Сетевая архитектура государственного управления проблемы концептуализации и практики (792420), страница 45

Просмтор этого файла доступен только зарегистрированным пользователям. Но у нас супер быстрая регистрация: достаточно только электронной почты!

Текст из файла (страница 45)

№ 4.

1. Семененко И.С. «Человек политический» перед альтернативами общественных трансформаций: опыт переосмысления индивидуального измерения политики // Полис, 2012, №5.

2. Сергеев В.М. Доверие и пространственное взаимодействие социальных сетей // Полис. 2007. № 2.

3. Скотт Дж. Благими намерениями государства. М.: «Университетская книга», 2005.

4. Сморгунов Л.В. В поисках управляемости: трансформация теории публичного управления в XX веке // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. 2011. Cер. 6. Вып. 4.

5. Сморгунов Л.В. Сетевая методология исследования политики // Политический анализ: Доклады Центра эмпирических политических

исследований СПбГУ. Вып. 2 / под ред. Г. П. Артемова. СПб.: Издательство С.- Петербургского университета, 2001.

1. Сморгунов Л.М. Инновационный потенциал сетевой организации образования // Образование и управление: Альманах по философии образования, эвристике, методологии и методике преподавания социогуманитарных дисциплин. СПб, 2007.

2. Сморгунов Л.М. Политические сети, информационные технологии и публичное управление: переход от концепции «E-Government» к «E- Governance» // Технологии информационного общества — Интернет и современное общество, 2005.

3. Сморгунов Л.М. Сетевой подход в исследовании политики // Политология. Лексикон / под ред. А.И. Соловьева. М.: РОССПЭН, 2007.

4. Сморгунов Л.М. Сетевой подход к национальной инновационной системе // Моделирование в социально-политической сфере. Научный альманах. М., 2008. № 1.

5. Сморгунов Л.М. Сетевой подход к политике и управлению // Полис. 2001. № 3.

6. Соловьев А.И. «Институциональные сети» российского государства и стратегия самолегитимации правящего режима // Политэкс. 2012. № 3.

7. Соловьев А.И. Латентные структуры управления государством, или игра теней на лике власти // Полис. 2011. № 5.

8. Соловьев А.И. Принятие государственных решений. М., 2006.

9. Соловьев А.И. Трансъячеистые структуры как форма строения и источник саморазвития государства // Полис. 2006. № 6.

10. Старк Д. Гетерархия: организация диссонанса // Экономическая социология. 2009. № 1.

11. Стрежнева М.В. «Трансправительственные сети» в ЕС // Международные процессы. 2008. № 1.

12. Тевено Л. Множественность способов координации: равновесие и рациональность в сложном мире // Вопросы экономики. 1997. № 10.

13. Тевено Л. Рациональность или социальные нормы: преодоленное противоречие? // Экономическая социология. Том 2. 2001. № 1.

14. Транснациональное политическое пространство: новые реальности международного развития / Косолапов Н.А., Стрежнева М.В., Войтоловский Ф.Г. и др.; отв. ред. Стрежнева М.В. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2010.

15. Уфимцев Р. Хвост ящерки. Метафизика метафоры. Калининград:

«Оттокар», 2010.

1. Учачева О.А. Сети гражданской мобилизации // Общественные науки и современность. 2012. № 6.

2. Хабермас Ю. Вовлечение другого. Очерки политической теории. СПб, 2001.

3. Хиценко В.Е. Эволюционный менеджмент // Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. 2000. № 1.

4. Хойслинг Р. Контексты и перспективы сетевой теории // Хойслинг Р. Социальные процессы как сетевые игры. Социологические эссе по основным аспектам сетевой теории / пер. с нем. М.: Логос-Альтера, 2003.

5. Шерстобитов А.С. Коммуникация в сетевом политическом управлении (на опыте политике в сфере телекоммуникаций в России). Дисс. к.п.н.: 23.00.02. СПб., 2010.

6. Шумпетер Й. Капитализм, социализм, демократия. М., 1995.

7. Acevedo B., Common R. Governance and the Management of Networks in the Public Sector. Drugs Policy in the United Kingdom and the Case of Cannabis Reclassification // Public Management Review. 2006. Vol. 8. P. 395–414.

8. Agranoff R. Managing Within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007.

9. Agranoff R., McGuire M. Collaborative Public management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.

10. Aldrich H.A. Organizations and Environment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall, 1979.

11. Aldrich H.A., Whetten H.D.A. Organization-sets, Action-sets and Networks: Making the Most out of Simplicity. In: Nystrom P.C., Starbuck W.H. (eds). Handbook of Organization Design. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

12. Allison G.T. Essence of Decision, Boston, 1971.

13. Atkinson M., Coleman W. Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks In Advanced Capitalist Economies // British Journal of Political Science. 1989. Vol. 19. P. 47–67.

14. Bachrach P., Daratz M. Two Faces of Power // American Political Science Review. 1962. Vol. 56.

15. Ball S., Junemann C. Networks, New Governance and Education. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2012.

16. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1986.

17. Barber B. Participatory Democracy // Encyclopedia of Democracy. 1995.

Vol. 3.

1. Barber B. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.

2. Barber B. Three Challenges to Reinventing Democracy. In: Hirst P., Khilnan S. (eds). Reinventing Democracy. Oxford: The Political Quarterly. 1996.

3. Baumgartner F., Jones B. Agendas and Instability in American Politics.

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

1. Baumgartner F., Jones B. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.

2. Behn R.D. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.

3. Behn R. The New Public Management Paradigm and the Search for Democratic Accountability // International Public Management Journal. 1998. P. 131–64.

4. Behn R. D. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.

5. Benhabib S. Toward a Deliberative Model of Democracy Legitimacy. In: S. Benhabib S. (ed.). Democracy and Difference. Princeton, 1996.

6. Benson J. A Framework for Policy Analysis. In: Rogers D., Whetten D. Interorganisational Coordination: Theory, Research, and Implementation. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1982.

7. Benson J.K. The Interorganisational Network as a Political Economy. In: Karpik L. (ed.). Organization and Environment. Deventer: Kluwer, 1978.

8. Benz A., Papadopoulos Y. Introduction: Governance and Democracy: Concepts and Key Issues. In: A. Benz and Y. Papadopoulos (eds.), Governance and Democracy: Comparing National. European and International Experience. London: Routledge. 2006. P. 1–26.

9. Berry F., Choi S., Goa W., Jang H., Kwan M., Word J. Three Traditions of Network Research: What the Public Management Research Agenda Can Learn from Other Research Communities // Public Administration Research. 2004. Vol. 64. P. 539–552.

10. Bevir M., Rhodes R.A.W. Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge, 2003.

11. Bevir M., Rodes R.A.W., Weller P. Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the Public Sector // Public Administration. 2003. Vol. 81. P. 1–17.

12. Bingham L., Nabatchi T., O’Learly R. The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government // Public Administration Review. 2005. Vol. 65. P. 547–558.

13. Blom-Hansen J. A New Institutional Perspective on Policy Networks // Public Administration. 1997. Vol.75. P. 669–693.

14. Bobbio N. The Future of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.

15. Bogason P., Musso J. The Democratic Prospects of Network Governance // American Review of Public Administration. 2006. Vol. 36. P. 3–18.

16. Boje D., Whetten D. Effects of Organizational Strategies and Contextual Constrains on Centrality and Attributions of Influence in Interorganisational Networks // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1981. Vol. 26. № 3. P. 378–

395.

1. Boltanski L, Thevenot L. Les economies de la grandeur. Paris, 1987.

2. Borganor V. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions. New York: Blackwell Reference, 1987. P. 113.

3. Borzel T. A. Organizing Babylon — on the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks // Public Administration. 1998. Vol. 76. P. 253–273.

4. Bovens M.A. The Social Steering of Complex Organizations // British Journal of Political Science. 1990. Vol. 20. P. 91–117.

5. Brans M. Challenges to the Practice and Theory of Public Administration in Europe // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1997. P. 389–415.

6. Brass D.J., Burkhardt M.E. Centrality and Power in Organizations. In:

N. Nohria, R. Eccles. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

1. Bressers H.T.A., O’Toole L.J.J. Instrument Selection and Implementation in a Network Context. In: Eliadis P. Hill M., Howlett M. Designing Governance: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005.

2. Brunsson N. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley, 1989.

3. Bryson J., Crosby B., Stone M. The Design Implication of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from Literature // Public Administration Review. 2006. Vol. 66. P. 44–55.

4. Burt R. S. The Contingent Value of Social Capital // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997. Vol. 42. P. 339–365.

5. Burt R. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

6. Burt R. The Network Structure of Social Capital. In: Research in Organizational Behavior / ed. by Staw B.M., Sutton R.I. Greenwich, CT: JAT Press, 2000. P. 345–423.

7. Burt R.S. Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. In: N. Lin, K. Cook, R.S. Burt, Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: de Gruyter, 2001.

8. Burt R.S., Knez M. Trust and Third-Party Gossip. In: R.M. Kramer,

T.R. Tyler Trust in Organisations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996.

1. Callon M. The Sociology Of An Actor-network: The Case Of Electric Vehicle. In: M. Callon, Н. Law, and A. Rip (eds). Mapping the Dynamics of Science And Technology. Sociology of Science in The Real World. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1986. P. 19–34.

2. Campbell C., Szablowski G. The Super-Bureaucrats: Structure and Behavior in Central Agencies. Toronto: Cage, 1980.

3. Campbell J. C., Baskin M.A., Baumgartner F.R., Halpern N.P. Afterword on Policy Communities: A Framework for Comparative Research // Governance. 1989.

4. Carroll G.R., Teo A.C. On the Social Networks of Managers // Academy of Management Journal. 1996. P. 421–440.

5. Castells M. Materials for an Exploratory Theory of the Network State // British Journal of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 1.

6. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

7. Cater D. Power in Washington: A Critical Look at Today’s Struggle in the Nation’s Capital, New York: Random House, 1964.

8. Cawson A. Corporatism and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

9. Christensen T., Lagreid P. New Public Management — the Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2001.

10. Christopoulus D.C. The Governance of Networks: Heuristic of Formal Analysis? // Political Studies. 2008. Vol. 54. P. 475–481.

11. Cobb R., Elder C. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Setting. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.

12. Cohen M., March J., Olsen J. A Garbage Can Model of Organization Choice // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1972. Vol. 17. P. 1–27.

13. Coleman J. S. The Mathematics of Collective Action. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.

14. Coleman J., Katz E., Mentzel H. The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicals. In: S. Leinhardt (ed.) Quantitative Studies in Social Relations. New York: Academic Press, 1977. P. 107–124.

15. Coleman J.S. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.

16. Coleman J.S. Individual Interest and Collective Action: Selected Essays.

New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

1. Comfort L. Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control // Public Administration Review. 2007. Vol. 67. P. 189–197.

2. Comfort L. Managing Intergovernmental Responses to Terrorism and Other Events // Publius. 2002. Vol. 32. P. 29–51.

3. Compston H. Policy Networks and Policy Change: Putting Network Theory on the Test. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

4. Connolly W. The Ethos of Pluralisation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.

5. Cooper P. Governing by Contracts: Challenges and Opportunities for Public Managers. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2003.

6. Cristensen T., Lagreid P. Administrative Reform Policy: the Challenges of Turning Symbols into Practice // Public Organization Review: A Global Journal. 2003. P. 3–27.

7. Crozier M., Friedberg E. Action and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1980.

8. Cushman J.N. Private Company Finds No Evidence Its Interrogator Took Part in Abuse // New York Times. 2004. 13 August.

9. Davis J.S. Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony.

Bristol: The Policy Press, University of Bristol, 2011.

1. De Bruijn J. A., Ringeling A. B. Normative Notes Perspectives on Networks. In: W.J.M. Kickert, E.H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan (eds). Managing Complex Networks. London: Sage, 1997.

2. Dean M. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage, 1999.

3. Denhardt J., Denhardt R. The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering.

NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2003.

1. Dijk van J. A.G.M. The Network Society. London: Sage, 2012.

2. Domberger S., Rimmer S. Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey // International Journal of the Economics of Business. 1994. Vol. 11.

3. Donahue J. D. The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means New York: Basic Books, 1989.

4. Dowding K. Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Network Approach // Political Studies. 1995. Vol. 43. P. 136–158.

5. Dowding K. There Must Be End to Confusion: Policy Networks, Intellectual Fatigue, and the Need for Political Science Methods Courses in British Universities // Political Studies. 2001. Vol. 49. P. 89–105.

6. Dryzek J. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Constatations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

7. Dunfee T. Corporate Governance in a Market with a Morality // Law and Contemporary Problems. 1999. Vol. 62.

8. Dunleavy P. Explaining the Privatization Boom: Public Choice versus Radical Approaches // Public Administration. 1986. P. 13–34.

9. Dunn D. Politics and Administration at the Top: Lessons from Down Under. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.

10. Duonleavy P., Mangetts H.H., Bastow S., Tinkler J. New Public Management is Dead – Long Live Digital Era Governance. // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2006. Р. 467–494.

11. Dyson E. Release 2.0.: A Design for Living in the Digital Age. New York, 1997.

12. Easter G. Reconstructing the State: Personal Networks and Elite Identity in Soviet Russia (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

13. Edelenbos J., Klijn E. Trust in Complex Decision-making Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration //Administration and Society. 2007. Vol. 39. P. 25–50.

14. Eijk C., Kok W. Nondecisions Reconsideration // Acta Politica. Vol. 10.

1975.

1. Elster J. Rational Choice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

2. Emery F.E., Trist E.L. The Causal Texture of Organizational Environment

// Human Relations. 1965. Vol. 18.

1. Etzioni-Halevy E. The Elite Connection: Problems and Potential of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.

2. Fernandez R. M. Structural Bases of Leadership in Interorganisational Networks // Social Psychology Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 54.

3. Foucault M. Governmentality // The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, 1991.

4. Fox C., Miller H. Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse.

London: Sage, 1995.

1. Freeman J. The Political Process. New York: Random House, 1965.

2. Freeman J.L., Parrish-Stevens J.P. A Theoretical and Conceptual Re- examination of Subsystem Politics // Public Policy and Administration. 1987. P. 9–24.

3. Friedman M. A Friedman Doctrine — The social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits // New York Times. 1970. September 13.

4. Fukuyama F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.

London: Hamish Hamilton, 1995.

1. Fulk J., DeSanctic G. Articulation of Communication Technology and Organization Form. In G. DeSanctic, J. Fulk (eds). Shaping Organizational Form: Communication, Connection, and Community. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1999.

2. Fulton Lord The Report of the Committee on the Civil Service. London: HMSO, 1968.

3. Fung A., Wright E.O. Deeping Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance // Politics and Society. 2001. Vol. 29. P. 5–41.

4. Haahr J. Governmentality and Political Studies // European Political Science. 2005. Vol. 4.

5. Gage R., Mandell M. Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York: Praeger, 1990.

6. Gintis H. Game Theory Evolving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.

7. Goetz K. H. Making Sense of Post-Communist Central Administration: Modernization, Europeanization or Latinization? // Journal of European Public Policy. 2001. Vol. 8.

8. Goldsmith S. Eggers W.D. Governing by Network — The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.

9. Goss S. Making Local Governance Work: Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change. London, 2001.

10. Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties // American Journal of Sociology. 1973. Vol. 76. P. 1360–1380.

11. Granovvetter M. S. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness // American Journal of Sociology. 1985. Vol. 91. P. 481–510.

12. Grimsey D., Lewis M.K. Public-Private Partnership. The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. UK, 2004.

13. Hajer M. Policy without a Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Avoid // Policy Science. 2003. Vol. 36. P. 175–195.

14. Hajer M., Wagenaar H. Deliberate Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

15. Hajer M., Wagenaar H. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

16. Hanf K., Scharpf F. W. Interorganisational Policy-Making, London: Sage, 1978.

17. Heclo H. Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978.

18. Hedlund C. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation // Strategic Management Journal. 1994. Vol. 15. P. 73–90.

19. Heider F. The Psycology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

20. Hellman J., Kaufmann D. Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies // Finance and Development. 2001. P. 40–44.

21. Hill M., Hupe P. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.

22. Hirst P. Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1994.

23. Hirst P. Governance and Democracy. In: Pierre J. Debating Governance.

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 13–35.

1. Hjern B., Porter D. Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis. In: B. Holzner (ed.). Realizing Social Science Knowledge. Vienna: Physica-Verlag, 1983. P. 265–277.

2. Hoggett P. A New Public Management in the Public Sector? // Policy and Politics. 1991. Vol. 19. P. 243–256.

3. Holden B. Global Democracy: Key Debates. London; New York: Routledge. 2000.

4. Hood C. A Public Management for All Seasons? // Public Administration.

1991. Vol. 69.

1. Howlett M. What Is A Policy Instrument? Tools, Mixes, and Implementation Style. In: P. Eliadis, M. Hill, M. Howlett (eds). Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005.

2. Jacoby H. The Bureaucratization of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.

3. Jessop B. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.

4. Jordan A. G. Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism, and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process // Journal of Public Policy. 1981. P. 95–123.

5. Jordan G. Sub-Governments, Policy Communities and Networks: Refilling Old Bottles? // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1990. P. 319–338.

6. Jordan G., Shubert K. A Preliminary Ordering of Policy Network Labels // European Journal of Political Research. 1992. Vol. 21. P. 7–27

7. Kapucu N. Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies: Boundary Spanners in Multi-Agency Coordination // Public Review of Public Administration. 2006. Vol. 36. P. 207–225.

8. Kapucu N. Public-nonprofit Partnership for Collective Action in Dynamic Contexts of Emergency // Public Management. 2006. Vol. 84. P. 205–220.

9. Katz M. Shapiro C. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility

// American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 3. P. 424–440.

1. Kenis P., Schneider V. Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox, in B. Martin and R. Mayntz (eds). Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Frankfurt a.M./Boulder, Co.: Campus Verlag / Westview Press, 1991.

2. Kettle D. F. Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets.

Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1993.

1. Kickert W.J.M. Public Management and Administrative Reform in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1997.

2. Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston, 1984.

3. Klijn E.-H., Kickert W.J.M, Klijn E.-H., Koppenjan J.F.M. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage, 1997.

4. Klijn E.-H., Skelcher C. Democracy and Governance Networks: Compatible or Not? // Public Administration. 2007. Vol. 85. P. 587–609.

5. Klijn Е.-H., Koppenjan J.F.M. Rediscovering the Citizen: New Roles for Politicians in Interactive Policy Making. In: McLaverly P. Public Participation and Innovations in Community Governance. Aldershot: Achgate, 2002.

6. Knill C., Lehmkuhl D. Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance // Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2002. Vol. 15. P. 41–63.

7. Knoke D., Kuklinski J. Network Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1982.

8. Knoke D., Pappi F., Broadbent J., Tsujinaka Y. Comparing Policy Networks. Labor Politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

9. Koliba C., Meek J., Zia A. Governance Network in Public Administration and Public Policy. New York: CRC Press, 2011.

10. Kononenko V., Moshes A. Russia as a Network State: What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Not? London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

11. Kooiman J. Governing as Governance. London: Sage, 2003.

12. Kooiman J. Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions.

London: Sage, 1993.

1. Kooiman J., Jentoft D. Meta-Governance: Values, Norms and Principles, and the Making of Hard Choices // Public Administration. 2009. Vol. 87. P. 818–836.

2. Koppel J. The Politics of Quasi-government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

3. Koppenjan J., Klijn E.-H. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision-making. London: Routledge, 2004.

4. Koppenjan J.F.M. Network Management and Decision Making in Networks: A Multi-Actor Approach to Governance. Paper presented to the Third International Research Symposium on Public Management (IRSPM III), Aston University Business School. Birmingham: UK, 1999, 25–26 March.

5. Krackhardt D. Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 35. P. 342–369.

6. Krackhardt D. Cognitive Social Structure // Social Networks. 1987.

P. 109–134.

1. Kryshtanovskaya O., White S. The Formation of Russia’s Network Directorate// Russia as a Network State. What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Not? / Ed. by V.Kononenko, A.Moshes. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

2. Labianca G., Brass D., Gray B. Social Networks and the Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties // Academy of Management Journal. 1998. Vol. 41.

3. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago, 1980.

4. Lawrence P.R., Lorsch J.W. Organization and Environment, Boston: Harvard University Press, 1967.

5. Ledeneva A.V. Can Russian Modernize? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

6. Ledeneva A.V. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practicec that Shaped post-Soviet Politics and Bossiness. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006.

7. Ledeneva A.V. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Bossiness. New York: Cornell University Press, 2006.

8. Ledeneva A.V. Informal Networks in Post-Communist Economies. In:

T. Lahusen, P. Solomon (eds). What Is Soviet Now? Identities, Legacies, Memories. Reihe: Geschichte: Forschung und Wissenschaft, 2007.

1. Lehmbruch G., Schmitter P. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-making.

London: Sage, 1982.

1. Lester R., Piore M. Innovation: the Missing Dimension. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.

2. Levine S., White P.E. Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganisational Relations // Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 5. 1961.

3. Lin N. Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

4. Lindblom C. E. The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press, 1965.

5. Litwak E., Hylton L. Interorganisational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Co- ordinating Agencies // Administrative Science Quarterly, 1962.

6. Lowi T.J. Legislative Politics USA. Boston, Mass.: Little Brown, 1962.

7. Lowi T.J. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority, New York: W.W. Norton, 1969.

8. Lynn L. Managing the Public Business. The Job of the Government Executive. New York: Basic Books, 1981.

9. Mandell M. Network Management: Strategic Behavior in the Public Sector.

In Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks / ed. by R.W. Gage and M. Mandell. New York: Praeger, 1990. P. 29–53.

1. March J., Olsen J. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press, 1995.

2. March J.C., Olsen J.P. Ambiguity and Choice in Organization. Bergen, 1976.

3. Marsden P., Friedkin N. Network Studies of Social Influence. In:

S. Wasserman, J. Galaskiewicz (eds). Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.

1. Marsh D. Comparing Policy Networks, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.

2. Marsh D. Privatization under Mrs. Thatcher: A Review of the Literature // Public Administration. 1991. Vol. 30. P. 459–480.

3. Marsh D., Rhodes R.F.W. Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

4. Mathur N., Skelcher C. Evaluating Democratic Performance: Methodologies for Assessing the Relationship Between Network Governance and Citizens // Public Administration Review. 2007. Vol. 67. P. 228–237.

5. Mayntz R. Governing Failures and the Problem of Governability: Some Comments on a Theoretical Paradigm. In: Kooiman J. Modern Governance: New Government — Society Interactions. London: Sage Publications, 1993.

6. McGann J., Sabatini R. Global Thin Tanks: Policy Networks and Governance (Global Institutions). New York, 2011.

7. Meadows D. Thinking in Systems. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008. P. 77–78.

8. Meuleman L. Public Management ant the Metagornance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and managing Governance Style Combinations. Leipzig: Physica-Verlag, 2010.

9. Milward H.B., Provan K.G. Measuring Network Structure // Public Administration. 1998. Vol. 76. P. 387–407.

10. Minogue M. Changing the State: Concepts and Practice in the Reform of the Public Sector. In: Minogue M., Polidano Ch., Hulme D. (eds). Beyond the New Public Management: Changing Ideas and Practices in Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.

11. Monge P., Contractor N. Emergence of Communication Networks. In:

F. Jablin, L. Putman (eds.). The New Handbook of Organizational Communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001.

1. Mouffe C. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso, 2000.

2. Navaro-Yashin Y. Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

1. Negandhi A.R. Interorganisational Theory. Kansas City: Kansas University Press, 1975.

2. Niskanen W. Bureaucracy: Servant or Master? London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1973.

3. Nooteboom B. Trust: Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures.

Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, 2002.

1. Nordlinger E. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.

2. O’Leary R., Bingham L. A Managers Guide to Resolving Conflicts in Collaborative Networks. Washington D.C.: IBM Centre for the Business of Government, 2007.

3. O’Tool L. Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-based Agendas in Public Administration // Public Administration Review. 1997. Vol. 57. P. 45–52.

4. O’Tool L., Meire K. Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Making Structural Networks and Managerial Networking // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2004. Vol. 14.

5. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.

6. Osborne S.P. Public-Private Partnership. Theory and Practice in International Perspective. New York, 2000.

7. Ostrom E. An Agenda for the Study of Institutions // Public Choice. 1986.

P. 3–25.

1. Ostrom V. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration.

Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1974.

1. Ostrom E. Governing in Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

2. Papandopoulos Y. Cooperative Forms of Governance: Problems in Democratic Accountability in Complex Environments // European Journal of Political Research. 2003. Vol. 43. P. 473–501.

3. Peters B. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1996.

4. Petеrs G., and J. Pierre. Governance, Accountability and Democratic Legitimacy, in A. Benz, Papadopoulos Y. (eds.). Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experience. London: Routledge, 2006.

5. Petеrs G., Pierre J. Governance, Accountability and Democratic Legitimacy, in A. Benz, Papadopoulos Y. (eds). Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experience. London: Routledge, 2006.

6. Pfeffer J. Power in Organization. Boston: Pitman, 1981.

7. Pierre J., Peters B.G. Governance, Politics and the State. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.

8. Pierre J., Peters B.G. Governance? Politics and the State. London: Macmillan, 2000.

9. Podolny J.M., Page K.L. Network Forms of Organization // Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, p. 58.

10. Pollitt C, Talbot C. Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualism. London: Routledge, 2004.

11. Powell W. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis / Ed. by P. DiMaggio Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

12. Propper I.M.A.M. Success and Failure in the Management of Policy Networks // Beleidswetenschap. 1997. Vol. 10. P. 345–365.

13. Provan K., Sebastian J. Networks within Networks: Service Link Overlap, Organizational Cliques, and Network Effectiveness // Academy of Management Journal. 1998. Vol. 41. P. 453–463.

14. Provan K.G., Kenis P. Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management and Effectiveness // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007. Vol. 18. P. 229–252.

15. Provan K.G., Milward H.B. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks // Pubic Administration Review. 2001. Vol. 61. P. 414–423.

16. Reagans R., Zukerman E. Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams // Organization Science. 2001. Vol. 12. P. 502–517.

17. Rhodes R.A.W., Marsh D. New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks

// European Journal of Political Research. 1992. Vol. 21. P. 181–205.

1. Rhodes R., Marsh D. Policy Network in British Politics. A Critique of Existing Approaches // Policy Network in British Government / eds. D. Marsh and R. Rhodes. Oxford, 1992.

2. Rhodes R.A.W. Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: The Sub-Central Governments of Britain. London: Unwind Hyman, 1988.

3. Rhodes R.A.W. Governance and Public Administration. In: J. Pierre (ed.).

Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

1. Rhodes R.A.W. Policy Networks. A British Perspective // Journal of Theoretical Politics. 1990. P. 293–317.

2. Rhodes R.A.W. The Hollowing Out of the State: the Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain // Political Quarterly. 1992. Vol. 65. P. 138– 151.

3. Rhodes R.A.W. The New Governance: Governing Without Government // Political Studies. 1996. Vol. 44. P. 652–667.

4. Rhodes R.A.W. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.

5. Richardson J, Jordan A.G. Doing Less by Doing More: British Government 1979-1993 // West European Politics. 1994. Vol. 17. P. 178–

197.

1. Richardson J., Jordan A. Governing and Pressure. The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1979.

2. Ripley R., Franklin G. Congress, the Bureaucracy and Public Policy.

Homewood IL: Dorsey, 1987.

1. Romzek B. Where the Buck Stops: Accountability in Reformed Public Organizations. In: Ingraham P., Thompson J., and Sanders R. (eds). Transforming Government: Lessons from the Reinvention Laboratories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.

2. Romzek B., Dubnik M. Accountability in Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987.

3. Romzek B., Johnston B. Reforming State Social Service through Contracting: Linking Implementation and Organization Culture. In: Brudney J., O’Tool L. Jn., Rainey H. Public Management: New Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2000.

4. Ronit K., Schneider V. Global Governance through Private Organizations

// Governance. 1999. P. 243–266.

1. Rosenau J.N. Change, Complexity and Governance in Globalizing Space.

In: J. Pierre (eds). Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

1. Rosenbaum D. Fast Quake Recovery Redeemed State Transportation Department // Engineering News Record. 1995. January 16.

2. Sabatier P. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy Oriented Learning Therein // Policy Science. 1988. Vol. 21.

3. Sabatier P. Policy Change over Decade or More. In: P. Sabatier,

H. Jenkins-Smith (eds). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, 1993.

1. Sabatier P., Jenkins-Smith H. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.

2. Salamon L. Economic Regulation. In: L. Salamon (ed.). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. P. 117–155.

3. Salamon L. The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action. In:

L. Salamon (ed.). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. P. 1–47.

1. Salamon L. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the Governance. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2002.

2. Salancik G. R. Wanted: A Good Network Theory of Organization // Administration Science Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 40. P. 345–349.

3. Sandel M. Democracy’s Discontent: America in a Search of Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.

4. Sanderson I. Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in Modern Local Government // Public Administration, 2001. Vol. 79.

5. Sandstrom A., Carlesson L. The Performance of Policy Networks: the Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance // The Policy Studies Journal. 2008. Vol. 36.

6. Sartori G. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers, 1987.

7. Schaap L., Twist M.J.W. The Dynamics of Closedness in Networks. In:

W.J.M. Kickert, E.-H. Klijn, J.F.M. Koppenjan (eds). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publishing, 1997. P. 62–76.

1. Scharpf F.W. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

2. Scharpf F.W. Interorganisational Policy Studies: Issues, Concepts and Perspectives. In: Hanf K.I., Scharpf F.W. Interorganisational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control. London: Sage, 1978. P. 354– 370.

3. Schmitter P., Lehmbruch G. Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation.

London: Sage, 1979.

1. Schmitter P.C. Participation in Governance: Is There Any Reason to Expect It Will Achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Politics in a Multilevel Context? In: Grote J.R., Gbikpi B. Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, 2002.

2. Scott J. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications, 1991.

3. Self P. Rolling Back the State: Economic Dogma and Political Choice.

New York: St Martin’s Press, 2000.

1. Simon H. A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Process in Administrative Organization. New York: MacMillan, 1957.

2. Smith D. The Shareholder Primacy Norm // Journal of Corporation Law.

1998. Vol. 23.

1. Smith M.J. Pressure, Power and Policy: State Autonomy and Policy Networks in Britain and the United States. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1993.

2. Smith S., Lipsky M. Nonprofits for Hire: the Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

3. Sorensen E. Democratic Theory and Network Governance // Administrative Theory and Praxis, 2002. Vol. 24. P. 693–720.

4. Sørensen E. Local Politicians and Administrators as Metagovernors. In: Marcussen M., Torfing J. Democratic Network Governance in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 89–108.

5. Sorensen E., Torfing J. Network Politics, Political Capital and Democracy

// International Journal of Public Administration. 2003. Vol. 26. P. 609–634.

1. Sorensen E., Torfing J. The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks // Scandinavian Political Studies. 2005. Vol. 28. P. 195–218.

2. Stark D. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life.

New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2009.

1. Stigler G. The Citizen and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.

2. Stone M.M., Ostrower F. Acting in the Public Interest? Another Look at Research on Nonprofit Governance // Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 36.

3. Streeck W., Schmitter P. Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London: Sage, 1985.

4. Teisman G. Decision-Making Processes: Phases, Streams and Rounds Models // Public Administration. 2000. № 4.

5. Termeer C.J.A.M., Koppenjan J.F.M. Managing Perceptions in Networks.

In Kickert W.J.M., Klijn E.-H., Koppenjan J.F.M. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage, 1997. P. 79–97.

1. Torfing J., Triantafillou P. Interactive Policy Making, Metagovernance and Democracy. UK, 2013.

2. Trevino L., Lengel R., Daft R. Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interaction Perspective // Communication Research. 1987. Vol. 14.

3. Tullock G. Provision of Public Goods through Privatization // KYKLOS, 1996. Vol. 49.

4. Van Waarden F. Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks // European Journal of Political Research 1992. Vol. 21.

5. Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997. Vol. 30.

6. Walti S., Kubler D. «New Governance» and Associative Pluralism: the Case of Drug Policy in Swiss Cities // The Policy Studies Journal. 2003. Vol. 31. P. 499–525.

7. Walty S., Kubler D., Papadoupolos Y. How Democratic Is “Governance”?

Lessons from Swiss Drag Policy // Governance. 2004. Vol. 17.

1. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

2. Weiss L. The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Process, 1998.

3. Wellman B. Physical Place and Cyberspace: the Rise of Networked Individualism // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2000.

№ 1.

1. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

1. Wilks S., Wright M. Comparative Government Industry Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.

2. Williamson O.E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, a Study of the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press, 1975.

3. Williamson P. Corporatism in Perspective. London: Sage, 1989.

4. Williamson О. The Economics оf Transaction Costs / Ed. by S. Masten.

Berkeley: University of California, 1999.

1. Wilson W. The Study of Administration // American Political Science Quarterly. 1941. Vol. 56.

2. Wohlstetter P., Smith J., Malloy C. Strategic Alliances in Action: Toward a Theory of Evolution // Policy Studies Journal. 2005. Vol. 33. P. 419–443.

3. Young I. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Характеристики

Список файлов диссертации