Диссертация (1136528), страница 25
Текст из файла (страница 25)
M., Roseborough M. Channels ofcommunication in small groups // American Sociological Review. 1951.Vol. 16. No. 4. pp. 461-468.62. Barker A., Peters G. The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using andManipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy. Pittsburgh:Pittsburgh University Press, 1993.63. Baumgartner F. R., Leech B.
L. Basic interests: The importance of groupsin politics and in political science. – Princeton University Press, 2001.64. Bentley A. The Process of Government. Cambridge: Mass, 1967.65. BERR’s Public Bodies Directory 2009 (Советы при британскомДепартаменте по бизнесу, инновациям и навыкам). [Электронныйресурс] URL:http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file53723.pdf (датаобращения: 27.10.2012 г.).66. Blau. P M. Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press, 197767.
Böcher M. The Role of Scientific Knowledge in Public Policy in Theoryand in Political Practice - The Case of Integrated Rural Development //Stehr, N. (ed). Knowledge Democracy – A 21st-Century perspective. NewBrunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2008. pp. 183–198.68. Boswell C. Knowledge, legitimation and the politics of risk: The functionsof research in public debates on migration //Political studies. 2008.
Vol. 57.No. 1. pp. 165-186.69. Boswell C. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policyand Social Research. Cambridge University Press, 2009.70. Bouwen P. Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic ofAccess//Journal of European Public Policy. 2002. Vol. 9. No.3. pp. 365–390.71. Brickman R., Rip A. Science Policy Advisory Councils in France, theNetherlands and the United States, 1957-77: A Comparative Analysis //166Social Studies of Science.
1979. Vol. 9. No. 2 ‘Politics and Science’. pp.167-198.72. Brint S. In an Age of Experts. Princeton University Press, 1996.73. Brook M.E., Ng S. H. Language and social influence in smallconversational groups // Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1986.Vol. 5. No. 3. pp.201-210.74. Broscheid A., Coen D. Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU:empirically exploring the nature of the policy good// Journal of EuropeanPublic Policy.
2007. Vol.14. pp.346-65.75. Broscheid A., Coen D. Lobbying Systems in the European Union: AQuantitative Study, MPIfG Working Paper. 2006. No. 06/3. [Электронныйресурс] URL: http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp06-3/wp06-3.html(дата обращения: 27.10.2012 г.).76. Brown M. B. The Politics of Representation on Government AdvisoryCommittees// Political Research Quarterly. 2008. vol. 61. No.
4. pp. 547560.77. Carpenter D. P. The Political Economy Of FDA Drug Review: Processing,Politics, And Lessons For Policy // Health Affairs. 2004. Vol. 23. No. 1.pp.52-63 .78. Cawson A. Corporatism and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell,1986.79. Centeno M. A. The New Leviathan: The Dynamics and Limits ofTechnocracy // Theory and Society. 1993. Vol. 22. pp. 307-335.80. Chin M. L., Lindquist E. Contours of Access in Federal AdvisoryCommittees, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AmericanPolitical Science Association, Boston, Massachusetts. 2002.[Электронный ресурс] URL:167http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65915_index.html (дата обращения:1.09.2012 г.).81. Coglianese C., Zeckhauser R., Parson E. Seeking Truth for Power:Informational Strategy and Regulatory Policymaking//Minnesota LawReview.
2004. No. 89. pp. 277-336.82. Cook D., Bero L. Business Interests and Executive Branch AdvisoryCommittees in Regulatory Policy. Paper presented at the annual meeting ofthe American Political Science Association. Chicago. 2004. [Электронныйресурс] URL:http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/6/0/3/3/p60339_index.html (дата обращения: 4.08.2012 г.).83.
Crano W.D., Chen X. The leniency contract and persistence of majorityand minority influence // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1998. No. 74. pp. 1437-1450.84. Croley S. P., Funk W. F. The Federal Advisory Committee Act and GoodGovernment//The Yale Journal on Regulation. 1997. Vol. 14. No. 2. pp.451-557.85. Crombez C. Information, Lobbying and the Legislative Process in theEuropean Union//European Union Politics.
2002. Vol.3. No.1. pp.7-32.86. Dahl R. A. Power as the control of behavior // Power. 1986. pp. 37-58.87. Dahl R. A. Who Governs? Democracy in an American City. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1961.88. De Dreu C.K.W., West M. A. Minority Dissent and Team Innovation: TheImportance of Participation in Decision Making // Journal of AppliedPsychology. 2001. Vol.
86. No. 6. pp. 1191-1201.89. Domhoff W. G. The Corporate Community, Nonprofit Organizations, andFederal Advisory Committees: A Study in Linkages. April 2005.[Электронный ресурс] URL:168http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/federal_advisory_committees.html (дата обращения: 1.09.2012 г.)90. Dür A. Interest Groups in the European Union: How Powerful Are They? //West European Politics. 2008. Vol.
31. No. 6. pp. 1212‐123091. Dur A., de Bievre D. The Question of Interest Group Influence //Journal ofPublic Policy. 2007. Vol.27. No.1. pp.1-12.92. Durso F. (ed.). Handbook of Applied Cognition: Second Edition. JohnWiley & Sons, 2007.93. Elster J. The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1989.94. Ericsson K.A., Charness N., Feltovich P.J., Hoffman R.R. (eds.). TheCambridge Handbook of Expert Performance. Cambridge University Press,2006.95. Eriksson J., Gilek M. Rudén C.
(Eds.). Regulating Chemical Risks.European and Global Challenges. Springer, 2010.96. Etzioni A. Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. Free Press,1975.97. Fairlie J.A. Advisory Committees in British Administration // TheAmerican Political Science Review. 1926. Vol.20. No.4. pp. 812-822.98. Fay N., Garrod S., Carletta J. Group Discussion as Interactive Dialogue oras Serial Monologue: The Influence of Group Size // PsychologicalScience. 2000. Vol.
11. No. 6. pp. 481-486.99. Freeman G. P. National models, policy types, and the politics ofimmigration in liberal democracies// West European Politics. 2006. Vol.29. No.2. pp. 227-247.100. French, J. R. P., Raven, B. The basis of social power // D. Cartwright (Ed.).Studies in social power. AnnArbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959.169101. Gann T. M., Barr D.J. Speaking from experience: Audience design asexpert Performance // Language and Cognitive Processes. 2012.[Электронный ресурс] URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.641388 (дата обращения31.10.2012 г.).102.
Gerver I., Bensman J. Towards a Sociology of Expertness // Social Forces.1954. No. 30. pp. 226-235.103. Gianos P.L. Scientists as Policy Advisers: The Context of Influence// TheWestern Political Quarterly. 1974. Vol. 27. No. 3. pp. 429-456.104. Golden M. M. Interest groups in the Rule‐Making process: Whoparticipates? Whose Voices Get Heard // Journal of Public AdministrationResearch and Theory. 1998. Vol.8. No.2.
pp. 245‐270.105. Gornitzka A., Sverdrup U. Access of experts: Information and EUdecision-making//West European Politics. 2011. Vol. 34. No.1. pp. 48-70.106. Gornitzka Å., Sverdrup U. Enlightened Decision Making: The Role ofScientists in EU Governance // ARENA Working Papers. 2010. No 10.[Электронный ресурс] URL:http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arenapublications/workingpapers/working-papers2010/wp_05_10.xml (датаобращения: 31.10.2012 г.).107. Gornitzka Å., Sverdrup U. Who consults? The use of Expert groups in theEuropean Union.
22.08.2007. [Электронный ресурс] URL:http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/workingpapers2007/papers/wp07_12.xml (дата обращения: 27.10.2012 г.).108. Greenwood J. R., Wilson D. J. Public Administration in Britain Today.Routledge, 1989.170109. Grossman E., Saurugger S. Les groupes d'intérêt au secours de ladémocratie? //Revue française de science politique.
2006. Vol. 56. No. 2.pp. 299-321.110. Haas P. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to thepolicy process //Journal of European public policy. 2004. Vol. 11. No. 4.pp. 569-592.111. Hackman, J.R., Morris C.G. Group task, group interaction process andgroup performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration//Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1975.
No 8. pp.45-99.112. Healy R. G., Ascher W. Knowledge in the Policy Process: IncorporatingNew Environmental Information in Natural Resources Policy Making//Policy Sciences. 1995. Vol. 28. No. 1. pp. 1-19.113. Hoffman, Robert R. (ed.). The Psychology of Expertise: CognitiveResearch and Empirical AI. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.114. Horowitz S., Marsh C.
Explaining regional economic policies in China:interest groups, institutions, and identities //Communist and PostCommunist Studies. 2002. Vol. 35. No. 2. pp. 115-132.115. Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. HarvardUniversity Press, 1990.116. Karty K. D. Membership balance, open meetings, and effectiveness inFederal Advisory Committees //The American Review of PublicAdministration. 2005. Vol. 35.
No. 4. pp. 414-435.117. Keiser, Norman F. Public Responsibility and Federal Advisory Groups: ACase Study //The Western Political Quarterly. 1958. Vol. 11. No. 2. pp.251-264.118. Klüver H. Measuring Interest Group Influence Using Quantitative TextAnalysis // European Union Politics. 2009. Vol.10. No. 4. pp. 535‐549.171119. Krauss, R. M., Fussell S. R. Perspective-Taking in Communication:Representations of Others' Knowledge in Reference// Social Cognition.1991. Vol. 9. No. 1. pp. 2-24.120. Krauss, R. M., Fussell S.
R. Social psychological models of interpersonalcommunication //E. T. Higgins, & A. Kruglanski (Eds.). Socialpsychology: A handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford, 1996.pp. 655-701.121. Larson J. R., Sargis E. G., Bauman C.W. Shared knowledge and subgroupinfluence during decision-making discussions // Journal of BehavioralDecision Making. 2004. Vol.17. No. 4.
pp. 245-262.122. Larsson T. Precooking - the function and role of expert groups in theEuropean Union. 2003. [Электронный ресурс] URL:aei.pitt.edu/6516/1/001507_1.pdf (дата обращения: 27.10.2012 г.)123. Lavertu S., Walters D.E., Weimer D. L. Scientific Expertise and theBalance of Political Interests: MEDCAC and Medicare Coverage Decisions// Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2012. Vol.22.No.1. pp.55-81.124. Lavertu S., Weimer D.L.
Information Costs, Policy Uncertainty, andPolitical Control: Federal Advisory Committees at the FDA [Draft]. 2009.[Электронный ресурс] URL:http://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workingpapers/weimer2009022.pdf (дата обращения: 31.10.2012 г.).125. Lehmbruch G., Schmitter P. C. Patterns of corporatist policy-making.London: Sage, 1982.126. Leyden K. M.
Interest group resources and testimony at congressionalhearings //Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1995. pp. 431-439.127. Lindblom C. E. Politics and markets: The world's political economicsystems. New York: Basic Books, 1977.172128. Lowi T. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice // PublicAdministration Review.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
