Диссертация (1139981), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
RoupetM.,HupertanV.,TraxerO.etal.Comparisonofopennephroureterectomy and ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upperurinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urology 2006 Jun; 67 (6): 1181-7.87. Roupret M, Cussenot O, Ghartier-Kastler E, Thibault P; Richard F, Conort P,Traxer O. Role of endoscopy in the management of upper urinary tract tumors. //Prog Urol. 2006 Nov; 16 (5):537-41.88. Rudnick D.M., Stoller M.L. Complications of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.Can.
J. Urol. 1999; 6:872–5.89. Rutner A.V. Ureteral balloon dilatation and stone basketing // Urology. - 1984. Vol.23.- pp. 44.90. Schatloff O., Weintraub Y., Leibovici D. Carbon dioxide-based nephroscopyduring laparoscopic pyeloplasty provides suboptimal view when stones arelocated in the lower calices. J. Endourol. 2011;25:97-9.91.
Schultz A., Kristensen J.K., Bilde T. et al. Ureteroscopy: results andcomplications. J Urol 1987; 137:865–866.92. Schuster T.G., Hollenbeck B.K., Faerber G.J. et al. Complications ofureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 2001;166:538–540.93. Shoma A.M., El Nahas A.R., Bazeed M.A.
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: aprospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal approach andretroperitoneoscopy. J Urol. 2007; 178:2020–2024.94. Skolarikos A., de la Rorette J. Prevention and treatment of complicationsfollowing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008; 18:229-234.95. Smith T.P., Darcy M.D., Amplatz K. New super-stiff guide wire. // Radiology.
1986.-Vol. 161.-pp. 551-552.96. Srinivas Rajamahanty and Michael Grasso. Flexible ureteroscopy update:indications, instrumentation and technical advances Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct-Dec;24(4): 532–537. PMCID: PMC2684394.17297. Stewart G.D., Tolley D.A. What are the oncological risks of minimal accesssurgery for the treatment of urinary tract cancer? // Eur Urol. 2004 Oct; 46(4):415-20.98. Takagi T., Go T., Takayasu N., Aso Y. A small caliber fiberscope for thevisualization of the urinary tract, biliary tract, and spinal canal. Surgery, 1968;64: 1033–1036.99. Tansu N., Obek C, Onal В., Yalcin V., Oner A., Solok V.
A simple position toprovide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca duringextracorporeal sock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar // Eur.Urol.2004. Vol. 45. № 3. pp. 352-355.100.Tavora F., Fajardo D.A., Lee T.K., et al. Small endoscopic biopsies ofureter and renal pelvis: pathologic pitfalls. A.M. J. Surg. Pathol. 2009 Oct;33(10): 1540-6Textbook of Endourology, 3rd Edition ISBN: 978-1-4443-3554-5.101.Tiselius H.G., Andersson A. Stone burden in an average Swedishpopulation of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stonesize be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol 2003 Mar; 4(3):275–81.102.Traxer O., Geavlete B., de Medina S.G., Sibony M., Al-Qahtani S.M.Narrow-band imaging digital flexible ureteroscopy in detection of upper urinarytract transitional-cell carcinoma: initial experience.
J. Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):19-23 PMID: 21247287.103.Tugcu V., Resorlu B., Sahin S., Atar A., Kocakaya R., Eksi M., Tasci A.I.Flexible Ureteroscopy versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy forthe Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones >15 mm: A Single SurgeonExperience. Urol Int. 2015; 96(1):77-82.104.Ugurlu İ.M., Akman T., Binbay M., Tekinarslan E., Yazıcı Ö., AkbulutM.F., ÖzgörF., MüslümanoğluA.Y.Outcomesofretrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients173withanomalouskidneys.Urolithiasis.
2015Feb;43(1):77-82.doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0713-9. Epub 2014 Aug 27.105.Vorrakitpokatorn P., Permtongchuchai K., Raksamani E.O., PhettongkamA. Perioperative complications and risk factors of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2006; 89:826–33.106.Wilhelm K., Hein S., Adams F., Schlager D., Miernik A., Schoenthaler M.Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesicconsumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renalstones 10-35 mm.
World J. Urol. 2015 May 14. PMID: 25971205.107.Wu C.F., Shee J.J., Lin W.Y., Lin C.L., Chen C.S. Comparison betweenextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope withholmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
J. ofUrol. 172 (5, Part 1 of 2): 1899-1902, November 2004.108.Xu G., Wen J., Li Z., Zhang Z., Gong X., Chen J., Du C. A comparativestudy to analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy combined withholmium laser lithotripsy for residual calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015 Mar 15; 8(3): 4501-7. eCollection 2015. PMID:26064375; PMCID: PMC4443209.109.Yamany T., van Batavia J., Ahn J., Shapiro E., Gupta M. Ureterorenoscopyfor upper tract urothelial carcinoma: how often are we missing lesions?Urology. 2015 Feb; 85(2):311-5.110.Youssef R.F., El-Nahas A.R., El-Assmy A.M., El-Tabey N.A., El-HefhawyA.S., Eraky I., El-Kenawy M.R., El-Kappany H.A., Sheir K.Z. Shock WaveLithotripsy Versus Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Calculi (<20mm): A Comparative Matched-Pair Study.
// Urology. 2009 Apr 9..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
