Диссертация (1151126), страница 27
Текст из файла (страница 27)
MIT press, 2001.98.Gapochka, A. Prospects of Russian Hub Ports Formation in the Baltic SeaRegion / А. Gapochka / Russian Logistics Journal. - 2016. - pp. 22-26.99.Goulet R. The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.Background and Analysis. European Commision, Directorate-General forRegional Policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanUnion100.High Level Group.
Report on the Trans-European Transport Network2003 (the Van-Miert Report).101.Huybrecht M. Port competitiveness: an economic and legal analysis ofthe factors determining the competitiveness of seaports. Antwerpen: De Boeck.2002. 153 p.102.International Maritime Organization. Shipping: a safe and friendlybusiness – facts and figures / Maritime Knowledge Centre, 2012. 47 p.103.International Maritime Organization.
Shipping: a safe and friendlybusiness – facts and figures - Maritime Knowledge Centre, 2012. 44 р.104.Jafari H. Khosheghbal B. Studying Seaports Hinterland-ForelandConcepts and the Effective Factors on Their Development / InternationalResearch Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 2013 Vol. 4 (5). pp. 10391046105.Jehnson C., Morgen H. ”Creating Global Opportunities: Maersk Line inContainerisation 1973-2003”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014106.Jung B.-M. Economic Contribution of Ports to the Local Economies inKorea / The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2011. Vol.
27. No. 1. pp.1-30107.Kowalczuk U. Hub-and-hinterland development in the Baltic Sea Region/ U. Kowalczuk // TransBaltic Extension. – 2012. – 84 p.108.Kowalczuk U. Institutional setting in port of Gdansk and planning policymeasures for the Baltic container hubs in the development strategies incl.166intermodal terminals in the port hinterland / U. Kowalczuk // TransBalticExtension. – 2014.
– 60 p.109.Kowalczyk U. Hub Deveplopment perspective in the public and marketstrategies – Development scenarios of the Gdansk container hub / Maritimeinstitute in Gdansk, 2014. 37 p.110.Krugman P. Competitiveness – a dangerous obsession// Foreign Affairs,1994, March/April, Volume 73, No2.111.Krugman P.R. The Role of Geography in Development // InternationalScience Review. 1999. Vol. 22, # 2. – P. 142-161.112.Krugman, P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.
The Journalof Political Economy, 1991, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483-499.113.Krugman, P. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, andInternational Trade. Journal of International Economics, 1979, vol. 9, pp. 469479.114.Krugman, P. Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade.Journal of Political Economy, 1981, vol.
89, no. 5, pp. 959-973.115.Kuznetsov A. Simulation as an integrated platform for container terminaldevelopment life-cycle in: The 7th International Mediterranian and LatinAmerican Modeling Multiconference / A. Kuznetsov, V. Pogodin, Y. Spassky,V. Gleim. – Morocco, Fes, October 13-15 2010, pp. 159-162.116.Lewis W. A. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour /The Manchester school, 1954. Т. 22. №. 2. С. 139-191.117.Luer-Villagra A., Marianov V. A competitive hub location and pricingproblem / European Journal of Operational Research, 2013. No. 6, p.
1-11118.Mackinder H. J. The geographical pivot of history / Royal GeographicalSociety, 1904.119.Maharaj, A. Economic Development Position Paper In Port Expansion /A. Maharaj// eThekwini Municipality Economic Development andInvestment Promotion Unit. 2012. – 35 p.167120.MarkusenA.R.Regions:Theeconomicsandpoliticsofterritory/Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc, 1987.121.Markusen, A. Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of IndustrialDistricts / A. Markusen // Economic Geogpraphy.- 1996.- № 72.- p.
293-313.URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1505247122.Marshall, A., Marshall, M. The Economics of Industry.- London:Macmillan, 1879.- 231 p.123.Meng Q., Zheng J., Sun Z. Liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design/ Transportation Research, 2015.
pp. 32-48124.Minchinton W. E. The growth of English overseas trade in theseventeenth and eighteenth centuries. / Methuen, 1969. - Vol. 324.125.Nam H.-S., Song D.W. Maritime Logistics Hub in Concept and Practice.12th WCTR, July 11-15, 2010 – Lisbon, Portugal126.Nam, H.S. Defining maritime logistics hub and its implication forcontainer port / H.S. Nam, D.W.
Song // Maritime Policy & Management –2011. – Issue 3, Vol. 38. – pp. 269-292127.National bank of Belgium statistics database – Режим доступа: http://http://stat.nbb.be/ - свободный. Загл. С экрана128.Notteboom T. Towards a new intermediate hub region in containershipping? Relay and interlining via Cape route vs. the Suez route / Journal ofTransport Geography, 2012 No. 22, pp. 164-178129.Notteboom, T.
The relationship between seaports and the intermodalhinterland in light of global supply chains: European Challenges – ResearchRound Table “Seaport Competition and Hinterland Connections”, Paris, 10-11April 2008 – 44 p.130.OECD statistics database – Режим доступа: http://stats.oecd.org/ -свободный. Загл. С экрана131.Partim Transshipment Volume. State of the European Port System –Market Trends and Structure Update / 7th Framework Programme, 2014. 31 p.168132.Premti A.
Liner shipping: is there a way for more competition? / NewYork - Geneva, United Nations Publication, 2016. No. 224. p. 36133.Rodrigue, J.P International Maritime Freight Transport and Logistics / J.P. Rodrigue, M. Browne // Transport Geographies – Elsevier B.V. – Режимдоступа: www.sciencedirect.com - свободный.
Загл. С экрана134.Rodrigue, J.P The Geography of Transport Systems / J.P. Rodrigue, C.Comtois, B. Slack – Routledge, London and New York, 2006 – 297 p.135.Shepherd, W.G., Shepherd, J.M.:Theeconomicsofindustrialorganization. Renmin University of China Publishing house, Beijing (2007)136.Stopford M. “Maritime Economics”. 3rd Edition, Routledge, NY, 2009137.Storper, M. Regions, Globalization, Development / M. Storper, A.
Scott// Regional Studies.- 2003.- №6.- p. 579-593.138.Talley, W.K. Maritime Transport Chains: Carrier, Port and Shipperchoice effects / W. K. Talley // Production Economics – Elsevier B.V. –Режим доступа: www.sciencedirect.com - свободный. Загл. С экрана139.Tellier L. N. Urban world history: An economic and geographicalperspective / PUQ, 2009. – 631 p.140.United Nations (1983) The Law of the Sea: Official Text of the UnitedNations Convention on the Law of the Sea with Annexes and Index (London:Croom Helm)141.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).Review of Maritime Transport 2013 / New York - Geneva, United NationsPublication, 2013. P. 233.142.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).Review of Maritime Transport 2014 / New York - Geneva, United NationsPublication, 2014. P.
136143.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).Review of Maritime Transport 2015 / New York - Geneva, United NationsPublication, 2015. P. 122169144.Viederyte, R. Cluster Organizations: Enhancing Role of MaritimeIndustry Development / R. Viederyte // Procedia – Elsevier B.V. –Режимдоступа: www.sciencedirect.com - свободный. Загл. С экрана145.Vier, T.B.
Hub Ports: A case study of Port of Singapore / T.B. Vier –Porto Alegre, 2010.146.Wall R. Ocean Liners / R. Wall, 2003, London147.Wang W.Y., Zeng Q., Li K., Yang J. Port connectivity in a logisticsnetwork: The case of Bohai Bay, China / Transportation Research, 2016, pp. 2-14148.Wang, Teng-Fei. Container port production and economic efficiency/Teng-Fei Wang, Kevin Cullinane, and Dong Wook Song.p.cm. Includesbibliographical references and index.
Palgrave Macmillan. 2005. Great Britainby Antony Rowe Ltd., Chippenham and Eastbourne.189 p.149.World Economic Forum. The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015.- 2014.- 565 p.150.WTO publication. Aid for Trade at a Glance 2015: Reducing Trade costsfor Inclusive, Sustainable Growth, 2015.- 413 p.151.WTO statistics database – Режим доступа: http://stat.wto.org/ -свободный.
Загл. С экрана152.Yeo G., RoeM., Dinwoodie J. Evaluating the competitiveness ofcontainer ports in Korea and China / Transportation Research, 2008, pp. 910 –921153.Zhang, Y. Research on the impacts of Ports’ construction on theregional economic development / Y. Zhang, S. Wen // Atlantis Press:International conference on Educational Technology and Management Science.- 2013. – 1420 – 1423 p.Приложение АРис. 7.1Классификация типов грузов, перевозимых морским транспортомГрузы, перевозимыеморским транспортомГенеральныеБалкерныеНавалочные- уголь, кокс- минеральныеудобрения- прочиеСухие балкерныеНасыпные- зерно- сахар- прочиеНаливные- нефть- нефтепродукты- сжиженный газ- химическиеМеталлопродукция- черные металлы- цветныеметаллы- металлоломТарно-штучные- а/м испецтехника (роро)- негабаритныегрузы- различныегрузы в коробкахмешках, бочках,рулонах и т.д.Контейнеры- стандартные- рефрижераторные- танк-контейнеры(бочки)- балк-контейнеры- платформы- с жесткой крышей- с открытойкрышейЛесоматериалы- необработанные(круглые)- обработанныеИсточник: составлено авторомПриложение БРис.
8.1Типы гаваней, представленные в регионе Балтийского моря№1.Тип гаваниГаванириасовоготипа2.Фиорды3.Фиарды4.Фердены5.Устьевыепорты92ХарактеристикаСпецифические категории гаваней,сформировавшихся в результате затоплениясуши. Риас представляет собой эстуарий92,погрузившийся в воду при одновременномомоложении рельефа суши. Такие гаванидостаточно глубоки, хотя они могут иметьсклонность к заиливанию.Для фиордов характерны большая длина всравнении с шириной, крутые берега,пороги у входа в море и большие глубины.Общей характеристикой всех фиордовявляется трудный доступ к ним с суши. Онирасположены в малонаселенныхпериферийных районах Норвегии,Гренландии.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
