Диссертация (1139643), страница 39
Текст из файла (страница 39)
Opin. Obstetr. Gynecol. – 2008. – Vol.20, N 3. – P. 269–74.168. Galfano A., Novara G., Iafrate M. et al. Surgical outcomes aftermodified antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy: a prospective analysis of 700 consecutivepatients with idiopathic varicocele. // J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 179, N 5. – P. 1933–7.169. Gat Y., Gornish M. Varicocele. Where, why and, if so, how? // J. Urol.– 2005.
– Vol. 173, N 6. – P. 2208.170. Glassberg K.I. Adolescent varicocelectomy-is the potential for catchup growth related to age and/or Tanner stage? // J. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 181, N 6. –P. 2830-1.171. Glassberg K.I., Poon S.A., Gjertson C.K. et al. Laparoscopic lymphaticsparing varicocelectomy in adolescents. // J. Urol. – 2008.
– Vol. 180, N 1. – P. 326–30.172. Goldstein M., Tanrikut C. Microsurgical management of maleinfertility. // Nature Clin. Pract. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 3, N 7. – P. 381–91.173. Golebiewski A., Krolak M., Komasara L., Czauderna P. Dye-assistedlymph vessels sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy. // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg.Techniques. – 2007.
– Vol. 17, N 3. – P. 360–3.174. Gosfey S. Untersuchunqen der Vena Spermatica interna durchretrograde Phlebographie Kranken mit Varicocele. // Zschr. f. Urologie. -1959 –Vol52. №2.- P. 105-115/175. Goulis D.G., Kantartzi P.D., Papadimas I. Always important--statisticaljustification for pooling heterogeneous studies? / D.G. Goulis, // Fertil.
Steril. –2008. – Vol. 89, N 4. – P. 1031.241176. Guo Y.J., Wang Z.J., Cao M., Kang G.J. An integrated method workswell on varicocele. // Zhong Hua Nan Ke Xue. – 2006. – Vol. 12, N 9. – P. 800–2.177. Hassan J.M., Adams M.C., Pope J.C. et al. Hydrocele formationfollowing laparoscopic varicocelectomy. // J. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 175, N 3. – P.1076–9.178. Hidalgo-Tamola J., Sorensen M.D., Bice J.B., Lendvay T.S. Pediatricrobot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy. // J. Endourol. – 2009. – Vol. 23, N 8.– P.
1297–300.179. Hsieh M.L., Huang S.T., Chen Y. et al. High inguinal loupe-assistedvaricocelectomy for subfertile men with varicocele: technical feasibility, clinicaloutcomes and complications. // Arch. Androl. – 2006. – Vol. 52, N 3. – P. 179–83.180. Huk J., Fryczkowski M., Kaletka Z., Szwedkowski M. Comparison oftesticular volume before and after laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children andadolescents. // Med. Wieku Rozwojowego.
– 2006. – Vol. 10, N 3. – P.885–91.181. Humke U. Correction of varicocele - laparoscopic varicocelectomy ismore efficient than scrotal sclerosing. // Aktuelle Urologie. – 2006. – Vol. 37, N 4.– P. 245–6.182. Hurtado de Catalfo G.E., Ranieri-Casilla A., Marra F.A. et al. Oxidativestress biomarkers and hormonal profile in human patients undergoingvaricocelectomy. // Intern. J.
Androl. – 2007. – Vol. 30, N 6. – P. 519–30.183. Husar M., Zerhau P., Tuma J. et al. Laparoscopic surgery varicocele inthe childhood and adolescent-our experience with 202 patients. // Rozhledy VChirurgii. – 2006. – Vol. 85, N 10. – P. 498–500.184. Hoeltl W., Hruby W., Anarinejad S. Renal vein anatomy and itsimplication for retroperitoneal surgery. // J.
Urol. -1990- Vol. 143, 1108-1114.185. Ichioka K., Nagahama K., Okubo K. et al. Genetic polymorphisms inglutathione S-transferase T1 affect the surgical outcome of varicocelectomies ininfertile patients. // Asian J. Androl. – 2009. – Vol. 11, N 3. – P. 333–41.186. Inci K., Hascicek M., Kara O.
et al. Sperm retrieval andintracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and242treated and untreated varicocele. // J. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 182, N 4. – P. 1500–5.187. Irkilata H.C., Yildiz O., Yildirim I. et al. The vasodilator effect oftestosterone on the human internal spermatic vein and its relation to varicocelegrade. // J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 180, N 2. – P. 772–6.188. Ishikawa T., Kondo Y., Yamaguchi K. et al. Effect of varicocelectomyon patients with unobstructive azoospermia and severe oligospermia. // BJU Intern.– 2008.
– Vol. 101, N 2. – P. 216–8.189. Ivanissevich O. Left varicocele due to reflux: experience with 4470operative cases in forty-two years // J. Int. Coll. Surg. 1960.Vol. 34. P. 742–55.190. Jallouli H., Hadj Slimen M., Sahnoun A. et al. Surgical treatment ofvaricocele improves fertility and facilitates medically assisted procreation. // Progresen Urologie. – 2008. – Vol. 18, N 8. – P. 543–9.191. Kaneko T., Sasaki S., Yanai Y.
et al. Effect of microsurgical repair ofthe varicocele on testicular function in adolescence and adulthood. // Intern. J. Urol.– 2007. – Vol. 14, N 12. – P. 1080–3.192. Kaouk J.H., Palmer J.S. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: initialexperience in children for varicocelectomy. // BJU Intern. – 2008. – Vol. 102, N1. – P. 97–9.193.
Karayi M.K., Maraj B.H. Effect of varicocelectomy on patients withunobstructive azoospermia and severe oligospermia. // BJU Intern. – 2008. – Vol.101, N 9. – P. 1181.194. Keys C., Barbour L., O'Toole S., Sabharwal A. Laparoscopic surgeryfor varicoceles in children: an audit in a single centre. // J.
Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg.Techniq. – 2009. – N 19. – P. S107-9.195. Khera M., Lipshultz L.I. Evolving approach to the varicocele. // Urol.Clin. North Amer. – 2008. – Vol. 35, N 2. – P. 183–9.196. Kim H.H. et al. Hemodynamic investigation of the left renal vein inpediatric varicocele. Doppler US, Venography and Pressure Measurements.Radiology 2006; 241.243197. Kim H.H., Goldstein M.
Adult varicocele. // Curr. Opin. Urol. – 2008.– Vol. 18, N 6. – P. 608–12.198. Kirkeby H.J., Varicocele testis—update. // Ugeskrift Laeger. – 2009. –Vol. 171, N 47. – P. 3420.199. Koc S., Memis D., Sut N. The preoperative use of gabapentin,dexamethasone, and their combination in varicocele surgery: a randomizedcontrolled trial. // Anesth. Analg. – 2007. – Vol. 105, N 4. – P. 1137–42.200. Kocvara R., Sedlacek J., Dolezal J. et al.
Microsurgical subinguinalvaricocelectomy in children and adolescents. // Casopis Lekaru Cheskych. – 2007.– Vol. 146, N 10. – P. 763–6.201. Kondo Y., Ishikawa T., Yamaguchi K., Fujisawa M. Predictors ofimproved seminal characteristics by varicocele repair. // Andrologia. – 2009. – Vol.41, N 1. – P. 20–3.202. Kotwal S., Madaan S., Prescott S. et al.
Unusual squamous cellcarcinoma of the scrotum arising from a well healed, innocuous scar of an infertilityprocedure: a case report. // Ann. Royal Coll. Surgeon Engl. – 2007. – Vol. 89, N 5.– P. W17–9.203. Krause W. Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts for treatingejaculatory symptoms. // BJU Intern. – 2005. – Vol. 96, N 7. – P. 1145.204. Lampel A. Varicocelectomy by the Bernardi method. // AktuelleUrologie. – 2007. – Vol. 38, N 2.
– P. 157–61.205. Lazarou S., Reyes-Vallejo L., Morgentaler A. Phleboliths invaricoceles presenting as spermatic cord mass. // Fertil. Steril. – 2006. – Vol. 86, N1. – P. 219.206. Lebed B., Packer M., Husmann D., Zaontz M. Results andcomplications of adolescent varicocele repair with intraoperative sodium morrhuatesclerotherapy. // J. Urol.
– 2008. – Vol. 180, N 4. – P. 1837–41.207. Lee J., Binsaleh S., Lo K.C., Jarvi K. Varicocelectomy may benefit menwith a sertoli cell-only pattern on microsurgical testicular sperm extraction: a casereport. // Urology. – 2008. – Vol.
71, N 6. – P. 1226.244208. Lee R., Li P.S., Goldstein M. et al. A decision analysis of treatments fornonobstructive azoospermia associated with varicocele. // Fertil. Steril. – 2009. –Vol. 92, N 1. – P. 188–96.209. Lee R.K., Li P.S., Goldstein M. Simultaneous vasectomy andvaricocelectomy: indications and technique. // Urology. – 2007. – Vol. 70, N 2. – P.362–5.210.
Lee, J.S., Park H.J., Seo J.T. What is the indication of varicocelectomyin men with nonobstructive azoospermia? // Urology. – 2007. – Vol. 69, N 2. – P.352–5.211. Libman J., Jarvi K., Lo K., Zini A. Beneficial effect of microsurgicalvaricocelectomy is superior for men with bilateral versus unilateral repair. // J. Urol.– 2006. – Vol. 176, N 6.
– P. 2602–5.212. Liu J.R., Wang H.X. Chinese and Western medical treatment ofvaricocele caused infertility. // Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. – 2007. – Vol.27, N 11. – P. 971.213. Liu Q.Z., Tian K., Zhang Y.X. et al. Comparison between laparoscopicand open surgical high ligation of the internal spermatic vein. // Zhong Hua Nan KeXue. – 2009. – Vol. 15, N 7. – P. 625–7.214. Lund L., Grazvydas T. Urologic laparoscopy in a Danish countyhospital: indications and results.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
