Диссертация (1174311), страница 30
Текст из файла (страница 30)
Udwadia, TE. Diagnostic laparoscopy. A 30-year overview // SurgEndosc. –2004. – Vol. 18. – Р. 6-10.154. Vaidya, BB. Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer with DelayedPresentation / Garg, CP, Shah, JB. // J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. – 2009. –Vol. 19, № 2. – Р. 153-6.155. Vons, C. Laparoscopy with a diagnostic aim in abdominal emergencies //Chirurgie. – 1999. – Vol. 124, № 2. – Р. 182-6.156. Weledji, EP. The challenge of intra-abdominal sepsis / Ngowe, MN. // Int J Surg.– 2013. – Vol. 11.
– Р. 290–5.157. Williams, JM. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Quick SequentialOrgan Function Assessment, and Organ Dysfunction: Insights From a ProspectiveDatabase of ED Patients With Infection / Greenslade, JH, McKenzie, JV, Chu,K, Brown, AFT, Lipman, J. // Chest. – 2017. – Vol. 151, № 3. – Р. 586-596.158. Wysocki, A. Changes in the Localization of Perforated Peptic Ulcer and itsRelation to Gender and Age of the Patients throughout the Last 45 Years / Budzyński,P., Kulawik, J., Drożdż, W.
// World J Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 35, № 4. – Р. 811-6.159. Zelickson, MS. Helicobacter pylori is not the predominant etiology for pepticulcers requiring operation / Bronder, CM, Johnson, BL, Camunas, JA, Smith, DE. //Am Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 77. – Р. 1054–1060.160.
Zhou, C. An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair forPerforated Peptic Ulcer / Wang, W, Wang, J, Zhang, X, Zhang, Q, Li, B, Xu, Z. // SciRep. – 2015. – Vol. 5. – Р. 13976.175161. Zittel, TT. Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today-indication,technique and outcome / Jehle, EC, Becker, HD. // Langenbecks Arch Surg. – 2000. –Vol.
385. – Р. 84-96.162. Zweig, MH. ROC Plots: A Fundamental Evaluation Tool in Clinical Medicine /Campbell, G. // Clinical Chemistry. – 1993. - Vol. 39, No. 4. – Р. 561-77..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
