Диссертация (1148432), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
59 – 73.114. Dewey, J. Human Nature and Conduct. An Introduction to Social Psychology.–NewYork:HenryHoltandCompany,1922.Availableat:www.gutenberg.org (accessed on 25.10.2015).115. Dik , S. C. The Theory of Functional Grammar. 2 Vols. – Berlin: Mouton deGruyter, 1997. – 509р.,477 р.116.
Eco, U. Le Signe. Histoire et analyse d’un concept. – Paris: Editions Labor,1988. – 220 p.117. Evans, V. Cognitive Linguistics // WIREs Cognitive Science. John Wiley &Sons, 2012. Available at: http://wires.wiley.com/ WileyCDA/WiresArticle/wisId-WCS1163.html (дата обращения: 16.11.2013).118. Evans, V. Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning-Construction//Cognitive Linguistics 17-4, 2006.
– Рр. 491-534.119. Falkum, I. L. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polysemy: A RelevanceTheoretic Account. Thesis, University College London, 2011. Available at:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1139079/1/1139079.pdf(датаобращения:15.11.2014).120. Fillmore, Charles J., Atkins, B. T. Towards a Frame-based organization of thelexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbours // Frames, Fields, andContrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization, ed. by A.Lehrer and E. Kittay.
– Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992. – рр. 75-102.121. Franckel, J.-J., Paillard, D. Aspects de la théorie d’Antoine Culioli //Language, 129, 1998. – Рp. 52-63.122. Frazer,J.G.TheGoldenBough.Availableat:http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3623/3623-h/3623-h.htm (дата обращения:01.02.2016)221123. Frege, G. Über Sinn und Bedeutung // Zeitschrift für Philosophie undphilosophische Kritik, NF 100, 1892. – S.
25-50.124. Freud, S. Interpretation of Dreams. – UK: Oxford University Press, 1999. –512 p.125. Gärdenfors, P. Meanings as Conceptual Structures // Lund UniversityCognitiveStudies,40,1995.Availableat:http://www.lucs.lu.se/LUCS/040/LUCS.040.pdf (accessed on 25.03.2015).126. Geeraerts, D. Theories of Lexical Semantics. – UK: Oxford University Press,2010. – 341 p.127. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
Idiomaticity and Human Cognition // Idioms: Structural andPsychological Perspectives. Everaert M., E. J. Van der Linden, A. Schenk &R. Schreuder (eds.). – Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995. - Pр. 97-116.128. Gioia, D. A., and Poole, P. P. Scripts in Organizational Behavior // TheAcademy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1984. - Pp.
449-459.129. Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. – London:Edward Arnold, 1985. – 387 p.130. Halliday, M. A. K., Webster, J. J. (eds.) Continuum Companion to SystemicFunctional Linguistics. – UK: Continuum Companions, 2009. - 299 p.131. Hanks, P. Do word meanings exist? // Computer and the Humanities.
Vol. 34,2000. – Рр. 205 – 215.132. Harder, H. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tensein English. – Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1996. – 586 p.133. Harris, R. The Semantics of Science. – London: Continuum International,2005. – 240 p.134. Harris, R., Hutton, Ch. Definition in Theory and Practice: Language,Lexicography and the Law.
– London: Bloomsbury, 2007. – 238 p.135. Hébert, L. Typologie des structures du signe: le signe selon le Groupe µ,2010.Availableat:(accessed on 26.04.2011).http://revues.unilim.fr/nas/document.php?id=3401222136. Johnson, M. The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning,Imagination, and Reason.
– Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. –272 р.137. Kilgarriff, A. I don’t believe in word senses // Computers and the Humanities,31, 2003. – Pp. 91-113.138. Klinkenberg, J.-M. Précis de sémiotique générale. – Paris: De BoeckUniversité, 2006. – 597 p.139. Kövecses, Z. Metaphor. – Oxford University Press, 2010. – 375 p.140. Labov,W.SociolinguisticPatterns.–Philadelphia:UniversityofPennsylvania Press, 1972. – 344 p.141. Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. – London: The University ofChicago Press, 1987. – 614 p.142.
Langacker, R. W. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis ofGrammar. – Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. – 395 p.143. Lebas-Fraczak, L. Description « communicative» des déterminants français envue de la didactisation // Les Cahiers de l’Acedle, 6, 2, 2009. Available at:https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00910782/document(accessedon19.04.2015).144. Lukianova, E., Tolochin, I.
Smelling the Red Herring. A closer Inspection ofthe True Nature of English Idioms. Учебное пособие. – СПб.: СПбГУ. РИО.Филологический факультет, 2013. – 136 с.145. Lukyanova, E. Idioms beyond their dictionary borders: How figurativemeaning functions in texts // Euralex 2012 Proceedings (Paper 063). Availableat:http://www.euralex.org/proceedings-toc/euralex_2012(accessedon:06.10.2015).146. Maturana, H.
R. Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for aCompelling Argument // The Irish Journal Psychology, vol. 9 (1), 1988. - Pp.25 – 82.223147. Morris, Ch. W. Foundations of the Theory of signs // InternationalEncyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. 1, No. 2. – Chicago: The University ofChicago Press, 1944. – 59 p.148. Mwihaki, A. Meaning as Use: A Functional View of Semantics andPragmatics // Swahili Forum, 11, 2004.
– Pp. 127-139.149. O’Donnell. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics for DiscourseAnalysis // Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2011-2012. Available at:http://web.uam.es/departamentos/filoyletras/filoinglesa/Courses/LFC11/LFC2011-Week1.pdf (accessed 27.03.2015)150. Omazic, M. Processing of Idioms and Idiom Modifications // Phraseology: anInterdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger, F.
Meunier (eds.). – John BenjaminsPublishing, 2008. – Pp. 66 – 79.151. Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. The Meaning of Meaning. – New York, 1946. –363 p.152. Paillard, D. A propos des verbes polysémique: identité sémantique etprincipes de variation // Syntaxe & Sémantique 2, 2002. – Pp. 99-120.153. Paillard, D. Prépositions et rection verbale // Travaux de linguistique, I/44,2002. – Pp. 51 – 67.154. Pauly, E. La polysémie. Réflexion théorique, méthodologique et application àla lexicographie.
– Paris: L’Harmattan, 2014. – 417 p.155. Perez, R. G. A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Heat Metaphors // RevistaAlicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 21, 2008. – Pp. 25 – 56.156. Pierce, Ch. S. Collected Papers. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, vol.1-6, 1931-1935.157. Porto Requejo, M. D. The Role of Context in Word Meaning Construction: ACase Study // International Journal of English Studies, vol. 7 (1), 2007. -Pp.169 – 173.158. Putnam, H. Meaning and Reference // The Journal of Philosophy, Vol.
70, No.19, 1973. – Pp. 699 – 711.159. Robertson Ian, S. Types of Thinking. – London, New York, 1999. – 182 p.224160. Rosch, E. Principles of Categorization // Cognition and Categorization. –Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1978. – Рр. 27-48.161. Russel, B. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. – London and New York:Routledge Classics, 2010. – 162 p.162. Sapir, E. Language. An Introduction to the Study of Speech. Available at:www.gutenberg.net (accessed on 02.05.2012).163. Schank, R., Abelson, R.
Scripts Plans and Knowledge // Advance Papers ofFourth Intern. Joint Conf. on Artif. Intell., 2, 1975. – Pр. 151 - 157.164. Skinner, B. F. Verbal Behavior. – New York: Appleton – Century – Crofts,Inc., 1957. – 478 p.165. Sperber, D., Wilson, D. The Mapping between the Mental and the PublicLexicon // Language and Thought. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998. – Pp. 184-200.166. Swales, J.M. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. - 260 p.167. Tannen, D.
Frames and Schemas in Interaction // Quaderni di Semantica, VI,2, 1985. – Pp. 326 – 335.168. Uexkűll, T. v. From Index to Icon // Iconicity. Essays on the Nature ofCulture. – Tűbingen, 1986. – Pp. 119 – 140.169. Ullmann, S. Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1962. – 278 p.170. Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. – London: Kegan Paul,Trench, Trubner, 1922. – 173 p.171. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations.
– UK: Basil Blackwell, 1986. –250 p.172. Xiao, R. Z. Theory-driven corpus research: using corpora to inform aspecttheory // Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Handbooks ofLinguistics and Communication Science, vol. 1. – Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin,Germany. – Pp.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
