Диссертация (1146365), страница 49
Текст из файла (страница 49)
229–235.66.Штаерман Е.М. Культура Древнего Рима. Т. 1. М., 1985. 431 с.67.Alexander M. The Commentariolum petitionis as an Attack onElection Campaigns // Athenaeum. Berlin, 2009. Vol. 97. P. 31–57, 369–395.68.Alexander M. Trials in the late Roman Republic, 149 B. C. to 50 B.C. Toronto, 1990. 235 p.69.Annequin J. L’esclavage et la crise des institutions à Rome. Laconjuration de Catilina de Mérimée // Dialogues d’histoire ancienne. Vol. 18,№1, Besançon, 1992.
P. 37–58.70.Astin A.E. The Lex Annalis before Sulla // Latomus. Vol. XXXII.Bruxelles, 1958. P. 49–64.71.Badian E. Foreign clientelae. Oxford, 1958. 342 p.72.Badian E. Publicans and sinners. Private Enterprise in the Service ofthe Roman Republic. Ithaca, New York, 1972. 170 p.73.Badian E. Lucius Sulla - The Deadly Reformer.
Sydney, 1970. 32 p.74.Balsdon J.P.V.D. The Commentariolum Petitionis // The CQ. 1963.Vol. 13. № 2. P. 242–250.75.Batstone W. Cicero's Construction of Consular Ethos in the. FirstCatilinarian // TAPA. Vol. 124. 1994. P. 211-266.76.Billows R. A. Julius Caesar. The Colossus of Rome. L. – N. Y., 2009.335 p.77.Boissier G. La conjuration de Catilina. Paris, 1905. 259 p.21578.Bradley K.R.
Slaves and the Conspiracy of Catiline // ClassicalPhilology, Vol. 73, No. 4. 1978. P. 329–336.79.Bringmann K. Krise und Ende der römischen Republik. Berlin, 2003.236 S.80.Broughton T. R. S. The Мagistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. II.NY, 1952. 647 p.81.Brunt Р.А.
Sulla and the Asian Publicans // Latomus. 1956. 15. Р. 17–25.82.Brunt P.А. Italian Manpower 225 B.C.–A.D. 14. Oxford, 1971. 776 p.83.Cadoux T.J. The Absent Senator of 5 December 63 B.C. // CQ. Vol.56. № 2. 2006. P. 612-618.84.Canfora L. The life and Times of People’s dictator / trans. by M. Hilland K. Windle. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1999. 392 p.85.Carcopino J. Les secrets de la correspondance de Cicéron.
Vol I.Paris, 1947. 446 p.86.Cary M. Rome in the absence of Pompey // CAH. Cambridge, 1932.Vol. IX. P. 475–505.87.Christ K. Sulla. Eine römische Karriere. München, 2002. 236 S.88.Ciaceri E. Cicerone e suoi tempi. Vol. I. Milano, 1939. 311 p.89.Drumann W. Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von derrepublikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung.
Leipzig, 1908. Bd. 4. 621S.90.Drumann W. Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von derrepublikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung. Leipzig, 1908. Bd. 5. 708S.91.Dugan J. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in theRhetorical Works. Oxford, 2005. X, 388 p.92.Eussner A. Commentariolum Petitionis examinavit et ex Buecherirecensione passim emendatum edidit Adam Eussner.
Würzburg, 1872. 43 S.93.Flower H.I. Roman Republics. Princeton, 2010. 204 p.21694.Fredericksen M.W. Caesar, Cicero and the Problem of Debt // JRS.Col. 56. 1966. P. 128–141.95.Fröhlich F. Cornelius (Sulla) // RE. Bd. 7. Stuttgart, 1900. Sp. 1522–1566.96.Garzetti A. Marco Licinio Crasso. L'uomo e il politico // Athenaeum20. 1942. P. 12–40.97.Gaughan J. E. Murder was not a Crime. Austin, 2010.
194 p.98.Gelzer M. Pompeius. München, 1959. 296 S.99.Gelzer M. Licinius (Crassus) // RE. Bd 13,1.HbBd 27. Stuttgart, 1926.Sp. 295–331.100.Gelzer M. Sergius (Catilina) // RE. Bd 13,1. HbBd 27. Stuttgart, 1926.Sp. 1693–1711.101.Gelzer M. Tullius (Cicero) // RE.
HbBd 13. Stuttgart, 1926. Sp. 827–1021.102.Genovese E. Cicero and Sallust: Catiline's “Ruina” // CW. Vol. 68.№3. 1974. P. 171–177.103.Gerrish J. Sallust’s Histories and Triumviral Historiography. Diss.PhD. 2012. 266 p.104.Goldsworthy A. Caesar. Life of a Colossus. New Haven, London,2006. 583 p.105.Greenhalgh P.
Pompey: the Roman Alexander. London, 1980. 267 p.106.Gruen E. S. Notes on the “First Catilinarian Conspiracy” // CPh. Vol.64. 1969. P. 20–24.107.Gruen E.S. M. Licinius Crassus. A review article // American Journalof Ancient History. Vol.
2. 1977. P. 117-128.108.Gruen E.S. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley,Los Angeles, 1994. 596 p.109.Gundel H. Vettius (6) // RE. Bd 8,2. HbBd 16. Stuttgart, 1958. Sp.1844-1850.217110.Gwatkin W. E. Jr. Cicero in Catilinam 1, 19 - Catiline's Attempt toPlace Himself in Libera Custodia // TAPA. Vol. 65. 1934. P. 271-281.111.Hammar I. Making Enemies: The Logic of Immorality in CiceronianOratory. Stockholm, 2013. 384 p.112.Hardy E. G. The Catilinarian Conspiracy in its Context: a Re-study ofthe Evidence // JRS. Vol.
7. 1917. P. 153–228.113.Harrisson I. Catiline, Clodius, and Popular Politics at Rome duringthe 60s and 50s BCE. // BICS. Vol. 51. 2008. P. 95–118.114.Heider U. Lucius Sergius Catilina – Ein Verbrecher aus verlorenerEhre? // Von Romulus zu Augustus. Große Gestalten der römischenRepublik. München, 2000.
S. 268–278.115.Henderson M.I. De commentariolo petitionis // JRS. 1950. Vol. 40. P.8–21.116.Hendrickson G.L. The Commentariolum petitionis Attributed toQuintus Cicero; authenticity, Rhetorical form, Style, Text. Chicago, 1903. 44p.117.Hellegouarc'h J. Le Vocabulaire Latin des Relations et des PartisPolitiques Sous la Republique. Paris, 1963. 601 p.118.Hill H.
Sulla's New Senators in 81 B. C. // CQ. Vol. 26. №3/4. 1932.P. 170–177.119.Hinard F. Les Proscriptions de la Rome républicaine. Paris, 1985. 605p.120.Hoffmann W. Catilina und die Römische Revolution // Gymnasium66. Heidelberg, 1959. S. 459–477.121.Husband R. The Prosecution of Catiline’s Associates // CJ. Vol. 9. No.1 (Oct.
1913). P. 4–23.122.JohnC.DieEntstehungsgeschichtederCatilinarischenVerschwörung; ein Beitrag zur Kritik des Sallustius. Besonderer Abdruck ausdem achten Supplementbande der Jahrbücher für classische Philologie.Leipzig, 1876. S. 703–819.218123.John C. Der tag der ersten rede Ciceros gegen Catilina // Philologus.Vol. 46. 1887. S. 650-665.124.Keaveney A.
Sulla. The Last Republican. L.; N. Y., 2005. 233 p.125.Keaveney, A. Strachan, J.C.G. L. Catilina legatus: Sallust, Histories1.46 M // CQ. Vol. 31. 1981. P. 363–366.126.Kelly G. P. A History of Exile in the Roman Republic. Cambridge,2006. 260 p.127.Koehn C. Pompeius, Cassius und Augustus. Bemerkungen zumimperium maius // Chiron. Mitteilungen der Kommission für alte Geschichteund Epigraphik des Deutschen archäologischen Instituts.
Sonderdruck ausBand 40. 2010. S. 301–322.128.Kunkel W. Wittman R. Staatsordnung und Staatspraxis der römischenRepublik. Munchen, 1995. 806 S.129.Last H. The breakdown of the Sullan system and the rise of Pompey //CAH. Cambridge, 1932. Vol. IX. P. 313–349.130.Leach J. Pompey the Great. London, 1978. 265 p.131.Letzner W. Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Versuch einer Biographie.Münster, 2000. 330 S.132.Lewis R. G. Catilina and the Vestal// The Classical Quarterly, NewSeries. Vol. 51, №1.
Cambridge, 2001. P. 141–149.133.Lintott A.W. P. Clodius Pulcher – “Felix Catilina?” // Greece & Rome,Second Series, Vol. 14, No. 2. Cambridge, 1967. P. 157–169.134.Laurand L. Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron. Paris, 1907.588 p.135.MacKay Ch. The Breakdown of the Roman Republic. Cambridge,2009. 445 p.136.Marshall B. Crassus. A Political Biography. Amsterdam, 1976. 205 p.137.Marshall B.
The Vote of a Bodyguard for the Consuls of 65 // CPh.1977. Vol. 72. P. 318–320.219138.Marshall B. A Historical Commentary On Asconius. Columbia, 1985.342 p.139.Marshall B. Catilina and the Execution of M. Marius Gratidianus //CQ. N.S. Vol. 35. №1. 1985. P. 124–133.140.McDermott W. Cicero's Publication of his Consular Orations //Philologus. Vol. 116. 1972.
P. 277-284.141.McDermott W. Lex de Tribunicia Potestate (70 B.C.) // CPh. Vol. 72.1977. P. 49–52.142.McGushin P. Commentary // Sallust. The Histories. Oxford, 1992.Vol. 1. P. 64–259.143.Mérimée P. Études sur l’histoire romaine. P., 1883. 430 p.144.Meyer Ed. Caesars Monarchie und das Principat des Pompejus. Stuttg.Berlin, 1922. 632 S.145.Miltner F. Pompeius // RE. Hbd. 42. 1952.
Sp. 2062–2211.146.Mommsen Th. Römisches Strafrecht. Graz, 1955. 1078 S.147.Mommsen Th. Römisches Staatsrecht. Bd. I. Leipzig, 1876. 682 S.148.Morstein-Marx R. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the LateRoman Republic. Cambridge, 2004. 313 p.149.Mühll P. von der. Hortensius // RE. Bd. VIII. Stuttgart, 1913. Sp.2470–2481.150.Neumann N. Der Ausnahmezustand in der Römischen Republik. Diss.PhD. Wien, 2010. 373 S.151.Nicolet C. L'ordre équestre `a l'époque républicaine. Paris, 1966. 753p.152.Nisbet R.G.M.
The commentariolum petitionis: Some Argumentsagainst Authenticity // JRS. 1961. Vol. 35. P. 84–87.153.Oman Ch. Seven Roman statesmen of the later republic. London,1903. 348 p.220154.Osmond P.J. Catiline in Fiesole and Florence: The After-Life of aRoman Conspirator // International Journal of the Classical Tradition, Vol.
7,No. 1. 2000. P. 3-38.155.Pagán V.E. Toward a Model of Conspiracy Theory for Ancient Rome// New German Critique, №. 103. 2008. P. 27–49.156.Pelling Ch. Plutarch and Catiline // Hermes. Bd. 113. H. 3. 1985. P.311–329.157.Philips E.J. Catiline's Conspiracy // Historia. 1976. Bd. 25. H. 4. P.441–448.158.Phillips E.J. Asconius’ magni homines // RhM, 1973. Bd. 116. H.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
