Диссертация (1174311), страница 29
Текст из файла (страница 29)
// Chirurg. – 1987. – Vol. 58. – Р. 84–92.106. Liu, L. Effect of local injection of mesenchymal stem cells on healing of suturedgastric perforation in an experimental model / Chiu, PW, Lam, PK. // Br J Surg. –2015. – Vol. 102, № 2. – Р. 158–68.107. Lo, HC. Laparoscopic simple closure alone is adequate for low risk patients withperforated peptic ulcer / Wu, SC, Huang, HC, Yeh, CC, Huang, JC, Hsieh, CH. //World J Surg. – 2011. – Vol.
35. – Р. 1873–8.108. Lohsiriwat, V. Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes,and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidityand mortality / Prapasrivorakul, S, Lohsiriwat, D. // World J Surg. – 2009. – Vol. 33,№ 1. – Р. 80–85.109. Lunevicius, R. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors oflaparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer / Morkevicius, M. // World J Surg.
–2005. – Vol. 29. – Р. 1299– 1310.110. Lunevicius, R. Risk factors influencing the early outcome results afterlaparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value /Morkevicius, M. // Langenbecks Arch Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 390. – Р. 413–420.170111. Lunevicius, R. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair forperforated peptic ulcer / Morkevicius, M.
// Br J Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 92. – Р. 1195–1207.112. Mcllrath, DC. Surgical management of Large Perforations of the Duodenum /Larson, RH. // Surg Clin North Am. – 1971. – Vol. 51. – Р. 857–61.113. Menekse, E. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients withperforated peptic ulcer / Kocer, B, Topcu, R, Olmez, A, Tez, M, Kayaalp, C. // WorldJ Emerg Surg. – 2015. – Vol. 10.
– Р. 7.114. Millat, B. Surgical treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers: controlled trials /Fingerhut, A, Borie, F. // World J Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 24. – Р. 299–306.115. Mishra, A. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation indeveloping countries / Sharma, D, Raina, VK. // Indian J Gastroenterol. – 2003. –Vol. 22, № 2. – Р.
49–53.116. Møller, MH. Preoperative prognostic factors for mortality in peptic ulcerperforation: a systematic review / Adamsen, S, Thomsen, RW, Møller, AM. // ScandJ Gastroenterol. – 2010. – Vol. 45. – Р. 785–805.117. Møller, MH. Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality inpatients with peptic ulcer perforation / Adamsen, S, Thomsen, RW, Møller, AN. // BrJ Surg. – 2011.
– Vol. 98, № 6. – Р. 802-10.118. Møller, MH. Perforated peptic ulcer: how to improve outcome? / Adamsen, S,Wøjdemann, M, Møller, AM. // Scand J Gastroenterol. – 2009. – Vol. 44. – Р. 15–22.119. Moller, MH. The peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortalityfollowing peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study / Engebjerg, MC, Adamsen, S,Bendix, J, Thomsen, RW. // Acta Anaesthesiol Scand.
– 2012. – Vol. 56, № 5. – Р.655–662.120. Mouret, P. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer / Francois, Y,Vignal, J. // Br J Surg. – 1990. – Vol. 77. – Р. 1006.121. Muller, MK. Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion inLaparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications / Wrann, S, Widmer, J, Klasen,J, Weber, M, Hahnloser, D. // World J Surg. – 2016. – Vol. 40, № 9. – Р. 2186-93.171122. Nathanson, LK. Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer/ Easter, DW, Cuschieri, A.
// Surg Endosc. – 1990. – Vol. 4. – Р. 232–233.123. Neudecker, J. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practiceguideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery / Sauerland,S, Neugebauer, E, Bergamaschi, R, Bonjer, HJ, Cuschieri, A. // Surg Endosc. – 2002.– Vol.
16, № 7. – Р. 1121-43.124. Rajesh, V. Risk factors predicting operative mortality in perforated peptic ulcerdisease / Chandra, SS, Smile, SR. // Trop Gastroenterol. – 2003. – Vol. 24. – Р. 148150.125. Robertson, GS. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. The role oflaparoscopy in generalized peritonitis / Wemyss-Holden, SA, Maddern, GJ. // Ann RColl Surg Engl. – 2000. – Vol.
82. – Р. 6–10.126. Saklad, M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures // Anesthesiology. – 1941.– Vol. 2. – Р. 281–284.127. Salem, TA. Prospective study on the role of the CT scan in patients with an acuteabdomen / Molloy, RG, O'Dwyer, PJ. // Colorectal Dis. – 2005. – Vol. 7, № 5. – Р.460-6.128. Sanabria, A. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease / Villegas,MI, Morales Uribe, CH. // Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
– 2013. – Vol. 2. – Р.Cd004778.129. Sartelli, M. Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patientswith complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISSStudy) / Abu-Zidan, FM, Catena, F, Griffiths, EA. // World J Emerg Surg. – 2015. –Vol. 10. – Р. 61.130.
Sartelli, M. Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper / Catena,F, Di Saverio, S. // World J Emerg Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 9. – Р. 22.131. Sartelli, M. The management of intra-abdominal infections from a globalperspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intraabdominal infections /Chichom-Mefire, A, Labricciosa, FM. // World J Emerg Surg. – 2017.
– Vol. 12. – Р.36.172132. Sartelli, M. Raising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitions / Kluger, Y.,Ansaloni, L., Hardcastle, T.C., Rello, J., Watkins, R., Bassetti, M., Giamarellou, E.,Coccolini, F., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Adesunkanmi, A.K. // World J Emerg Surg. – 2018.– Vol. 13.
– Р. 6.133. Sauerlenad, S. Laparoscopic for abdominal emergencies: evidence basedguidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery / Agresta, F,Bergamaschi, R, Borzellino, G. // Surg Endosc. – 2006. – Vol. 20, № 1. – Р. 14-29.134. Schietroma, M. Peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcer and immune response /Piccione, F, Carlei, F, Sista, F, Cecilia, EM, Amicucci, G.
// J Invest Surg. – 2013. –Vol. 26, № 5. – Р. 294-304.135. Seow, JG. Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection inpatients with perforated peptic ulcer / Lim, YR, Shelat, VG. // Eur J Trauma EmergSurg. – 2017. – Vol. 43, № 3. – Р.
293-298.136. Sharma, D. 'Free Omental Plug': A Nostalgic Look at an Old and DependableTechnique for Giant Peptic Perforations / Saxena, A, Rahman, H, Raina, VK,Kapoor, JP. // Dig Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 17. – Р. 216–8.137. Sharma, SS. A prospective cohort study of postoperative complications in themanagement of perforated peptic ulcer / Mamtani, MR, Sharma, MS, Kulkarni, H. //BMC Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 6.
– Р. 8138. Singer, M. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septicshock (Sepsis-3) / Deutschman, CS, Seymour, CW. // JAMA. – 2016. – Vol. 315. –Р. 801–10.139. Siu, W. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlledtrial / Leong, H, Law, B, Chau, CH, Li, AC, Fung, KH, Tai, YP, Li, MK. // Ann Surg.– 2002. – Vol.
235. – Р. 313–319.140. Siu, WT. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer / Chau,CH, Law, BKB, Tang, CN, Ha, PY, Li, MKW. // Br J Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 91, № 4. –Р. 481–4.173141. So, JB. Risk factors related to operative mortality and morbidity in patientsundergoing emergency gastrectomy / Yam, A, Cheah, WK, Kum, CK, Goh, PM. // BrJ Surg.
– 2000. – Vol. 87. – Р. 1702–1707.142. Søreide, K. Perforated peptic ulcer / Thorsen, K, Harrison, EM, Bingener, J,Møller, MH. // Lancet. – 2015. – Vol. 386. – Р. 1288-1298.143. Søreide, K. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery forperforated peptic ulcer / Thorsen, K, Søreide, JA. // BJS. – 2014. – Vol. 101. – Р. 51–64.144. Svanes, C.
Perforated peptic ulcer over 56 years. Time trends in patients anddisease characteristics / Salvesen, H, Stangeland, L, Svanes, K, Søreide, O. // Gut. –1993. – Vol. 34. – Р. 1666-1671.145. Svanes, C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment andprognosis // World J Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 24. – Р. 277–283.146.
Thomsen, RW. Diabetes and 30-day mortality from peptic ulcer bleeding andperforation: a Danish population-based cohort study / Riis, A, Christensen, S,Nørgaard, M, Sørensen, HT. // Diabetes Care. – 2006. – Vol. 29. – Р. 805-810.147. Thorsen, K. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients withperforated peptic ulcer / Glomsaker, TB, von Meer, A, Søreide, K, Søreide, JA. // JGastrointest Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 15.
– Р. 1329–1335.148. Thorsen, K. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: Age- and gender-adjustedanalysis of incidence and mortality / Søreide, JA, Kvaløy, JT, Glomsaker, T, Søreide,K. // World J Gastroenterol. – 2013. – Vol. 19, № 3. – Р. 347-354.149. Thorsen, K. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforatedpeptic ulcer / Søreide, JA, Søreide, K. // Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. – 2013.– Vol. 21. – Р. 25.150. Thorsen, K. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcerdisease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including threeclinical scoring systems / Søreide, JA, Søreide, K.
// J Gastrointest Surg. – 2014. –Vol. 18, № 7. – Р. 1261–8.174151. Tsugawa, K. The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery forgastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age / Koyanagi, N,Hashizume, M. // Hepatogastroenterology. – 2001. – Vol. 48. – Р. 156–162.152. Uccheddu, A. Surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in the elderly. Evaluation offactors influencing prognosis / Floris, G, Altana, M, Pisanu, A, Cois, A, Farci, SL. //Hepatogastroenterology. – 2003. – Vol. 50. – Р. 1956–1958.153.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
