – No 2. – P. 502-524.265.Bourdieu P. Television //European Review. – 2001. – Т. 9. – No 03. – P.245-256.;266.Bourdieu P. Intellectual field and creative project //Social scienceinformation. – 1969. – Vol. 8. – No 2. – P. 89-119.267.Bourdieu P. The political field, the social science field, and the journalisticfield //Bourdieu and the journalistic field. - 2005. - P. 29 - 47.268.Callon M., Latour B. Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so //Advances in socialtheory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro-and macro-sociologies.– 1981.
– С. 277-303.269.Callon M., Law J. Agency and the Hybrid Collectif //Durham, NC: DukeUniversity Press. - 1997. - P. 95-118.270.Callon M., Law J. On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment andCounter-Enrolmen //Social Studies of Science. – 1982. – No 12. - P. 615-625.271.Carrier M. What is wrong with the miracle argument?? //Studies in Historyand Philosophy of Science Part A. – 1991. – Vol. 22. – No 1. – P.
23-36.272.Charaudeau P. La médiatisation de la science: clonage, OGM,manipulations génétiques //De Boeck Supérieur. - 2008. – P. 23-45.160273.Clarke B. Mediating the fly: Posthuman metamorphosis in the 1950s//Configurations. 2002. - Vol 10. - No 1. - P. 169-191.274.Cole S.
and Cole J. Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in theOperation of the Reward System in Science //American Sociological Review. –1967. - P. 377-390.275.Crémieux-Brilhac J. L. Le mouvement pour l’expansion de la recherchescientifique, 1954-1968 //Les Cahiers pour l’histoire du CNRS.
- 1995. – P. 2367.276.Drucker-Godard C., Fouque T., Gollety M., Le Flanchec A. Le ressenti desenseignants-chercheurs: un conflit de valeurs //Gestion et management public. –2013. - No 1(4). - P. 4-22.277.Foucault M. Life: Experience and science //Essential works of Foucault. –1998. – Vol. 2. – P. 465-478.278.Freeman C. The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective//Cambridge Journal of Economics. – 1995. - No 19 (1). - P.
5-24.279.Gingras Y., Keating P., Limoges C. 2000. Du savant au chercheurentrepreneur //Sciences humaines. - No 31. - P. 32-35.280.Glagolev V.S. Cooperation of technologic and scientific knowledge indevelopment of european culture //Munich: Vela Verlag Waldkraiburg. – 2013. –P.171-175.281.Griffiths P. A. 1993. Science and the public interest //The Bridge. – 1993.– Vol. 23. - No 3. - P. 3-14.282.Heise D. R. Enculturating agents with expressive role behavior. AgentCulture //Human-Agent Interaction in a Multicultural World. - 2004.
- P. 127142.283.La Recherche. – 2014. – №. 485. – 112 p.284.Lamy E., Shinn T. L'autonomie scientifique face à la mercantilisation:Formes d'engagement entrepreneurial des chercheurs en France //Actes de larecherché en sciences sociales. – 2006. – No 164. – P. 23-50.285.Larat F., Chauvigné C. Overcoming the tensions between values: achallenge for French public service managers and their training schools//International Review of Administrative Sciences.
– 2015. – P. 34-56.286.Latour B. Is it Possible to Reconstruct the Research Process? Sociology ofa Brain Peptide //Dordrecht: Reidel. – 1981. - P. 53-77.287.Latour B. When Things Strike Back: a Possible Contribution of “ScienceStudies” to the Social Sciences //British Journal of Sociology. – 2000. – No 51.
P. 107-123288.Les Grands dossiers des sciences humaines. – 2014. – №. 33. – 84 p.289.Lhérété H. Sciences Humaines: L'aventure d'une revue //Scienceshumaines. – 2011. – Vol. 222. – No 1. – P. 16-26.290.Lowie R. H. Primitive Behavior: An Introduction to the Social Sciences.William I. Thomas //American Anthropologist. – 1938. – Vol. 40. – No 1.
– P.125-144.161291.Matsumoto D., Hwang H. S. Culture and Emotion The Integration ofBiological and Cultural Contributions //Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. –2012. - No 43(1). - P. 91-118.292.Narin F., Hamilton K.S., D. Olivastro. The Increasing Linkage between USTechnology and Public Science //Research Policy. - 1997. – No 26. – P. 317-330.293.Oyserman D., Kemmelmeier M., Coon H.
Cultural psychology: a new look//Psychological Bulletin. 2002. -Vol. 128. - No. 1. - P. 110-117.294.Oyserman D., Lee S. W. S. Does culture influence what and how we think?Effects of priming individualism and collectivism //Psychological bulletin. –2008. – Vol. 134.
– No 2. – P. 311-342.295.Oyserman D., Markus H. R. The sociocultural self //Psychologicalperspectives on the self. – 1993. – Vol. 4. – P. 187-220.296.Parsons T. Professions //New York: Macmillan Company and Free Press. 1968. - Vol. 12. - P. 536-547.297.Paul H. W. The role and reception of the monograph in nineteenth-centuryFrench science //Development of Science Publishing in Europe, Elsevier,Amsterdam. – 1980. – P. 123-148.298.Petigura E. A., Howard A. W., Marcy G. W. Prevalence of Earth-sizeplanets orbiting Sun-like stars //Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences.
– 2013. – Vol. 110. – No 48. – P. 193-198.299.Pinault M. 2003. L’intellectuel scientifique: du savant à l’expert //Paris,PUF. 2003. - P. 229-254.300.Robert G. France in the Age of the Scientific State //N.J.: Princeton. 1968. - P. 2-111.301.Schwartz S. H. Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents andconsequences across nations //Measuring attitudes cross-nationally. 2007. P.169-203.302.Science et Vie. – 2014.
– No 1157. – 140 p.303.Toffler A. The third wave //New York: Bantam books. - 1981. – P. 32-33.304.Weaver W. Science and complexity //Facets of Systems Science. –Springer US. - 1991. – P. 449-456.305.Windelband W., Oakes G. History and natural science //History andtheory. – 1980. – Vol. 19. – No 2.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
