Диссертация (1146365), страница 50
Текст из файла (страница 50)
3/4.P. 353–357.159.Phillips E.J. Cicero and the Prosecution of C. Manilius // Latomus.1970. Vol. 29. P. 595–607.160.Pina Polo F. Contra arma verbis. Stuttgart, 1996. 216 S.161.Pina Polo F. Veteres Candidati: Losers in the Elections in RepublicanRome // Vae Victis! Perdedores en el mundo antiguo. Collecció Instrumenta,14. Barcelona, 2012. P. 63–83.162. Radin M. The Conviction of Lentulus // Latin Leaflet.
Vol. IV. № 100.1904. P. 1-4.163. Ramsey J.T. Commentary // Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Oxford, 2007.252 p.164. Richardson J. The ”Commentariolum petitionis“ // Historia. 1971. Bd.20. H. 4. P. 436–442.165.Salmon E. T. Catiline, Crassus and Caesar. The American Journal ofPhilology. Baltimore, 1935. Vol. 56. No. 4. P. 302–316.166.Santangelo F.
Sulla and the Senate: A Reconcideration // CCGG. Vol.17. 2006. P. 7–22.167.Santangelo F. Sulla, the Elites and the Empire. A Study of RomanPolicies in Italy and the Greek East. Leiden, Boston. 2007. 300 p.221168.Schauer M. CUM TACENT, CLAMANT. ”Beredtes Schweigen” alsInstrument rhetorischer Strategien bei Cicero // RhM. 154. Köln, 2011.
S.300–319.169.Schmal S. Sallust. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York, 2001. 216 S.170.Schnorr Karolsfeld H. von. Über die Reden und Briefe bei Sallust.Berlin, 1893. 81 S.171.Schwartz Ed. Die Berichte ueber die Catilinarische Verschwoerung //Hermes. Bd. 32. 1897. S. 554–608.172.Scullard H. H. From the Gracchi to Nero. A History of Rome from133 B.C.
to A.D. 68. N.Y., 1963 484 p.173.Seager R. The First Catilinarian Conspiracy // Historia. Bd. 13. 1964.P. 338–347.174.Seager R. Iusta Catilinae // Historia. Vol. 22. 1973. P. 240–248.175.Seager R. Sulla // CAH. Vol. IX. Cambridge, 2008. P. 165–207.176.Shaw B.D. Debt in Sallust // Latomus. T. 34. 1975. P. 187–196.177.Speck H. Katilina im Drama der Weltliteratur. Leipzig, 1906. 98 S.178.Steel C. The End of the Roman Republic 146 to 44 BC: Conquest andCrisis. Edinburgh, 2013. 284 p.179.Steel C. Rethinking Sulla: the Case of the Roman Senate // // CQ.
Vol.64. Issue 02. 2014. P. 657–668.180.Stern E. von. Catilina und die Parteikaempfe in Rom der Jahre 66–63.Dorpat, 1883. 179 S.181.Stone A.M. A House of Notoriety: An Episode in the Campaign for theConsulate in 64 B. C. // CQ. Vol. 48. № 2. 1998. P. 487-491.182.Strachan-Davidson J.L. Cicero and the Fall of the Roman Republic.London, 1894. 446 p.183.Strasburger H. Optimates // RE.
Bd 36. Stuttgart, 1939. Sp. 773–798.184.Sumner G. V. Cicero, Pompeius, and Rullus // TAPA. Vol. 97. 1966.P. 569–582.185.Syme R. The Roman Revolution. Oxford, 1939. 568 p.222186.Syme R. Sallust. Berkeley; L.A.; L., 1964. 433 p.187.Tatum W. J. Always I Am Caesar. Oxford, 2008. 216 p.188.Taylor L.R. Caesar's early career // CPh. Vol. 36 (№2). 1941. P. 113–132.189.Taylor L.
R. Caesar and the Roman Nobility // TAPA. Vol. 73. 1942.P. 1–24.190.Thein A.G. Sulla’s Public Image and the Politics of Civic Renewal.Diss. Ph.D. Univ. of Pennsylvania. 2002. 411 p.191.Ungern-Sternberg J. v. Ciceros erste Catilinarische Rede und DiodorXL 5a // Gymnasium 78. 1971. S. 47–54.192.Valverde L. A. El asesinato de Cn. Calpurnio Pisón // Gerión. Vol. 20.2002.
P. 255–279.193.Ward A.M. Politics in the trials of Manilius and Cornelius // TAPA.1970. Vol. 101. P. 545–556.194.Ward A. M. Cicero’s Fight against Crassus and Caesar in 65 and 63B.C. // Historia. Bd. 21. 2. 1972. P. 244-258.195.Ward A.M. Marcus Licinius Crassus and the Late Roman Republic.Columbia and London, 1977. 323 p.196.Waters K. H. Cicero, Sallust and Catiline // Historia. Vol. 19. №2. S.l., 1970. P. 195–215.197.Willems P. Le sénat de la République romaine; sa composition et sesattributions.
Vol. I. Louvain; Berlin. 1883.198.Williams K.F. Manlius’ Mandata: Sallust Bellum Catilinae 33 // CPh,Vol. 95, No. 2. Chicago, 2000. P. 160–171.199.Wirszubski Ch. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the LateRepublic and Early Principate. Cambridge, 1950. 182 p.200.Wiseman T.P. New Men In the Roman Senate 139 B.C. – A.D. 14.Oxford, 1971. 155 p.201.Yavetz Z.
The Failure of Catiline’s Conspiracy // Historia. 1971. Bd.12. H. 4. P. 485–499.223.