Диссертация (1147103), страница 24
Текст из файла (страница 24)
- 2008. – С. 364-386.82.Alexander J. Global Civil Society. // Theory, Culture & Society. -May 2006. - Vol. 23. - № 2–3. - P.521-524.83.Althaus M. Discovering Our (Corporate) Grassroots: EuropeanAdvocacy 2.0. / Routledge Handbook of Political Management. / Edited by DennisW. Johnson. - New York: Routledge. – 2009.
- P.492-494.84.Amoore L., Langley P. Ambiguities of global civil society //Review ofInternational Studies. – 2004. – Vol. 30. – №. 1. - P. 89-11085.Anheier H., Glasius M., Kaldor M. Introducing global civil society. /Global Civil Society yearbook 2001. / Edited by Helmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius,and Mary Kaldor. - Oxford: Oxford University Press. – 2001. – P. 3-22.86.Anheier H., Themudo N. Organisational forms of Global Civil Society:implications of going global. // Global Civil Society yearbook 2002.
/ Edited byHelmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius, and Mary Kaldor. - Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress. – 2002 – P. 191-216.87.23.01.2013.Apple обошла Microsoft на рынке операционных систем.http://www.macdigger.ru/macall/apple-oboshla-microsoft-na-rynke-operacionnyx-sistem.html88.Archer M.
Structure, agency and the internal conversation. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 370 P.89.Archibugi D. Cosmopolitan democracy and its critics: a review//European Journal of International Relations. – 2004. – Vol. 10. – №. 3. – P. 437473.13390.Ayres J.
Framing collective action against neoliberalism: The case ofthe ―anti-globalization‖ movement //Journal of world-systems research. – 2004. –Vol. 10. – №. 1. – P. 11-34.91.Batliwala S. Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors:Implications for Global Civil Society. // Voluntas: International Journal ofVoluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. - December 2002. - Vol.
13. - №. 4. - P.393-410.92.Bennett L. Social movements beyond borders: understanding two erasof transnational activism. // Transnational protest and global activism / ed. byDonatella Delia Porta and Sidney Tarrow. - Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield,2005. - P. 203-226.93.Bexell M., Tallberg J., Uhlin A.
Democracy in global governance: Thepromises and pitfalls of transnational actors // Global Governance: A Review ofMultilateralism and International Organizations. – 2010. – Vol. 16. – №. 1. – P.81-101.94.Beyeler M., Kriesi H. Transnational protest and the Public Sphere //Mobilization: An International Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 10. - №. 1. - P.
95-109.95.Booth K. Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory andPractice. // International Affairs. - Jul. 1991. - Vol. 67. - №. 3. - P. 527-545.96.Bowden B. Civil society, the state, and the limits to global civilsociety. // Global Society. - April 2006. - Vol. 20. - №. 2. - P.167-168.97.Buckley K.Global Civil Society: The Dialectics of Concept andReality. // Globalizations. – 2013. - Vol.10.
- №. 2. - P.231-244.98.Camia V., Caramani D. Family meetings: Ideological convergencewithin party families across Europe, 1945–2009 // Comparative European Politics.– 2011. – Vol. 10. – №. 1. – P. 48-85.99.Castells M. The new public sphere: Global civil society,communication networks, and global governance //The ANNALS of the AmericanAcademy of Political and Social Science.
– March 2008. – №. 1. – P. 78-93.134100. Chambers S., Kopstein J. Civil Society and the State. / The OxfordHandbook of Political Theory. / Edited by John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig & AnnePhillips . - Oxford: Oxford University Press. - 2006. – P. 363-381.101. Chandler D. Deriving Norms from «Global Space»: The Limits ofCommunicative Approaches to Global Civil Society Theorizing //Globalizations. June 2007. - Vol.
4. - No. 2. - P. 283–298.102. Chua B. Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. –London: Routledge. - 1995. – 256 P.103. Colás A. Global civil society: analytical category or normativeconcept? / Global Civil Society: Contested Futures. / Edited by G. Baker and D.Chandler - London: Routledge. – 2005. – P. 17-33.104. Colas A. Putting cosmopolitanism into practice: the case of socialistinternationalism // Millennium-Journal of International Studies. – 1994.
– Vol. 23.– №. 3. – P. 513-534.105. Cox R. Civil society at the turn of the millennium: prospects for analternative world order //Review of international studies. – 1999. – Vol. 25. – №. 1.– P. 3-28;106. Cox R. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay inmethod. // Millennium: Journal of International Studies. – 1983.
- Vol. 12. - № 2. P.162–175;107. Dryzek J. Deliberative global politics: Discourse and democracy in adivided world. – Cambridge: Polity, 2006. – 208 P.108. Etzioni A. From empire to community: A new approach tointernational relations. – New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. – 258 P.109. Falk R. Resisting «globalisation‐from‐above» through «globalisation‐from‐below» //New Political Economy. – 1997.
– Vol. 2. – №. 1. – P. 17-24;110. Falk R. The changing role of global civil society. / Edited by G. Bakerand D. Chandler / Global Civil Society: Contested Futures. - New York:Routledge. – 2005. - P.59-71.135111. Frederick H. Computer networks and the emergence of global civilsociety //Global networks: Computers and international communication. / Editedby Linda M. Harasim. – Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. - 1993. – P.283-295.112.
Germain R., Kenny M. Engaging Gramsci: International relationstheory and the new Gramscians. // Review of International Studies. – 1998. - Vol.24. - №. 1. - P.3–21;113. GillS.Globalization,marketcivilization,anddisciplinaryneoliberalism //Globalization, Critical Concepts in Sociology: Globalization–Education and Management Agendas. – 1995. – Vol. 42.
– P. 256-281;114. Gill S. Reflections on Global Order and Sociohistorical Time. //Alternatives. - Summer 1991. - Vol. 16. - №. 3. - P.275-314;115. Global Civil Society 2001. / Edited by Helmut Anheier, MarliesGlasius and Mary Kaldor. – Oxford: Oxford University Press. - 2001.116. Habermas J.
The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: AnInquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1989. – 301 P.117. Hay C., Wincott D. Structure, agency and historical institutionalism//Political studies. – 1998. – Vol. 46. – №. 5. – P. 951-957.118. Kaldor M. Transnational civil society. / Human Rights in GlobalPolitics – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
– P. 195-213.119. Keane J. Global Civil Society? / Global Civil Society yearbook 2001./ Edited by Helmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius, and Mary Kaldor. - Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press. – 2001. – P. 23-47.120. Keane J. Global civil society? – Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
- 2003. – 220 P.121. Keane J. Introduction / Civil society and the state: new Europeanperspectives. / Edited by John Keane. - London: Verso. – 1988.136122. Kellner D. Globalisation from below? Toward a radical democratictechnopolitics //Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. – 1999. – Vol. 4.– №. 2. – P. 101-113.123. KendallG.,WoodwardI.,SkrbisZ.TheSociologyofCosmopolitanism: Globalization, Identity, Culture and Government.
- N.Y.:Palgrave Macmillan. – 2009. - 177 P.124. Kitschelt H. Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-CommunistDemocracies Theoretical Propositions // Party Politics. – 1995. – Vol. 1. – №. 4. –P. 447-472.125. Kitschelt H. The radical right in Western Europe: A comparativeanalysis. – Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. – 1997. – 332 P.126. Langlois A. Human rights and cosmopolitan liberalism //CriticalReview of International Social and Political Philosophy. – 2007. – Vol.
10. – №. 1.– P. 29-45.127. Lipschutz R. Reconstructing world politics: The emergence of globalcivil society. // Millennium: Journal of International Studies. – 1992. - Vol. 21. - №3. - P.389–420.128. Lu C. Cosmopolitan liberalism and the faces of injustice ininternational relations //Review of International Studies. – 2005. – Vol. 31. – №. 2.– P. 401-408;129. Lupel A. Tasks of a global civil society: Held, Habermas anddemocratic legitimacy beyond the nation-state //Globalizations.
– 2005. – Vol. 2. –№. 1. – P.117-133;130. Norris P. Global governance and cosmopolitan citizens // Governancein a globalizing world. / Edited by Joseph S. Nye and John D. Donahue. –Washington: Bookings Institution, 2000. – P. 155-177.131. Norris P. Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. –Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - 2005. – 349 P.132. Nye J. Soft power // Foreign policy. – 1990. – № 80. – P. 153-171.137133.
Oliveira M. The case for global civil society //National Civic Review.– 1995. – Vol. 84. – №. 2. – P.130-132.134. Political Innovation and Conceptual Change / Edited by Terence Ball,James Farr, and Russell L. Hanson. - New York: Cambridge University Press. 1989. – 366 P.135. Raiser K.
The World Council of Churches and international civilsociety //The Ecumenical Review. – 1994. – Vol. 46. – №. 1. – P. 38-44.136. Reitan R. Global activism. – N.Y.: Routledge, 2007. – 332 P.137. Roach C. Cultural imperialism and resistance in media theory andliterary theory // Media, Culture & Society. – 1997. – Vol. 19. – №. 1. – P. 47-66.138. Roudometof V. Transnationalism, cosmopolitanism and glocalization//Current sociology. – 2005.
– Vol. 53. – №. 1. – P. 113-135;139. Salamon L. Global civil society: An overview. – The Johns HopkinsUniversity: Center for Civil Society Studies. - 2003.140. Salamon L. The rise of the nonprofit sector //Foreign Affairs. – 1994. Vol. 73. - №. 4. – P. 109-122.141. Santos B. The Rise of the Global Left: The World Social Forum andBeyond. - London: Zed Books. - 2006. – 222 P.142. Scholte J. Global civil society. // The Political Economy ofGlobalization.
– L.: Macmillan. - 2000. - P.178-190.143. Seckinelgin H. Civil society as a metaphor for western liberalism//Global society. – 2002. – Vol. 16. – №. 4. – P. 357-376.144. Sherkat D., Blocker T. Explaining the political and personalconsequences of protest. // Social Forces. – 1997. – Vol. 75. – №. 3. – P. 10491070.145. Stanley T.
Karl Barth and Jürgen Habermas: Transcendental aporias ofGlobal Civil Society //Political Theology. – 2008. – Vol. 9. – №. 4. – P. 477-502.146. Tarrow S. The New Transnational Activism. - Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005. - 258 P.138147. Tomlinson J. Cultural imperialism. – London: Blackwell. – 1991. 187P.148. Turner S. Global civil society, anarchy and governance: assessing anemerging paradigm //Journal of Peace Research. – 1998. – Vol. 35. – №. 1.
– P.25-42.149. Warkentin C., Mingst K. International Institutions, the State, andGlobal Civil Society in the Age of the World Wide Web // Global Governance. Apr-Jun 2000. - Vol. 6. - Issue 2. - P.237-256.150. Warr K. The normative promise of religious organizations in globalcivil society //Journal of Church and State.
– 1999. – Vol. 41. – №. 3. – P. 499523.151. Went R. Globalization: Neoliberal challenge, radical responses. –London: Pluto Press. -- 2000. – 170 P.152. Wuthnow R. Communities of discourse: Ideology and Social Structurein the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism. - Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. - 1993.
– 751 P.139.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
