Диссертация (1145129), страница 89
Текст из файла (страница 89)
J.M. Nicholas] – Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1977.413.Paivio, A. Neomentalism // Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29. – 1975. – P. 263-291.414.Pearce, W.B., Littlejohn, S.W. Moral conflict: when social worlds collide. – ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Inc., 1997.415.Perner, J. Understanding the representational mind. – Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press,1991.
– 362 p. URL: http://bookfi.org/book/1187416 (дата обращения 03.03.2015)416.Pfeifer, H., Iacoboni, M., Mazziotta, C., Dapretto, M. Mirroring other‘s emotionsrelates to empathy and interpersonal competence in children // NeuroImage, 39. – 2008. – Pp.4272076-2085. URL: http://iacoboni.bol.ucla.edu/pdfs/Neuroimage_Pfeifer_v39p2076.pdf (датаобращения 04.03.15)417.Political spin control // Merriam-Webster Dictionary. URL: http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/spin%20control (дата обращения 26.01.14)418.Premack, D.G., Woodruff, G.
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? //Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1. – 1978. – Pp. 515-526.419.Proust, J. Metacognition and metarepresentation: is a self-directed theory of mind aprecondition for metacognition? // Synthese, 159. – 2007. – Pp. 271-295. URL:http://joelleproust.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Metacognition-andMetarepresentation.pdf (дата обращения 14.03.15)420.Rababah, G. Second Language Communication Strategies: Definitions, Taxonomies,Data Elicitation Methodology and Teachability Issues.
A Review Article. – 2002.https://clck.ru/9T7Ck (дата обращения 29.03.15)421.Randall, D., H. Shrobe, P. Szolovits What is a Knowledge Representation? // AIMagazine, 14 (1), 1993 – P. 17-33 http://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/ftp/psz/k-rep.html422.Ranum, O. Richelieu, premier home d‘État, et les instances de la raison. // Richelieu.L‘Art et le Pouvoir. – Montréal: Musée des beaux-arts de Montréal, 2002. – Pp. 58-63.423.Riley, A., Burke, P.J. Identities and self-verification in the small group // SocialPsychology Quaterly, 58. – 1995.
– Pp. 61-73.424.Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L. Premotor cortex and the recognitionof motor actions // Cognitive Brain Research, 3. – 1996. – Pp. 131-141.425. Rizzolatti, G., Arbib, M.A. Language within our grasp // Trends in Neurosciences. – Vol.
21, No. 5.– 1998. – Pp. 188-194. URL: http://www.liralab.it/teaching/ROBOTICA/docs/rizzolatti.arbib.1998.pdf(дата обращения 04.03.15)426.Rokeach, M. From Individual to Institutional Values: With Special Reference to theValues of Science // Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal London: the FreePress, 1979. – Pp.
47-70.427.Rosenthal, D. Consciousness and Mind. – Oxford: Clarendon press, 2005. – 392 p. URL:https://sites.google.com/site/davidrosenthal12/cmb.pdf?attredirects=0(датаобращения05.03.15)428.Rumelhart, D.E., J.L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group Parallel DistributedProcessing.
Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol 1. Foundations. –Cambridge, Mass., London: the MIT Press, 1987.429.Sacks, O. Seeing Voices: a Journey into the World of the Deaf. – Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press, 1989.430.Schank, R.C. Dynamic Memory. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.431.Schank, R.C., R.P. Abelson Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: an Inquiry intoHuman Knowledge Structures. – Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., 1977.432.Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W.
Toward a theory of the universal content and structure ofvalues: Extensions and cross-cultural replications // Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology. – Vol. 58, No. 5. – 1990. – Pp. 878-891 URL: http://psycnet.apa.org.scihub.org/journals/psp/58/5/878/ (дата обращения 14.04.15)433.Schwartz, S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advancesand empirical tests in 20 countries // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. [Ed. byM. Zanna]. – Vol.
25. – New York: Academic Press, 1992. – Pp.1-65.434.Schwartz, S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of humanvalues? // Journal of Social Issues, 50. – 1994. – Pp. 19-45.435.Schwartz, S.H., Sagiv, L. Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure ofvalues // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26. – 1995. – Pp. 92-116.428436.Scott, S. Metarepresentation in Philosophy and Psychology // 23rd Annual Conference ofthe Cognitive Science Society, 1-4 August, 2001, Edinburgh, Scotland. URL:http://conferences.inf.ed.ac.uk/cogsci2001/pdf-files/0910.pdf (дата обращения 09.03.15)437.Searle, J.R.
A Re-Discovery of the Mind. – Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: theMIT Press: 1992.438. Searle, J.R. The Construction of Social Reality. – N.Y.: The Free Press, 1995.439. Serpe, R.T., Stryker, Sh. The construction of Self and the reconstruction of socialrelationships. // Advances in Group Processes. – 4. – 1987. – Pp. 41-66.440.Sinha, C., Rodrígez, C. Language and the signifying object // The Shared Mind.
Ed. byJ. Zlatev, T.P. Racine, Ch. Sinha, E. Itkonen. – Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsPublishing Company, 2008 – Pp. 357-378.441.Shabes, V. Psycholinguistic Approach to Continual-Discrete Theory (CDT) of SocialCognitive Representation. Неизданное.442.Shabes, V., Troshchenkova, E., Potapova, T., Cooper, K., Augusen, H. ExperimentalResearch on Russian and Swedish Value Systems (preliminary survey data of cognitivepsycholinguistic experiments with teachers, university teacher-students and school pupils).St.-Petersburg, 2007.443. Shabes, V., Troshchenkova, E., Potapova, T., Ivarsson, L., Damber, U., Bostedt, G.Complex Values in Different Cultures: Some Research Results of PsycholinguisticExperiments with Russian and Swedish Students // US-China Education Review A.
– Vol. 2,Number 1, January 2012 (Serial number 8). – EL Monte: David Publishing Company, 2012. –Pp. 70-83.444.Shabes, V., Bostedt, G., Troshchenkova, E., Ivarsson, L., Damber, U., Potapova T.An Experimental Study of Russian and Swedish Value Systems // Identities in Transition.eBook Ed. by Georgina Tsolidis. – Inter-Disciplinary Press, 2012 URL:https://www.interdisciplinarypress.net/online-store/ebooks/society-and-culture/identities-intransition445.Sharifian, F.
Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Theoretical Framework andApplications. – Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2011.446.Scholl, B.J., Leslie, A.M. Modularity, development, and ―theory of mind‖. // Mind andlanguage, 14. – 1999. – Pp. 131-153.447.Sørensen, T. A Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant SociologyBased on Similarity of Species and Its Application to Analyses of the Vegetation on DanishCommons. BiologiskeSkrifter // KongeligeDanskeVidenskabernesSelskab.
– 5 (4). –1957. –Pp. 1–34.448.Sperber, D. How do we communicate? // How things are: A science toolkit for the mind.[J. Brockman, K. Matson (Eds.)]. – N.Y.: Morrow, 1995. – Pp.191-199. URL:http://www.docdatabase.net/more-how-do-we-communicate-dan-sperber-1099199.html (датаобращения 09.03.15)449. Sperber, D.
Metarepresentation // The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences.[R.A. Wilson, F.C. Keil (Eds.)]. – Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999. – Pp. 541-543.450. Sperber, D. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective // Metarepresentations: AMultidisciplinary Perspective. [Ed. by D. Sperber]. – Oxford University Press, 2000. – Pp. 117-137. URL:http://books.google.ru/books?id=ZNA1O3Dyb6sC&pg=PA117&hl=ru&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false; http://cogprints.org/851/1/metarep.htm (дата обращения 09.03.15)451.Sperber, D., Wilson, D.
Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-reading // Mind andLanguage, 17. – 2002. – Pp. 3-23. URL: http://www.dan.sperber.fr/wpcontent/uploads/2009/09/PragmaticsModularityMindReading.pdf (дата обращения 15.03.15)452.Spin // Oxford Dictionaries. URL: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/spin(дата обращения 26.01.14)429453.
Spin // McMillan Dictionary. URL: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/spin_27 (датаобращения 26.01.14)454.Steele, E.D., Redding, W.C. The American Value System: Premises for Persuasion //Western Speech. No. 26. – 1962. – Pp. 83-91.455.Stets, J.E., Burke, P.J. A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity.// Handbook of Selfand Identity. [M.R. Leary, J.P. Tangney (Eds.)]. – Guilford Press, 2003. – Pp.
128-152. URL:http://wat2146.ucr.edu/Papers/02a.pdf (дата обращения 22.04.14)456.Stryker, Sh. Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolicinteraction theory for family research // Journal of Marriage and the Family. – 1968. – Pp.558-64.457.Stryker, Sh. Fundamental principles of social interaction // Sociology. [Ed. by N.Smelser]. – New York: Wiley, 1973. – Pp. 495-547.458.Stryker, Sh., Serpe, R.T. Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior //Personality, roles, and social behavior.
[W. Ickes, E. Knowles (Eds.)]. – New York: SpringerVerlag, 1982. – Pp. 199-218.459.Stryker, Sh. Exploring the relevance of social cognition for the relationship of Self andsociety // The Self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion, and action. [J. Howard, P.L. Callero(Eds.)]. – Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1991. – Pp. 19-41.460. Stryker, Sh., Serpe, R.T. Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent,overlapping, or complementary concepts? // Social Psychology Quaterly, 57. – 1994. – Pp. 16-35.461.Tajfel, H. La catégorisation sociale.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
