Диссертация (1136982), страница 38
Текст из файла (страница 38)
“Telephone Law” and the “Rule of Law”: The RussianCase // Hague J. Rule Law. 2009. Vol. 1, № 02. P. 241–262.154.Hendley K. Justice in Moscow? // Post-Sov. Aff. 2015. P. 1–21.155.Hendley K. Puzzling Non-Consequences of Societal Distrust ofCourts: Explaining the Use of Russian Courts, The // Cornell Int. Law J.2013.
Vol. 45. P. 517.156.Hilbink T. Constructing Cause Lawyering: Professionalism, Politics,& Social Change in 1960s America: SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2417253.Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2006.157.Hill L. et al. Legal knowledge, needs, and assistance seeking amongHIV positive and negative women in Umlazi, South Africa // BMC Int.Health Hum. Rights. 2016. Vol. 16, № 1. P.
3.158.Hosticka C. We Don’t Care about What Happened, We Only Careabout What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer-Client Negotiations of Reality //Soc. Probl. 1979. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 599–610.159.Hwang H., Powell W. The Rationalization of Charity: The Influencesof Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector // Adm. Sci. Q. 2009. Vol. 54, №2. P.
268–298.160.Jack R., Jack D. Moral Vision and Professional Decisions: TheChanging Values of Women and Men Lawyers. Cambridge UniversityPress, 1989. 237 p.192161.Johnson E. Lawyers’ Choice: A Theoretical Appraisal of LitigationInvestment Decisions // Law Soc. Rev. 1980. Vol.
15, № 3/4. P. 567–610.162.Johnson R., Onwuegbuzie A. Mixed Methods Research: A ResearchParadigm Whose Time Has Come // Educ. Res. 2004. Vol. 33, № 7. P. 14–26.163.Karpik L. Lawyers and Politics in France, 1814–1950: The State, theMarket, and the Public // Law Soc. Inq. 1988. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 707–736.164.Karpik L. Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities / trans.Scott N. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
288 p.165.Karpik L., Halliday T. The legal complex // Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci.2011. Vol. 7. P. 217–236.166.Kawar L. Legal Mobilization on the Terrain of the State: Creating aField of Immigrant Rights Lawyering in France and the United States // LawSoc. Inq. 2011. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 354–387.167.Kazun A., Yakovlev A. Who demands collective action in animperfect institutional environment? A case study of the profession ofadvocates in Russia // J. Eurasian Stud.
2017. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 60–71.168.Kim H. Market Uncertainty and Socially Embedded Reputation // Am.J. Econ. Sociol. 2009. Vol. 68, № 3. P. 679–701.169.Kritzer H. Contingent-Fee Lawyers and Their Clients: SettlementExpectations, Settlement Realities, and Issues of Control in the LawyerClient Relationship // Law Soc. Inq. 1998. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 795–821.170.Kritzer H. Risks, Reputations, and Rewards: Contingency Fee LegalPractice in the United States. Stanford University Press, 2004.
364 p.171.Kuhlthau C., Tama S.L. Information search process of lawyers: A callfor ’just for me’ information services // J. Doc. 2001. Vol. 57, № 1. P. 25–43.172.Kutateladze B., Andiloro N., Johnson B.D. Opening Pandora’s Box:How Does Defendant Race Influence Plea Bargaining? 2014.173.Lancaster R., Uzzi B. Legally Charged: Embeddedness and Profit inLarge Law Firm Legal Billings // Sociol. Focus. 2012. Vol. 45, № 1.
P. 1–22.174.Larson M. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977. 332 p.175.Ledeneva A. Telephone Justice in Russia // Post-Sov. Aff. 2008. Vol.24, № 4. P. 324–350.176.Leshem S. Contingent Fees, Signaling and Settlement Authority //Rev. Law Econ. 2009. Vol.
5, № 1. P. 436–460.177.Levin L., Mather L. Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making inContext. University of Chicago Press, 2012. 401 p.193178.Lipsey R., Lancaster K. The General Theory of Second Best // Rev.Econ. Stud. 1956. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 11–32.179.Liu S., Halliday T. Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness:Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers //Law Soc.
Rev. 2011. Vol. 45, № 4. P. 831–866.180.Lochner L. Education, Work, and Crime: A Human Capital Approach// Int. Econ. Rev. 2004. Vol. 45, № 3. P. 811–843.181.Locke R. Building Trust. San Francisco, California: Paper presented atthe Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, 2001.182.Lorty D. Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: Universityof Chicago Press, 1975. 284 p.183.Luban D. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press, 1988. 472 p.184.Makri S., Blandford A., Cox A.L.
Investigating the informationseeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis’s model to design // Inf.Process. Manag. 2008. Vol. 44, № 2. P. 613–634.185.Marenin O. Police Performance and State Rule: Control andAutonomy in the Exercise of Coercion // Comp. Polit. 1985. Vol. 18, № 1.P. 101–122.186.Markus S. Secure Property as a Bottom-Up Process: Firms,Stakeholders, and Predators in Weak States // World Polit. 2012. Vol. 64, №2. P. 242–277.187.Marshall A., Hale D. Cause Lawyering: SSRN Scholarly Paper ID2519018.
Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2014.188.Mather L., McEwen C., Maiman R.J. Divorce Lawyers at Work:Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. 1 edition. Oxford ; New York:Oxford University Press, 2001. 256 p.189.McChesney F. Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the EconomicTheory of Regulation // J. Leg. Stud. 1987. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 101–118.190.McClelland C. The German Experience of Professionalization:Modern Learned Professions and Their Organizations from the EarlyNineteenth Century to the Hitler Era. Cambridge University Press, 2002.272 p.191.McEvoy K., Rebouche R.
Mobilizing the Professions: Lawyers,Politics, and the Collective Legal Conscience // Judges, Transition, andHuman Rights / ed. Morison J., McEvoy K., Anthony G. Oxford UniversityPress, 2007. P. 275–314.192.Merton R. Social Structure and Anomie // Am. Sociol. Rev. 1938.Vol. 3, № 5. P. 672–682.194193.Mertz E. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like aLawyer.” Oxford England; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
336p.194.Michelson E. The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: ChineseLawyers at Work // Law Soc. Rev. 2006. Vol. 40, № 1. P. 1–38.195.Moley N. Confronting the Challenges of Ethical Accountability inInternational Human Rights Lawyering // Stanf. J. Int. Law. 2014. Vol. 50,№ 2. P. 359–392.196.Mrowczynski R. Institutional professionalization of lawyers in statesocialism and post-socialism: Poland and Russia compared // Int.
J. Leg.Prof. 2016. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 157–184.197.Mrowczynski R. Self-Regulation of Legal Professions in StateSocialism: Poland and Russia Compared // Leg. Hist. J. Max Planck Inst.Eur. Leg. Hist. 2012. № 20. P. 170–188.198.Munger F., Cummings S., Trubek L. Mobilizing Law for Justice inAsia: A Comparative Approach // Wis. Int. Law J. 2014. Vol.
31, № 3. P.353–420.199.Nelson P. Information and Consumer Behavior // J. Polit. Econ. 1970.Vol. 78, № 2. P. 311–329.200.North D. et al. In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, andthe Problems of Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2012. 376 p.201.North D., Wallis J., Weingast B. Violence and Social Orders: AConceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History.Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 1 p.202.Olgiati V. et al.
Professions, identity and order in comparativeperspective. Oñati: The International Institute for the Sociology of Law,1998.203.Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theoryof groups. USA: Harvard University Press, 1965. 196 p.204.Osipian A. Predatory raiding in Russia: Institutions and propertyrights after the crisis // J. Econ. Issues.
2012. Vol. 46, № 2. P. 469–479.205.Ostrom E. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms // J.Econ. Perspect. 2000. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 137–158.206.Otike J. The Information Needs and Seeking Habits of Lawyers inEngland: A Pilot Study // Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 1999. Vol. 31, № 1. P. 19–39.207.Paik A., Heinz J., Southworth A.
Political Lawyers: The Structure of aNational Network // Law Soc. Inq. 2011. Vol. 36, № 4. P. 892–918.208.Paneyakh E. Faking performance together: systems of performanceevaluation in Russian enforcement agencies and production of bias andprivilege // Post-Sov. Aff. 2014. Vol. 30, № 2–3.
P. 115–136.195209.Paneyakh E. The Practical Logic of Judicial Decision Making // Russ.Polit. Law. 2016. Vol. 54, № 2–3. P. 138–163.210.Parker C., Evans A. Inside Lawyers’ Ethics. 1 edition. CambridgeEngland; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 288 p.211.Parsons T. Professions // International encyclopedia of the socialsciences / ed. Sills D. New York: The Macmillan Company & The FreePress, 1968.
Vol. 12. P. 536–547.212.Parsons T. The Professions and Social Structure // Soc. Forces. 1939.Vol. 17, № 4. P. 457–467.213.Paul P., Valtonen H. Health inequality in the Russian Federation: Anexamination of the changes in concentration and achievement indices from1994 to 2013 // Int. J. Equity Health. 2016. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 36.214.Peleg A., Bogoch B. Removing Justitia’s blindfold: the mediatizationof law in Israel // Media Сulture Soc. 2012.
Vol. 34, № 8. P. 961–978.215.Pepper S. The Lawyer’s Amoral Ethical Role: A Defense, A Problem,and Some Possibilities // Am. Bar Found. Res. J. 1986. Vol. 11, № 4. P.613–635.216.Pigou A. The Economics of Welfare. 4th ed. London: Macmillan andCo., 1932.217.Piquero N. et al. Exploring Lawyer Misconduct: An Examination ofthe Self-Regulation Process // Deviant Behav. 2016. Vol. 37, № 5. P. 573–584.218.Powell W. Fields of Practice: Connections between Law andOrganizations // Law Soc.
Inq. 1996. Vol. 21, № 4. P. 959–966.219.Prabhat D. After 9/11: Guantánamo and the mobilization of lawyers //Special Issue Social Movements/Legal Possibilities. Emerald GroupPublishing Limited, 2011. Vol. 54. P. 213–259.220.Ratner M. Litigating Guantánamo // SpringerLink. Springer BerlinHeidelberg. P. 201–211.221.Rhode D. Access to Justice. Oxford University Press, 2004. 265 p.222.Ribstein L. The death of big law // Wis. Law Rev. 2010.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
