Диссертация (1139643), страница 40
Текст из файла (страница 40)
// Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Techniq. –2008. – Vol. 18, N 6. – P. 579–82.215. Lv K.L., Zhuang J.T., Zhao L., Wan Z., et.el. Varicocele anatomicduring subingvinal surgical varicocelectomy of Chinese men. //Andrologia. –2015– Vol. 47, N 10. – P.1190-5.216. Mac Lellan D.L., Diamond D.A. Recent advances in external genitalia.// Pediatr.
Clin. North America. – 2006. – Vol. 53, N 3. – P. 449–64.217. Mahomed A.A., McLean V. Cost analysis of minimally invasivesurgery in a pediatric setting. // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Techniq. Part A. – 2007.– Vol. 17, N 3. – P. 375–9.245218. Makari J.H., Atalla M.A., Belman A.B. et al. Safety and efficacy ofintratesticular injection of vital dyes for lymphatic preservation duringvaricocelectomy. // J.
Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 178, N 3. – P. 1026–30.219. Marmar J.L. Benoff S. The safety of ultrasonically guided testisaspiration biopsies and efficacy of use to predict varicocelectomy outcome. //Human Reprod. – 2005. – Vol. 20, N 8. – P. 2279–88.220. Marmar J.L., Agarwal A., Prabakaran S. et al. Reassessing the value ofvaricocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. //Fertil. Steril. – 2007.
– Vol. 88, N 3. – P. 639–48.221. Marmar J.L., Sharlip I., Goldstein M. Results of vasovasostomy orvasoepididymostomy after failed percutaneous epididymal sperm aspirations. // J.Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 179, N 4. – P. 1506–9.222. Marte A., Sabatino, M. Borrelli M.D. et al. LigaSure vessel sealingsystem in laparoscopic Palomo varicocele ligation in children and adolescents. // J.Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Techniq.
Part A. – 2007. – Vol. 17, N 2. – P.272–5.223. Mathers M.J., Sperling H., Rubben H., Roth S. The undescended testis:diagnosis, treatment and long-term consequences. // Deutsch. Arzteblatt Intern. –2009. – Vol. 106, N 33. – P. 527–32.224. Memis D., Hekimoglu S., Kaya G. et al.
Efficacy of levobupivacainewound infiltration with and without intravenous lornoxicam for post-varicocoeleanalgesia: a randomized, double-blind study. // Clin. Drug Investig. – 2008. – Vol.28, N 6. – P. 353–9.225. Mendez-Gallart R., Bautista-Casasnovas A., Estevez-Martinez E.,Varela-Cives R. Laparoscopic Palomo varicocele surgery: lessons learned after 10years' follow up of 156 consecutive pediatric patients. // J. Pediatr.
Urol. – 2009. –Vol. 5, N 2. – P. 126–31.226.May R., Thurner J The cause of predominantly sinistraloccurrence of thrombosis of the pelvic veins. Minerva Cardioangiol 1957; 3: 346349.246227. Minei S., Minamida S., Dobashi M. et al. Varicocele complicatingspontaneous arteriovenous fistula. // Intern. J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 15, N 12. – P.1084–5.228.
Moskovtsev S.I., Lecker I., Mullen J.B. et al. Cause-specific treatmentin patients with high sperm DNA damage resulted in significant DNA improvement.// Systems Biol. Reprod. Med. – 2009. – Vol. 55, N 2. – P. 109-15.229. Muensterer O.J. Genitofemoral nerve injury after laparoscopicvaricocelectomy in adolescents. // J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 180, N 5. – P.
2155–7.230. Nagappan P., Keene D., Ferrara F., et al. Antegrade venographiyidentifies parallel venous duplications in the majoryriti of adolescentswithvaricocele. // J. Urol. – 2015. – N 1. – P. 286 – 90.231. Oswald J., Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye duringvaricocele surgery: a single-center retrospective study.
// J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2008. –Vol. 4, N 6. – P. 480–1.232. Ozden C., Ozdal O.L., Bulut S. et al. Effect of varicocelectomy onserum inhibin B levels in infertile patients with varicocele. // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.– 2008. – Vol. 42, N 5. – P. 441–3.233. Pace G., Galatioto G.P., Guala L. et al. Ejaculatory duct obstructioncaused by a right giant seminal vesicle with an ipsilateral upper urinary tract agenesia:an embryologic malformation // Fertil. Steril.
– 2008. – Vol. 89, N 2. – P. 390–4.234. Pan L.J., Gao D.J., Zhang H.P., Wang X.Y. Apoptosis and expressionof caspase-3 protein in germ cells of varicocele rats. // Zhong Hua Nan Ke Xue. –2006. – Vol. 12, N 1. – P. 53–6.235. Pan L.J.,Xia X.Y.,Huang Y.F.,Gao J.P.Microsurgicalvaricocelectomy for male infertility. // Zhong Hua Nan Ke Xue. – 2008. – Vol. 14,N 7. – P.
640–4.236. Pasqualotto F.F., Pasqualotto E.B. Reassessing the value ofvaricocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. //Fertil. Steril. – 2007. – Vol. 88, N 6. – P. 1710.247237. Poon S.A., Kozakowsk K.A., Decastro G.J. et al. Adolescentvaricocelectomy: postoperative catch-up growth is not secondary to lymphaticligation. // J.
Pediatr. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 5, N 1. – P. 37–41.238. Popken G., Schwarzer J.U. Current aspects of surgical restoration offertility. // Urologe (Ausg. A). – 2008. – Vol. 47, N 12. – P. 1568–72.239. Rabah D.M., Adwan A.A., Seida M.A. Lymphatic preservation usingmethylene blue dye during laparoscopic varicocelectomy: early results. // Canad.
J.Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 16, N 5. – P. 4826–30.240. Rizkala E., Fishman A., Gitlin J., et al. Long ferm outcomes oflymphatic sparing laparoscopic // J. Pediat. Urol. – 2013 – Vol. 9, №4. – P458 –63.241. Richardson I., Grotas A.B., Nagler H.M. Outcomes of varicocelectomytreatment: an updated critical analysis. // Urol. Clin. North America.
– 2008. – Vol.35, N 2. – P. 191–209.242. Richardson I., Nagler H.M. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis not neededfor microsurgical varicocelectomy. // Urology. – 2008. – Vol. 71, N 4. – P. 669–71.243. Rodriguez Pena M., Alescio L., Russell A. et al. Predictors of improvedseminal parameters and fertility after varicocele repair in young adults.
//Andrologia. – 2009. – Vol. 41, N 5. – P. 277–81.244. Sakamoto H., Saito K., Ogawa Y., Yoshida H. Effects of varicocelerepair in adults on ultrasonographically determined testicular volume and on semenprofile. // Urology. – 2008. – Vol. 71, N 3. – P. 485–9.245. Salas Cabrera R., Ramirez Torres C., Sague Larrea J., Laurencio MenaA. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the adult patient. // Arch. Esp. Urol. – 2008.
–Vol. 61, N 7. – P. 815–8.246. Salem H.K., Mostafa T. Preserved testicular artery at varicocele repair.// Andrologia. – 2009. – Vol. 41, N 4. – P. 241–5.247. Schiff J.D., Ramirez M.L., Bar-Chama N. Medical and surgicalmanagement male infertility. // Endocrinol.
Metab. Clin. North Amer. – 2007. – Vol.36, N 2. – P. 313-31.248248. Schlegel P.N. Evaluation of male infertility. // Minerva Ginecol. – 2009.– Vol. 61, N 4. – P. 261–83.249. Shah P. Varicocelectomy by means of subinguinal cremastericcompartment disruption and venous ligation. // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. – 2007. –Vol. 41, N 1. – P. 54-7.250. Shamsa A., Mohammadi L., Abolbashari M. et al. Comparison of openand laparoscopic varicocelectomies in terms of operative time, sperm parameters,and complications. // Urology J.
– 2009. – Vol. 6, N 3. – P. 170–5.251. Shindel A.W., Yan Y., Naughton C.K. Does the number and size ofveins ligated at left-sided microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy affect semenanalysis outcomes? // Urology. – 2007. – Vol. 69, N 6. – P.76–80.252. Shiraishi K., Naito K. Nitric oxide produced in the testis is involved indilatation of the internal spermatic vein that compromises spermatogenesis ininfertile men with varicocele.
// BJU Intern. – 2007. – Vol. 99, N 5. – P. 1086–90.253. Shiraishi K., Takihara H., Matsuyama H. Effects of grade 1 varicoceledetected in the pediatric age-group on testicular development. // J. Pediatr. Surg. –2009. – Vol. 44, N 10. – P. 1995–8.254. Shu T., Taghechian S., Wang R. Initial experience with robot-assistedvaricocelectomy // Asian J. Androl. – 2008. – Vol. 10, N 1. – P. 146–8.255. Simforoosh N., Ziaee S.A., Behjati S.
et al. Laparoscopic managementof varicocele using bipolar cautery versus open high ligation technique: arandomized, clinical trial. // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Techniq. Part A. – 2007. –Vol. 17, N 6. – P. 743–7.256. Smit M., Romijn J.C., Wildhagen M.F. et al. Decreased sperm DNAfragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancyrate. // J.
Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 183, N 1. – P. 270–4.257. Stahl B.C., Patil S.R., Syrop C.H. et al. Supernumerary minute ringchromosome 14 in a man with primary infertility and left varicocele. // Fertil. Steril.– 2007. – Vol. 87, N 5. – P. 1213.249258. Tek M., Cayan S., Yilmaz N. et al. The effect of vascular endothelialgrowth factor on spermatogenesis and apoptosis in experimentally varicocele-inducedadolescent rats. // Fertil.
Steril. – 2009. – Vol. 91, N 5. – P. 2247–52.259. Turner T.T. Varicocele: still an enigma. // J. Urol. 1983. – Vol. 129. –P. 695–9.260. Tong Q., Zheng L., Tang S. et al. Lymphatic sparing laparoscopicPalomo varicocelectomy for varicoceles in children: intermediate results. // J.Pediatr. Surg. – 2009. – Vol. 44, N 8. – P. 1509–13.261.
Valla, J.S. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery in children // Semin. Pediatr.Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 16, N 4. – P. 270–7.262. Van Saen D., Goossens E., De Block G., Tournaye H. Bone marrowstem cells transplanted to the testis of sterile mice do not differentiate intospermatogonial stem cells and have no protective effect on fertility. // Fertil. Steril.– 2009. – Vol. 91, N 4.
– P. 1549-52.263. Vard E., Ozaydin M. The relationship between mean plateled volumeand varicocele. // Angiology. – 2015. – Vol. 47, N 6. – P. 1207–10.264. Venkatachalam S., Bumpus K., Kapadia S.R., Gray B., Lyden S.,Shishehbor M.H. The nutcracker syndrome. // Ann Vasc. Surg. 2011 Vol.25, №8 –P. 1154-64.265. Wan X., Wang Z., Ji Z. Microsurgical varicocelecctomy for clinicalvaricocele: A review for potencional new indications // Andrologia. – 2017. Vol. 49,N 10. – P. 128–27.266. Werthman P., Wixon R., Kasperson K., Evenson D.P. Significantdecrease in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation after varicocelectomy. //Fertil. Steril.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
