Диссертация (1173934), страница 48
Текст из файла (страница 48)
Mandatory Rules of Law in InternationalCommercial Arbitration // Melbourne Journal of International Law. 2005.226Volume 6;297. Basedow J. Wirtschaftchaftskollisionsrecht:: Theoretischer Versuch über dieordnungspolitischen Normen des Forumstaates // RabelZ. 52. 1988;298. Belohlavek A. Public Policy and Public Interest in International Law and EULaw // Czech Yearbook of International Law. Volume III. 2012;299. Benedettelli M. Public Policy and Italian Law of International Arbitration.2015 // URL: http://www.ibanet.org /300. Bermann G.A. Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration. In:Ferrari F., Kröll St.
ed. Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration. München,2010;301. Blessing M. Mandatory Rules of Law versus Party Autonomy in InternationalArbitration // Journal of International Arbitration. 1997. № 14;302. Boele-Woelki K., Joustra C., Steenhoff G. Dutch Private International Law atthe End of the 20th Century: Pluralism of Methods // URL: http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/43871 /303. Bonomi A. Conversion of the Rome Convention on Contracts into an ECInstrument: Some Remarks on the Green Paper of the EC Community // Yearbookof Private International Law. Volume 5. 2003;304.
Bonomi A. Overriding Mandatory Provisions in the Rome I Regulation on theLaw Applicable to Contracts // Yearbook of Private International Law. Volume X.2008;305. Brandt S., Hidegard M. Making Contracts Online Country Questions: Sweden// URL: http://uk.practicallaw.com/1-102-2246?source=relatedcontent /306.
Brkan M. Data Protection and European Private International Law. EUIWorking Paper RSCAS 2015/40. 2015;307. Bühler M. Choice of Swiss Law – No Escape Route to Avoid Application ofInternational Sanctions // Newsletter. 2001. № 29;308. Calvo Caravaca A.-L. El reglamento Roma I Sobre La Ley Aplicable A LasObligaciones Contractuales Cuestiones Escogidas // Cuadernos de DerechoTransnacional.
Octubre 2009. Volume 1. № 2;227309. Capitolo Quinto. Funzionamento Della Norma Di Diritto InternazionalePrivato E I Limiti All` Applicazione Della Norma Straniera richiamata // URL:http://www.simone.it/catalogo/v25.pdf /310. De Miguel Asensio P.A. The Law Governing International IntellectualProperty Licensing Agreements (A Conflict of Laws Analysis) // ResearchHandbook on Intellectual Property Licensing.
Cheltenham, 2013;311. Derains Y. Public Policy and the Law Applicable to the Dispute inInternational Arbitration. In: Sanders P. Comparative Arbitration Practice andPublic Policy in Arbitration. The Netherlands, 1987;312. Dickinson A. Third-Country Mandatory Rules in the Law Applicable toContractual Obligations: So Long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, Adieu? // Journalof Private International Law. April. 2007;313.
Dollinger J. World Public Policy: Real International Public Policy in theConflict of Laws // Texas International Law Journal. 1982. № 17;314. Dong J. On the Internationally Mandatory Rules of the PRC // CambridgeJournal of China Studies. 2016. Volume 11. № 2;315. Erkan M. Möhuk Madde Bağlaminda Türk Hukukunda Doğrugan UygulananKurallara Bakiş // Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi C. XV. 2011;316. Fawcett J. Evasion of Law and Mandatory Rules in Private International Law// CLJ.
1990. № 4;317. Fumagalli L. Mandatory Rules and International Arbitration. An ItalianPerspective // ASA Bulletin. 1998. № 16;318. Garcimartin F. The Law Applicable to Companies in the European Union: AProposal by the European Group for Private International Law // URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2857077 /319. Ginsburg J.C., Sirinelli P.
Private International Law Aspects of Authors`Contracts: the Dutch and the French Examples // URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2704017 /320. Global Labour and Employment Horizon. 2012 // URL: http://www.klgates.com /228321. Günther L. German Federal Labour Court of Foreign Mandatory Rules andthe Principle of Cooperation Among EU Member States // URL: http://conflictoflaws.net/2015/german-federal-labour-court-on-foreignmandatoryrules-and-the-principle-of-cooperation-among-eu-member-states /322. Guzman A. Arbitrator Liability: Reconciling Arbitration and Mandatory Rules// Duke Law Journal. 2000. № 49;323. Hartley T.
Beyond the Proper Law: Mandatory Rules under Draft Conventionon the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations // European Law Review. № 4.2011;324. Hartley T. Mandatory Rules in International Contracts: The Common LawApproach. In: Recueil des Cours. Volume 266. 1997;325. Hauser P.
French Subcontractor Law as Overriding Mandatory Provisions – anew Beginning? // IPRax. 2015. № 2;326. He Q. Public Policy in Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in theSupreme People`s Court of China // Hong Kong Law Journal. Volume 43. Part 3.2013;327. Hellner M. Third Country Overriding Mandatory Rules in the Rome IRegulation: Old Wine in New Bottles? // Journal of Private International Law.2009;328. Hery C. International Works Subcontracting: Foreign Subcontractors Savedby French Law? // Distribution Law Commission Newsletter. № 5.
2011;329. Köhler A. Uzimanje u obzir stranih normi neposredne primene u evropskommedunarodnom ugovornom pravu // Nova Pravna Revija. 2014. № 1;330. Kunda I. Defining Internationally Mandatory Rules in European Private Lawof Contracts // GPR. 2007. Volume 4. № 5;331.
Kunda I. Intellectual Property and Private International Law: ComparativePerspectives / ed. by T. Kono. Oxford & Portland, Oregon, 2012;332. Lalive P. Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy andInternational Arbitration // Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy inArbitration / ed. by P. Sanders. ICCA Congress Series. № 3. New York, 1987;229333. Lando O. The Conflict of Laws of Contracts: General Principles. In: Recueildes Cours.
Volume 189. 1984-IV;334. Lando O. The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute // Essays onInternational Commercial Arbitration / P. Sarcevic. 1989;335. Lazareff S. Mandatory Extraterritorial Application of National Law Rules. In:van den Berg A.J. Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings: The Law Applicablein International Arbitration. The Hague. 1996;336.
Long W. The First Choice-of-Law Act of China`s Mainland: An Overview //IPRax. 2012. № 3;337. Lorenzo S. Choice of Law and Overriding Mandatory Rules in InternationalContracts After Rome I // Yearbook of Private International Law. Volume 12.2010;338. Marques C.L., Jacques D.C. Normas Aplicação Imediata Como Um MétodoPara O Direito Internacional Privado De Proteção Do Consumidor No Brasil //URL: http://seer,urfas.br/index.php/ppgdip/article/download/27376.pdf /339. Mayer P. Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration // ArbitrationInternational. 1986.
№ 2;340. Mayer P., Sheppard A. Final ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar toEnforcement of International Arbitral Awards // Arbitration International. 2003. №19 (2);341. Moravcěvic S., Bezarevic J., Šumar T. Public Policy and MontegrinArbitration Law in Practice. 2016;342. Moravcěvic S., Šumar T. Public Policy and Serbian Arbitration Law inPractice. 2016;343. Morrone L. Il Regolamento Roma I: le norme a tutela dei lavoratori // Dirittodei Lavori Anno V.
№ 3. Dicembre 2011;344. Moss G.C. The Norwegian Approach to Private International Law –Illustrated by a recent Supreme Court Decision on the District Action againstInsurer. In: Intercontinental Cooperation through Private International Law. Essaysin Memory of Peter E. Nygh / ed. by T. Einborn, K. Siehr.
The Hague, 2004;230345. Moss G.C. Recent Private International Law Codifications: National Reportfor Norway // URL: http://folk.uio.no/giudittm/IACL_10_PIL_Norway.pdf /346. Natov N. The Autonomy of Arbitrators in Determining the Law Applicable tothe Merits of a Case // Czech (& Central) European Yearbook of Arbitration.Volume II. 2012;347.
Pauknerova M. Overriding Mandatory Rules in Czech Law // CzechYearbook of international Law. Volume 1. 2010;348. Pauknerova M. Overriding Mandatory Rules and Czech Law // CzechYearbook of International Law. Volume III. 2012;349. Razvi H. Mandatory Rules of Law in International Business Arbitration //Lahore Journal of Economics.
1998. Volume 3. № 2;350. Renner M., Hesselbarth M. Corporate Control Contracts and the Rome IRegulation // IPRax. Volume 2. 2014;351. Rodríguez M.J. El Juego de la Normas Imperativas en el Regolamento RomaII. Sobre Ley Aplicable a Las Obligaciones No Contractueles: Límites a laAplicacion de la Lex Causae // Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales.2013. № 25;352. Rühl G.
Commercial Agents, Minimum Harmonization and OverridingMandatory Provisions in the European Union // Common Market Law Review.№ 53. 2016;353. Sadowski W. Effect of Bankruptcy Proceedings in Poland on ArbitrationProceedings Conducted Abroad: Remarks based on the Elektrim case // ArbitrationE-Review. 2010. № 2;354. Sherer M. The Public Policy Exception under V (2)(b) – MethologicalApproaches Country Report Austria. 2015;355. Siehr K.
International Contracts, Party Autonomy and Mandatory Rules //Hellenic Review of International Law. 2014. № 67;356. Sinay-Cytermann A. La protection de la parte faible en droit internationalprivé // Le Droit International Privé: Esprit et Méthodes. Mélanges en l`honneur dePaul Lagarde. Paris, 2005;231357. Sperdutti G. Norme di applicazione necessaria e ordino pubblico // Rivista didiritto internazionale. Volume 59. 1976;358. Steennot R. The Protection of Consumers in Cross-Border Airline`s Contractsof Carriage at the Level of Private International Law // URL: http://biblio.ugent.be/publication/ 5749842/5749850 /359. Suk K.H. Harmonization of Private International Law Rules in Northeast Asia// URL: http://www.jsil.jp/annual_documents/2013/1012223.pdf /360.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
