Диссертация (1151040), страница 30
Текст из файла (страница 30)
Byrne // Routledge Taylor & Francis Group:N. Y, 2009. – 338 p.105. Campos, H. The entrepreneurial orientation–dominant logic performancerelationship in new ventures: an explanatory quantitative study / H. Campos, J.Nuno, F. Parellada // Brazilian Administration Review.
– 2012. – №9. – P. 60–77.106. Cantillon, R. 1734. Essai sur la nature du commerce en general, Essay on theNature of General Commerce / R. Cantillon // Translated by H. Higgs, London:Frank Cass and Co., 1959.107. Capron, L, Chatain O. Competitors' resource–oriented strategies: acting oncompetitors' resources through interventions in factor markets and politicalmarkets / L. Capron, O. Chatain // Academy of Management Review. – 2008.
–№33(1). – P. 97–121.108. Caruana, A. 2002. Effects of some environmental challenges and centralization onthe entrepreneurial orientation and performance of public sector entities / A.Caruana, M.T. Ewing, B. Ramaseshan // Service Industries Journal. – 2002. –№22 (2). – P. 43–58.109. Casillas, J.
2010. A configurational approach of the relationship betweenentrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms / J. Casillas, A. Moreno, J.Barbero // Family Business Review. – 2010. – №23. – P. 27–44.110. Castrogiovanni, G. Organization task environments: have they changedfundamentally over time? / G.
Castrogiovanni // Journal of Management. – 2002. –№28(2). – P. 129–150.111. Cheung, G.W. Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables:bootstrapping with structural equation models / G.W. Cheung, R. Lau//Organizational Research Methods. – 2008. – №11(2). – P. 296–235.112. Child, J. Organisation structure, environment and performance: the role of strategicchoice / J. Child // Sociology. – 1952. – №6. – P. 1–22.161113.
Covin, J.G. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm’s behavior / J.G.Covin, D.P. Slevin // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 1991. – №16 (1). –P. 7–25.114. Covin, J.G. Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on aneeded construct / J.G. Covin, G.T. Lumpkin // Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice. – 2011. – №35(5). – P. 855–872.115. Covin, J.G.
International entrepreneurial orientation: conceptual considerations,research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions / J.G. Covin,D. Miller // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 2014. – №38(1). – P. 11–44.116. Covin, J.G. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benignenvironments / J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin // Strategic Management Journal.
– 1989. –№10 (1). – P. 75–87.117. Covin, J.G. The influence of organization structure on the utility of anentrepreneurial top management style / J.G. Covin, D.P. Slevin //Journal ofManagement Studies. – 1988. – №25 (3). – P. 217–234.118. Covin, J.G. The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation / J.G. Covin, W.J.Wales // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 2012.
– №36 (4). – P. 677–702.119. Cyert, R. A Behavioural Theory of the Firm / R. Cyert, J. March // Prentice–Hall:Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963.120. Cyr D, Implications for learning: human resource management in east–west jointventures / D. Cyr, S. Schneider // Organization Studies. – 1996. – №17(2). – P.207–226.121. Dada, L. Entrepreneurial orientation and the franchise system: Organisationalantecedents and performance outcomes / L. Dada, A. Watson // European Journalof Marketing.
– 2013. – №47(5–6). – P. 791–812.122. Dai, L., 2014. Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: The differentialroles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk–taking / L. Dai, V. Maksimov, B.Gilbert, S.A. Fernhaber // Journal of Business Venturing. – 2014. – №29 (4). – P.511–524.162123. Damanpour, F. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizationalperformance: A longitudinal study of service organizations / F. Damanpour, R.Walker, C.
Avellaneda // Journal of Management Studies. – 2009. – №46(4). – P.650–675.124. David, P. A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY / P.A. David // AmericanEconomic Review. – 1975. - №75. – P. 332-337.125. Davidsson, P. Growing profitable or growing from profits: putting the horse infront of the cart? / P. Davidsson, P.
Steffens, J. Fitzsimmons // Journal of BusinessVenturing. – 2009. – №24(4). – P. 388–406.126. De Clercq, D. Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledgesharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation / D. De Clercq, D. Dimov, N.Thongpapanl // Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. – 2013. – №37(3).
– P.505–537.127. De Clercq, D. The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on theentrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship / D. De Clercq, D. Dimov, N.Thongpapanl // Journal of Business Venturing. – 2010. – №25. – P. 87–103.128. Delmar, F. Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survivalin new firms / F. Delmar, A. McKelvie, K. Wennberg // Technovation.
– 2013. –№33(8). – P. 276–291.129. De Luca, L.M. 2007. Market knowledge dimensions and cross–functionalcollaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance /L.M. De Luca, K. Atuahene–Gima // Journal of Marketing. – 2007. – №71. – P.95–112.130. Dess, G.G. Configuration research in strategic management: Key issues andsuggestions / G.G. Dess, S. Newport, A.
Rasheed // Journal of Management. –1993. – №19(4). – P. 775–795.131. Dess, G.G. Dimensions of organizational task environments / G.G. Dess, D.W.Beard // Administrative Science Quarterly. – 1984. – №29. – P. 52–73.163132. Dess, G. G.Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests ofcontingency and configurational models / G. G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin, J. G. Covin// Strategic Management Journal. – 1997. – №18(9). – P. 677-695.133. Durand, R.
Age, order of entry, strategic orientation, and organizationalperformance / R. Durand, R. Courderoy // Journal of Business Venturing. – 2001. –№16(5). – P. 471–94.134. Edwards, J.R. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research:An integrative analytical framework / J.R. Edwards // Organizational ResearchMethods. – 2001. – №4(2). – P. 144–192.135. Engelen, A.
Entrepreneurial orientation as a function of national culturalvariations in two countries / A. Engelen // Journal of International Management. –2010. – №16. – P. 354–368.136. Fayolle, A. Three levels of culture and firms’ entrepreneurial orientation: Aresearch agenda / A. Fayolle, O. Basso, V. Bouchard // Entrepreneurship &Regional Development. – 2010. – №22(7–8). – P. 707–730.137.
Filser, M. The effect of financial resource availability on entrepreneurialorientation, customer orientation and firm performance in an international context:an empirical analysis from Austria and Hungary / M. Filser, F. Eggers, S. Craus, E.Malovics // Journal for East European Management Studies.
– 2014. – №19(1). –P. 7–30.138. Fornell, C. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables andmeasurement error. / C. Fornell, D. Larcker // Journal of Marketing Research. –1981. – №18(1). – P. 39–50.139. Frank, H. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance – a replicationstudy. / H. Frank, A. Kessler, M. Fink // Schmalenbach Business Review. – 2010.– №62. – P.
175–198.140. Frese, M. Psychological success factors of small scale businesses in Namibia: theroles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation and the environment. / M.Frese, A. Brantjes, R. Hoorn. // Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. –2002. – №7(3). – P. 259–282.164141. Fulford, H. A conceptual model for the strategic orientation of small firms / H.Fulford, A. Rizzo // Journal of Enterprising Culture. – 2009. – №17(1). – P.
25–54.142. George, B. Entrepreneurial Orientation: A Theoretical and Empirical Examinationof the Consequences of Differing Construct Representations. / B. George // Journalof Management Studies. – 2011. – №48(6). P. 1291–1313.143. George, B. The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: conceptual formation,modeling and operationalization. / B. George, L. Marino // EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice.
– 2011. – №35(5). – P. 989–1024.144. Gerbing, D. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporatingunidimensionality and its assessment. / D. Gerbing, J. Anderson // Journal ofMarketing Research. – 1988. №25(2). P. 186–192.145. Ginsberg, A. Measuring changes in entrepreneurial orientation following industryderegulation: The development of a diagnostic instrument.
Proceedings. / A.Ginsberg // Annual Meetings, International Council of Small Business. – 1985. –P. 50–57.146. Grande, J. The relationship between resources, entrepreneurial orientation andperformance in farm–based ventures. / J. Grande, E. Madsen, O. Borch //Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. – 2011. – №23(3–4). – P. 89–111.147. Grant, R.M. The Resource–Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implicationsfor Strategy Formulation. / R.M. Grant // California Management Review. – 1991.– №33(3). – P.114–135.148.
Green, K. Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness andentrepreneurial orientation: The role of structure–style fit. / K. Green, J.Covin, D.Slevin // Journal of Business Venturing. – 2007. – №23. – P.356–383.149. Hafeez, S. The effect of market and entrepreneurial orientation on firmperformance. / S. Hafeez, R. Chaudhry, Z. Siddiqui, K. Rehman // InformationManagement and Business Review. – 2011.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
