Диссертация (1136784), страница 24
Текст из файла (страница 24)
Разводы и современный уровень рождаемости /Проблемы воспроизводства и занятости населения. М.: Академия наукСССР, 1984, с. 18-30.73.Тольц М.С., Антонова О.И., Андреев Е.М. Рождаемость итрансформация института семьи в современной России //Вопросыстатистики. 2005. № 7, с. 51-60.74.Тольц М.С. От абортного термидора к законодательномулиберализму.
Политика в области брачно-семейных отношений какзеркало истории СССР // Развитие населения и демографическаяполитика. Памяти А.Я. Кваши: Сборник статей / Под ред. М.Б.Денисенко, В.В. Елизарова. М.: МАКС Пресс, 2014, с. 157-169.75.ТындикА.О.Репродуктивныеустановкинаселениявсовременной России // SPERO. 2012. Весна-лето, с.95-112.76.Тындик А. О., Митрофанова Е. С.
Социально-экономическоеповедение индивида в зеркале концепции жизненного пути//Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальныеперемены. 2014. №3 (121), с. 146-159.16177.Хадерка И. Вступление в брак. Правовые аспекты. – перевод счешск. М.: Юрид. лит., 1980.78.Харчев А.Г. Брак и семья в СССР. М.: Мысль, 1979.79.Янкова З.А. Городская семья.
М.: Наука, 1979.80.Ярская-Смирнова Е.Р., Романов П.В. Социальная защищенностьгородской монородительской семьи// Мир России. 2004. Т. 13, №2, с.66 – 95.81.Amato P. R., Booth A. A Generation at Risk: Growing up in an Era ofFamily Upheaval. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000.82.Amato P. The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children //Journal of Marriage and Family.
2000. Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 1269-1287.83.AndreevE.M.,Jasilionienedocumentation:Russia.A.Human2012.fertilitydatabaseURL:http://www.himanfertility.org/Docs/RUS/RUScom.pdf84. Andersson G. Children's experience of family disruption and familyformation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries // Demographic Research. 2002.Vol. 7, Art. 7, pp. 343-364.85. Andersson G., Philipov D. Life-table representations of family dynamicsin Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptionsof demographic behavior // Demographic Research. 2002. Vol.
7. Art. 4, pp.67-144.86.Andress H. J., Borgloh B., Bröckel M., Giesselmann M.,Hummelsheim D. The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution.A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, GreatBritain, Italy, and Sweden. // European Sociological Review. 2006.
Vol.22.No.5, pp. 533-560.87.Archambault P. Séparation et divorce: quelles conséquences sur laréussite scolaire des enfants? // Population et Societe. 2002. No. 379, pp. 14.16288.Avdeev A., Monnier A. La nuptialité russe: une complexité méconnue// Population. 1999. Vol. 54, No.4, p. 635-676.89.Avdeev A., Monnier A. Marriage in Russia. A complex phenomenonpoorly Understood // Population.
2000. No. 12, pp. 7–50.90. Bastardy and its Comparative History: Studies in the history ofillegitimacy and marital nonconformism in Britain, France, Germany,Sweden, North America, Jamaica and Japan. Ed. by P. Laslett, K. Oosterveenand R.M. Smith. Harvard University Press, 1980.91.Bedard K., Deschênes O. Sex Preferences, Marital Dissolution and theEconomic Status of Women // Journal of Human Resources.
2005. Vol.40,No.2, pp. 411–434.92.Bennett N., Bloom D., Miller C. The Influence of NonmaritalChildbearing on the Formation of First Marriages // Demography. 1995. Vol.32, No. 1, pp. 47-62.93.Berrington A., Perelli-Harris B., Trevena P. Commitment and thechanging sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insightsfrom qualitative research in the UK // Demographic Research. 2015. Vol.33,Art.12, pp.327-362.94.Brzozovska S.
Births to single mothers: Age- and education relatedchanges in Poland between 1985 and 2010 // Demographic Research. 2014.Vol. 30, Art.52, pp. 1445-1462.95. Bumpass L., Lu H.-H. Trends in Cohabitation and Implications forChildren's Family Contexts in the U.S. CDE Working Paper No. 98-15.96.Bumpass L., Lu H-H. Trends in cohabitation and implications forchildren's family contexts in the United States // Population Studies. 2000.Vol.54, No.1, pp. 29–41.97. Cherlin A.
J. Toward a new home socioeconomics of union formation.In L. J. Waite et al. (Eds.). The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriageand Cohabitation (pp. 126-144). New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2000.16398. Denisov B. P., Sakevich V. I. and Jasilioniene A. Divergent Trends inAbortion and Birth Control Practices in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. PlosOne. 2012. Vol. 7, No.11, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.004998699. Duncan G., Rodgers W. Has Children's Poverty Become MorePersistent? // American Sociological Review. 1991. Vol.
56, pp. 538-550.100. Edin K. What Do Low-Income Single Mothers Say about Marriage?// Social Problems. 2000. Vol. 47. No. 1, pp. 112-133.101. Eggebeen D. J., Lichter D. T. Race, Family Structure, and ChangingPoverty among American Children // American Sociological Review. 1991.Vol.56, pp.801-817.102. Elder G.
The Life Course as Developmental Theory // ChildDevelopment. 1998. Vol. 69. No. 1, pp. 1-12.103. England P., Shafer E.F., Wu L.L. Premarital conceptions,postconception (“shotgun”) marriages, and premarital first births: Educationgradients in U.S. cohorts of white and black women born 1925-1959 //Demographic Research. 2012. Vol. 27. Art. 6, pp. 153-166.104.
Ermish J. Lone parenthood: an economic analysis. CambridgeUniversity Press, 2001.105. Population aged 15 and over, living in private households, by sex,age group, family status and current activity status [cens_01nhfst].Eurostat, 2014. URL: http://opendata.europa.eu/en/data/dataset/h592a0m3puFKXRAi3BMVew106. Festy P. Analysis of Couple formation and Dissolution. In.
Casseli G.,Vallin J., Wunsch G. (Eds). Demography: Analysis and Synthesis: ATreatise in Population. Academic Press, 2005.107. Frejka T. and Zakharov S. V. (2013) The Apparent Failure of Russia’sPronatalist Family Policy // Population and Development Review. Vol. 39,No.4, pp. 635-647.164108. Glick P., Northon A. Perspectives on the Recent Upturn in Divorceand Remarriage // Demography. 1973.
Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 301-314.109. Glick P. The Family Life Cycle and Social Change // The FamilyRelations. 1989. No. 36, pp. 123-129.110. Glick P. Remarried Families, Stepfamilies, and Stepchildren: A BriefDemographic Profile // Family Relations. 1989. No.38, pp. 24-27.111. Gonzalez L. The Determinants of the Prevalence of Single Mothers:A Cross-country Analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1677, 2005.112.
Gonzalez L. The effect of benefits on single motherhood in Europe.IZA Discussion Paper No. 2026, 2006.113. Goode W.I. Family Disorganisation. Contemporary Social Problems,ed. R. Merton. N.Y., 1961.114. Graaf de P.M, Kalmijn M. Change and Stability in the SocialDeterminants of Divorce: A Comparison of Marriage Cohorts in theNetherlands // European Sociological Review. 2006. Vol.
22, No.5, pp. 561572.115. Hanson S., Sporakowski M. Single Parent Families // FamilyRelations. 1986. No.35, pp.3-8.116. Hill R. Life Cycle Stages for Types of Single Parent Families: ofFamily Development Theory // Family Relations. 1986. No. 35, pp. 19-29.117. Holland J.A. Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timingand childbearing in Sweden // Demographic Research.
2013. Vol. 29. Art.11, pp. 275-306.118. Kiernan K. The Impact of Family Disruption in Childhood onTransitions Made in Young Adult Life // Population Studies. 1992. No. 46,pp. 213-234.119. Kiernan K., Hobcraft J. Parental Divorce during Childhood: Age atFirst Intercourse, Partnership and Parenthood // Population Studies. 1996.Vol. 51, pp.
41-56.165120. Kiernan K., Cherlin A. Parental divorce and partnership dissolution inadulthood: Evidence from a British cohort study // Population Studies. 1999.Vol. 53, pp. 39-48.121. Le Goff J.-M. Cohabiting Unions in France and West Germany:Transitions to the first birth and first marriage // Demographic Research.2002. Vol.7. Art. 28, pp.
593-624.122. Lesthaeghe R., Neidert L., Surkyn J. Household Formation and the“Second Demographic Transition” in Europe and the US: Insights fromMiddle Range Models // Population and Development Review. 2006.Vol.32, No.4, pp.669-698.123. Lesthaeghe R. The Unfolding Story of the Second DemographicTransition // Population and Development Review. 2010. Vol.36, No.2,pp.211-251.124. Lichter D.T., Graefe D.R., Brown J.B.
Is Marriage a Panacea? UnionFormation Among Economically Disadvantaged Unwed Mothers. // SocialProblems. 2003. Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 60-86.125. Locoh T. Factors in Couples Formation. In. Casseli G., Vallin J.,Wunsch G. (Eds). Demography: Analysis and Synthesis: A Treatise inPopulation. Academic Press, 2005126. Lokshin M., Harris K.M., Popkin B. Single mothers in Russia:Household Strategies for Coping with Poverty. Policy Research WorkingPaper, No.
2300, 2000.127. Madden-Derdich D. A., Leonard S.A. Parental Role Identity andFathers’ Involvement in Coparental Interaction after Divorce: Fathers’Perspectives // Family Relations. 2000. Vol. 49, No.3, pp. 311–318.128. Manning W.D. Marriage and Cohabitation Following PremaritalConception // Journal of Marriage and the Family.1993. Vol. 50, pp. 839850.166129. Manning W. Children and the Stability of cohabiting couples //Journal of Marriage and Family.
2004. Vol. 66. No.3, pp. 674-689.130. Maslauskaite A., Jasilioniene A., Jasilionis D., Stankuniene V.,Shkolnikov V.M. Socio-economic determinants of divorce in Lithuania:Evidence from register-based census-linked data // Demographic Research.2015. Vol.33, Art. 30, pp. 871-908.131. McDonald P. L'équilibre numérique entre hommes et femmes et lemarché matrimonial: le point sur la question // Population (French Edition).1995. No. 6, pp. 1579-1590.132. McDonald P. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition //Population and Development Review. 2000. Vol. 26, pp.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
