Диссертация (1136758), страница 62
Текст из файла (страница 62)
№ 3. Р. 225239385) Broughton D., ten Napel H. Conclusion: European exceptionalism //Religion and Mass Electoral Behavior in Europe. London: Routledge, 2000.Pp.198-209.386) Broughton W. Religiosity and Opposition to Church Social Action: ATest of the Weberian Hypothesis // Review of Religious Research. 1978. 19(2).Pp.154-66.387) Buss A. The Economic Ethics of Russian-Orthodox Christianity: PartI // International Sociology. 1989.
vol. 4. Pp. 235-258.388) Buss A.The Economic Ethics of Russian-Orthodox Christianity: PartII - Russian Old Believers and Sects // International Sociology.1989. vol. 4. Pp.447-472.389) Campbell A., Gurin G., Miller W.E. Political Issues and the Vote:November, 1952 // American Political Science Review. 1953. №47. Рр. 359–385.390) Chadee D., Joseph C., Peters C., V. Sankar, Nair N., Philip J.Religiosity, and Attitudes Towards Homosexuals in a Caribbean Environment //Social and Economic Studies. 2013. Vol.
62. No. 1/2. Рp. 1-28.391) Chang C.F. The Influence of Church and Synagogue Attendance onthe Probability of Giving and Volunteering // Journal of Nonprofit & Public SectorMarketing. 1995. Volume 2. Issue 4. P.15-25.280392) Clayton R. R., Gladden J. W. The Five Dimensions of Religiosity :Toward Demythologizing a Sacred Artifact // Journal of the Scientific Study ofReligion, 1974.
Vol. 13. No. 2. Р. 135–143.393) Clements B. Religion and Party Choice // Religion and Public Opinionin Britain: Continuity and Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. P. 4479.394) Colton T., Hale H. The Putin Vote: Presidential Electorates in aHybrid Regime // Slavic Review. 2009. Vol. 68, No. 3. Pp. 473-503.395) Cornwall M., Albrecht S., Cunningham P., Pitcher B. The Dimensionsof Religiosity: A Conceptual Model with an Empirical Test // Duke J.T. Latter-daySaint Social Life: Social Research on the LDS Church and its Members.
Provo,Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1998.396) Cornwall M., Albrecht S., Cunningham P., Pitcher B. The Dimensionsof Religiosity: A Conceptual Model with an Empirical Test // Review of ReligiousResearch. 1986. № 27 (3). Pp. 226–244.397) Dahl R.A. The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph fora Monument to a Successful Protest // The American Political Science Review.1961. Vol. 55. No. 4. Р. 763-772.398) Daniels J.P., Ruhr M.
Trust in Others: Does Religion Matter? //Review of Social Economy. 2010. Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 163-186.399) Davidson J. Glock's model of religious commitment: Assessing somedifferent approaches and results // Review of Religious Research. 1975. №16.Рр.83-93.400) Davidson J., Knudsen D. A New Approach to Religious Commitment// Sociological Focus. 1977.
Vol. 10, No. 2. Рp. 151-173.401) Dilmaghani M. Religiosity and social trust: evidence from Canada //Review of Social Economy. 2017. Volume 75. Issue 1. Pp. 49-75.402) Easton D. Introduction: The current Meaning of Behavioralism //Limits of Behavioralism in Political Science. Ed.
J.C.Chatsworth. - Philadelphia:American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1962. P. 1-25.403) Easton D. Political Science in the United States: Past and Present //International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique.-1985.- Vol. 6.- No. 1. Pp. 133-152.404) Easton D. The Current Meaning of Behaviouralism // ContemporaryPolitical Analysis. Ed. J.C.Chatsworth. New York: The Free Press, 1967. Pp.1132.405) Easton D. The future of the post-behavioral phase in political science// Contemporary Empirical Political Theory. Kristen Renwick Monroe (Ed.)Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1997. P. 13-46.406) Easton D.
The New Revolution in Political Science // The AmericanPolitical Science Review. 1969. №62. Рp.1051-1061.407) Eesuola K. Political behavior. Lagos: National Open University ofNigeria, 2013.281408) Evans G., Northmore‐Ball K. The limits of secularization? Theresurgence of orthodoxy in post‐Soviet Russia // Journal for the Scientific Study ofReligion. 2012. № 51(4).
Pp.795-808.409) Evans G., Whitefield S. Explaining the Emergence and Persistence ofClass Voting for Presidential Candidates in Post-Soviet Russia, 1993-2001 //Political Research Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 59. №1. Pp. 23-34.410) Faulkner J., de Jong G. Religiosity in 5-D : An empirical analysis //Social Forces. 1966. V. 45.
P. 246–254.411) Fehr E., Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism // Nature. 2003.Vol. 425: 785- 791.412) Finney J. A Theory of Religious Commitment // SociologicalAnalysis. 1978. Vol. 39, No. 1. Pp. 19-35.413) Finney J.M. A Theory of Religious Commitment // Source:Sociological Analysis. 1978. Vol.
39. №1. P.20-21. Pp. 19-35.414) Freeze G. From dechristianization to laicization: state, Church, andbelievers in Russia // Canadian Slavonic Papers. 2015. Vol.57(1/2). Pp.6-34.415) Frejka T., Westoff C.F. Religion, religiousness and fertility in the U.S.and in Europe // European Journal of Population. 2008. Volume 24. Pp. 5–31.416) Fukuyama Y. The Major Dimensions of Church Membership //Review of Religious Research. 1961. Vol.
2. No. 4. Р. 154–161.417) Geissbuhler S. Are Catholics Still Different? Catholicism, PoliticalAttitudes and Party Attachments in Switzerland, 1970–95 // West EuropeanPolitics. 1999. № 22. Р.223–240.418) Gibbs D.R., Mueller S.A., Wood J.R. Doctrinal orthodoxy, salience,and the consequential dimension // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.1973. 12.
Pp.33-52.419) Gibbs J.O., Crader K.W. A Criticism of Two Recent Attempts toScale Glock and Stark's Dimensions of Religiosity : A Research Note //Sociological Analysis. 1970. Vol. 31. №. 2. Р. 107–114.420) Gillum R.F., King D.E., Obisesan T.O., Koenig H.G. Frequency ofattendance at religious services and mortality in a U.S.
national cohort // AnnEpidemiol. 2008. 18(2). Pp.124-9.421) Girvin B. The political culture of secularisation: European trends andcomparative perspectives // D. Broughton & H.-M. ten Napel (eds), Religion andmass electoral behaviour. London: Routledge, 2000.422) Glock C.Y. On the Study of Religious Commitment // ReligiousEducation, Research Supplement.
1962. Vol. 42. Р. 98–110.423) Glock C.Y., Stark R. Religion as a Social Phenomenon // Religion andSociety in Tension. Chicago; NY; SF; London : Rand Mc.Nally & Company,1965. P. 1-66.424) Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. People's Opium? Religion andEconomic Attitudes // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2003. №50. Рр. 225-82.425) Guth J.L., Fraser C.
R. Religion and Partisanship in Canada//Journalfor the Scientific Study of Religion.-2001. - Vol. 40. - №. 1. Р. 51-64282426) Haass M., Becker L. The Behavioural Revolution and After //Approaches to the Study of Political Science ed. Haas M., Kariel H. SanFrancisco: Chandler Publishing Company, 1970. Pp.479-510.427) Harold G. Koenig H., Zaben F., Khalifa D., Shohaib S. Chapter 19.Measures of Religiosity // Measures of Personality and Social PsychologicalConstructs.
Boyle, G.J., Saklofske, D.H., & Matthews, G. (Eds.). Measures ofpersonality and social psychological constructs. London, United Kingdom:Academic Press, 2015. Pp. 530-561.428) Hesli V., Erdem E., Reisinger W., Miller A. The Patriarch and thePresident: Religion and Political Choice in Russia // Demokratizatsiya. 1999. Vol.7. №1. P.42-72.429) Hill P. C. Measurement in the psychology of religion and spirituality// Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality / Еd. R.
F. Paloutzian, C.L. Park. New York, London : Guilford Press, 2005. Р. 43–61.430) Hill T., Burdette A., Ellison C., Musick M. Religious attendance andthe health behaviors of Texas adults // Preventive Medicine. 2006. №42. Pp. 309–312.431) Hill T., Burdette A., Idler E. Religious involvement, health status, andmortality risk // Settersten R., Angel J.
(Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging.New York: Springer, 2011. Рp. 533–546.432) Hirschl T. A., Booth J.G., Glenna L.L. The Link Between VoterChoice and Religious Identity in Contemporary Society: Bringing Classical TheoryBack // Social Science Quarterly.2009. №90.
Рр. 927-944.433) Hirschl T. A., Booth J.G., Glenna L.L., Green B.Q. Politics, religion,and society: Is the United States experiencing a period of religious-politicalpolarization? // Review of European Studies. 2012. №4(4). Pp. 95-109.434) Holdcroft B. What Is Religiosity? // Catholic Education: A Journal ofInquiry and Practice.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
