Диссертация (1151040), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
– P. 185–204.191. Makadok, R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capabilityviews of rent creation / R. Makadok // Strategic Management Journal. – 2001. –№22(5). – P. 387–401.192. Manolova, T. Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: evidence fromemerging economies in Eastern Europe / T. Manolova, R. Eunni, Gyoshev B.
//Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 2008. – №32(1). – P. 203–218.193. Marcotte, C. Country entrepreneurial profiles: assessing the individual andorganizational levels of entrepreneurship across countries / C. Marcotte // Journalof Enterprising Culture. – 2011. – №19(2). – P. 169–200.194. Martins, I. Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental hostility and SMEprofitability: a contingency approach / I. Martins, A. Rialp // Cuadernos deGestión.
– 2013. – №13 (2). – P. 67–88.195. Matsuno, K., The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation onfirm performance / K. Matsuno, J.T. Mentzer, A. Ozsomer // Journal of Marketing.– 2002. – №66. P. 18–53.196. May, R. Environmental scanning behavior in a transitional economy: evidencefrom Russia / W. Stewart, R. Sweo // Academy of Management Journal. – 2000. –№43. – P. 403–427.197. McGee, J.
When the going gets tough, the tough get going entrepreneurially: therelationshipbetweenenvironmentalhostility,entrepreneurialorientation,170entrepreneurial self–efficacy and firm performance / J. McGee, S. Khavul, D.Harrison, L. Perez–Nordtvest // Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. – 2012. –P. 239–239.198. Merz, G.
R. Profiles of managerial activities in small firms / G. R. Merz, M. H.Sauber // Strategic Management Journal. – 1995. – №16 (7). – P. 551–564.199. Messersmith, J.G. Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in young firms:The role of human resource management / J.G. Messersmith, W. Wales //International Small Business Journal.
– 2013. – №31(2). – P. 115–136.200. Meyer, K. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies / K.Meyer, S. Estrin, S. Bhaumik, M. Peng // Strategic Management Journal. – 2009. –№30(1). – P. 61–80.201. Miles, M. The relationship between environmental dynamism and small firmstructure, strategy, and performance / J. Covin, M. Heeley // Journal of MarketingTheory and Practice. – 2000. – №8.
– P. 63–78.202. Miles, R.E. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process / R.E. Miles, C.C.Snow // New York: McGraw–Hill, 1978. – 274 p.203. Miller, D. Archetypes of strategy formulation / D. Miller, P. H. Friesen //Management Science. – 1978. – №24. – P. 294–316.204. Miller, D. Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models ofstrategic momentum / D. Miller, P. H. Friesen // Strategic Management Journal.
–1982. – №3(1). – P. 1–25.205. Miller, D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms / D. Miller //Management Science. – 1983. – №29(7). – P. 770–791.206. Miller, D. Strategy–making and environment: the third link / D. Miller, P. H.Friesen // Strategic Management Journal. – 1983. – №4. – P. 221–235.207. Miller, D. Strategy making in context: Ten empirical archetypes / D. Miller, P. H.Friesen // The Journal of Management Studies. – 1977.
– №14 (3). – P. 253–280.208. Miller, D. Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications forperformance / D. Miller // Academy of Management Journal. – 1987. – №30(1). –P. 7–32.171209. Mintzberg, H. Patterns in strategy formation / H. Mintzberg // ManagementScience. – 1978. – №24(9). – 934–948.210. Mintzberg, H. Strategy-making in three modes / H. Mintzberg // CaliforniaManagement Review. – 1973. – №16 (2). – P.
44–53.211. Mintzberg, H. Strategy formation: Schools of thought / H. Mintzberg // In:Fredrickson J.W. (ed.). Perspectives on Strategic Management. Harper Business:N.Y., 1990. – pp. 105–236.212. Moreno, A. Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model / A.Moreno, J. Casillas // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – 2008. – №32(3). –P. 507–528.213. Morris, M. H. The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing inestablished firms / M.
H. Morris, G.W. Paul // Journal of Business Venturing. –1987. – №2(2). – P. 247-259.214. Moriarty, R.T. High-tech marketing: Concepts, continuity, and change / R.T.Moriarty, T.J. Kosnik // Sloan Management Review. – 1989. – №30 (4). – P. 7–17.215. Naldi, L. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms /L. Naldi, M.
Nordqvist, K. Sjöberg, J. Wiklund // Family Business Review. –2007. – №20 (1). – P. 33–47.216. Nelson, R. R. Why do firms differ and how does it matter? / R. R. Nelson //Strategic Management Journal. – 1991. – №12. – P. 6I–74.217.
Newbert, S.L. Empirical research on the resource–based view of the firm: Anassessment and suggestions for future research / S.L. Newbert // StrategicManagement Journal. – 2007. – №28. – P. 121–146.218. North, D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance / D. North// Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 159 p.219. Nunnally, J. Psychometric theory / J. Nunnaly // McGraw–Hill: New York, 1978.– 640 p.220.
Parida, V. M. Exploring the effects of network configurations on entrepreneurialorientation and firm performance: an empirical study of new ventures and small172firms / V. M. Parida, H. Ylinenpää Westerberg, S. Roininen // Annals ofInnovation & Entrepreneurship. – 2010. – №1. – P. 1–13.221. Peng, M. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions,organizations, and strategic choices / M. Peng, P. Heath // Academy ofManagement Review. – 1996. – №21. – P. 492–528.222. Pérez–Luño, A.
The dual nature of innovative activity: how entrepreneurialorientation influences innovation generation and adoption / A. Pérez–Luño, J.Wiklund, R. Cabrera // Journal of Business Venturing. – 2011. – №26(5). – P.555–571.223. Peteraf, M.A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource–based view/ M.A. Peteraf // Strategic Management Journal. – 1993. – №14 (3).
– P. 179–191.224. Podsakoff, P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review ofthe literature and recommended remedies / P. Podsakoff, S. MacKenzie, J–Y. Lee,N. Podsakoff // Journal of Applied Psychology. – 2003. – №88. – P. 879–903.225. Porter, M. The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management /M. Porter // Academy of Management Review.
– 1981. – №6(4). – P. 609–620.226. Preacher, K. J. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simplemediation models / K. J. Preacher, A. F. Hayes // Behavior Research Methods,Instruments, and Computers. – 2004. – №36(4). – P. 717–731.227. Rauch, A. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment ofpast research and suggestions for the future / A. Rauch, J. Wiklund, GT Lumpkin,M. Frese // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
– 2009. – №33(3). – P. 761–787.228. Raykov, T. Structural models for studying correlates and predictors of change / T.Raykov // Australian Journal of Psychology. – 1992. – №44(2). – P. 101–112.229. Read, S. Effectual entrepreneurship / S. Read, S. Sarasvathy, N. Dew, R. Witbank,A.V. Ohlsson // Routledge: London, 2011. – 228 p.230. Richard, O.C. Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and themoderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions / O.C. Richard, T.173Barnett, S. Dwyer, K. Chadwick // Academy of Management Journal.
– 2004. –№47(2). – P. 255–268.231. Rigtering, J. A comparative analysis of the entrepreneurial orientation/growthrelationship in service firms and manufacturing firms / J. Rigtering, S. Kraus, F.Eggers, S. Jensen // The Service Industries Journal. – 2014. – №34 (4). – P. 275–294.232. Romanelli, E. New venture strategies in the microcomputer industry / E.Romanelli // California Management Review.
– 1987. – №30. – P.160–175.233. Romanova Stettler, T. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Acomparative longitudinal study in the developed and emerging countries / T.Romanova Stettler, G.V. Shirokova, K.A. Bogatyreva, A. Baldauf // GSOMEmerging Markets Conference: Business and Government Perspectives. – 2014. –P.
447-456.234. Rosenbusch, N. The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation in the taskenvironment–performance relationship: a meta–analysis / N. Rosenbusch, A.Rausch, A. Bausch // Journal of Management. – 2013. – №39 (3). – P. 633–659.235. Roxas, B. Effects of formal institutions on the performance of the tourism sectorin the Philippines: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation / B. Roxas, D.Chadee // Tourism Management. – 2013. – №37. – P. 1–12.236.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
