Диссертация (1136982), страница 37
Текст из файла (страница 37)
Vol. 35, № 2. P. 275–319.86.Barclay S., Fisher S. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, Failure andSuccess: Comparing the Two Waves of Same Sex Marriage Litigation //Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford University Press. PaloAlto, CA, 2006. P. 84–100.87.Barkow R. Separation of Powers and the Criminal Law // Stanford Law Rev.2006. Vol. 58, № 4.
P. 989–1054.88.Becker G. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, withSpecial Reference to Education, 3rd Edition. 3 edition. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press, 1994. 412 p.89.Becker G., Landes W., Research N. Essays in the Economics of Crime andPunishment. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1974. 294p.90.Becker H. et al. Boys in White.
Reprint edition. New Brunswick u.a.:Transaction Publishers, 1976. 456 p.91.Belianin A., Kosals L. Collusion and Corruption: an Experimental Study ofRussian Police. Working Paper WP9, 2015. 19 p.92.Bibas S. Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial // Harv. Law Rev. 2004.Vol. 117, № 8. P. 2463–2547.93.Bibas S.
Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market: From Caveat Emptor toConsumer Protection // Calif. Law Rev. 2011. Vol. 99, № 4. P. 1117–1161.94.Binder D., Price S. Legal Interviewing and Counseling: A Client-CenteredApproach. 1st edition. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing, 1977. 256 p.95.Bonelli M. da G. Lawyers’ Associations and the Brazilian State, 1843-1997// Law Soc. Inq. 2003.
Vol. 28, № 4. P. 1045–1073.18896.Bonroy O., Lemarié S., Tropéano J.-P. Credence goods, experts and riskaversion // Econ. Lett. 2013. Vol. 120, № 3. P. 464–467.97.Boukalas C. Politics as Legal Action/Lawyers as Political Actors Towards aReconceptualisation of Cause Lawyering // Soc. Leg. Stud. 2013. Vol. 22,№ 3. P. 395–420.98.Brante T. Sociological Approaches to the Professions // Acta Sociol. 1988.Vol.
31, № 2. P. 119–142.99.Bukkvoll T. Their Hands in the Till: Scale and Causes of Russian MilitaryCorruption // Armed Forces Soc. 2007. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 259–275.100.Burgess G. When the personal becomes political: using legal reform tocombat violence against women in Ethiopia // Gend. Place Cult. 2012. Vol.19, № 2. P. 153–174.101.Burkhardt F. The institutionalization of relative advantage: formalinstitutions, subconstitutional presidential powers, and the rise ofauthoritarian politics in Russia, 1994–2012 // Post-Sov. Aff. 2017. Vol. 33,№ 6. P. 472–495.102.Chaserant C., Harnay S. Self-regulation of the legal profession andquality in the market for legal services: an economic analysis of lawyers’reputation // Eur. J.
Law Econ. 2015. Vol. 39, № 2. P. 431–449.103.Costa M., Ferreira M. Sources and Reactions to Stress in BrazilianLawyers // Paid. São Paulo. 2014. Vol. 24, № 57. P. 49–56.104.Cummings S., Rhode D. Managing pro bono: Doing well by doingbetter // Fordham Law Rev. 2010. Vol. 78, № 5. P. 2357–2442.105.Dinovitzer R. Social Capital and Constraints on Legal Careers // LawSoc. Rev. 2006.
Vol. 40, № 2. P. 445–480.106.Dinovitzer R. The Financial Rewards of Elite Status in the LegalProfession // Law Soc. Inq. 2011. Vol. 36, № 4. P. 971–998.107.Dinovitzer R., Garth B. Lawyer Satisfaction in the Process ofStructuring Legal Careers: SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 948571.
Rochester,NY: Social Science Research Network, 2006.108.Dinovitzer R., Reichman N., Sterling J. The Differential Valuation ofWomen’s Work: A New Look at the Gender Gap in Lawyers’ Incomes //Soc. Forces. 2009. Vol. 88, № 2. P. 819–864.109.Djankov S. et al. The Regulation of Entry // Q. J. Econ. 2002. Vol.117, № 1. P. 1–37.110.Doner R., Schneider B. Business Associations and EconomicDevelopment: Why Some Associations Contribute More Than Others // Bus.Polit. 2000. Vol. 2, № 3. P.
261–288.111.Duvanova D. Building Business in Post-Communist Russia, EasternEurope, and Eurasia: Collective Goods, Selective Incentives, and PredatoryStates. Cambridge University Press, 2013. 277 p.189112.Duvanova D. Bureaucratic Corruption and Collective Action:Business Associations in the Postcommunist Transition // Comp. Polit. 2007.Vol.
39, № 4. P. 441–461.113.Economic Survey of Lawyers in Alabama. Alabama State Bar, 2014.114.Eisenstein J., Jacob H. Felony Justice: an Organizational Analysis ofCriminal Courts. First Printing edition. Boston: Little, Brown, Boston, 1977.322 p.115.Ellis S., Makri S., Attfield S. Keeping up with the law: investigatinglawyers’ monitoring behaviour // New Libr.
World Lond. 2014. Vol. 115, №7/8. P. 313–292.116.Emons W. Credence Goods and Fraudulent Experts // RAND J. Econ.1997. Vol. 28, № 1. P. 107–119.117.Emons W. Credence goods monopolists // Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2001.Vol. 19, № 3–4. P. 375–389.118.Epstein C. Stricture and structure: The social and cultural context ofpro bono work in wall street firms // Fordham Law Rev.
2002. Vol. 70, № 5.P. 1689–1698.119.Evetts J. A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities //Curr. Sociol. 2011. Vol. 59, № 4. P. 406–422.120.Evetts J. The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism OccupationalChange in the Modern World // Int. Sociol. 2003. Vol. 18, № 2. P. 395–415.121.Fehr E., Gächter S.
Cooperation and punishment in public goodsexperiments // Am. Econ. Rev. 2000. Vol. 90, № 4. P. 980–994.122.Felstiner W., Sarat A. Enactments of Power: Negotiating Reality andResponsibility in Lawyer-Client Interactions // Cornell Law Rev. 1992. Vol.77, № 6.123.Firestone T. Criminal Corporate Raiding in Russia // Int. Lawyer.2008. Vol. 42, № 4.
P. 1207–1229.124.Fligstein N., McAdam D. Toward a General Theory of StrategicAction Fields // Sociol. Theory. 2011. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 1–26.125.Flood J. The re-landscaping of the legal profession: Large law firmsand professional re-regulation // Curr. Sociol. 2011. Vol. 59, № 4. P.
507–529.126.Foucault M. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison / trans.Sheridan A. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1995. 333 p.127.Fournier V. The appeal to “professionalism” as a disciplinarymechanism // Sociol. Rev. 1999. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 280–307.128.Freidson E.
Occupational Autonomy in Labor Market Shelters //Varieties of Work. CA: Sage., 1982. P. 39–54.129.Freidson E. Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice ofKnowledge. 1 edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. 240 p.190130.Freidson E. The Changing Nature of Professional Control // Annu.Rev. Sociol. 1984. Vol. 10. P. 1–20.131.Fried C. The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of theLawyer-Client Relation // Yale Law J.
1976. Vol. 85, № 8. P. 1060–1089.132.Frye T. Capture or Exchange? Business Lobbying in Russia // Eur.Asia Stud. 2002. Vol. 54, № 7. P. 1017–1036.133.Galanter M., Henderson W. The Elastic Tournament: A SecondTransformation of the Big Law Firm // Stanf. Law Rev. Stanf. 2008. Vol.60, № 6. P. 1867–1929.134.Gans-Morse J. Violence, Law, and Property Rights: InstitutionalDemand in Post-Soviet Russia.
2015.135.Gerber T., Mendelson S. Public Experiences of Police Violence andCorruption in Contemporary Russia: A Case of Predatory Policing? // LawSoc. Rev. 2008. Vol. 42, № 1. P. 1–44.136.Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’sDevelopment. Reissue edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,1993. 184 p.137.Gobe E. Of Lawyers and Samsars: the Legal Services Market and theAuthoritarian State in Ben “Ali”s Tunisia (1987—2011) // Middle East J.2013. Vol.
67, № 1. P. 45–63.138.Gobe E. The Tunisian Bar to the test of authoritarianism: professionaland political movements in Ben Ali’s Tunisia (1990–2007) // J. North Afr.Stud. 2010. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 333–347.139.Gobe E., Salaymeh L. Tunisia’s “Revolutionary” Lawyers: FromProfessional Autonomy to Political Mobilization // Law Soc. Inq. 2015. P.n/a-n/a.140.Gould D., Gruben W. The role of intellectual property rights ineconomic growth // J. Dev.
Econ. 1996. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 323–350.141.Gould J. Strong Bar, Weak State? Lawyers, Liberalism and StateFormation in Zambia // Dev. Change. 2006. Vol. 37, № 4. P. 921–941.142.Granfield R. Private lawyers and the public interest: the evolving roleof pro bono in the legal profession. USA: Oxford University Press, 2009.143.Granfield R.
The Meaning of Pro Bono: Institutional Variations inProfessional Obligations among Lawyers // Law Soc. Rev. 2007. Vol. 41, №1. P. 113–146.144.Greeno E., Shdaimah C., Cornelius L. Meeting the Civil Legal Needsof Low-Income Marylanders: An Evaluation of a Judicare Pilot // J. PolicyPract. 2014. Vol. 13, № 2. P.
65–84.145.Greenwood E. Attributes of a Profession // Soc. Work. 1957. Vol. 2,№ 3. P. 45–55.191146.Hagan J. The Gender Stratification of Income Inequality AmongLawyers // Soc. Forces. 1990. Vol. 68, № 3. P. 835.147.Hajjar L. Cause Lawyering in Transnational Perspective: NationalConflict and Human Rights in Israel/Palestine // Law Soc. Rev. 1997.
Vol.31, № 3. P. 473–504.148.Halliday T. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, andProfessional Empowerment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.420 p.149.Halliday T., Karpik L. Lawyers and the Rise of Western PoliticalLiberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to TwentiethCenturies. Clarendon Press, 1997. 400 p.150.Halliday T., Powell M., Granfors M.W. After Minimalism:Transformations of State Bar Associations from Market Dependence to StateReliance, 1918 to 1950 // Am. Sociol.
Rev. 1993. Vol. 58, № 4. P. 515–535.151.Heinz J., Laumann E. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of theBar. Northwestern University Press, 1994. 260 p.152.Hellman J., Jones G., Kaufmann D. Seize the state, seize the day:State capture and influence in transition economies // J. Comp. Econ. 2003.Vol. 31, № 4. P. 751–773.153.Hendley K.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
