Диссертация (Влияние индивидульных особенностей когнитивного развития на овладение навыками чтения и письма младшими школьниками), страница 45

— № 103. — P. 56—115.352. Plomin R., Kovas Y. Generalist genes and learning disabilities //Psychological Bulletin. — 2005. — № 131. — P. 592—617.353. Posthuma D., de Geus E. J. C., Boomsma D. I., Neale M. C.Combined linkage and association tests in MX // Behavior Genetics. — 2004.

—№ 34. — P. 179—196.251354. Pugh K. R., McCardle P. How children learn to read: Current issuesand new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics ofreading and dyslexia research and practice. — New York, NY: PsychologyPress, 2009.355. Puolakanaho A., Ahonen T., Aro M., Eklund K., Leppanen P.,Poikkeus A.-M., Tolvanen A., Torppa M., Lyytinen H.

Very early phonologicaland language skills: estimating individual risk of reading disability // Journal ofChild Psychology and Psychiatry. — 2007. — № 48. — P. 923—931.356. Rasch G. An item analysis that takes individual differences intoaccount // The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. —1966. — № 19. — P. 49—57.357. Raskind W. H., Igo R. P.

J., Chapman N. H., Berninger V. W.,Thomson J. B., Matsushita M., Brkanac Z., Holzman T., Brown M., Wijsman E.M. A genome scan in multigenerational families with dyslexia: Identification ofa novel locus on chromosome 2q that contributes to phonological decodingefficiency // Molecular Psychiatry. — 2005. — № 10.

— P. 699—711.358. Rayner K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning andskilled readers // Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. — 1986. — № 41.— P. 211—236.359. Rayner K., Pollatsek A., Ashby J., Clifton C. Psychology of reading.— New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2011.360. Riley J. L. The ability to label the letters of the alphabet at schoolentry: A discussion on its value // Journal of Research in Reading. — 1996. —№ 19. — P. 87—101.361. Roeske D., Ludwig K.

U., Neuhoff N., Becker J., Bartling J., BruderJ., Brockschmidt F. F., Warnke A., Remschmidt H., Hoffmann P., MullerMyhsok B., Nothen M. M., Schulte-Korne G. First genome-wide associationscan on neurophysiological endophenotypes points to trans-regulation effects onSLC2A3 in dyslexic children // Molecular Psychiatry. — 2011. — № 16. — P.97—107.252362. Rosner J. Test of auditory analysis skills. — Novato, CA: AcademicTherapy Publications, 1999.363. Rubenstein K., Matsushita M., Berninger V. W., Raskind W. H.,Wijsman E.

M. Genome scan for spelling deficits: effects of verbal IQ onmodels of transmission and trait gene localization // Behavior Genetics. — 2011.— № 41. — P. 31—42.364. Sampson G. Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. — London,UK: Hutchinson, 1985.365. Samuelsson S., Byrne B., Olson R. K., Hulslander, Wadsworth S.,Corley R., Willcutt E. G., Defries J. C. Response to early literacy instruction inthe United States, Australia, and Scandinavia: A behavioral-genetic analysis //Learning and Individual Differences.

— 2008. — № 18. — P. 289—295.366. Schatschneider C., Fletcher J. M., Francis D. J., Carlson C. D.,Foorman B. R. Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinalcomparative analysis // Journal of Educational Psychology. — 2004. — № 96.— P. 265—282.367. Schiff R., Schwartz-Nahshon S., Nagar R. Effect of phonological andmorphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speakingadolescents with reading disabilities // Annals of Dyslexia. — 2011.

— № 61.— P. 44—63.368. Schoolcraft H. Historical and statistical information respecting thehistory, condition and prospects of the Indian tribes of the United States:6 vol. — Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott, Grambo & Company, 1851—1857.369. Schumacher J., Hoffmann P., Schmal C., Schulte-Korne G., NothenM. M. Genetics of dyslexia: the evolving landscape // Journal of MedicalGenetics. — 2007. — № 44. — P. 289—297.370.

Seidenberg M. S. Connectionist models of word reading // CurrentDirections in Psychological Science. — 2005. — № 14. — P. 238—242.253371. Seidenberg M. S., McClelland J. L. A distributed, developmentalmodel of visual word recognition and naming // Psychological Review. — 1989.— № 96. — P.

523—568.372. Sera M. D., Elieff C., Forbes J., Burch M. C., Rodriguez W., DuboisD. P. When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis ofgrammatical gender and classification // Journal of Experimental Psychology:General. — 2002. — № 131. — P. 377—397.373. Seymour P. H. K., Aro M., Erskine J. M. Foundation literacyacquisition in European orthographies // British Journal of Psychology. — 2003.— № 94. — P. 143—174.374. Share D. L. On the anglocentricities of current reading research andpractice: The perils of overreliance on an «outlier» orthography // PsychologicalBulletin. — 2008.

— № 134. — P. 584—615.375. Sharpley C. F., Edgar E. Teachers’ ratings vs. standardized tests: Anempirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement //Psychology in the Schools. — 1986. — № 23. — P. 106–111.376. Skiba T., Landi N., Wagner R., Grigorenko E. L. In search of theperfect phenotype: An analysis of linkage and association studies of reading andreading-related processes // Behavior Genetics. — 2011. — № 41. — P.

6—30.377. Smith E. V. J., Conrad K. M., Chang K., Piazza J. An introduction toRasch measurement for scale development and person assessment // Journal ofNursing Measurement. — 2002. — № 10 — P. 189—206.378. Smith R. M. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models //Journal of Applied Measurement. — 2000. — № 1. — P. 199—218.379.

Smith R. M., Schumacker R. E., Bush J. J. Examining replicationeffects in Rasch fit statistics // Objective measurement: Theory into practice / ed.by M. Wilson, G. Engelhard. — Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corp, 2000. —Vol. 5. — P. 303—317.254380. Smith S. D., Kimberling W. J., Pennington B. F., Lubs H. A.Specific reading disability: identification of an inherited form through linkageanalyses // Science.

— 1983. — № 219. — P. 1345—1347.381. Stephenson S. Six cases of congenital word-blindness affecting threegenerations of one family // Ophthalmoscope. — 1907. — № 5. — P. 482—484.382. Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L. Myths in psychology and educationregarding the gene — environment debate // Teachers College Record.

—1999a. — № 100. — P. 536—553.383. Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L. Our labeled children. (What everyparent and teacher needs to know about learning disabilities). — Reading, MA:Perseus Publishing Group, 1999b.384. Stockall L., Marantz A.

A single route, full decomposition model ofmorphological complexity: MEG evidence // The Mental Lexicon. — 2006. —№ 1. — P. 85—123.385. Strickland D. S., Shanahan T. Laying the groundwork for literacy //Educational Leadership. — 2004. — № 61. — P. 74—77.386. Sulzby E. Kindergartners as readers and writers // Advances inwriting research / ed. by M.

Farr. — Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985. — Vol. 1:Children’s early writing development. — P. 127—199.387. Taylor J., Roehrig A. D., Soden Hensler B., Connor C. M.,Schatschneider C. Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading// Science. — 2010. — № 328. — P. 512—514.388. Teddlie C., Kirby P. C., Stringfield S. Effective versus ineffectiveschools: Observable differences in the classroom // American Journal ofEducation.

— 1989. — № 97. — P. 221—236.389. Temple C., Nathan R., Buriss N. The beginnings of writing. —Boston, MA: Allyn, Bacon, 1982.390. Thomas C. J. Congenital «word-blindness»’ and its treatment //Ophthalmoscope. — 1905. — № 3. — P. 380—385.255391. Thompson J., Richardson U., Goswami U. Phonological similarityneighbourhoods and children's short-term memory: Typical development anddyslexia // Memory and Cognition. — 2005. — № 33. — P. 1210—1219.392.

Tong X., Deacon H., Kirby J. R., Cain K., Parrilla R. Morphologicalawareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English //Journal of Educational Psychology. — 2011. — № 103. — P. 523—534.393. Treiman R. The internal strucutre of the syllable // Linguisticstrucutre in language processing / ed. by G. Carlson, M. Tanenhaus. —Dordrecht, Holland: Kluger, 1988.

— P. 27—52.394. Treiman R., Broderick V. What's in a name: Children's knowledgeabout the letters in their own names // Journal of Experimental ChildPsychology. — 1998. — № 70. — P. 97—116.395. Treiman R., Kessler B., Bourassa D. Children's own names influencetheir spelling // Applied Psycholinguistics. — 2001. — № 22.

— P. 555—570.396. Treiman R., Zukowski A. Levels of phonological awareness //Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman / ed. S. A.Brady, D. P. Shankweiler. — Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1991. — P. 67—83.397. Tunmer W. E., Herriman M., Nesdale A. Metalinguistic abilities andbeginning reading // Reading Research Quarterly. — 1988. — № 23.

— P. 134–158.398. Van den Bos K. P. IQ, phonological awareness, and continuousnaming speed related to Dutch children’s poor decoding performance on twoword identification tests // Dyslexia. — 1998. — № 4. — P. 73—89.399. Van den Bos K. P., Zijlstra B. J. H., Spelberg H. C. L. Life-span dataon continuous-naming speeds of numbers, letters, colors, and pictured objects,and word-reading speed // Scientific Studies of Reading. — 2002. — № 6. —P. 25—49.400.